Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Psychology 213 Review 2/13/2012 3:24:00 PM Chapter 1 high-level processing is dependent on lower-level processing rationalism: Plato’s theory of arriving at the truth through rational thought and logic, important in theory development empiricism: Aristotle’s theory of arriving at the truth through observation, and experimentation, important for the scientific method structuralism: Wundt’s theory that the best way to study the mind is through studying perception and through introspection functionalism: William James’s theory that placed a focus on the functions that the brain carries out by any method that’s effective associationism: synthesis of structuralism and functionalism, study the association of events and how that association leads to learning behaviorism: all behavior can be attributed to associations between behavior and/or object and reward, also called the law of effect all communication can be broken down into three parts: sender, communication channel, and receiver information theory: the less likely a message is, the more information it transmits e.g. saying “I’m terrible” transmits more information than “I’m good” in response to “how are you?” bit: the amount of information transmitted by an event, defined as the amount of questions necessary to reach an answer the more possible responses, the longer the response time, because the more information each signal transmits there’s a limit to the amount of information a sensory system can process at a time the interference between two stimuli is defined by the amount of information they transmit and the overlap between the kind of processing that they depend on Broadbent’s Filter model: attentional processing works in the model of a channel with a filter that selects for certain features and allows them through to attention Waugh and Norman’s Model of Information-Processing: stimuli go into primary memory automatically, but are only committed to secondary memory if they’re rehearsed Brown-Peterson task: a task requiring participants to recall stimuli after some kind of interference preventing rehearsal decay of memory increases with interfering stimuli ecological approach: approach that tries to approximate real-life conditions affordances: what objects imply/afford information pickup: the process of learning what different parts of our environment afford schema: a means of cognitively exploring the world through our expectations based on previous experience can have schemas for people (including the self) as well as for objects, person schemas help to interpret behavior perceptual cycle: Neisser’s paradigm of schema development, whereby exploration of environment through a schema, which provides further information that can then affect the schema cognitive ethology: studies carried out in the real world to complement laboratory studies, based on evidence that cognitive processes change based on the situation and setting (and therefore will be different in a lab than in real life) pattern classification: a means of studying behavior by observing its coincidence with patterns of neuroimaging Chapter 2 phrenology: idea that bumps on the skull revealed peoples’ personality traits by revealing the parts of their brains that were more developed than others, disproved, but served as a precedent for the idea of localization of brain functions law of mass action: destruction of function after a lesion depends not on the individual cells lesioned but rather the amount of brain tissue lesioned law of equipotentiality: while certain functions might be specialized, pretty much any part of the brain can function as any other part of the brain interactionism: Descartes’s theory that the mind and brain exist separately but interact, specifically at the pineal gland epiphenomenalism: the mind is a byproduct of the brain’s functioning, and has no impact on behavior parallelism: the mind and the brain are two parallel aspects of the same reality, where anything that happens to one happens at the same time to the other isomorphism: any event of the mind (experience) and event of the brain (neural patterns) take the same shape e.g. for the Necker cube, our altered perception of it is coupled with altered brain processing patterns based on the results of his studies of split brain patients and animals, Sperry hypothesized that consciousness was an emergent property of the brain, meaning that it can’t be reducible to individual brain functions with the emergence of consciousness, consciousness can enact emergent causation on lower-level brain functions the mind is supervenient, meaning that it has the capacity for topdown influence despite having emerged from the processes that it is influencing connectionism: the theory that cognitive processes emerge from a large number of interconnected neurons, which then form neural networks, and changes in neural processing (like learning) come from changes in the strength of the connections of these neural networks, which then affects behavior assumes parallel processing, the idea that many neural connections can be active at once, in contrast to serial processing, which is the theory that only one connection is active at a time Hebb rule: when a neuron is repeatedly involved in causing another neuron to fire, the connection between those two neurons is strengthened single dissociation: damage to the temporal lobe causes damage to memory but not planning double dissociation: damage to the temporal lobe causes damage to memory but not planning, and damage to the frontal lobe causes damage to planning but not memory the caveat in neuroimaging studies is that they always show a correlational but not necessarily causational link between brain processes and behavior chronometric measures: behavioral measures of performance like reaction time and accuracy on a task necessary to study behavior as well as brain function because just because a subject seems to be attending to a task (and therefore that their brain function is a reaction to it) doesn’t necessarily mean that they are Chapter 3 our perception of vision comes from the brain, constructed around the light information received from the retina, the eyes aren’t necessary for seeing auras with migraines, imagining things we’ve never seen associative agnosia: a visual agnosia in which patients can copy images but are incapable of recognizing them optic ataxia: incapacity to reach for objects despite being able to perceive them normally, due to damage in the dorsal visual stream optic apraxia: problems with smooth pursuit and initiating saccades time spaces: a phenomenon in which some people see a representation of time (in months, weeks, hours, etc.) as existing in the physical world surrounding them theory of ecological optics: Gibson’s theory that the information received by sensory organs is directly used to guide behavior in our environments ambient optical array (AOA): Gibson’s term for the patterns of light that we see in our environment at any given time that give rise to visual perception, transforms as we move topological breakage: discontinuity that results from the meeting of two different texture gradients optic flow: the pattern of constant transformation of the AOA that results when an observer moves through their environment Gibson wasn’t interested in illusions, but a more ecological approach, by studying our perceptions in normal real-world situations of visual perception pattern recognition: the recognition of an individual instance or object as part of a larger pattern (e.g. seeing a coffee cup and recognizing it as belonging to the schema of coffee cups) percept: categorization of a certain type of object, formed by the experience of those objects creating a memory trace Hoffding function: the meeting of an emerging perception and a memory trace, which leads to recognition template-matching theory: the theory that we have a template of known objects in our minds (specific objects or prototypes can both serve as templates), and recognition depends on the matching of that template to a particular instance of perception multiple-trace memory model: Hintzman’s theory that each perceptual experience causes a memory trace experience is thought to initiate a probe into secondary memory, where it is matched to similar memory traces and then returns an echo to primary memory experiment: subjects were shown distorted versions of a prototype, and were able to classify the original prototypes well when they saw them, and mistakenly thought they’d seen it before o Hintzman said that the distorted prototypes created an echo that contained everything the prototypes had in common, which was then recalled by the probe when shown the nondistorted prototype pandemonium: a version of feature detection theory consisting of three levels features: aspects of an object like color, shape, and size cognitive demons: specialized processes the selectively detect features of the object decision demon: selects for the “demon” that is responding most, determining which pattern is recognized contrast energy: determined by the degree of contrast between an object and its background squelching: blocking of processing by the visual system when there’s not enough information for feature processing, can occur if the contrast energy isn’t high enough recognition by components (RBC): the theory that every object can be reduced to combinations of 36 geons recognition gets better with the inclusion of more geons (and therefore more detail) recoverability of geons refers to how easy they are to make out the template of an image would include most of the usual angles from which we would see it context effects: the restricting effect of context on the interpretation of perceptual information demonstrated by the jumbled word effect word superiority effect: finding that it’s easier to recognize a letter in a word than in a non-word or alone parallel distributed processing (PDP): processing occurs through the interactions of units sending excitatory and inhibitory signals to one another when recognizing a word, knowing that the first letter is a consonant inhibits the likelihood of recognizing the second letter as also being a consonant and thereby facilitates recognition of the word as a whole empirical theory of color vision: the theory that perception of color depends on the processing of the wavelengths of light, but is also affected by previous experience of color perception and the effect of different lighting on perception, etc. cross-modal context: context provided by information from other sensory modalities, the McGurk effect demonstrates this change blindness: our failure