Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Weed control wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Soil compaction (agriculture) wikipedia , lookup
Decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Crop rotation wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative agriculture wikipedia , lookup
No-till farming wikipedia , lookup
Sustainable agriculture wikipedia , lookup
AMER. ZOOL., 13:193-201 (1973). The Relationship between Protozoan Populations and Biological Activity in Soils JOHN D. STOUT Soil Bureau, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand SYNOPSIS. The protozoan populations of soil, both free-living and parasitic, are discussed in relation to their size, distribution, biomass, and metabolic activity. Flagellates, small amoebae, and ciliates are the most widespread and active of free-living forms, while the distribution of parasites is related to the distribution of their hosts. The theory of partial sterilization, which first related protozoan populations to soil fertility, is discussed within the broader context of the soil organic cycle. The role of freeliving protozoa as micropredators and the importance of the soil biomass, as well as fresh plant debris, as a substrate for microbial activity are emphasized. The nature and activity of the microbial population are related to plant productivity and the size of the soil animal biomass. It is suggested that comparatively small changes in population and biomass may be associated with greatly accelerated metabolic turnover where micropredation takes place. This suggestion is supported by data from microrespirometry experiments. PROTOZOAN POPULATIONS OF SOIL Composition and distribution: the edaphic fauna Free-living protozoa are associated with almost all phases of terrestrial ecosystems. They are to be found on the leaves of plants and on the bark of trees; in water reservoirs in plants and soil; on moss and lichens; but most commonly and most characteristically, in the surface horizons of the soil, particularly in association with decaying vegetation. The fauna comprises hundreds of species of free-living protozoa representing almost all groups except the Radiolaria, but some are much better represented than others. Flagellates, amoebae, and ciliates are the most widespread forms. Heliozoa are represented by only a few species, and of the shelled amoeboid taxa, those related to the Foraminifera, such as Gromia, are uncommon although a large and varied range of thecate forms are a conspicuous element in the fauna of organically rich soil. Proteomyxa and Myxomycetes are associated with soils rich in decaying material. Because of their different ecological requirements the distribution of the taxa varies from soil to soil and from site to site, but the faunal pattern is closely related to ecological condi193 tions and a number of different species associations have been recognized (Bonnet, 1961). Protozoan parasites and symbionts are associated with a number of soil animals. Symbionts include ciliates in the gut of oligochaetes and flagellates in the gut of the termites. These protozoa are host-specific and, consequently, like their hosts, show a distinctive pattern of geographical distribution in contrast to most free-living species. However, some free-living species may also show restricted geographical distribution, if not at the species level, then, as with ciliates, at the variety level. Parasites include gregarines which infect earthworms and beetle larvae and which may be transmitted through the soil, and ciliates, such as Tetrahymena and Colpoda, which include facultative parasites capable of infecting a wide range of invertebrate hosts, such as snails and enchytraeid worms. Numbers of protozoa Numbers of protozoa vary enormously, not only from site to site and from season to season but between parallel samples taken from the same site at the same time. The flagellates, small limax amoebae, and ciliates are normally the most numerous, 194 JOHN D. STOUT although large concentrations of testaceans may occur under some conditions and the amoebae of slime molds may multiply to large numbers prior to fruiting. Biomass It follows from the great variation in numbers that there is similarly a great variation in biomass, but normally protozoa constitute a relatively insignificant part of the total microbial biomass or of the total animal biomass (Stout and Heal, 1967). conditions are not consistently favorable; for most of their life the cells will be either starving, resting, or encysted, and their rate of respiration will consequently be greatly reduced. Reproduction. Under