* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download W AA
Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia wikipedia , lookup
Genome-wide association study wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Population Genetics Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Population genetics • Concerned with changes in genetic variation within a group of individuals over time • Want to know: – Extent of variation within population – Why variation exists – How variation changes over time • Study the gene pool – All alleles of every gene in a population Population • Group of individuals of the same species that occupy the same region and can interbreed with one another • Local population (demes) – Smaller groups within population – Separated by moderate geographic barrier – More likely to interbreed Two local populations of douglas fir Figure 24.1 Populations • Dynamic – Size • Feast or famine – Geographic location • Migrate to new site with new environment – Consequences of changes in size and location • Changes in genetic composition Polymorphism • “many forms” • Traits display variation within population • Ex. happy face spider – Differ in alleles that affect color and pattern • At the DNA level: – Multiple alleles for gene – Involves changes in DNA: deletion, duplication, single nucleotide change • SNP – most common – Monomorphism – single allele within population Figure 24.3 Polymorphism in humans • Human b-globin gene • HbA - normal gene • HbS - differs by SNP – Homozygous for HbS sickle cell anemia • Deletion – Loss of function allele Two important frequency calculations • Allele frequency = (Number of copies of an allele in population) / (Total number of all alleles for that gene in the population) • Genotype frequency = (Number of individuals with a particular genotype in a population) / (Total number of individuals in a population) An example • 100 pea plants – 64 tall (TT) – 32 tall (Tt) – 4 dwarf (tt) • Allele frequency = number of copies of allele / total number of alleles – To calculate the frequency of ‘t’ • (32 + 8)/200 = 0.2 or 20 % • What would be the frequency of ‘T’? • Genotype frequency = number of individuals with particular genotype / total number of individuals – To calculate the frequency of ‘tt’ • 4/100 = 0.04 = 4% • Frequencies must always be less than or equal to 1 (100%) Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium • Allele and genotype frequencies in a population are not changing over the course of many generations Hardy-Weinberg Equation • Allows us to calculate allele and genotype frequencies • If gene is polymorphic and exists in two alleles, then p + q = 1 • p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1 • p2 = genotype frequency of AA • 2pq = genotype frequency of Aa • q2 = genotype frequency of aa Applying the HW equation • Assume that gene exists as two different alleles: G and g. • If p = 0.8, then what is the genotype frequency of gg? Applying the HW equation • Assume that gene exists as two different alleles: G and g. • If p = 0.8, then what is the genotype frequency of gg? • p = allele frequency of G • p + q = 1 so q = 0.2 • q2 = genotype frequency of gg = (0.2)2 = 0.04 = 4% Figure 24.4 Confirm with product rule HW – predicting carriers • Allows us to determine the frequency of heterozygotes for recessive genetic diseases • Ex. Cystic fibrosis • Frequency of affected individuals (homozygous recessive) is 1 in 2500 • What is the frequency of heterozygous carriers? HW – predicting carriers • • • • q2 = 1/2500 q = √(1/2500) = 0.02 p + q = 1 so p = 0.98 Frequency of heterozygous carriers = 2pq = 2(0.02)(0.98) = 0.0392 = 3.92% Conditions for Hardy-Weinberg with regard to gene of interest • No new mutations: The gene of interest does not incur any new mutations • No genetic drift: The population is so large that allele frequencies do not change due to random sampling effects • No migration: Individuals do not travel between different populations • No natural selection: All of the genotypes have the same reproductive success • Random mating: With respect to the gene of interest, the members of the population mate with each other without regard to their phenotypes and genotypes Figure 24.5 Relationship between allele frequencies and genotype frequencies according to Hardy-Weinberg Use chi-square to determine if population exhibits Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for gene • MN blood type • 200 people – 168 MM – 30 MN – 2 NN • First, calculate allele frequency of M and allele frequency of N • Then find expected MM, MN, and NN and solve chi-square equation Chi square analysis • Allele frequency of M = (2(168)+30)/400 = 0.915 = p • Allele