to notice change if we’re not explicitly attending to the object or area that’s undergoing the change doesn’t occur if we’re able to perceive the change as movement, because our visual system is attuned very highly to recognize movement feature integration theory (FIT): Anne Treisman’s theory that we perceive objects by parsing out their individual features and then binding them together pre-attentive processing: occurs for features like color and shape (as well as for meaningful words) that we process unconsciously and without necessarily attending to them feature binding only occurs at the level of attentive processing, which is conscious, and involves binding together two or more preattentive features bi-stable figures: figures like the Necker cube that can be perceived in two different but equally stable ways Gestalt theory postulates that perception is holistic and emerges from our grouping of the elements of an object according to certain organizational principles principle of emergence: perceptions arise as a whole, not parts (i.e. Necker cube) principle of reification: perceptions of an object can contain more information than the object itself (i.e. illusory figures) principle of invariance: we recognize simple shapes regardless of size, orientation, color, etc. principle of experience: grouping based on our previous experiences with similar objects figure-ground segmentation: distinguishing between what makes up the background of an image and what the object/focus is o Gibson thought that we did this according to the denotivity of each part of an image, which is its relative meaningfulness/recognizableness principle of proximity: grouping based on objects’ physical proximity to one another principle of closure: grouping based on forming a closed object principle of good continuation: grouping objects to form smooth, continuous lines or curves principle of similarity: grouping based on the similarity of two or more objects principle of common fate: grouping based on objects moving in the same direction or fashion however, processing of particular elements of an image can sometimes override the overall perception of the image, which suggests that Gestalist principles don’t apply to all perception congenital prosopagnosia: face blindness or deficiency in recognition of faces resulting not from brain damage but from a congenital defect, and despite the fusiform face area functioning normally, suggesting that it is due to a problem with connections to the area rather than a problem with the area itself, shows that prosopagnosia seems to exist more on a spectrum than in the all-or-none fashion of brain damage that we previously believed it to be Chapter 4 shadowing task: dichotic listening task in which the participant has to repeat the message from one ear, shows that we have a filter to selectively attend to certain information early selection theory: attention can prevent the processing of irrelevant information in the early stages of processing late selection theory: all information is processed, and attention relies on people actively ignoring that which is irrelevant automatic process: process that happens whether or not we pay attention to executing it controlled process: process that requires the devotion of attention to execute activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex are involved in selecting relevant information from a group attention capture: a stimulus that grabs attention involuntarily inattentional blindness: the failure to notice something that otherwise should’ve been attended to because attention is elsewhere spotlight metaphor for attention: Posner’s idea that attention is like a spotlight of fixed size, where we attend to exclusively what’s illuminated by the metaphorical spotlight zoom lens metaphor for attention: Eriksen’s idea that attention is like a zoom lens where we zoom in selectively on certain parts of visual percepts while effectively ignoring all others, and when we zoom out, it expands our attentional field while decreasing the amount of processing that can be allocated to each item gradient metaphor for attention: LaBerge’s idea that there’s a gradation of attention where what’s in the center of our attention is in sharp resolution and everything around it is allocated gradated degrees of processing, which decrease with the distance from the center despite the fact that these theories imply selection of attention based on space, evidence (i.e. the gorilla video) indicate that we can also select for objects flanker task: people had to search for someone’s name while a face (either that of the searched person or not) was displayed in the periphery, people couldn’t ignore the face even when it was incongruous and therefore increased response time face processing seems to be an instance of attention capture capacity model: the model of attention that postulates that we have limited attentional resources, and that performance on a given task is a direct result of how much attention we have available to dedicate to it structural limits: the theory that we have attentional capacity for certain kinds of tasks, and that similar tasks will interfere more with each other because they draw on the same capacity attending to something increases the processing of that thing while decreasing processing of all other things central bottleneck: the theory that we have a filter through which information relevant to only one task at a time can pass unclear whether this filter acts before or after perceptual processing of information, some evidence (like the cocktail party phenomenon: our attention can be grabbed by someone saying our name) suggests that it happens after processing, because clearly at least some information is being processed and ignored if the attentiongrabbing stimulus is also processed divided attention: the theory that we are capable of dividing our attention between two tasks simultaneously set: top-down organization of cognitive processes that facilitates attention in one area while inhibiting it in other areas attentional set: a temporary organization of cognitive processes that facilitates responses when attending to a particular task task switching: switch between carrying out two different tasks, exacts a switch cost, which is a dip in the performance level on the task, occurs whether or not the switch was voluntary additive factors logic: if we’re capable of performing two tasks simultaneously without interference, then they draw on different attentional resources interacting factors logic: if we’re incapable of performing two tasks simultaneously without interference, then they draw on the same attentional resources backward masking: the experimental procedure of presenting a stimulus and then masking it with another stimulus, allows study of the priming effect of the original stimulus stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA): time period between the presentation of the stimulus and its masking cuing task: task developed by Posner where the subject’s attention is cued somewhere or to something and then the stimulus is presented either where the attention was cued (valid target) or elsewhere (invalid) for reflexive attention (subject is told that the cue only predicts the target at a chance level): if the SOA is between 0 and 1 seconds, the reaction time is faster if the target is valid, and if it’s longer, the reaction time is slower if the target is valid, because attention will abandon the cued area or object and not return to it until all other objects or areas have been inspected, called inhibiting orienting response (IOR) for volitional attention (subject is told that the cue predicts the target at a level higher than chance): no attentional effect at SOAs less than 1 second because volitional attention isn’t yet engaged (should be effect of reflexive attention but not included in models) but no IOR effect at longer SOAs (i.e. cuing facilitates target identification on valid trials) dissociation paradigm: strategy that relies on the presumption that it’s possible to process stimuli without being consciously aware of it objective threshold: the threshold at which a stimulus is no longer being processed and the subject’s response can be assessed through indirect measures as being at chance level, lower than the subjective threshold subjective threshold: the level at which the subject reports to not have perceived the stimulus process dissociation procedure: a research paradigm in which stimuli are shown and then the subject is asked not to respond with the stimulus they were just shown, once the SOA was below the subjective threshold, the subjects were more likely to respond with the stimulus, showing that they had unconsciously perceived it but didn’t have the conscious control to not provide it as a response rapid stream visual presentation (RSVP): an experimental method that studies the temporal constraints of attention, revealed the phenomenon of attentional blink attentional blink: the lack of processing of a stimulus when it’s presented within 550 millisceonds after another one, thought to be because the first stimulus is still being processed, more likely to occur if the first stimulus was extensively attended to attention is constrained by the physical limitations of our bodies hemispatial neglect: neglect of the contralesional space due to damage to the parietal lobe (almost always the right parietal lobe), also causes sluggishness to use contralesional limbs, anytime there’s competition for attention between the two halves of attentional space, the contralesional space is always neglected, but if stimuli are presented separately to each half of space, attention and processing are normal Balint’s syndrome: bilateral parietal damage resulting in simultagnosia and optic ataxia and apraxia sequential attention hypothesis: the hypothesis that overt attentional shifts follow covert attentional shifts physiological nystagmus: the minute movements of the eyes that are constantly occurring, small movements indicate fixation while large movements indicate saccades moving window technique: the technique of obscuring a text except for the area where the person is focusing, has no affect on reading as long as the person can see between 17 and 20 characters at a time entry point: the place in a text where a person begins reading, often a heading or picture in newspapers saccadic movements aren’t random, but seem to center around the most relevant information task-related knowledge: knowledge about the task at hand that guides the eye’s exploration of an image or scene reflexive attention is faster but shorter-lasting, whereas volitional attention is