* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1 - City of San Carlos
Telecommunications in India wikipedia , lookup
Cellular network wikipedia , lookup
History of smart antennas wikipedia , lookup
Service delivery platform wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications relay service wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications in China wikipedia , lookup
Western Electric wikipedia , lookup
British telephone socket wikipedia , lookup
GPO telephones wikipedia , lookup
United States Telephone Herald Company wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunication wikipedia , lookup
Telephone exchange wikipedia , lookup
PSTN network topology wikipedia , lookup
History of the telephone wikipedia , lookup
History of mobile phones wikipedia , lookup
Telekom Malaysia wikipedia , lookup
Telephone newspaper wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications in Russia wikipedia , lookup
Business telephone system wikipedia , lookup
Model 500 telephone wikipedia , lookup
Presents to the Telecommunications Technology Review and Assessment October 2005 CITY OF SAN CARLOS 1 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Page TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 II. Executive Summary 3 III. Objectives 3 IV. Evaluation Methodology 4 V. Current Telephone System Environment 4 VI. Call Accounting System 5 VII. Voice Processing System 5 VIII. Cabling 6 IX. IT and Voice Infrastructure 6 X. Traffic Analysis 6 XI. Overall Voice System Evaluation 6 XII. City of San Carlos Telephone User Needs Analysis Meetings 8 XIII. General Trends in PBX Technology 5 XIV. Telephone System Design Alternatives 10 XV. Local Trunking Issues 18 XVI. Summary and Conclusion 19 XVII. Requirements of New System Basic Design Configurations 20 XVIII. Recommendation 22 APPENDIX I Power over Ethernet (PoE) Whitepaper 23 Present Telephone System Environment Schematic Drawing Exhibit A City Wide Design – Option 1.) Schematic Drawing Exhibit B City Wide Design – Option 2.) Schematic Drawing Exhibit C City Wide Design – Option 3.) Schematic Drawing Exhibit D Telephone System Options Cash Flow Analysis Exhibit E CITY OF SAN CARLOS 2 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 I. Introduction The following report outlines the results of World Communications Group’s analysis of the strategic and economic telephone system upgrade alternatives available to the City of San Carlos. Also detailed is a description and evaluation of the current telephone service and related ancillary systems currently in service at the City. II. Executive Summary The City of San Carlos is currently supported by a re-furbished telephone system that was purchased in 1987, upgraded in 1992. It is approximately three (3) generations removed from today’s state of the art technology. The system is, and will continue to be, costly to maintain. Replacements parts have become scarce, which can seriously jeopardize the ability for the City to adequately service the calling public. Council directed at their May 9, 2005 that an action plan was to proceed that would replace the City's current telephone system and to present alternatives and detailed recommendations to improve communications capacity and capability, and enhance system flexibility. In this regard, the City has engaged World Communications Group to conduct a detailed study and evaluation. Consultant has performed the necessary tasks, which we believe will provide the information and guidance to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth by Council. Essentially, we have examined the current telephone and IT environment at each primary City facility, and interviewed a representative number of employees from all City Departments. In addition, we engaged in many personal meetings and telephone conferences with our existing telephone service providers, IT manufacturers and other vendors to gather research and information for this analysis. During our interviews with City staff, if became clear that there is a strong belief that the present system lacks the features necessary for today's work environment, and excellence of support by the current phone vendor. Very little happens in business or local government today that is not preceded or following by a telephone conversation. Therefore, is has become commonly recognized how important an easy-to-use and cost efficient telephone system is to the successful conduct of business in today’s fast-paced world. Consequently, getting the user community’s input early on in our evaluation proved to be extremely useful. Equally important is an organization’s ability to manage and maintain its telecommunications resources in-house. This generally allows for significant costs savings over outside vendorsupported services. The present City telephone system network does not currently provide that opportunity. Modern telephone systems, albeit a bit more technologically complex, inherently provide the tools to