* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Solid-state convection in Earth`s deep interior and the origin of
Schiehallion experiment wikipedia , lookup
Geomorphology wikipedia , lookup
History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Spherical Earth wikipedia , lookup
Post-glacial rebound wikipedia , lookup
History of Earth wikipedia , lookup
Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup
Tectonic–climatic interaction wikipedia , lookup
Future of Earth wikipedia , lookup
History of geology wikipedia , lookup
Plate tectonics wikipedia , lookup
Solid-state convection in Earth's deep interior and the origin of volcanic islands Gillian R. Foulger Univ. Durham, Science Labs., South Rd., Durham DH1 3LE, U.K. email: [email protected] The Earth’s mantle–the region between depths of about 30 and 3,000 km–is made up of an assemblage of minerals such as peridot and garnet that deforms slowly at the temperatures of the interior of the Earth. It is this ability to deform that permits the surface tectonic plates to move and for continental drift, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions to occur. The properties of the mantle thus affect human beings more than many people may suspect! The radical effect that mantle convection has on Earth’s surface came into focus in the mid-1960s and was subsequently subject to much research. Despite this, many aspects of the dynamic behaviour of the mantle are still controversial. Key questions that are the subject of current cutting-edge research in Earth science include how molten material is distributed in the mantle, whether the entire mantle convects vigorously or only the uppermost part, and the chicken-and-egg question of whether tectonic plate movements drive deformation of the mantle or vice versa. In recent years, these unknowns have given rise to a major controversy in Earth science. This is the cause of volcanic islands and volcanic fields in the interior of the continents. Such places include the islands of Hawaii and Iceland, and areas such as the Siberian Traps and the volcanoes of Italy and East Africa. Two radically different views have emerged, known as the Plate-, and the Plume hypotheses. The Plume hypothesis views Earth’s hot core as comprising a major thermal reservoir that inputs heat into the mantle above. In this view, large thermal diapirs rise from the bottom-most mantle, where it touches the core, and actively rise, punch through the crust, and cause volcanism. Plumes, and the volcanoes they spawn, are thus envisaged to be driven by thermal energy from Earth’s core alone. The Plate hypothesis is the conceptual inverse. It envisages the main driver of magmatism to be heat loss from the surface. This is the ultimate driver of plate tectonics, which is responsible for essentially all surface volcanism [http://www.mantleplumes.org/]. Magma is envisaged to leak out of the mantle as a passive reaction to surface, plate-tectonic-induced stretching, e.g., at mid-ocean ridges and rift valleys. Hypothesis-testing normally comprises testing predictions against observations. If the predictions of an hypothesis are consistently falsified, the hypothesis is abandoned. Unfortunately, in the case of the Plate/Plume controversy this scientific method has become corrupted and workers have found it very difficult, in practice. to abandon failing hypotheses. Part of the reason for this is the increasing specialization of Earth scientists, which has led to a “blind-men-and-the-elephant” situation where each worker only understands a small subset of the data in existence. Another is the “bandwagon” problem where an hypothesis, assumed to be correct by the mainstream scientific machine comprising scientists, students, grant-awarding authorities, journals and reviewers, has become “too big to fail”. This is not the first time this has happened in Earth science. A strong scientific case was built for continental drift by Alfred Wegener in 1915, but not accepted by mainstream Earth science for over fifty years. In my talk I shall aim to touch on all these aspects of this multi-faceted and never-dull subject. Questions and input on any aspect, throughout my presentation, will be welcome. Further reading Foulger, G. R. (2010), Plates vs Plumes: A Geological Controversy, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K., xii+328 pp. http://www.mantleplumes.org Morgan, W. J. (1971), Convection plumes in the lower mantle, Nature, 230, 42-43. Oreskes, N. (1999), The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science, Oxford University Press, ix + 420 pp. Wegener, A. (1915), Die Entstehung der Kontinente und Ozeane, Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig. http://www.mantleplumes.org