slower but longer-lasting reflexive attention can also interrupt volitional attention (i.e. a loud sound reflexive attention relies on the ventrolateral frontoparietal network, which seems to consist of the medial and inferior front gyri, as well as the tempoparietal junction in the right hemisphere volitional attention relies on the dorsolateral frontoparietal network, which seems to consist of the superior and inferior parietal lobules as well as the front eye field (which controls voluntary eye movements) bilaterally Yerkes-Dawson law: optimal retrieval of a memory is at a moderate level of emotional arousal, which implies attention to the task at hand without excessive arousal causing anxiety memory suffers with depression, both clinical and temporarily lab-induced greater the severity of the symptoms the greater the memory impairment thought to be due to a depletion of attentional resources because they’re tied up in the depression, which leads to a lower degree of attention available to allocate to a task, as well as an unwillingness to do a task unless it seems to be relevant or necessary (which a laboratory task probably won’t) Velten procedure: a means of inducing a mood in a laboratory by having the subject read phrases designed to exemplify a certain mood and asking them to try to identify with them state-dependent memory can apply for mood, context, culture, and roles as well as for drugs, and affects free-recall most state seems to affect both encoding and retrieval sensory memory: measured in units of seconds, traces are found in sensory cortices sensory buffer: iconic/echoic memory, iconic memory can last up to a second and echoic memory up to ten seconds, can hold a lot of material but only for a very limited period of time and only sensory material, which hasn’t been semantically processed and therefore isn’t contextualized short-term memory: measured in seconds and minutes, has a limited capacity (about seven items) but is conscious information can be lost from short-term memory through decay (natural fading) or interference (other information, either retroactive or proactive, interferes with encoding), which causes the information to leave short-term memory earlier than it otherwise would have and to drop off more precipitously working memory: Baddeley’s theory of short-term memory that it exists both to retain and manipulate memories that come both from sensory and long-term memory storage long-term memory: measured in minutes to years, thought at first that memory has to go through short-term memory and be rehearsed in order to be committed to long-term memory (Atikson and Shiffrin), but lesion studies in humans have shown that some kinds of information can go straight from sensory memory to long-term memory Chapter 5 mystic writing pad: Freud’s metaphor for memory, perceptual experiences leave traces that are overlaid, our experience of memory is the sum of those overlaid traces reappearance hypothesis: idea that when we recall a memory we are merely calling the same thing up over and over again flashbulb memories: memories of a consequential event (e.g. Kennedy’s assassination) that seem especially vivid and detailed but aren’t actually any more accurate or immune to degradation than normal memories seem to emerge because they’re the intersection of memories and telling our life story, flashbulb memories represent a memory that also serves as a significant life story event Now Print theory: theory that accounts for flashbulb memories, according to which certain memories are recorded in vivid and accurate detail when they’re perceived to be both surprising and especially significant because they’re surprising and significant, we tend to rehearse them more than other memories, both to ourselves and to other people consolidation theory: the theory that memory traces aren’t fully consolidated into memory for some time after the initial experience retroactive interference: something that happens after an experience that can affect our recall of it because the memory is still being consolidated can either be something that interferes directly with the consolidation of the memory by affecting our perception of it, or indirectly just by drawing on mental resources during the consolidation process false memories: memories of things that didn’t actually occur, can arise from suggestion after the fact, demonstrated by experiment in which 30% of people said they recalled a plausible but never-occurred event from childhood as well as Loftus’s study where she changed the intensity of the word used to describe a car accident and thereby changed peoples’ perception of the accident reconsolidation: changes that can occur to a memory trace after recall based on the conditions under which it was recalled, occurs in the hippocampus rationalization: automatic process of making sense of remembered information in a way that’s not always the most faithful to the truth it’s possible that body schema is able to change more readily when the change is gradual (i.e. growth over a period of time rather than abrupt loss of a limb) schema theories usually see memory as being described most accurately by 4 processes selection: we select information that’s relevant to our interests at the time (e.g. extract information relevant to a burglar or prospective home buyer depending on which role the subject’s asked to play), doesn’t mean we completely ignore the other information if it later becomes relevant abstraction: we extract the meaning from an event rather than the absolute details of the event itself, effect of abstraction becomes more powerful as time passes interpretation: we interpret this meaning based on context at the time and the context of our other memories (e.g. example of the roman numerals on the grandfather clock, interpretation can override sensory information) integration: we integrate the information into our schema, doesn’t always occur schemas can make information easier to remember, demonstrated by the experiment with seemingly nonsensical information if the subject wasn’t first provided with a schema misinformation effect: the phenomenon by which misleading information after an event can affect our recall of the event itself, often impossible to know where the misleading information came from and it’s therefore attributed to be from the experience itself source monitoring framework: a theory that people often fail to adequately monitor the sources of information and can thereby easily be misled about the details of an event script: a predetermined set of expectations for a specific experience of situation life scripts: culturally-shared and -determined expectations about the scope and timing of a life course, not determined by personal experience as most other scripts are primary memory: the initial experience and processing of a perceptual event secondary memory: the stored perceptions of events that can be activated by probes and thereby produce an echo of the original perception depth of processing: the degree of complexity to which information is processed (e.g. shallow would be processing based on simple features like the font of letters and deep would be processing based on the word’s semantic meaning), the more deeply we process an event the better we remember it elaboration: extra processing of a memory that forms connections between it and other memories/information distinctiveness: the degree of precision to which a memory is encoded (i.e. “cabbage” is more distinct than “food”) general levels of representation: the basic underlying meaning behind information or a memory, is retained even as people age (e.g. who someone is, relationship to you) specific levels of representation: more specific and often superficial aspects of memory or information, often lost as people age (e.g. someone’s name) the parts of the brain activated when an experience is occurring tend to be the same as those activated in the recall of that experience general principles approach to research: laboratory study that focuses on finding the principles underlying experience and behavior ecological memory approach to research: study focusing more on real-world observation to lead to practical applications forgetting curve: result of Ebbinghaus’s experiments with nonsense syllables, which shows that memory drops off rapidly at first and then plateaus over time varies with amount of information, depth of processing, and temporal distribution of studying Jost’s law of forgetting: if two memory traces are of equal strength, the decay of the younger trace will be faster than that of the older trace, expression of the pattern of the forgetting curve Ribot’s law of retrograde amnesia: the fact that for patients with retrograde amnesia due to brain damage, newer memories are more likely to be lost than older memories law of progressions and pathologies (last in, first out): the newer a system is, the more quickly it will show degeneration permastore: the theory that there’s a relatively permanent store of memory, that at a certain point, memory ceases to decay, or decays at such a slow rate that the memory loss is imperceptible (demonstrated by the studies of people who had studied Spanish), rehearsal after information is learned doesn’t seem to affect its transfer to permastore level and length of retention seems to depend much less on aptitude and much more on the method by which the material was learned, more successful retention is associated with learning the material over a relatively extended period of time, and repeated exposure to it afterwards Chapter 6 principle of encoding specificity: if a cue was originally coded with an item, it’s more likely that that cue will facilitate recall episodic memory: memory of something that has happened to you, a personal experience, autonoetic because it involves memory of personal experiences semantic memory: memory of facts, general knowledge, noetic because it implies consciousness of the current situation as well as of the past and future it’s possible for a person to have access to semantic memory without having access to episodic memory recency bias: bias to remember something that was most recently experienced primacy bias: bias to remember the thing that happened first in a series, due to increased rehearsal the middle of the series tends to be remembered least effectively, because it doesn’t have the benefit of the recency bias and rehearsal of the first information interfered with its encoding procedural memory: a kind of implicit memory that contains information about how to carry out well-rehearsed procedures (e.g. walking), anoetic because it’s concerned only with the task at hand prefrontal