self-administer and maintain both telephone system hardware and software functionality. The result, in the long run, is lower cost of ownership. We have also reviewed the City's current telephone network architecture and costs, as well as a substantial sample of the miscellaneous monthly telephone billings. It is our belief that there are opportunities to reengineer the existing basic telephone trunking arrangements and reduce CITY OF SAN CARLOS 3 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 costs. It is our finding that the City's Emergency Operation Center must be addressed outside of the City's phone system to ensure that this system is available during a crisis situation. (please expand here). In our review it was determined that two locations needed handling outside of the project as well, due to their proximity, and their existing systems. Fire Station 16 was reviewed and found to be an adequate phone service, and will not be included within the project. Laureola Park was determined to be a location that needed special consideration. We are recommending that the old 1A2 type telephones be replaced with a new Electronic Telephone Key System due to the lack of connectivity to the city hall. However, both locations will continue to have telephone extension (and DID capability) from the new proposed City Hall phone system In terms of overall the telephone system, based on our findings, we have outlined, in this report, three (3) alternative telephone system upgrade designs. Five-year projected costs have also been detailed for each of these choices. Option 1. Traditional TDM Telephone Network - A traditional TDM (Time-DivisionMultiplexing) PBX can be described as a state-of-the-art digital switching system, which has been the front-running telephone system technology since the mid 1970’s. They have, over the years, become feature rich and are able to interface with Information Technology databases through a technique called Computer Telephony Integration. They support both analog and digital telephones, although the latter are usually proprietary to a particular vendor platform, (CTI). These systems have a long track record of very stable service with extremely reliable uptime. Configurations can economically scale and support, from about 30 to over, 40 thousand telephones. Option 2. Converged TDM/IP (also referred to as IP Hybrid) - This design is typically based on a LAN-connected call server supporting IP telephones and traditional circuitswitched (digital) port carrier equipment distributed across a LAN/WAN infrastructure. This requires a voice-ready packet-switched enterprise IT network. The converged design is optimal for organizations with distributed communications requirements across a campus environment and a balanced mix of TDM (analog, digital) and IP stations. However, if could be configured as all TDM or all IP, with the flexibility to mix-and-match as conditions dictate. Option 3. Client Server (also referred to as VOIP) - The Client Server PBX model is a 100% packet-switched design absent any circuit switching (digital) capability. Media Gateways are utilized to support trunks and analog telephones. This arrangement also requires a voice-ready packet-switched enterprise IT network and is optimal for organizations who plan to install a significant percentage of IP telephones and have limited analog station port requirements. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 4 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 We have prepared an RFP driven by the City Staff's Business Requirements, which allows freedom to the vendor community to design and propose their "best practice" phone solution for our City. It is also recommended that the following items also be pursued during the project: First and foremost we would strongly suggest consolidating all local and long distance telephone services under the SBC/CalNet program. A Phone Service Audit be completed to determine if all phone number that are being billed are in service and/or could be replaced by utilizing the new proposed telephone system. The EOC Phones be replaced as a separate project, concurrent with the new Phone system installation. By providing phone service directly from the local exchange carrier, independent of the new phone system, reliable uptime capability is assured in the event of a commercial power or main phone system failure. A Project Manager is hired for the implementation of the phone system with duties including the insurance of the phone number portability as well as overall re-engineering of the voice trunking network from our current service provider to the new service provider. III. Objectives The Objectives of the study was to find solutions which will enable the City to: a. Automate and improve voice communication capability, b. Increase productivity in communication tasks, c. Automate routine tasks, d. Reduce operating costs, e. Provide superior customer service to other departments and to