* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Understing the word Scientific Literacy by the example of Immune
Herd immunity wikipedia , lookup
Complement system wikipedia , lookup
Vaccination wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Autoimmunity wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Social immunity wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Scientific Literacy I think the term scientific literacy refers to having the scientific knowledge. As it is noted by Emily Martin in the article “Scientific literacy, What is it, Why it’s important and Why Scientist Think We Don’t Have It: The case of immunology and the Immune system”, in science matters: “science literacy is defined as ‘the knowledge you need to understand public issue…to put of [scientific] advances into a context that will allow you to take part in the national debate about them” (340). I think this definition of scientific literacy is too narrow because just to take part in debate and pass it is not scientific knowledge. If we take story number one as an example for this definition, it will make more sense to understand the definition of scientific literacy. It proves that this definition is too narrow because everybody has knowledge that immune system helps to fight against disease. I think this information is enough for ordinary public. The scientist from scientific matters is trying to prove the scientific literacy by giving us the result of the pop quiz that was held on the general scientific knowledge of ordinary people. There is a controversy in the answer of the public and scientists. We can not say that anybody is wrong. That means we cannot say that we are illiterate. I think the immune system is a complex collection of organs, cells and a tissue, which prevents that pathogenic organism, enter in our body. In the story one, there is a professor in microbiology. He is trying to explain the immune system in common language. As professor Keller explains immune system as a powerful system in our body and metaphor for real power that is in our body (342). That means that without Immune system, it is not easy to live as he compares the immune system with the real power in the body. There are many chances to get infection. Without immune system, the body can not fight against the infection. In Professor Keller’s class, there are two very different views from two different students. For Mike, to understand immune system is very hard and troublesome. It is not necessary to understand immune system for him. Here, Professor Keller’s class doesn’t prove enough to make important of immune system for Mike. However, for the other student Elizabeth, from the same class, the immune system is amazing different interconnected world in our body. As she explains us that, “Everything’s all connected…Inside me is like whole other universe…I have like micro cells within me and then I’ll go up to the bones and organs put together, and just after that, and then comes myself…”(344). For her to understand immune system is important and interesting. She explains to us that it is empowerment for her. She is student of Professor Keller too. But for her after Professor Keller’s class, it is really amazing and powerful system of the body. I think the understanding of Elizabeth about the immune system is somehow related to my definition. Her understanding about the immune system is the other way to understand immune system as a different world in our body. In this story, the metaphor that is used for immune system is a different world. I think this definition is easily understandable. We can not describe this kind of situation as a scientific illiteracy. By looking at all examples, in which one student have really interesting knowledge about immune system. However, the other student doesn’t. That doesn’t mean that everybody does not have scientific knowledge. Even though, Mike doesn’t have any interest to understand the immune system, he has knowledge that immune system fights against diseases. So, it can not be scientific illiteracy. By looking at all the arguments and examples, it can be concluded that we have lack of scientific knowledge. But, we do have scientific knowledge. This idea is supported by looking at the examples of story about professor’s class in which one student has really interesting ideas about immune system. So, I am disagreeing with author because according to me this definition is too narrow.