frequency of N = (2(2)+30)/400 = 0.085 = q • Expected frequency of MM = p2 = (0.915)2 = 0.837 – Expected number of MM individuals = (200 people)(0.837) = 167 • Expected frequency of MN = 2pq = 2(0.915)(0.085) = 0.007 – Expected number of MN individuals = (200 people)(0.007) = 1 • Expected frequency of NN = q2 = (0.085)2 = 0.156 – Expected number of NN individuals = (200 people)(0.156) = 31 Chi square analysis • Apply the ᵪ2 formula • ∑((observed-expected)2/expected) • = ((168-167)2/167) + ((30-31)2/31) + ((2-1)2/1) = 1.04 • Degrees of freedom = n-1 – Gene exists in 2 alleles so n=2 so DofF = 1 – See chart – p > 0.05 – Do not reject the Null hypothesis • Genes appear to be in HW equilibrium • Genetic variation in natural population typically changes over many generations – Changes in gene pool Mutations • Random events that occur spontaneously at a low rate or are caused by mutagens at a higher rate • Mutations can provide new alleles to a population but do not substantially alter allele frequencies Mutations – an example • Mutation rate – probability that gene will be altered by a new mutation – 10-5 to 10-6 per generation • How much does mutation affect allele frequency? • Consider a mutation that converts A to a where the allele frequency of “A” = p and the allele frequency of “a” = q Mutation – an exmple • Consider that Dq = mp (p decreases as A is converted to a) • Let’s assume: p = frequency of A = 80%; q = frequency of a = 20% • Assume m (rate of conversion of A to a) = 10-5 • To calculate change in allele frequency – (1-m)t = (pt/p0) – pt = allele frequency of A at time t; p0 = allele frequency of A at time 0; t = time; m = mutation rate Mutations – an example • What would be the allele frequency of p after 1 generation? – (1-10-5)1 = pt/0.8 – p1 = 0.799992 – q1 = 0.200008 • What would be the allele frequency of p after 1000 generations? – (1-10-5)1000 = pt/0.8 – p1000 = 0.792 – q1000 = 0.208 • Notice that the change in allele frequency is very low. Figure 24.6 Genetic Drift • Changes in allele frequencies due to random fluctuations • Small sample size – Large fluctuations between generations – Allele eliminated or fixed at 100% over fewer generations • Large sample size – Random sampling has smaller effect New allele fixation / elimination • Must first calculate the expected number of new mutations – Depends on mutation rate (μ) and population size (N) – 2Nμ • Note: New mutation is more likely in a large population • Probability of fixation = 1/2N • Probability of elimination = 1- (1/2N) New allele fixation / elimination • Probability of fixation = 1/2N • Probability of elimination = 1- (1/2N) • Large population – Greater likelihood for mutation – But, greater likelihood that new mutation will be eliminated from the population • Small population – Decreased likelihood for mutation – But, greater likelihood that new mutation will be fixed in the population How long will fixation take? • ṫ = average # of generations to achieve fixation • ṫ = 4N – Note: Allele fixation takes much longer in larger populations Genetic Drift – Take home message • Operates in random manner with regard to allele frequency – Regardless of the type of allele • Deleterious, neutral, beneficial • Eventually leads to allele fixation or elimination • Occurs more quickly in smaller population Changes in population size and genetic drift • Bottleneck effect – Decrease in population size because of events such as earthquake, drought, destruction of habitat • Elimination without regard to genetic composition • Founder effect – Migration of small group of individuals to new location • Small group may not have same genetic composition as parent population Figure 24.7 Bottleneck effect An example: Low genetic variation thought to be due to previous bottleneck Founder effect • An example: – Old Order Amish in Lancaster County, PA – 1770: 3 couples immigrated to US – 1960: 800 individuals • Very high prevalence of recessive form of dwarfism • Thought that one of original ancestors carried recessive mutation or new mutation occurred early on Migration • Between two different established populations – May alter allele frequencies • New population (after migration) = conglomerate • Change in allele frequency in conglomerate DpC = m(pD-pR) m = proportion of migrants that make up conglomerate pD = allele frequency in donor population pR = allele frequency in original recipient population Migration – an example • A donor population has an “A” allele frequency of 0.7. A recipient population has an “A” allele frequency of 0.3. 