the public, f. Provide the ability to access a wide range of voice communication services and technological advances as they become available. g. Meet with staff to determine existing shortcomings and/or perceived needs h. Consider probable telecommunications requirements for continuing service over the next 7 - 10 years i. Examine alternative system(s) designs; j. Recommend preferred system designs. IV. Evaluation Methodology The following methodology was used in conducting this evaluation: a. Several personal discussions and telephone conversations, and miscellaneous emails with members of City Information Technology management: Ms. Connie Dillard, Information Technology Manager and Mr. Todd Rovatti, Systems Analyst. b. Group meetings with City managers and staff of various City departments, c. A review of the City’ available telecommunications records and inventory. d. Telephone, FAX and email exchanges with miscellaneous City telephone service providers: Mr. Albert Gonzales, Senior Account Manager, SBC; Mr. Bill Wilde President, Mr. Roosevelt Matthews- Operations Manager, Creative Interconnect; Mr. Jim CITY OF SAN CARLOS 5 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Chase- Account Manager, Mr. Darin Kelly- Systems Engineer and Mr. Maz Zabaneh Territory Account Manager, Cisco Systems; Mitel Consultant Liaison Support Group as well as several miscellaneous telecom system vendors. e. A review of SBC Telephone billings and related records. f. Personal tours of all City facilities. g. A review of available Centigram/Mitel Networks (Voice Processing) technical data. V. Current Telephone System Environment The following telephone system network is currently providing all of the City’s voice communication services: 1. Main PBX-City Hall The telephone system currently in service at the City Main facility, 600 Elm Street, is a 2-cabinet Mitel Networks upgraded Mitel 200SX-Digital PBX system supported by Mitel 15 generic software. The system is configured as follows: Number of Cards Item Ports Equipped Working Spare 4 15 18 2 5 2 CO Trunk Digital Line Analog Line ONS (analog line) DID/Tie T-1 16 180 144 24 10 48 16 178 Unknown 12 10 48 0 2 Unknown 0 0 0 This system supports the following City facilitates via direct cable connectivity: Senior Center: 601 Chestnut Street Library: 610 Elm Street South County Fire Station 13, 525 Laurel Street Telephone Instruments There is a mix of approximately 180 digital telephones, and 150 analog port devices powered by the City Hall PBX. A RightFax fax server supports faxing to the desktop. There are no empty card slots available for expansion in this single Processor Cabinet /Port Cabinet arrangement 2. Remote Offices Telephone service to several remote locations is supported from the main PBX via Creative Interconnect leased T-1 connections. These T-1’s are arranged to support both voice and data to the remote locations. The specific telephone equipment at each remote site is as follows: Location Telephone Equipment Youth Center : 1001 Chestnut Mitel Networks SX200 ML (Lightware rel 17) PBX System Burton Park: 1017 Cedar Street This system supports both the Youth Center and the Burton Park Kiwanas building (connected via direct cable). It is configured for 24 digital and 12 analog station ports and the T1 to the Mitel PBX at City Hall. Corporation Yard: 1000 Bransten CITY OF SAN CARLOS Mitel Networks SX200 ML (Lightware rel 16) PBX System This system provides telephone service to all Corporation Yard 6 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 buildings and consists of 36 digital and 12 analog station ports, 6 CO analog trunk ports and the T-1 card which connects to City Hall Fire Station 16, 1280 Alameda De Las Pulgas Connected to City Hall PBX via SBC leased lines terminated on an Iwatsu Omega Key Telephone System. Laureola Park, 525 Old County Road Connected to City Hall PBX via SBC leased lines terminated on 1A2 key telephone instruments. VI. Call Accounting System The only Call accounting functionality is provided via Automatic Identification of Outward Dialing (AIOD) through the current network reseller Teltrex Management Corporation, dba Creative Interconnect Telemanagement of San Carlos California. This only provides outgoing call detail at the individual station level via Creative Interconnect monthly service billings. It does not support any in-house capability to produce detailed usage reports or traffic analysis. VII. Voice Processing System The current Voice Processing System supporting all City employees is a Mitel Networks, Mitel Mail Model 70 Release (6) with 18 Loop Start Ports and 55 hours of voice storage. One port is used for message waiting lights, and another provides outbound access for notification to pagers. The current telephone system vendor, Creative Interconnect, has advised that they are in the process of upgrading this system to release (7) software, but that the port count will be reduced to an unknown quantity. VIII. Cabling CAT5 wiring runs to all data and phone locations at most City locations, usually in a complement of 2 RJ45 and 2 RJ11 jack arrangements. Although there are no detailed cable records available, this should not be an issue or have any significant affect on the deployment of a new telephone system IX. IT and Voice Infrastructure 1. The City IT Infrastructure includes 9 sites. 