favorable conditions protozoa may reproduce within hours. It seems probable that in nature very short periods of favorable conditions associated with a relatively high rate of reproduction are balanced by long periods when the cells do not divide. Unfavorable conditions are less likely to be due to exhaustion of food than to desiccation, predation, or competition. Metabolic activity Nutrition. There are few photosynthetic protozoa present in most soils, although Euglena is comparatively widespread. The great majority of edaphic protozoa are heterotrophic. Many of the flagellates may feed osmotrophically. Although most species of flagellates, amoebae, and ciliates can be cultured axenically on dissolved nutrients, in nature it is most probable that they feed on paniculate food and particularly bacteria and yeast cells. Indeed, it is known that particulate matter must be present even in axenic cultures before the cells will form food vacuoles. In nature nutrients in solution are likely to be metabolized more rapidly by the extracellular enzymes of bacteria or fungi than ingested by protozoa. Further, the nutritional requirements of most protozoa are complex and are more likely to be satisfied by ingesting bacterial or yeast cells than by nutrients dissolved in soil solution. Excretion. Protozoa tend to be ammoniotelic and do not excrete complex nitrogenous or phosphatic compounds. Their carbohydrate metabolism is similar to other animal cells and may lead to the excretion of organic acids. Respiration. As small-celled animals, protozoa maintain a high rate of respiration under favorable conditions of nutrition and aeration. The metabolic activity of ciliates is slightly greater than that of amoebae or flagellates. However, in nature THE SOIL ORGANIC CYCLE: THE THEORY OF PARTIAL STERILIZATION The soil organic cycle has been described as the constant struggle of the vegetation to maintain the fertility of the soil against the impoverishing effects of leaching and soil weathering. Plant nutrients drawn from the soil are returned in plant litter as dead leaves and roots. These contain nitrogen, phosphorus, and, of course, carbon, but generally in a form no longer accessible to growing plants. The decomposition, or mineralization, of these residues release them for plant growth and, consequently, for recycling. Consequently, the maintenance of soil fertility is dependent upon the maintenance of this cycle: where it ceases and where plant debris tends to accumulate, as in peat, the fertility of the soil is depleted and plant growth tends to be reduced. Thus, in most soils it is the efficiency of the decomposition of plant residues that is critical in maintaining soil fertility and also in preserving other soil properties such as soil structure. Russell and Hutchinson (1909), in their classical theory put forward shortly after the turn of the century, proposed that the infertility of "sick" soils resulted from protozoa preying on the beneficial soil microflora. Partial sterilization, which appeared to benefit such "sick" soils, was supposed to suppress the protozoa and so permit the growth of the beneficial bacteria. How- PROTOZOAN POPULATIONS IN SOILS ever, it is now considered that protozoan predation is more likely to stimulate than depress bacterial activity, and further, that partial sterilization is unlikely to suppress protozoan activity other than temporarily, the protozoa becoming active again when the bacterial population recovers. The effects of partial sterilization are much more comprehensive than originally considered by Russell and Hutchinson (1909). Partial sterilization kills a substantial part of the soil biomass and so releases appreciable quantities of readily available nutrients for further microbial growth; this is reflected not only in enhanced bacterial growth but also in greatly increased protozoan activity. Repeated partial sterilization reduces the total microbial biomass so that the response to successive sterilization is gradually diminished. The evidence of partial sterilization experiments indicates that microbial activity in soil is largely dependent upon the accumulated biomass of the soil and is not simply dependent on the accretion of fresh plant residues of the soil. There are, thus, two major sources of energy for the maintenance of microbial activity in soil: first, the energy of the soil biomass, and second, the accretion of fresh plant nutrients. The cycling of nutrients in the soil is chiefly dependent upon heterotrophic organisms which must derive their energy from one of these two sources (Fig. 1). Their activity in turn effects