20 people join the recipient population which originally had 80 members. What is the allele frequency in the conglomerate? Migration – an example DpC = m(pD-pR) • m = 20/(20+80) • pD = 0.7 • pR = 0.3 DpC = 0.2(0.7-0.3) = 0.08 pC = allele frequency in conglomerate pC = pR + DpC = 0.3 + 0.08 = 0.038 Migration • Often bidirectional flow • Tends to reduce differences in allele frequencies between neighboring populations Natural selection • Conditions found in nature result in the selective survival and reproduction of individuals whose characteristics make them well adapted to their environment • Surviving individuals are more likely to reproduce and contribute offspring to the next generation • Must consider Darwinian fitness – Relative likelihood that a phenotype will survive and contribute to the gene pool of the next generation – measure of reproductive superiority – Not same as physical fitness • Consider a gene with two alleles, A and a – The three genotypic classes can be assigned fitness values according to their reproductive potential Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-45 • Suppose the average reproductive success is – AA 5 offspring – Aa 4 offspring – aa 1 offspring • By convention, the gene with the highest reproductive ability is given fitness value of 1.0 – The fitness values of the other genotypes are assigned relative to 1 • Fitness values are denoted by the variable W – Fitness of AA: WAA = 1.0 – Fitness of Aa: WAa = 4/5 = 0.8 – Fitness of aa: Waa = 1/5 = 0.2 Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-46 • Differences in reproductive achievement could be due to the – 1. Fittest phenotype is more likely to survive – 2. Fittest phenotype is more likely to mate – 3. Fittest phenotype is more fertile Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-47 • Natural selection acts on phenotypes (which are derived from an individual’s genotype) • With regard to quantitative traits, there are four ways that natural selection may operate – 1. Directional selection • Favors the survival of one extreme phenotype that is better adapted to an environmental condition – 2. Stabilizing selection • Favors the survival of individuals with intermediate phenotypes – 3. Disruptive (or diversifying) selection • Favors the survival of two (or more) different phenotypes – 4. Balancing • Favors the maintenance of two or more alleles Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-48 • Directional Selection favor extreme phenotype – A gene exist in two alleles A and a – The three fitness values are • WAA = 1.0 • WAa = 0.8 • Waa = 0.2 – In the next generation, the HW equilibrium will be modified in the following way by directional selection: • Frequency of AA: p2WAA • Frequency of Aa: 2pqWAa • Frequency of aa: q2Waa Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-49 – These three terms may not add up to 1.0, as they would in the HW equilibrium – Instead, they sum to a value known as the mean fitness of the population • p2WAA + 2pqWAa + q2Waa = W – Divide both sides of the equation by the mean fitness of the population p2WAA W + 2pqWAa W + q2Waa =1 W – Now, calculate the expected genotype and allele frequencies after one generation of natural selection Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-50 – Frequency of AA genotype = p2WAA W – Frequency of Aa genotype = 2pqWAa W – Frequency of aa genotype = q2Waa W – Allele frequency of A: pA = p2WAA + W – Allele frequency of a: qa = q2Waa W pqWAa W + pqWAa W Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-51 • Example: – Starting allele frequencies are A = 0.5 and a = 0.5 – Fitness values are 1.0, 0.8 and 0.2 for genotypes AA, Aa and aa, respectively • p2WAA + 2pqWAa + q2Waa = W W = (0.5)2(1) + 2(0.5)(0.5)(0.8) + (0.5)2(0.2) = 0.25 + 0.4 + 0.05 = 0.7 – After one generation of selection: Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-52 – Frequency of AA genotype = p2WAA (0.5)2(1) = = 0.36 0.7 W – Frequency of Aa genotype = 2pqWAa W – Frequency of aa genotype = 2(0.5)(0.5)(0.8) = = 0.57 0.7 (0.5)2(0.2) = = 0.07 0.7 q2Waa W – Allele frequency of A: pA = p2WAA + W pqWAa W = 0.36 + 0.57/2 = 0.64 – Allele frequency of a: qa = q2Waa W + pqWAa W = 0.07 + 0.57/2 = 0.36 Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-53 • After one generation – f(A) has increased from 0.5 to 0.64 – f(a) has decreased from 0.5 to 0.36 – This is because the AA genotype has the highest fitness • Natural selection raises the mean fitness of the population – Assuming the individual fitness values are constant W = p2WAA + 2pqWAa + q2Waa = (0.64)2(1) + 2(0.64)(0.36)(0.8) + (0.36)2(0.2) = 0.80 Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-54 General trend • increase A, decrease a, and increase the mean fitness of the population Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display 24-55