2. The main site, City Hall, has pure Cisco Network equipment including Dual redundant Core 6505’s, 4006, and 3524XL switches. All of this equipment is connected via multi-mode fiber (MMF) running at 1GB. VLANS have been created for data and phone. 3. The Library is connected to the City hall with MMF and 100 pair copper, and has a 3524 XL Switch. 4. The Adult Community Center and Fire Station 13 are connected with single-mode fiber (SMF) and 100 pair copper, with similar switching gear. 5. The Corporation Yard carries phone over a T-1 Connection, and Data over an 802.11b wireless connection. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 7 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 6. The Laureola Park Building has off-premise extension (OPX) lines for phone and a wireless connection for data. 7. The Youth Center and Burton Park Buildings are connected by a T-1 for voice and wireless for data. 8. Fire Station 16 only has OPX lines for phone. 9. The City Network and application standards are pure Microsoft. We have a mix of Microsoft Windows Server 2000, and 2003. Our desktops are a mixture of Microsoft Windows 2000 and XP. The City currently run Exchange 2000 for email services, and a RightFax server for fax services. X. Traffic Analysis 1. The current Mitel telephone system network does not provide traffic statistics; therefore, we are unable to ascertain an exact grade of service on the voice network. No major complaints were expressed during our discussions with City employees that would suggest any problem with dialing station to station, receiving incoming calls from the public network, or placing external calls. 2. Similarly, the IT network is not currently monitored for throughput analysis, so statistics for data traffic cannot be determined at this time. XI. Overall Voice System Evaluation 1. Telephone Switching System Network Creative Interconnect, the company who continues to service and maintain the equipment, apparently originally installed the current Mitel PBX telephone system in 1992. At that time the system was reconditioned and was limited to only analog telephone support. The PBX was upgraded in 1994 to provide for digital telephone capability. The original Mitel SuperSwitch PBX was introduced in the early 1980’s and utilized analog “space-division” computer switching technology. The 200SX Digital version is a hardware and software upgrade that allows the system to support digital as well as analog telephone instruments. This retrofit of the original model became a very popular upgrade for Mitel in the early 1990’s. It is important to note that the current release of this product is now at Version 15. While it is possible to upgrade the existing system to a higher version of software release, we do not believe that it would be economically sound to do so. This system has served the City fairly well for a significant period if time, however by most industry standards it is well past the projected useful of life of this vintage of telephone switching systems. 2. Voice Processing System We do not believe that any further upgrades to this system would be justified. Also the storage capacity is rather limited. Today’s technology for voice storage is virtually unlimited and is, in many cases, based on the size of the system’s standard hard disk storage capacity. A 40 Gb, for example, would provide 8,000 to 10,000 hours of storage. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 8 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 XII. CITY OF SAN CARLOS Telephone User Needs Analysis Meetings 1. Following are the results of the citywide telephone user surveys conducted via group meetings and email replies. Participants from City departments were: NAME DEPARTMENT NAME DEPARTMENT Jennifer Moore Recreation Vicky Galea Recreation Janet Leus Recreation Tonya Booker Recreation Barry Weiss Recreation Kathy Giraud Recreation Anita Olsen HR/Recreation Andrea Greenberg HR Sherry Henderson HR Janet Beaugh HR Justin Anderson IT Jasmine Frost IT Jeff Maltbie City Manager Nekaya Nachmann City Manager Christine Boland City Clerk Darcie Connell Reception Carroll Woods Building Chris Valley Building Dorothy Dale Public Works Don Gilbert Public Works Paul Baker Public Works Laura Snideman Economic Dev. Laurie Cudworth Planning Liz Cullinan Planning Stephanie Bertollo-Davis Planning Kristina Woemer Planning Serena Nevarez Planning Mary Arnold Police Sandra Spagnoli Police Jenna McAlpin Police John Murphy Police Doug Eckles Police Marti Overton Police Donna Raffaelli Police Linda Navarro Finance Diane Stow Finance Beth Liu Finance