the release of plant nutrients, such as phosphate or nitrogen, from soil organic matter and, consequently, replenishes the fertility of the soil. The pattern of decomposition will be determined by the nature of plant residues— whether or not they are readily comminuted by the soil fauna and whether or not they consist of organic constituents, such as lignin, relatively resistant to microbial attack. The rate of decomposition will be determined by ecological factors, such as moisture and temperature, and by the composition of the fauna and microflora. Although there is evidence of some freeliving soil protozoa being able to hydrolyze cellulose and even humic substances, they 195 are not generally capable of attacking such complex polymers and are not, therefore, associated with their degradation. One notable exception is the symbiotic flagellate population of some termite species upon whose cellulolytic activity the life of their hosts depend. Where the protozoa are primary consumers of plant cells or plant tissue, therefore, their efficiency is low since the components which they are able to metabolize—simple carbohydrates, amino acids, proteins and fats—constitute a relatively small proportion of the normal plant biomass. Further, a low efficiency in the conversion of plant substrate to new protozoan cell material means a relatively low rate of reproduction and, consequently, slow population growth. In general, therefore, protozoa are unlikely to make as effective a contribution to primary consumption as either the larger animals, which are able to comminute plant tissues and, thereby, extract greater quantities of available nutrients, or the microflora, with its wider range of enzymes, particularly cellulolytic and lignolytic. When the typical primary consumers, bacteria and fungi, have effected the initial decomposition of the plant debris, they themselves become the substrate for secondary consumers. Of these secondary consumers, protozoa comprise the initial population in most conditions. The activity of the protozoa reduces the microbial biomass, particularly the bacterial biomass, and the succession of consumers may then include other micropredators, such as nematodes or rotifers, or else the whole biomass may pass through the gut of larger animals, such as earthworms, which feed on the total plant debris. At each stage of decomposition the initial tissue and its associated biomass may be considered to consist of three parts: (1) the fraction that is lost by leaching or by conversion to carbon dioxide or other volatile residues; (2) the fraction that is resistant to decomposition or that is derived from such resistant substances, for example, the humic substances derived from aromatic polymers, which accumulate in the soil; and (3) the organisms comprising 196 JOHN D. STOUT SOIL NUTRIENT CYCLE INPUT |PLANT AND ANIMAl RESIDUES SOLUBLE (sugars, amino-adds, phenolics) INSOLUBLE (cellulose, lignia phenolics) ENDOGENOUS METABOLISM BIOMASS EXOGENOUS METABOLISM CHEMICAL OXIDATION SOIL PRIMARY CONSUMPTION AUTOTROPHIC GROWTH SECONDARY CONSUMPTION AUTOLYSIS PREDATKDN EXCRETION HETEROTROPHIC GROWTH SOLUBLE INSOLUBLE IMMOBILIZED (clay/organic complex) PLANT UPTAKE LEACHATES LOSSES FIG. 1. The soil nutrient C)cle. PROTOZOAN POPULATIONS IN SOILS the biomass. When the biomass of the primary decomposers autolyzes, it also fractionates into two parts: the residues which are leadily broken down by available soil enzymes or lost by leaching or as volatile compounds, and relatively resistant structures such as bacterial cell walls. At this stage, therefore, the resistant fraction may not be of plant origin but of microbial origin. Micropredators, such as protozoa, which feed either on living or dead bacterial cell walls and which are able to hydrolyze the entire cell structure, including the cell wall, therefore perform a necessary and valuable role in the pattern of decomposition. The cell wall material commonly includes lipids, amino acids, and often polysaccharides. It is a valuable food for the protozoan predator which is able to decompose it. Since most of the bacterial nitrogen is excreted as ammonia some hours after ingestion, protozoan metabolism contributes directly to the mineralization of nitrogen and so to the soil nitrogen cycle. The pattern of succession of primary and secondary decomposers has been followed by Tribe (1961) who emphasized the role of protozoa as secondary consumers following the initial growth of bacteria and fungi. The pattern of autolysis of grass leaves has been followed by autoradiography by Grossbard (1971), and the overall incorporation of plant