leucotomy: procedure that cuts off all connections between the prefrontal lobe and the rest of the brain, greatly decreases autonoetic functioning chronesthesia: our subjective experience of our existence in time, thought to be one important distinguishing factor between humans and non-human animals while birds have been shown to have a conception of time passing in regards to the past, but not necessarily for the future butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: the characteristic of memory that context is often important for memory method of opposition: experimental method of presenting subjects with stimuli under either full or divided attention, and then asking them to complete word stems either with a word for the previous list or with anything but words from the previous list, subjects exposed to the words with divided attention complete the word stems with words from the list whether they were asked to or asked to avoid doing so perceptual representation system: a kind of implicit memory that consists of a system of representation of events that’s thought to be responsible for priming generic recall: recall of words similar to but not exactly the word one’s trying to recall when suffering from tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon teachable language comprehender (TLC): computer model of semantic memory that functions by using units (e.g. fish) that are characterized by properties (e.g. scales) and related by pointers (e.g. has), the more connected things are the easier it is to verify relationships Moses illusion: peoples’ tendency to respond to corrected versions of otherwise nonsensical questions when the error is close enough to the correct version semantically and phonologically (i.e. How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the ark?) spreading activation: the activation of a semantic network and the nodes connected to it, an activated network can be searched more quickly and therefore a response that can be found in a semantic network that’s already active will be faster, explains priming inhibitory response: means of recall facilitation by inhibiting certain semantic connections that are irrelevant excitatory response: means of recall facilitation by exciting certain semantic connections that are relevant involuntary semantic memories: memories that pop into your head for seemingly no reason (e.g. a song), seem to be primed by events that we’re generally unconscious of unless we actively search for them as causes, this mind popping is a form of priming fan effect: the more information we have about a concept, the longer it takes to identify specific information related to it propositional network: network of information containing both the information itself and relationships between individual units of information working memory: Baddeley’s theory of short term memory that encompasses both the temporary storage and the manipulation of information phonological loop: the audio/language aspect of working memory, temporarily holds language-related information, based in the auditory cortex visuo-spatial sketchpad: the visual aspect of working memory, temporarily holds visual information, based in the striate cortex episodic buffer: working memory system that controls the movement of information both to and from episodic long-term memory, coordinates the phonological loop and visuo-spatial sketchpad with long-term memory central executive: means by which information is both selected and integrated from different memory systems, associated with conscious experience, based in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex fluid systems: systems that manipulate information but are unchanged by it crystallized systems: systems that accumulate information episodic memory is especially affected by aging, more so than semantic memory it’s possible to have a deficit in semantic but not episodic memory (due to brain damage) associative deficit hypothesis: thought to be an explanation of memory degradation in older people, deficiency in both creating and maintaining links between information units (e.g. not being able to pair a name with a face), only affects explicit memory Korsakoff’s syndrome: a kind of amnesia resulting from brain atrophy because of a thiamine deficiency, thought to be a kind of disconnection syndrome, which means that implicit learning can take place but there’s no awareness of learning having taken place, also characterized by emotionally flatness and an unawareness of any memory deficit Alzheimer’s disease: characterized not by retrieval failure but a loss of information that was once there prospective memory: memory system that deals with events that will happen in the future errorless learning: the most effective way of teaching amnesics new skills by not allowing them to commit errors, which maximizes on their implicit learning skills method of vanishing cues: method of removing cues slowly until the amnesic is capable of naming a word when given its definition without any cues, relies on not having to generalize to contexts very disparate from the original context of learning cryptomnesia: unintended plagiarism resulting from the failure to recognize something as being familiar dissociative memory disorders: can arise when a part of someone’s personality becomes dissociated due to a traumatizing event without any brain damage psychogenic amnesia: can’t recall personal memories, temporary psychogenic fugue: psychogenic amnesia with an ensuing flight to live as someone else, the person can’t remember the fugue episode once they recover from the amnesia dissociative identity disorder: no explicit memory transfer between alters, but implicit memory transfer can occur childhood amnesia: the incapacity to remember events from before a certain age, usually three or four, thought to be due to differing memory schemas in children that could prevent retrieval, as well as encoding by general schemas instead of by individual memories, and possibly the lack of language to organize the information Chapter 7 Paivio’s dual-coding theory: theory that there are two separate systems (verbal and non-verbal) that code events logogens: units of the verbal coding system, information lying behind our use of a word, relies more on the left hemisphere imagens: units of the non-verbal coding system, images that represent concepts, relies more on the right hemisphere concreteness: the degree to which a word refers to a concept that can be experienced through the senses, highly correlated with the degree of imagery associated with a concept concrete words are coded by the verbal and non-verbal systems, and are therefore easier to learn than abstract words, which are only coded by the verbal system concrete and abstract words are processed differently by the two hemispheres but not preferentially by either (refutes hypothesis that the right hemisphere would show heightened processing of concrete words) method of loci: a mnemonic device dependent on remembering something by remembering it as being associated with a certain location thought to function because it organizes otherwise disparate information into meaningful units von Restorff effect: phenomenon of an item being more memorable if it’s different from all the other items in a given set if all the other items are common, a bizarre item will be best remembered, but if all the other items are bizarre, a common item will be best remembered humorous items appear to be more memorable than simply weird items in a set of otherwise mundane items, humor in and of itself may have an effect on how memorable something is special places theory: theory that putting something in a distinctive/unlikely place will allow the person to remember while not allowing others to guess the place, similar strategy used in creating passwords not effective: distinctiveness aids memory in remembering individual items, but not in remembering associations between items o e.g. putting valuables in the freezer will be more difficult to remember than putting valuables in a safe, because the distinctiveness is in the association, not in either of the items individually chromasthesia: experience of synesthetes of colored hearing inducer: stimulus that elicits a synaesthetic experience concurrent: synaesthetic experience itself synaesthesia can aid memory if the information isn’t presented in a way that confounds the synaesthetic experience, like presenting numbers in colors different from the concurrent colors theory: synaesthesia evolved because the connections between different sensory modalities in the brain that are normally pruned weren’t pruned normally, and that these sensory modalities then activate one another when they’re activated o a synaesthestic experience can be provoked by a concept as well as a sensory experience, suggests that these connections aren’t necessarily exclusively between sensory processing centers of the brain weak synaesthetes: most people, capable of appreciating parallels between sensory modalities (e.g. sunlight is judged to be louder than moonlight) without actually having synaesthetic experiences imagery seems to activate the same brain areas as actually seeing what we’re imagining, the visual cortex as well as higher cognitive areas people who are told to imagine flying over their house show eye movements that would correspond to looking at something from above imagery seems to rely on a feedforward-feedback loop between the early sensory systems and the cognitive systems feedback input from the higher cognitive areas allows the lower sensory systems to recreate perceptual experiences, feedforward loop is responsible for normal perception we usually close our eyes when we imagine, which prevents interference between the two systems because there’s nothing coming through the feedforward loop the only difference between actual perception and imagined perception is slightly less activation in the visual cortex imagery seems to exist separately from visual perception systems, because some patients can draw objects despite not being able to recognize them possible that LTM input is what’s necessary for imagery, but it’s still unresolved icon: representation of a visual stimulus that persists briefly after that visual stimulus has gone away eidetic imagery: representation of a visual stimulus that persists for a minute or longer after the stimulus has gone away, reports of details from perceptions of eidetic images allow more rapid and assured than reports from memory, but not more accurate seems that describing an eidetic image causes it to fade more rapidly some people have especially clear and long-lasting eidetic images, but