* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download do with electron orbitals?
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup
Hartree–Fock method wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Chemical bond wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Erwin Schrödinger wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
What does probability have to do with electron orbitals? Today: The physics behind chemistry. How wavefunctions describe the rules of chemical bonding. Fill out the Faculty Course Questionnaire HWK 13 up later today on the website. Final Exam is Monday, Dec. 15 10:30A-1P HERE Duane G1B20 Review Models of the Atom – – • Thomson – Plum Pudding – Why? Known that negative charges can be removed from atom. – Problem: Rutherford showed nucleus is hard core. – – – • Rutherford – Solar System – Why? Scattering showed hard core. – Problem: electrons should spiral into nucleus in ~10-11 sec. – + • Bohr – fixed energy levels – Why? Explains spectral lines, gives stable atom. – Problem: No reason for fixed energy levels • deBroglie – electron standing waves – Why? Explains fixed energy levels – Problem: still only works for Hydrogen. • Schrodinger – quantum wave functions – Why? Explains everything! – Problem: None (except that it’s hard to calculate) + + Schrödinger’s Solutions for Hydrogen How is it same or different than Bohr, deBroglie? (energy levels, angular momentum, interpretation) What do wave functions look like? What does that mean? Extend to multi-electron atoms, Extend to molecules and bonding, Extend to solids (metals, insulators, etc.) Extend to neutron stars… 2 How does x, t V x, t x, t i x, t 2 2m x t Relate to atoms? Next: Apply Schrödinger Equation to atoms and make sense of chemistry! (Reactivity/bonding of atoms and Spectroscopy) Schrodinger predicts: discrete energies and wave functions for electrons in atoms How atoms bond, react, form solids? Depends on: the shapes of the electrons wave functions the energies of the electrons in these wave functions, and how these wave functions interact as atoms come together. Next: Apply Schrödinger Equation to atoms and make sense of chemistry! (Reactivity/bonding of atoms and Spectroscopy) Schrodinger predicts: discrete energies and wave functions for electrons in atoms Which colors emitted by atoms/molecules and the probability of transitions (the brightness of the line)? Depends on: the energies of the electrons in these wave functions, and how the shapes of these wave functions relate A brief review of chemistry First, what is you chemistry background? a. no chem b. regular HS chem c. AP or IB HS chem d. college chem What is Schrodinger Model of Hydrogen Atom? Electron is cloud of probability whose wave function (x,t) is the solution to the Schrodinger equation: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( x, y, z , t ) 2m x y z V ( x , y , z ) ( x , y , z , t ) i ( x , y , z , t ) t where: V Zke2 Zke2 V ( x, y , z ) 2 r ( x y 2 z 2 )1/ 2 r Can get rid of time dependence and simplify: Equation in 3D, looking for (x,y,z,t): 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( x, y, z , t ) 2m x y z V ( x , y , z ) ( x , y , z , t ) i ( x , y , z , t ) t Since V(x,y,z) not function of time: ( x, y , z , t ) ( x, y , z ) e iEt / E ( x, y, z )e iEt / Time independent Schrödinger Equation: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( x, y, z ) V ( x, y, z ) ( x, y, z ) E ( x, y, z ) 2m x y z Since potential spherically symmetric “easier” to solve w/ spherical crds: 2 V (r ) Zke / r Schrödinger’s Equation in Spherical Coordinates & no time: z r y x 1 2 (x,y,z) = r 2 (rsincos, rsinsin, rcos 2m r r r 2 2 1 1 V (r ) E sin 2 2 2 2mr sin sin 2 Technique for solving = “Separation of Variables” (r, , ) R(r ) f ( ) g ( ) iEt / (r , , , t ) R(r ) f ( ) g ( ) e Have you seen this technique for solving different equations? A. yes B. no z In 1D (electron in a wire): we got quantization from applying boundary conditions in terms of x. In 3D, now have 3 degrees of freedom: Boundary conditions in terms of r,, r x y What are the boundary conditions on the wavefunction () in r ? a. must go to 0 at r=0 b. must go to 0 at r=infinity c. at infinity must equal at 0 d. A and B e. A, B, and C must be normalizable, so needs to go to zero … Also physically makes sense … not probable to find electron there z In 1D (electron in a wire): Have 1 quantum number (n). Need to specify value of n to know what state electron is in. (x, t) n ( x) n (t) n r 2 nx iE n t / sin( )e L L In 3D, now have 3 degrees of freedom: Boundary conditions in terms of r,, x y How many quantum numbers are there in 3D? In other words, how many numbers do you need to specify unique wave function? And why? (We’ll ask you to explain your reasoning!) a. 1 r: n Answer: 3 – Need one b. 2 quantum number for : l c. 3 each dimension: d. 4 : m e. 5 (If you said 4 because you were thinking about spin, that’s OK too. We’ll get to that later.) z In 1D (electron in a wire): Have 1 quantum number (n) In 3D, now have 3 degrees of freedom: Boundary conditions in terms of r,, Have 3 quantum numbers (n, l, m) r x y nlm (r , , ) Rnl (r ) f lm ( ) g m ( ) Shape of depends on n, l ,m. Each (nlm) gives unique 2p n=1, 2, 3 … = Principle Quantum Number l=0, 1, 2, 3 …= Angular Momentum