residues, particularly rye-grass roots, has been followed by Jenkinson (1971) using radiocarbon-enriched material. Jenkinson found that about one third of the added carbon remains in the soil after the first year and about 15-21% after five years. He estimated that about 10% of the added carbon is in the biomass after one year and about 4% after four years. This means that there is a relatively high rate of decomposition in the first year, but although over 60% is lost from the soil only 10% is converted to biomass. This indicates either a very low rate of conversion of plant residues to soil biomass or, more likely, the frequent turnover of the biomass. When the remaining plant residues have either been decomposed or incor- 197 porated into the biomass, the rate of release of radiocarbon from the soil drops sharply. There is relatively slow reduction in the biomass, 10% to 4% over three years, compared with the initial reduction in plant residue of over 60% in one year which suggests that the microbial tissue rather than the plant residues are proving the least amenable to decomposition. The rate of turnover of the bacterial population is very difficult to estimate since it depends not only on the generation time but also on the mortality. Recent estimates have differed widely—from a mean value of 16 hours (Gray and Williams, 1971) to a few times each year (Babuik and Paul, 1970). In both estimates, however, no attempt was made to determine mortality which in most soils probably is due largely to predation, either by micropredators, such as protozoa or nematodes, or by the larger fauna which pass large volumes of soil organic material through their gut, such as earthworms. Further, it is well known that micropredators are selective in their diet, prefering some types of bacteria to others and indeed finding some types inedible or even toxic. Bacteria also differ widely in their longevity: Gram-negative bacteria, such as the Pseudomonadaceae and Enterobacteriacae, survive starvation or desiccation far less successfully than pleomorphic bacteria, such as Arthrobacter, while bacterial spores are virtually immortal. Thus, any estimate of bacterial turnover must take into consideration both the nature of the microflora and of the predatory microfauna, as well as the increment of energy available in fresh plant residues or in the biomass, and these factors are interrelated. A continuing increment of fresh plant residues, rich in readily available nutrients, such as sugars or amino acids, will differentially stimulate the fast growing zymogenic flora which consists largely of Pseudomonadaceae and Enterobacteraceae (Stout, 1973) and which in turn provides the most acceptable diet for most soil protozoa. Protozoan populations will increase, therefore, if other ecological conditions 198 JOHN D. STOUT are favorable, and there will be much more rapid rate of turnover of substrate, bacteria, and protozoa in the soil. An extreme example of nutrient enrichment is that of whey-irrigated soil when the whey contains lactose. In such a soil, there is a marked increase in the zymogenic population, in the number of protozoa, and in the rate of soil respiration. When there are only minimal increments of fresh plant residues, or where they consist of substances low in immediate nutrient value, or where the soils are generally unfavorable to biological activity because of drought, the autochthonous micro flora will be dominant and the activity of the protozoa will be reduced, not only because of the smaller increment of food, but also because of its relatively low nutrient value. For this reason small protozoan populations are correlated less with the size of the total bacterial population than with the nature of the soil organic matter and its rate of decomposition. The importance of protozoa in the soil organic cycle is likely to be relatively greater in soils with a high rate of turnover than in soils with a low rate of turnover for two reasons: first, because the nutrient status of the microflora, particularly the bacterial flora, is more favorable, and second, because the higher population provides better opportunities for predation. In soils with a high energy intake and a high rate of turnover, a greater proportion of available energy passes to the secondary consumers than in a soil with low nutrient intake and a low rate of turnover which has longer periods of strictly endogenous metabolism. It has been estimated that protozoan consumption of bacteria in plots of increasing turnover of Broadbalk field increases from 15 to 85 times the standing crop of readily available bacteria, and it