seems to exist to a certain extent in everyone vividness of visual imagery: measure of the degree of richness of a certain memory, not necessarily correlated with accuracy mental rotation: the capacity to mentally rotate an object, evidence suggests that people actually go through the process of rotating the object in their mind, takes about one second to rotate an object 60 right hemisphere seems to be preferentially engaged for simpler mental rotation tasks, but both hemispheres are engaged for more complex tasks, like mental folding women tend to be worse at mental rotation, but improved much more than men after training playing video games to the point where there was no discrepancy objective distance: the perceived true distance between two objects with respect to their representation on a map the farther two objects are objectively, the longer it takes to scan from one to the other mentally, we incorporate objective distances into our mental processing categorical distance: the number of landmarks that lie between two objects on a map also a positive correlation between mental scanning time and categorical distance images as anticipations: the phenomenon that we will more readily perceive something if we were imagining it already or if the stimulus falls within the area where we were imagining something in general, we pick up information that we expect better than information that we don’t we don’t have the capacity to imagine an ambiguous figure and flip between perceptions of it the way that we do with actual images of ambiguous figures, imagery and perceptions are fundamentally different emergent properties of imagery: new properties or interpretations of images can emerge even if they didn’t exist/weren’t perceived during the initial perception of the image or if the imagery is completely invented, suggests that imagery isn’t only one thing, as the ambiguous figure experiment might suggest analog form of representation: the theory that imagery is not just a mental representation of the relationships between objects, but can give rise to new perceptions of those relationships egocentric perspective transformations: imagining one’s movement through space while the environment remains constant people using this paradigm take longer to identify an object located in the imaginary space behind them than that in front of them spatial framework: imaginary representation of our body by which we distinguish ahead/behind, above/below and left/right o takes relatively longer to distinguish left/right because it’s the only dimension in which both sides are symmetrical tasks relying on imagery, like mental rotation, are more and more susceptible to error depending on the subject’s unfamiliarity with the object imagery is not simply the scanning of an image across our visual cortex, it requires inferences and therefore higher cognitive processes cognitive maps: our mental representation of the relationship between objects/locations, subject to error because we make general classifications of categories of objects (i.e. by country) which are generally but not always accurate cognitive maps seem to rely on the hippocampus, example of the London taxi drivers consulted by means of an egocentric frame of reference rather than the way we would consult a real map o path integration: the process by which we and other animals update our positions on cognitive maps in relation to relevant landmarks/the destination mental models: our mental representations of objects or situations, which are often unscientific and therefore sometimes inaccurate e.g. anthropomorphizing the vacuum cleaner Chapter 9 finite state grammar: idea that language emerges from the construction of sentences starting at the first word and ending at the last word Chomsky says it’s not possible, we’d have to learn a ridiculous number of sentences before we could speak properly, and that finite state grammar is an insufficient way to describe the emergence of language, because a sentence making sense and being grammatical are dissociated phrase structure rules: process describing how linguistic symbols can be replaced by other linguistic symbols to eventually create sentences e.g. sentence = noun phrase + verb phrase grammatical transformations: the transformation of a whole string of structures as opposed to just on one structure by the tenets of phrase structure rules competence: a person’s command of a language determined by their internalization of a system of rules relating sound or symbols to meaning performance: a person’s display of their ability to communicate, affected by language competence as well as by cognitive and situational factors deep structure: the underlying meaning of a sentence surface structure: the words used to represent the deep structure of a sentence process of comprehension is the transformation of the surface structure to the deep structure of a sentence innateness hypothesis: Chomsky’s idea that linguistic competence is innate poverty of the stimulus argument: supports the innateness hypothesis through the postulation that the sample of language that children are exposed to is too limited and full of errors for the child to grow up and communicate properly without having an innate mechanism to interpret and produce grammatical communication language acquisition device: Chomsky’s name for this innate mechanism to understand language and communicate using language by containing the principles of universal grammar found in any language language acquisition doesn’t seem to happen through conditioning, because parents affirm or deny what their children say based on its intended meaning and not whether it’s grammatically correct parental reformulations: evidence that parents reformulate children’s incorrect sentences as feedback, even if they don’t explicitly say “no” or “yes” depending on if the sentence is grammatical suggests that language acquisition could occur through a more complex kind of conditioning syntactic development: capacity of the child to organize words into grammatical sentences, seems to be influenced by the child’s exposure to complex and varied speech by both parents and other adults, like teachers challenges the inference of the poverty of the stimulus argument that a child’s future speech isn’t affected by the degree of their exposure to correct and varied speech early in life minimalism: the theory that language acquisition occurs through a method in which a person incorporates only those characteristics that are absolutely necessary parameter setting: the process by which one acquires a particular language, by selecting the parameters of that particular language among the options offered by universal grammar, accounts for the differences between languages concealing function of language: the aspect of language that allows it to conceal the communicated meaning from those who don’t speak it while revealing that meaning to those who do allows it to function as a sort of code code model of communication: communication begins with the stage of the speaker’s thoughts being encoded into speech, and the listener subsequently decoding the speech stimulus into meaning correct interpretation of the speech stimulus requires that the speaker and listener share sufficient mutual knowledge of the situation inferential model of communication: communication can be classified as a series of intentions and inferences; the speaker has certain intentions in communicating through speech, and the listener must make certain inferences to properly decode that speech conversation maxims: certain rules (like striving to be clear and truthful) that a listener must assume that the speaker is following in order to make correct inferences about meaning co-operative principle: the assumption that the speaker is striving to be both truthful and relevant that allows the listener to infer the intent of the speaker communication probably consists alternately of speech and understanding following the code and inferential models of communication syntactic parse: the breakdown of a sentence into its components allowing comprehension of its literal/propositional meaning can be ambiguous depending on the polysemous nature of words sometimes units only have meaning in the context of the other units also have to incorporate the social-pragmatic context, including tone of voice, situation, social relationship between speaker and listener, etc. standard theory of irony: process of the comprehension of irony whereby the listener first takes the irony literally, then realizes that this interpretation is impossible, and therefore takes the intent of the speaker to be the communication of exactly the opposite of what they have just said relies on the listener realizing that the speaker can’t be both relevant and truthful if the sentence is taken literally, and therefore that it must be irony if it’s not a violation of the co-operative principle not clear if irony always needs to be interpreted literally first, perhaps only when it’s unexpected prosody: melody of the speech, including accentuation of certain words hesitation pauses: pauses in speech filled with speech disfluencies like um or uh um and uh seem to play different roles, um indicates the expectation of a longer pause than does uh o suggests that we are capable of anticipating how long it will take to retrieve the information necessary to produce speech even before we’ve actually retrieved it egocentric speech: speech characteristic of children that doesn’t take the listener’s perspective into account, becomes inner speech as the child becomes socialized inner speech: silent, rapid speech that regulates thought, occasionally externalized when trying to get other people to pay attention to one’s inner state (e.g. oops!, brr) zone of proximal development: distance between problem-solving capabilities alone and the degree of potential development as determined by problem-solving capabilities with the help of someone else correlation between the zone of proximal development and the development of inner speech literacy: the ability to read and write, which is generally accompanied by the capacity to think about and discuss language (including books, plays, etc.) as well as the vocabulary to do so, known as metalanguage degree of exposure to printed exposure is correlated with the degree of development of metalanguage can communicate through speech or writing, comprehension varies as a function of handwriting and accents/pronounciation Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: the theory that differences in language between peoples can affect those peoples’ perceptions of the object described by that word, a