* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Mendel_APP
Genetically modified organism containment and escape wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Level 3-8 (AF 1.3) Gregor Mendel and his obsession with pea plants! Who was Gregor Mendel? Gregor Mendel was born in 1822. He was the son of a poor farmer. In order for him to get an education he joined the church and became a Monk. While at the monastery, Mendel became interested in mathematics and biology and began to teach biology at the university. However, Mendel found teaching the ideas of inheritance very difficult. He had to teach his students a theory called ‘The Blending Theory’. This was the idea that offspring were a perfect blend of both parents. However, he began to realise that the blending theory was flawed as it could not explain how a black sheep could be born from two white parents and how a blue eyed child could be born from parents with brown eyes. He set out to find out what caused inheritance. What did he set out to find out? The flaws that Mendel could see in the blending theory made him determined to investigate what caused inheritance. He needed a living thing that was easy to reproduce and to count. This was when his attention turned to peas! He could cross pollinate different strains of pea plants and count the characteristics seen in the offspring produced. His experiments could be easily reproducible by others. Surely no-one could argue with the findings? His experiments Mendel carried out many breeding experiments with peas. He bred pure strains of peas together. In one of his experiments, he bred round pea plants with wrinkled pea plants. He found that all the offspring were round! Mendel then bred the offspring together. He found that exactly ¾ of the offspring were round and a ¼ were wrinkly. This demonstrated that round peas were more common than wrinkled peas in the offspring. However, it also showed that the information for a wrinkled pea seemed to be passed on even when the parents were not wrinkled themselves. This characteristic was seen in later generations. Mendel suggested that characteristics were passed on from parents to offspring in ‘inherent material’ and that some codes of this inherent material were stronger than others i.e. more dominant. The weaker genes are said to be recessive and two recessive genes are needed for a recessive characteristic to be seen. This is why only ¼ of the second generation peas were wrinkly. They inherited two recessive genes coding for a wrinkly surface. In previous lessons, you have seen how you can use genetic crosses to work out the chances of the offspring having a certain characteristic. Below is a genetic cross showing the two genes of each parent from the second generation of plants. It shows that 25% of the offspring would be wrinkly, while 75% will be smooth. This is exactly what Mendel’s experiments found out. Parent’s genes w S w ww Sw S Sw SS Reasons why no one believed him Mendel’s ideas were flatly rejected by the scientific community. He held a seminar explaining his experiments and the results to the scientific community. However, everyone left the seminar before it even ended. Here are some reasons why his ideas of inheritance were not believed People did not know what determined our characteristics as they did not know about chromosomes, genes or DNA. Mendel was lacking any evidence of what was actually being passed on from parents to offspring. The church was very strong and Mendel’s ideas were not readily accepted by the church. Mendel’s presented his findings in complicated mathematical ways which no one could understand and so they felt like they were in a complicated mathematics lesson rather than a seminar on what causes inheritance. Most of the scientific community believed in the blending theory. This was the idea that you were a blend of your parents. Scientists argued that peas were plants and were much simpler organisms than animals. For this reason, they said that inheritance in peas was unlikely to be anything like the mechanisms of inheritance in animals. What you need to do Complete the following on the sheet provided Level 3 What question was Mendel trying to answer when he carried out his experiment with pea plants? Using the information given, give two reasons why pea plants were a good living thing to use to answer this question Level 4 Mendel cross-pollinated one type of pea plant with another. Cross-pollination is the same as fertilisation in animals. In animals the sperm and egg join together to form a fertilised egg cell which then grows to form an embryo (unborn baby). 1. Use the information above about animal fertilisation and the labelled diagram of a flower from a pea plant to explain how Mendel cross-pollinated a smooth pea plant with a wrinkled pea plant to form a seed. You should use the following key words in this description: pollen, stigma, ovary, seed Level 5 1. A lot of people would say that Mendel’s thinking was creative. Suggest reasons why people may think that Mendel was a creative thinker. Use the information in the passage to help you with this! 2. What evidence did Mendel use to back up his theory of inheritance? Do you think this was strong or weak evidence and why? Level 6 In a much detail as you can suggest reasons why people now believe Mendel’s theory of inheritance to be true Level 7 1. In as much detail as possible, explain why the Blending theory is now widely rejected by the scientific community 2. In as much detail as possible, explain what advancements in technology and evidence have led to Mendel’s theory being widely accepted by the scientific community. Level 8 (application of knowledge) A scientist suggests that the birth of a child is triggered by a hormone released from the breasts in the last few months of pregnancy. In as much detail as you can explain how this theory would be accepted or rejected by the scientific community. Scaffolding to help them with this To do PowerPoint for teacher to go over the concepts for students with literacy issues Modify to allow access for less able as this is high level!!!!!!!!!!!!!!