has also been estimated that the amount of protoplasm produced and recycled by the small amoebae and flagellates varies from 50 to 300 times the standing crop (Stout and Heal, 1967). In soils of high productivity, such as New Zealand pasture soils where there is a large soil biomass which fluctuates in size throughout the year, the availability of nutrients for microbial metabolism from this source could be as important as that from fresh plant residues. The earthworm biomass is directly correlated with plant productivity, there being 150 kg fresh weight of earthworms per hectare for every 1000 kg dry herbage produced annually. In a high-producing New Zealand pasture the earthworm biomass alone may reach a peak figure of 2700 kg fresh weight per hectare in the autumn and may fall to 1300 kg fresh weight per hectare during the summer months. Part of the earthworm mortality will be due to predation by birds but the greater part of the 1400 kg fresh weight of biomass lost during the year will remain in the soil and will become available as a substrate for other soil organisms, of which microorganisms are likely to be the most active. This recycling of energy in the biomass is facilitated by the nature of the biomass tissue which consists of readily accessible carbon compounds and other nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur and trace minerals. There is not likely to be any limiting nutrient, such as nitrogen, as with plant tissues. The larger the biomass becomes the more important is the recycling within the biomass, and the more important is the respiration dependent upon the release of energy from the biomass (by autolysis or secretion). Conversely, the endogenous respiration of the biomass is less important. Some indication of the relative importance of endogenous and exogenous respiration is given by respiratory measurements. When soil plots under very different productivity regimes are compared, the respiratory rate (release of carbon dioxide per unit of soil carbon) is very similar. However, when fresh substrate such as glucose is added, the highproducing plots metabolize the added substrate much more rapidly than the lowproducing plots, and this is correlated with a larger bacterial population and particularly a larger population of Enterobacteriaceae (Stout and Dutch, 1968); that is, high-producing soils not only have a 199 PROTOZOAN POPULATIONS IN SOILS larger biomass but also a more marked response to added nutrients and, therefore, a more rapid rate of cycling. This cycling involves not only fresh plant residues but also the recycling of energy within the biomass. For this reason micropredators, such as protozoa, which accelerate the rate of recycling play an important role in soil ecology. INTERACTIONS OF PROTOZOA WITH OTHER SOIL ORGANISMS: INTERACTION WITH BACTERIAL AND YEAST POPULATIONS While protozoa are normally thought of as predators of the bacterial and yeast microflora, under normal conditions the death of protozoan cells will also release nutrients for further bacterial and yeast growth. Thus, the growth of protozoa with bacteria or yeasts provides three possibilities: (1) The protozoa may feed on the bacterial or yeast population, resulting in stimulated growth and metabolic activity of the protozoa and reduction of the microfloral population; (2) the protozoan cells may die and release nutrients which stimulate metabolic activity of the microfloral population; (3) there may be no marked interaction where the microflora is unacceptable to the protozoa which may encyst. The ecology of soil protozoa is characterized by two important features: first, the activity of populations is confined to small spaces and consequently small populations; and second, activity is restricted to brief periods when moisture conditions are favorable. Experiments designed to study interactions of soil populations must simulate these two features, that is, they must study the interactions of restricted populations over relatively short periods. For this reason elaborate model systems, such as chemostats, are not applicable to problems of soil ecology. One technique which does permit the study of interactions of relatively small microbial populations confined to small spaces is the ampulla diver technique used in microrespirometry. A simplified form of this technique using an open gradient has recent- ly been developed (Nex0 et al., 1973) and preliminary experiments give some indication of how small population changes can effect marked changes in respiratory activity. A typical experiment is shown in Figure 2 where the results are plotted as the movement of