phenomenon called linguistic relativity for example, Inuit peoples having more words for what we call snow is a result of having much more extensive experience with snow and therefore the capacity and need to distinguish much more extensively between different kinds of snow polysemous words: words that have multiple meanings, which can lead to delayed comprehension of the meaning of a word because it depends on context the more abstract a word is, the less likely it is that it will have a direct translation equivalent because bilinguals split their speaking time between two languages, they necessarily speak each language less, and therefore they use language-specific words less in each language interlingual homographs: words that are spelled the same between two languages but have different meanings, will cause an interference in comprehension in bilinguals shows that we employ non-selective access of language when reading/listening level of semantic constraint: the degree to which the context forces a particular semantic interpretation of a word high semantic constraint eliminated interference for interlingual homographs at higher levels of processing degree of cognitive processing of a word increases the longer we spend looking at it/the more times we go back to look at it Berlin-Kay hypothesis of basic color terms: while different languages might have different numbers of words for different colors, there is a particular order in which color words develop, starting with the most simple (e.g. black and white) and progressing to the most complex (e.g. purple and pink) derives this order from Hering’s theory of color opponency, where words for Hering’s primary colors arise first experiment showing that memory for color was dependent on the words in the subject’s language that referred to that color and how specific they were (e.g. blue-green distinctions were difficult for people who spoke a language which had one word for the color spanning blue and green), challenges the Berlin-Kay hypothesis and seems to support the linguistic relativity hypothesis intrinsic frame of reference: judgment of the relationships of objects based on the relationships between those objects relative frame of reference: judgment of the relationships of objects based on the observer’s position, most common to English-speakers absolute frame of reference: judgment of the relationships of objects based on an absolute and unchanging set of co-ordinates, like north-south evidence that the language one speaks has a great impact on conception of frame of reference Chapter 10 Gestalt switch: sudden change in perception, can be sensory perception or cognitive, like understanding of a problem Gestaltists theorized that there’s something special about insight in that it requires unconscious leaps in thinking and is characterized by accelerated mental processing and a short circuit of normal processing but, some people experience insight on non-insight problems or solve insight problems without experiencing insight, suggesting that it’s perhaps just an extension of normal thinking given that insight is a specific kind of subjective experience, suggests that it’s special in some way, perhaps the temporal collusion of several different kinds of mental processes insight problem: a problem that requires the restructuring of its representation through the experience of insight before it can be solved chimpanzees have the capacity for insight productive thinking: thinking that results from a comprehension of the problem at hand and its parameters e.g. child solving the altar window problem despite having knowledge of geometry structurally blind thinking: engaging in reasoning appropriate for other situations but not the situation at hand e.g. adult trying to apply the principles of geometry to the altar window problem unnecessarily well-structured problems: problems that have a specific and well-defined path to resolution requiring following specific rules ill-structured problems: problems that don’t have an immediately clear path to the solution, problems that require insight isomorphic problems: problems that have the same underlying structure as another problem but are contextualized/framed in a different way analysis of the situation: first stage of problem solving in which we determine the functions of the objects involved in the situation and how they can be used to solve the problem if a situation doesn’t require going beyond the giving information to reach a resolution, it’s not a problem functional fixedness: the incapacity to see past the standard function of an object to use it in a different way to solve a problem doesn’t have an effect on children five and younger, who are also unaffected whether or not the object is presented in a way that serves to remind the problem-solver of its usual function functional fixedness occurs across cultures, even those with much less technology than our own, seems to have evolved because thinking about using an object for its design is evolutionarily adaptive in trying to solve a problem that requires insight, hints can’t be useful unless they’re consistent with the direction of the person’s thinking and help to resolve a difficulty that that person has already faced insight is all-or-none and (to the person who experiences it) it doesn’t seem to arise from any hints the person might have received solution emerges suddenly as a whole feeling of warmth: the feeling of growing closer to the goal that arises from attempting to solve non-insight problems, but not insight problems feeling of knowing: the degree to which a person can predict whether or not they’re going to be able to solve a given problem, possible only with noninsight problems progress monitoring theory: the theory that people monitor their own progress when approaching an insight problem, and after reaching an impasse following what seemed to be the most direct route to solution, they become open to experiencing insight representational change theory: the theory that reaching an insightful solution to a problem requires a change in the problem-solver’s representation of it constraint relaxation: one way by which this change in representation can occur, which is by overcoming assumptions about the problem that are blocking insightful solution to it chunk decomposition: another way by which this change can occur, by thinking about parts of the problem that might otherwise be seen as an undivided whole as separate parts successful problem solvers spend more time looking at the parts of the problem that require constraint relaxation and/or chunk decomposition in order to reach the insightful solution, research shows that guiding peoples’ attention to those parts of the problem increased their chances of reaching the insightful solution activation of the anterior cingulate cortex is correlated with having an insightful experience thought to be because the ACC detects conflicting response tendencies, person becoming aware of this conflict is necessary for experience of insight performance on insight problems increased after sleep, possible that sleep causes the restructuring process that’s necessary for insight to occur Einstellung effect: tendency to respond in an inflexible pre-ordained fashion even if there’s a simpler way to solve the problem e.g. following the set of steps usually necessary to solve the water jar problem even when presented with an analogous problem that doesn’t require all the steps effect becomes more powerful when the problem-solver is under pressure negative transfer: problem-solvers showing the Einstellung effect even when the previous set is inappropriate o strong but wrong tendency: the analogy of this effect to more every day life situations, our tendency to act according to habit even if that habit is inappropriate because of a change in situation left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is crucial in the inhibition of obvious responses in order to make less obvious ones when necessary mindfulness: the openness to alternative solutions that allows for insightful problem-solving mindlessness: the rote application of previously seen paradigms to reach a solution positive transfer: past success facilitates problem solution negative transfer: past mental sets impede finding a solution, can be minimized by putting the problem to the side for a period of time heuristic: a pre-established problem-solving procedure whose application can often impede reaching insightful solution artificial intelligence designers convert heuristics into algorithms to allow the machine to problem solve using the heuristic evaluation function: the process by which a machine develops a plan to solve the problem by evaluating the problem and applying an algorithm to solve it, selecting the most advantageous plan of all possible courses of action problem space: the representation of the problem including the goal and the various possible procedures to reach that goal search tree: the representation of all the possible moves to reach the goal production rules: the set of conditions and ordained actions as a result of those conditions that guide problem solving for artificial intelligence machines iterations: repetitions of a certain maneuver to reach an end goal means-end analysis: the analysis of the difference between the current state and the goal state, as well as the different possible mechanisms to reduce that difference subgoals: goals that must be attained before reaching the final goal goal stack: the series of subgoals that must be accomplished, in order, with the final goal at the bottom concurrent verbalization during problem solving is a representation of inner speech and serves as a window into the human problem-solving process model of insight in artificial intelligence: program a stop in the program after it’s been unsuccessful for a certain period of time, and order it to search in a different problem space after it’s resumed problem solving cognitive theory of science: the study of the notes and problem-solving process of famous scientists throughout history in order to better understand problem-solving techniques and insightful discovery further investigation of unexpected findings is key to scientific problem solving Zeigarnik effect: the tendency to persist in unfinished tasks to reach a solution BACON: artificial intelligence technology that analyzes patterns between two variables using several heuristics, capable of discovering certain alreadyestablished scientific laws test subjects who successfully discovered some of the same laws as BACON did so using the same techniques Chapter 11 deductive reasoning: reasoning from the general