Sandy Johnson Finance Mary Nakamura Finance Richard Averett Finance Rebecca Mendenhall Finance Marilyn Maytum Finance With respect to the perceived quality of telephone and voice processing service provided by the existing telecommunications network, a pattern of complaints or issues were expressed by a fair amount of the general population who participated in this study. Here are the City staff Business Requirements voiced during these meetings. Many of the features listed below are available within the current system as marked by * Ability to forward call to cell phones, pagers, More detailed “out of office” messaging More than three-way conference calling *Cordless headsets for hands-free conversations Call waiting and caller incoming I.D. on all phones Unblock caller ID on outbound calls Two or more greeting options - one standard and one for holidays, vacations, time away, etc. Direct lines for incoming calls (by employee name, department) “Mute” feature for conference calls CITY OF SAN CARLOS 9 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 *Program speed dial from desk *One-touch voice mail access More buttons on phone for access to features and to see who is on the phone *Dial out without lifting receiver (hot dial pad) *Call pickup groups Intercom through speakers on phone Different rings for internal and external calls Ability for incoming callers to dial out of voicemail to another extension at any time Incoming meet-me-conference capability Wireless phones for mobility Choice of different number of rings before going to voicemail Slow down (or speed up) voicemail messages Better Speakerphone Recording of phone calls Consistent types of phones throughout the City departments More extensions on phone Multiple voicemail boxes per person/extension Customized marketing messages played while on-hold Ability to answer your phone from other phones, outside your department Specific requests of Police Department Voicemail notification via cell phone Recording of all business calls Ability to dial back to outdoor telephones Expand Police overhead paging system Ability for polices officers (without phones) to be notified of voicemail messages on a monitor panel Specific requests of IT Department Administration and Management Cordless Phones that work throughout city hall. Network Monitoring Tool for voice, data. With full reporting features. Maintenance/Parts Contract with 2 to 4 hour on-site parts replacement. Interactive Voice Response Capable Integrated Messaging with Exchange/Outlook, allowing voice messages to stay on the Voicemail Server and are handled as pointers into the Exchange Server. Keep current city hall phone numbers 650-802-4XXX Trunk and T-1 monitoring and alarms In-House Administration and support; Training for all IT Staff on Moves, Adds, Changes, System Administration, Reporting. Call Accounting Package with full reporting features Parts Inventory Management Network, Hardware and IP Schema Assessment with Maintenance Plan and 5 year budget Auto Attendant for after-hours and before hours Client Software must be Microsoft W2K, XP and Vista Compliant Exchange 2000 + Compliant CITY OF SAN CARLOS 10 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Administrator’s ability to set up Global VM Distribution Lists At least music on hold, if not in-house marketing messages Full Documentation of the new hardware, wiring, system setup, trunks and phone numbers Today’s basic telephone switching systems (PBX’s) provide standard capabilities and additional features that would correct or otherwise satisfy nearly all of the comments or requests for enhancements discussed above. Any of these applications could be easily introduced into a new PBX platform based on the individual needs of each department or section. The basic designs of contemporary telephone systems all conform to international telephony standards to support these potential enhancements. The requested functionality that are advanced optional features can be incorporated in the Request for Proposal documents as additional items. XIII. General Trends in PBX Technology (Excerpted from The City of Sunnyvale “Telecommunications Policy” 2000/2001. “ … Rapid development of advanced telecommunications resources carries the promise of new economic prosperity, new tools for streamlining the delivery of both public and private services, and new opportunities to improve the quality of life of citizens. While cities can anticipate these benefits in the near future, local governments must be mindful of the impact of this emerging industry on them and on the citizens they serve.” In keeping with the foregoing observation, it is important to note that the global PBX industry is in the throes of revolutionary change. Driven by advances in technology and changing customer needs, its vendors have to find new direction – most commonly toward the realm traditionally inhabited by computer vendors. PBX vendors’ evolution will have to more closely mimic that