experimental and control divers in an open gradient since this shows most dramatically the contrast between the control divers, the divers with pure cultures, and those in which both protozoa and bacteria are present. These experiments indicate that: (1) the endogenous respiration of small populations of bacterial and yeast cells is almost negligible, but respiration is significantly stimulated by the depth of protozoan cells; (2) the endogenous respiration of ciliate cells is very much lower than the respiration of feeding and dividing cells; and (3) even where there are minimal population changes of predator and prey the respiration of the two populations together is much greater than either separately. In one set of experiments, the respiratory activity of the ciliate Colpoda steinii and the yeast Rhodotorula together was about twice that of the two organisms measured separately, although there was no division of Colpoda during the experiment and the population of Rhodotorula was only reduced by about 5%. Such experiments give a better insight into how very small changes in the activity of microbial populations in soil can affect significant changes in soil metabolism. Such changes in the biomass will take place continuously with the fluctuating conditions which obtain in soil, whereas major changes in biomass and in the accretion of fresh plant residues occur over longer periods. CONCLUSIONS The role of protozoa in soil ecology can be considered under the following headings: 1) The role of symbionts such as the termite flagellates or oligochaete ciliates whose presence is essential to the life of their hosts. 200 JOHN D. STOUT RESPIRATION OF TETRAHYMENA A N D PSEUDOMONAS 66 ( 2 3 4 TIME (HOURS) HG. 2. Relative oxygen uptake of bacteria and domonas, I — Tetrahymena pyriformis) proto/oa separately and together. (P = Pseu- PROTOZOAN POPULATIONS IN SOILS 2) The role of parasites which affect populations of soil animals, such as earthworms, enchytraeids, snails, or beetle larvae. 3) The role of protozoa as food ensuring the healthy development of other animals, e.g., Eisenia foetida (Miles, 1963). 4) The role of protozoa in modifying the microbial population of soils, e.g., by removing the enteric bacteria or by influencing the incidence of phytopathogenic fungi (Nikoljuk, 1965). 5) The role of protozoa in attacking plant residues or humic substances (Schonborn, 1965). 6) The role of protozoa in accelerating the turnover of the soil biomass and consequently of the turnover of soil organic matter. REFERENCES Kabuik, L. A., and E. A. I'aul. 1970. The use of Hiioresceii) isothiocyanate in the determination o£ the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 16:57-62. Bonnet, L. 1961. Caracteres generaux des populations ihccamoebiennes endogees. Pedobioloeia 1:6-24. Cray, T. R. C, and S. T. Williams. 1971. Micro bial productivity in soil, p. 255-286. In D. E Hughes and A. H. Rose [ed.], Microbes and biological productivity, Twenty-first Symposium 201 of the Society of General Microbiology, University Press, Cambridge. Grossbard, E. 1971. The utilization and translocation by microorganisms of carbon-14 derived from the decomposition of plant residues in soil. J. Gen. Microbiol. 66:339-348. Jenkinson, D. S. 1971. Studies on the decomposition of C" labeled organic matter in soil. Soil Sci. 111:64-70. Miles, H. B. 1963. Soil Protozoa and earthworm nutrition. Soil Sci. 95:407-409. Xex0, B. A., K. Hamburger, and E. Zeuthen. 1973. Simplified microgasometry with gradient divers. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg. (In press) Xikoljuk, V. E. 1965. Antagonistic interrelationship between some soil protista and certain phytopathogenous fungi affecting cotton plants, p. 118-119. In Excerpta Med., Int. Cong. Ser. No. 91, 2nd Int. Conf. Protozool., London, July-August 1965, Progress in Protozoology. Russell, E. J., and H. B. Hutchinson. 1909. On the effect of partial sterilization of soil on the production of plant food. J. Agric. Sci. 3:111-114. Schonborn, W. 1965. Untersuchungen fiber die Erna'hrung bodenbewohnender Testaceen. Pedobiologia 5:205-210. Stout, J. D. 1973. Response of some soil bacteria and yeasts to glucose. Soil Biol. Biochem. (In press) Stout, J. D., and M. E. Dutch. 1968. Rates of organic matter decomposition measured by Warburg respiratory experiments. Trans. 9th Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Adelaide 3:203-209. Stout, J. D., and O. W. Heal. 1967. Protozoa, p. 149-195. In A. Binges and F. Raw [ed.], Soil biology. Academic Press, London. Tribe, H. T. 1961. Microbiology of cellulose decomposition in soil. Soil Sci. 92:61-77.