to the specific inductive reasoning: reasoning from the specific to the general impossible to prove anything using induction, can only indicate what’s likely conditional reasoning: drawing conclusions in the form of if-then propositions modus ponens: reasoning that takes the form if p then q; p, therefore q o impossible to reach a conclusion by denying the antecedent (i.e. no p, therefore no q, is not a valid conclusion) modus tollens: reasoning that takes the form if p then q; no q, therefore no p o impossible to reach a conclusion by affirming the consequent (i.e. q, therefore p, is not a valid conclusion) o we’re not always naturally inclined to test for modus tollens, as evidenced by our failure on the Wason’s card selection task, unless it’s structured to test for breach of the social contract syllogism: two premises and a conclusion universal affirmative: all A are B (doesn’t necessarily mean that all B are A) universal negative: no A are B, and no B are A particular affirmative: some A are B, and some B are A (could mean that all A are B or all B are A) particular negative: some A are not B (could mean that no A are B) logicism: the belief that logical reasoning is an integral part of human nature practical syllogism: a syllogism whose conclusion necessitates an action (e.g. vegetarianism!) a syllogism can be valid even if its premises are false and therefore its conclusion is also false however, people make errors and are much more likely to accept invalid syllogisms with believable conclusions as valid than to accept invalid syllogisms with unbelievable conclusions we also make errors in evaluating syllogisms involving the word some, we judge it to imply less than half of a given group, and certainly not the entire group relational reasoning/linear syllogisms: reasoning that relies on the relationship between two items three-term series problem: a problem consisting of two comparative sentences from which a conclusion must be drawn emergent consequences: the phenomenon that a mental model constructed to represent a three-term series problem necessarily leads to its conclusion principle of parsimony: the fact that people will always tend to construct the simplest mental model possible to represent a problem natural deduction system: use of deduction rules to draw conclusions from propositions generative problem: a problem in which people must generate their own information in order to solve it (e.g. by making guesses and having them refuted or affirmed) eliminative strategy: attempt to falsify hypotheses in order to reach the correct conclusion, not how people intuitively problem solve Wason’s card selection task: have to engage in an eliminative strategy and resist confirmation bias to solve it properly people are more likely to do this if the problem is presented as a paradigm in which the goal is to identify someone violating the social contract (i.e. cheating) o shows that we don’t use the same reasoning strategies in all situations law of large numbers: the larger a sample of events, the more likely that the proportion of those events to one another will be closer to the true statistical value law of averages: fallacious belief that events of one kind of balanced by events of the other, and that the law of large numbers also applies to smaller samples gambler’s fallacy: the idea that individual events aren’t separate from one another and that the likelihood of future events occurring is affected by the occurrence of previous events law of small numbers: fallacious belief that small samples are necessarily representative of the larger population from which they were drawn representativeness heuristic: use of inferences based on the law of small numbers leading to judgments that a sample more likely belongs to a certain category because it’s more representative of that category o e.g. we’ll judge a coin toss of THTTH to be more likely to be random than one of THTHT because the first is more representative of random events, despite the fact that both are equally likely people will judge the product of numbers to be greater if the starting number is greater, shows that our judgments are dependent on the situation in which they are made availability heuristic: the fallacious strategy of judging the likelihood/commonness of an event based on how easily it comes to mind/how memorable it is illusory correlation: the fallacious judgment that two things are more likely to occur together because they’re related in our minds, buoyed by our tendency to remembering confirming instances and ignore disconfirming instances regression to the mean: the tendency of a second value to be closer to the mean (or less extreme) than the first when two variables aren’t perfectly correlated we tend to judge this as having a cause even though it has none, and we’re less likely to do this in situations that we’re familiar with Kahneman and Tversky showed that we used heuristics to make decisions because they make cognitive processing simpler and easier, but using them can lead to errors problem space: the frame within which a problem’s understood, can lead to faulty problem solving recognition heuristic: the reasoning ecologically rational technique of choosing that that we’re familiar with over that that we’re not suggestion that techniques like this are only rational for decisions of less importance Chapter 12 Binet-Simon intelligence test: calculates intelligence as the ratio between mental age (what’s typical of a person of that age) and actual age, where an exact matching of the two would lead to a score of 100 problem: initial measure was only for children, because mental age of adults doesn’t vary enough for it to be salient now WAIS (Wechler’s Adult Intelligence Scale) is used, tests for verbal IQ, performance IQ, and overall IQ two-factor theory of intelligence: Spearman’s theory that level of intelligence is determined by two factors, general intelligence (g), which remains constant in an individual, and specific intelligence (s), which varies in an individual between that person’s different abilities any given ability is determined in part by s and in part by g theorized that heredity was more important for g, while environment was more important for s g predicts 50% of variability in performance, rest is determined by work crystallized intelligence: everything we’ve learned, increases over a lifetime fluid intelligence: capacity to manipulate that information, remains constant over a lifetime, thought to be very similar to g Raven Progressive Matrices: test designed to measure a person’s capacity to draw out novel relationships in a situation, which was central to measuring g central executive aspect of working memory seems to be performing the role that could be classified as fluid intelligence, and therefore as the functional representation of g test of working memory do have something of a correlation with performance on the Raven Progressive Matrices neural plasticity: the degree to which the brain adapts as a function of experience, now thought to be what underlies g dedicated intelligence: domain-specific modules that have evolved to deal with specific problems (e.g. Chomsky’s language acquisition device) improvisational intelligence: intelligence that’s evolved to deal with unforeseen problems, thought to be analogous to g, because it requires the manipulation of new information to reach a solution g is useful in evolutionarily novel situations, not situations that our brain would have already evolved a mechanism to deal with Flynn effect: the phenomenon that IQ scores increase over time, seems to be flattening requires that intelligence tests be constantly recalibrated could be attributed to our increasingly enriched environment, stimulating greater neural plasticity and therefore us coming closer to our full g potential advances in nutrition and overall health could also contribute intellectual components: the information process that consists of the way that we transform our cognitive representations of objects or experiences metacomponents: components that control the execution of other components performance components: components used in the execution of a task knowledge acquisition components: components involved in learning new information and storing it in memory triarchic theory of intelligence: Sternbeg’s theory that intelligence is made up of three different kinds, which vary in the processes that they use to manipulate information analytical intelligence: what’s usually tested by standard intelligence tests o made up of metacomponents (executive processing), performance components (their implementation) and knowledge-acquisitoin components (learning how to solve problems) creative intelligence: capacity to reason using novel concepts o entrenched concepts: natural ways of reasoning that can be applied to familiar situations o non-entrenched concepts: more unnatural reasoning mechanisms that may be necessary to deal with unfamiliar situations, capacity to use these is a measure of creative intelligence practical intelligence: capacity to function in situations demanding expertise of a non-academic sort o involves adapting to the new environment, selecting its interesting features, and shaping the environment o shown to be separate from measures of academic intelligence tests have shown the three kinds of intelligence to be correlated theory of multiple intelligences: Gardner’s theory that there are many different kinds of intelligences, all of which are related to a specific and distinct part of the brain and represented by a different symbol system, and exist separately from each other symbol system: way of representing information related to a certain kind of intelligence, like music or dance thought that intelligences could be determined by looking at prodigies and the areas that they excelled in U-shaped development: shape that certain skills, like drawing, take, where they decrease during the conventional stage and then increase again during the post-conventional stage (if the person reaches that stage) environment has an impact on the development of these skills, people tend to develop musical skills more when they grow up in societies that value music highly it’s possible that more intelligent brains rely more on expertise and automatized processes, which would explain the negative correlation between IQ and cortical glucose metabolism, because automatized processes require less energy to carry out the correlation between cognitive thickness and IQ is positive in childhood, and becomes negative approaching adulthood cortical thickness in childhood indicates brain plasticity and thinness in adulthood indicates