Quantum Number =s, p, d, f (restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) n=2 m = ... -1, 0, 1.. = z-component of Angular Momentum l=1 (restricted to –l to l) m=-1,0,1 Comparing H atom & Infinite Square Well: Infinite Square Well: (1D) • V(x) = 0 if 0<x<L ∞ otherwise ∞ r ∞ 0 L x • Energy eigenstates: n 2 2 2 En 2mL2 2 L sin( nx L • Energy eigenstates: mZ 2 k 2 e 4 En 2 2 n 2 • Wave functions: n ( x) H Atom: (3D) • V(r) = -Zke2/r ) n ( x, t ) n( x)e iE nt / • Wave functions: nlm (r , , ) Rnl (r ) f lm ( ) g m ( ) nlm (r , , , t ) nlm (r , , )e iE nt / What do the wave functions look like? nlm (r , , ) Rnl (r ) f lm ( ) g m ( ) n = 1, 2, 3, … l (restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) m (restricted to –l to l) Much harder to draw in 3D than 1D. Indicate amplitude of with brightness. 1s Increasing n 2s Increases distance from nucleus, www.orbital.com Increases # of radial nodes See pictures: m=-3 3s 4s (l=0) 4p (l=1) 4d (l=2) Increasing l Increases angular nodes Decreases radial nodes Changes 4f (l=3, m=0) angular distribution m=3 Shapes of hydrogen wave functions: nlm (r , , ) Rnl (r ) f lm ( ) g m ( ) Look at s-orbitals (l=0): no angular dependence n=1 n=2 Higher n average r bigger more spherical shells stacked within each other more nodes as function of r n=1 l=0 Probability finding electron as function of r n=2 l=0 n=3 l=0 0.05nm Radius (units of Bohr radius, a0) Shapes of hydrogen wave functions: nlm (r , , ) Rnl (r ) f lm ( ) g m ( ) l=1, called p-orbitals: angular dependence (n=2) l=1, m=0: pz = dumbbell shaped. l=1, m=-1: bagel shaped around z-axis (traveling wave) l=1, m=+1 r r / 2 a0 3 n 2, l 1, m 0 211 e cos 4 2 6a03 a 0 1 r r / 2 a0 3 i n 2, l 1, m 1 211 e sin e 3 a 8 2 6a0 0 1 Superposition applies: px=superposition (addition of m=-1 and m=+1) py=superposition (subtraction of m=-1 and m=+1) w/time dependence eim+it/h Dumbbells (chemistry) Physics vs Chemistry view of orbits: 2p wave functions (Physics view) (n=2, l=1) Dumbbell Orbits (chemistry) px m=1 m=-1 m=0 pz py px=superposition (addition of m=-1 and m=+1) py=superposition (subtraction of m=-1 and m=+1) Chemistry: Shells – set of orbitals with similar energy 1s2 2s2, 2p6 (px2, py2, pz2) 3s2, 3p6 3d10 These are the wave functions (orbitals) we just found: n=1, 2, 3 … = Principle Quantum Number En E1 / n 2 (for Hydrogen, same as Bohr) l=s, p, d, f … = Angular Momentum Quantum Number =0, 1, 2, 3 (restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) | L | l (l 1) m = ... -1, 0, 1.. = z-component of Angular Momentum (restricted to –l to l) Lz m n=1, 2, 3 … = Principle Quantum Number En E1 / n 2 (for Hydrogen, same as Bohr) l=s, p, d, f … = Angular Momentum Quantum Number =0, 1, 2, 3 (restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) | L | l (l 1) m = ... -1, 0, 1.. = z-component of Angular Momentum (restricted to -l to l) Lz m An electron in hydrogen is excited to Energy = -13.6/9 eV. How many different wave functions nlm in H have this energy? [graded indep. but use groups] a. 1 b. 3 c. 6 d. 9 e. 10 An electron in hydrogen is excited to Energy = -13.6/9 eV. How many different wave functions in H have this energy? a. 1 b. 3 c. 6 d. 9 e. 10 n= Principle Quantum Number: l=(restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) m=(restricted to -l to l) n 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 En E1 / n 2 n=3 l=0,1,2 Answer is d: m 0 3s states 9 states all with the same energy -1 0 3p states (l=1) Isn’t this cool… 1 Chemists had already -2 figured out rules for how -1 many electrons could be in 0 3d states (l=2) each shell. Didn’t know 1 why. Solving Schrödinger 2 equation explains WHY! Energy Diagram for Hydrogen l=0 (s) n=3 n=2 3s 2s l=1 (p) 3p l=2 (d) 3d 2p In HYDROGEN, energy only depends on n, not l and m. (NOT true for multi-electron atoms!) n=1 1s l=0,m=0 n=1, 2, 3 … = Principle Quantum Number En E1 / n 2 (for Hydrogen, same as Bohr) l=s, p, d, f … = Angular Momentum Quantum Number =0, 1, 2, 3 (restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) | L | l (l 1) m = ... -1, 0, 1.. = z-component of Angular Momentum (restricted to -l to l) Lz m What is the magnitude of the angular momentum of the ground state of Hydrogen? a. 0 b. h c. sqrt(2)h d. not enough information Answer is a. n=1 so l=0 and m=0 ... Angular momentum is 0 … Schrodinger finds quantization of energy and angular momentum: n=1, 2, 3 … l=0, 1, 2, 3 (restricted to 0, 1, 2 … n-1) En E1 / n 2 | L | l (l 1) How does Schrodinger compare to what Bohr thought? same I. The energy of the ground state solution is ________ II. The angular momentum of the ground state solution is different _______ different III. The location of the electron is _______ a. same, same, same b. same, same, different c. same, different, different d. different, same, different e. different, different, different Bohr got energy right, but he said angular momentum L=nh, and thought the electron was a point particle orbiting around nucleus. How does Schrödinger model of atom compare with other models? Why is it better? Student ideas… • • • • • • Solved S’s equation for hydrogen: wave functions, energies, angular momentum In atom with multiple electrons, what do you expect to change in the way you set up the problem? and in the solutions? Student Ideas: A. B. C. D. E. F. G.