* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2 components to Habitat Fragmentation
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Soundscape ecology wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Conservation movement wikipedia , lookup
Extinction debt wikipedia , lookup
Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Tropical Andes wikipedia , lookup
Decline in amphibian populations wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife crossing wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup
Source–sink dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup
Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Habitat Fragmentation 2 components to Habitat Fragmentation • 1) Reduction of some habitat types in a landscape • 2) remaining habitat is distributed in smaller, more isolated patches • Impact on biodiversity will be dependent on the natural patchiness of the habitat • 2 types of Habitat Fragmentation: • 1) islands 2) shreading Habitat Shredding (Essay 9a - Feinsinger 1997) • Suggests that shredded landscape is better than island fragmented landscape • Shredding can be worse than island fragmentation if the strips are too narrow (edge effects everywhere) • Metapopulation models do not fit shredded habitat • Need new models and more study off this type of habitat patch Edge Effects • Habitat fragmentation increases the amount of edge habitat relative to the amount of interior habitat. • Characteristics of Edge Habitat: • 1) increased light, increased temperature, noticed effects up to 40 m in Amazon forest (Kapos 1989) • 2) Increased wind - results in more wind stress, increased dryness (soil and air), strong effects up to 200 m, see effects up to 500 m (studies in Australia and Pacific NW) Edge Effects • 3) increased fire risk caused by combination of increased temp., wind, and light • 4) Increased predation/easier access - very big problem for birds and small mammals • 5) Increased competition from exotics and common native species • Note: most terrestrial game are edge adapted so increased edge habitat has been promoted by wildlife managers in the past Edge Effects • Some habitat fragments can be so small that they are all edge and no interior habitat • Doug Fir in Pacific Northwest: with a 50% cut in the standard checkerboard pattern, remaining habitat is all edge Crowding Effects • Temporary increase in density of individuals due to loss of surrounding habitat • documented in the tropics (Leck 1979, Lovejoy et al 1986) and in temperate habitats (Noss 1981) • Reach carrying capacity and collapse • Habitat actually becomes a sink Case Study - Flattened Musk Turtle • The SE US has a large percentage of endemic fauna of mollusks, fish, turtles due to numerous river drainage systems • The Flattened Musk turtle is one endangered endemic • Due to habitat destruction only 7% range is remaining • Remaining habitat is fragmented in such a way that make migration impossible • Local populations are in danger of extinction because of disease, reducing breeding Dung Beetles • Dung beetles are keystone species in forest ecosystems • Researchers studied effects of habitat fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon on dung beetles (Klein 1989) • Surveyed fragments of 1ha, 10 ha, continuous forest and clear cuts • Smaller fragments had fewer species, lower densities, and smaller-sized beetles • Dung decomposed at a lower rate Raptors of Java • 150 million people in 132,000 sq. km • originally tropical forest, only 10% remains in reserves • Research project studied effects of habitat fragmentation on 10 raptor species (Thiollay and Meybury 1988) • Reserves had high densities of birds, numbers of species increased with size of reserve • used as nesting grounds for forest birds but dispersed for foraging Raptors of Java • Problems: • 1) Non-forest species, osprey, sea eagle do not nest in reserves and habitat is not protected • 2) Many fragments are less than 100 sq. km and will not support viable populations • 3) Not much habitat left for conservation - would have to restore/convert agricultural land to preserve the raptors that are declining rapidly Biological Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation • Genetic? patches, local heterozygosity, inbreeding Drift between regional heterozygosity, • Population? • Lost, increase, decrease, species mobile and moves between patches, species less mobile and becomes divided • Species? • Increase diversity, decrease diversity, increase richness, increase richness, change balance and interaction, increase exotics Biological Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation • Ecosystem Lost, Greatly reduced, fragmented, change in community structure, change in the balance of ecological processes may change (species interactions, nutrient cycling, fires) • Landscape? Gamma diversity may decrease, proportion of ecosystems may change, Historical patterns of fire may change, Corridors will be lost and gained Biological Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation What about the effects of climate change on species in a fragmented landscape? Roads as Barriers One of the hottest new areas of research - impacts have been documented in amphibians, insects, small mammals, large mammals, plants - Few studies of long-term effects on population dynamics, genetics Genetic studies White footed mice Canada (Merriam et al 1989) - no effect He, genetic drift Tropical trees (Hall et al. 1996) - decrease He Common frogs (Reh and Seitz 1990) - decrease He Natural Fragmentation • In many ways, natural habitat is fragmented • Landscapes are mosaics of different habitats and the patchiness changes over time due to succession, fires, climatic fluctuations • If conservation biologists claim/believe that human-caused habitat fragmentation is bad for biodiversity: we must be able to outline the fundamental differences between natural habitat mosaics and habitat fragmentation 3 Hypotheses • 1) Natural patches have a complex structure of diversified habitats, human-altered fragmented landscape has simplified patches (parking lots, buildings, clearcuts, agriculture) • 2) Natural landscapes have natural edges with less contrast than human fragmented landscapes • 3) Some features of human habitat fragmentation - like roads pose specific threats to population viability Complications • Island biogeography theory, species area/curves, landbridge island data all suggest that habitat fragmentation will result in a decrease biodiversity • Habitat fragmentation has been shown to not change or even to increase bird diversity in some studies • Habitat fragmentation occurs on many different scales, the point at which habitat fragmention results in a decline of biological integrity is unclear What can be done? • We need more long-term research on impacts of habitat fragmentation There is a lot to be done! Use these data to: • Design Optimal Reserves Systems • Design forestry strategies that minimize impacts • Restore ecosystems • Plan road systems, corridors