effective pruning prodigies: children that display extraordinary skills in a domain before that level of skillfulness would be expected usually, prodigies have to devote a great degree of time into developing their skills, relies on the encouragement of their families 10-year rule: the hypothesis that it takes about ten years of practice to become an expert in a domain experts show functional anatomical differences when processing information in the domain or their expertise, related to different cognitive strategies, but not structural differences example: chess players chunk chess pieces into positions, expert memorizers show activity in hippocampal areas related to navigation when memorizing strings of digits (evidence that they’re using the method of loci) creativity is related to finding problems and defining them in a unique way, rather than solving them this kind of problem-finding often facilitates problem solution blind variation: blind exploration of alternatives without knowledge in advance of which will be fruitful, important facet of creative thinking, leads to serendipity through selective retention of those alternatives that turn out to be fruitful the process by which it occurs is unimportant too much education interferes with the working of this process and therefore inhibits creative potential, optimal level of education will vary between fields o creative potential: the ability to generate useful ideas creative people tend to have intrinsic rather than extrinsic motivations, work hard and are extremely motivated Price’s law: the idea that half of all contributions to a specific field will come from a number of people equal to the square root of the total number of people working in that field these people are thought to have greater creative potential hierarchy of responses: series of responses to a particular word or stimulus, progressing from most to least obvious, capacity to make use of responses lower in the hierarchy is important for originality alternate uses test: requires people to list possible uses for a given object, measures their progression in the hierarchy of responses and thereby their capacity to escape functional fixedness creative people are thought to have flat hierarchies, where those responses lower on the hierarchy are just as evident as those that are higher unclear if there are any salient differences between Einstein’s brain and normal peoples’ brain after the glial cell finding turned out to be misleading Chapter 14 important to balance methodology with focus on the practical problem of interest in psychological research we base our analysis of gravity on visual cues, important for pilots to be informed whether they were upside down because they’d have no way of knowing just by looking at the sky colors are a misleading way to represent a continuum, brightness is more effective study showed that people think articles with brain images are more credible and make more sense than those with bar graphs, important for psychologists and neuroscientists to know and vary the representation of their research accordingly field studies of driving have to take place in a closed course if the driver is going to be impaired, which is more unnatural than simulated driving tasks drivers using handheld phones drove more slowly than normal, whereas those using handless phones drove more quickly than normal possible explanation: holding the phone reminded the driver that they were impaired reaction time studies showed that talking on the phone slowed reaction time regardless of phone type simulated driving studies showed that phone users had more accidents, more variable following distance, and slower reaction time, regardless of phone type analysis of hospital records showed the phone users had a four times greater likelihood of getting in an accident, which is the same as that of legally drunk drivers although they didn’t show trouble in lane maintenance as drunk drivers did, people did shoe this impairment if texting texting impairs driving in terms of split attention as much as does cellphone use, and has the added effect of causing the driver to look away from the road we can train to reduce switch costs of splitting attention, but our performance will never reach 100% on either task knowledge of cognitive processes allows us to identify where our errors come from activation-trigger-schema theory: the theory that certain situations trigger certain schemas, and that multiple schemas can be triggered at the same time, leaving us open to the possibility to incorrectly apply a schema and therefore make an error we’re bad at remembering to do a postponed task when we’re actively engaged in another, necessary to keep that postponed task in awareness for it not to be overridden by habitual responses mode errors: errors that would be fine for a certain situation, but not the current situation (e.g. taking out keys to get on the subway) description errors: errors resulting from an insufficient understanding of the situation (e.g. pouring orange juice into a coffee cup) capture errors: following the actions of an overlearned sequence rather than the action demanded by the current situation/one’s intentions anticipation errors: responses that occur earlier in the sequence than they should ergonomics: study of people and their working environment user interface: the relationship between a person and a device necessary to carry out a task the fact that calculators and telephones have different keypad layouts because each is more efficient for the task, but that the use of one doesn’t interfere with the other shows that different contexts allow for different solutions to co-exist without interfering affordances: the possible functions of an object, a successfully designed object will afford actions that are appropriate and not those that are inappropriate statistical graphics: field concerned with presenting visual data in a way that’s clear and causes the viewer to draw the correct inferences population impact number: the number of people in the population that will be positively affected by an intervention often not provided by health authorities because it reveals that the risk of refusing a medical procedure are less than what other statistics might suggest information foraging: the search for information analogous to the search for food, successful foraging provides the most information for the smallest among of effort information scent: imperfect clues used by the information forager to find the sought-after information information diet: creating a pool of a large sample of information and then retaining only those that are relevant modularity: the representation of the chunks into which a process can be decomposed if a task can’t be decomposed into chunks and its completion has to be carried out in an all-or-none fashion, then it will be much harder to complete while consistency is important for a good user interface, as it grows more complicated, a certain degree of inconsistency is also valuable in order to not lead to rampant featurism and allow the interface to be adapted to specific user needs rampant featurism: the expansion of features beyond necessity spaced-out learning resulted in the best performance on tests as long as the learning reaches completion perhaps due to the fact that learning over time allows for more experiences of one’s failures and therefore more opportunities to work further on those areas to improve systematic learning is faster, but random practice results in better performance in the long run periodic feedback, rather than immediate feedback, better imitates realworld situations and allows for more effective learning foresight bias: fallacious belief that one will be able to recall an answer later when one’s in the presence of the answer judgments of learning: believing that you’ve learned something better than you have, related to foresight bias region of proximal learning: theory that people will choose to work on material of moderate difficulty, will move up in difficulty as expertise increases and the region of proximal learning moves Social cognition impact factor: number of times a journal article’s been cited readability index: how easy it is to read review article: summary of the literature on a topic, peer reviewed adolphs: processes of behavior in response to individuals of the same species, specifically higher level processes seen in highly social animals, like primates having social skills is adaptive not only for cooperation, but for coercion and manipulation social brain/Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis: higher proportion of cortical matter to the rest of the brain is correlated with and a consequence of the complexity of the social structure of a species temporal cortex is important for the higher-level processing of visual stimuli (e.g. fusiform face area) amygdala may play a role in preferentially processing all kinds of social stimuli, not just threatening stimuli, and in tagging that information that merits further inspection patients with amygdala lesions don’t look at eyes and have trouble identifying fearful expressions, perhaps due to a problem with marking the eyes in fearful expressions as stimuli meriting further inspection patients with amygdala damage judge fearful or aggressive faces to be more trustworthy than controls failure to interpret animacy in humans, we also have alternate methods to process information, impairment of social functioning in monkeys with bilateral amygdala damage is greater than that in humans damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex results in a fundamental incapacity to incorporate social knowledge into behavior Iowa gambler’s task: patients don’t show autonomic changes seen in controls, and an incapacity to convert emotional hunches into useful behavior (i.e. avoiding the bad deck) Wason card sorting task: showed greater impairment in reasoning for social version of the task, and lesser impairment than controls for the standard version right somatosensory damage can impair ability to attribute mental states to others, important aspect of theory of mind probably has to do with damage to the mirror neuron system o activation of mirror neurons depends on there being an interaction between the effector and an object (no activation if there’s no object) thought that we might understand other peoples’ emotional states by recreating their facial expressions in our minds monkey “pay per view” experiment: monkeys would “pay” more to see “monkey porn” and the faces of high-status monkeys, but had to be “paid” more to look at images of low-status monkeys 2/13/2012 3:24:00 PM 2/13/2012 3:24:00 PM