of the computer world in order to compete, including heightened attention to service and support, the unbundling of architectures, intensive software development, and greater involvement in activities such as systems integration and IP Telephony. IP Telephony has already begun changing the face of the PBX industry. With more demand for integration between the computer and the telephone, telephony platforms are rapidly expanding into the data side of networks. The intelligence and processing power is clearly moving out of the PBX and towards a more distributed architecture based on PC’s and on-line servers. Although it is certain that, at this point, the PBX is better at real-time call processing than the data side, it is only a matter of time before the data world gains the experience and expertise needed to catch up. Some may say that they already have. This combined with the fact that the data folks are much better at bandwidth management and networking, means that the computer industry is posing a real threat to the PBX industry. However, the data side will first have to deal with the issue of reliability that PBX vendors have effectively addressed for many years through, among other things, redundancy. The bottom line, though, is that forward-thinking business and governmental enterprises should be prepared to view PBX systems in place today as a last generation platform. The transition from PBX to IP Telephony is not likely to evolve at a uniform pace; instead, we will see a gradual collaboration of PBX and data processing/IS vendors. PBX functionality will no longer be proprietary, but instead will be transformed into telephony-featured software, operating on industry-standard, computer based, and network platforms. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 11 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 The core architecture platform of PBX systems is undergoing an important transition from circuit-switched to packet-switched transmission and coding techniques. Time-division multiplexing (TDM), using Pulse Code Modulation (PCM), has been the primary digital transmission method used by PBX systems for the past quarter century, but the future of voice communications appears headed towards incorporation of the Internet Protocol (IP). During the past 3-5 years, almost every major PBX manufacturer has introduced platforms that incorporate IP into its system design, and for two primary functions: To support peripheral ports (desktop stations and/or trunk circuits) and for signaling/transmission links between distributed port equipment cabinets. Internet Telephony, along with technologies like Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), MPLS, video and audio compression and super-powered computers, will lead us to incredible advances in communication products. We will see high-quality video conferencing that will be affordable enough to be in everyone’s home. We will see a global communication network that will far surpass today’s telephone network Every day, the gap that exists between Internet Telephony and traditional communication routes grows smaller and smaller, internet gateway servers now provide a foundation for technologies to come. Manufacturers will continue toward the goal of unifying Internet Telephony with the traditional public phone system. Internet Telephony may not entirely replace the existing system, but will enhance it with better products, better features, better reliability and better performance, which gives real power to everyone. It is paramount that the City evaluate telecommunications system vendors who can not only provide today’s up-to-date technology, but who have already economically migrated into the inevitable world of IP technologies. XIV. Telephone System Design Alternatives Since the onset of this project, it has been our primary intention to remain mindful of the City’s concern for the overall level of service provided by its telecommunications facilities for both its staff and the citizens of San Carlos. In that effort, we have attempted to seek solutions, which could minimize the overall cost of attaining that goal. During the course of our review and interviews, several important observations were made. Specifically, that while there exists a small number of the City’s administrative staff that are satisfied with what they have, there are a substantial number who are either relegated to the use of out-dated “plain old telephone system” hardware or must live with less than full-featured voice-mail capability—or both. In truth, there can be inexpensive, stopgap measures, which might be recommended and implemented to alleviate some of these situations. But in light of the seriousness of the more obvious technological and end of lifecycle shortcomings of the current Mitel PBX network and ancillary hardware as outlined earlier in this report, our professional judgment has taken us on a different course. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 12 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Accordingly, World Communications Group offers to the City three (3) upgrade options to consider: Option 1. Traditional TDM Telephone Network Here we envision a single “master” PBX system at the Main Campus, 600 Elm Street (City Hall, Library, and Senior Center) which controls two (2) remote survivable nodes at: Site 2. The Corporation Yard Site 3. Burton Park / Youth Center 1000 Bransten Rd 1017 Cedar St./1001 Chestnut St. This design will ensure the uniformity and support of digital telephones, voicemail and call accounting at all three PBX locations and the remote sites that they support. Connectivity to the main site would be accomplished via leased T-1 circuits with either conventional or IP technology. The following locations would be served as remote OPX sites utilizing analog extensions on single line or electronic key system telephones in much the same way as they are now. Site 4. Laureola Park Site 5. Fire Station 16 525 Old County Rd 1280 Alameda De Las Pulgas Site 6, Fire Station 13, could be supported with either existing direct copper cable or fiber connections to digital phones or as a remote survivable node (in much the same way as Sites 2 & 3) incorporating T-1, conventional or IP connectivity with either copper, fiber, or leased line. Option 1 would provide the significant flexibility for system management and administration, since all sites are controlled from the main campus switch and voicemail system through a single database. Additionally all, or most, of the existing voice cabling infrastructure can be reused, as is. Backup trunks at each remote site could allow for placing emergency calls, in the unlikely event of a total T-1 outage. Connectivity back to the main switch to allow for station-tostation calls and voicemail access is also optionally possible during T-1 circuit failure through dialup trunks back to the main site. See Exhibit B Pros Cons Least expensive to install May not initially support IP Telephony Simply to engineer and design Diminished Vendor R&D policies Shortest Interval to deployment Requires CTI development for database access Largest compliment of standard features Digital telephones are vendor specific (proprietary) Proven reliability of technology Could utilize nearly all existing station wiring, as is Modifications to IT infrastructure not required Easy to Administer and Maintain Unlikely to require additional administrative and management staff CITY OF SAN CARLOS 13 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Estimated Purchase costs including, installation; sales taxes; general user, system administration and Attendant Console training; one-year full warranty and: o o o o o All PBX hardware, software and telephone instruments: 250 digital stations equipped 48 analog station ports Redundancy of call processing 2-PRI’s and 12 analog trunks for local access 2-T-1 for connectivity to remote survivable nodes Voicemail w/Integrated Messaging (200 users) Call Accounting and System Administration tools $185,000 25,000 15,000 Total $ 220,000 Since no IP Telephony is involved in this design, there would be no need to modify the existing IP infrastructure and all existing voice cabling would be reused, as is. Total expected costs for this alternative is $220,000. Option 2. Converged TDM/IP Often also referred to as IP Hybrid technology, these systems are generally based on a LAN-connected call server supporting both IP and/or traditional circuit switched (digital) endpoints (telephones) distributed over a LAN/WAN infrastructure and/or existing copper cabling. Analog station ports are supported via peripheral equipment modules or Media Gateways Here again, we envision a single “master” PBX system at the Main Campus, 600 Elm Street (City Hall, Library and Senior Center) which controls two (2) (or 3) remote survivable nodes at: Site 2. The Corporation Yard Site 3. Burton Park / Youth Center 1000 Bransten Rd 1017 Cedar St./1001 Chestnut St. These nodes could be configured to support any combination of digital and IP or analog telephones. This design will allow for and support the mix and match of digital telephones and IP telephones, voicemail and call accounting at all three PBX sites. Connectivity to the main site would be accomplished via leased T-1 circuits with either conventional or IP technology. However, where IP telephones are deployed, the City’s IT infrastructure must be verified for Quality of Service (QoS) on all appropriate data switches and routers, as well as Power over Ethernet (PoE) capability for each IP telephone instrument. Our investigation has revealed that the current model of IT switches employed at all City locations (Cisco Systems 3524XL) are specifically designed to support PoE for the majority of Cisco only IP telephones. This arrangement does not comply with the universally accepted PoE standard 802.3af. Consequently, we believe that the City must consider other methods of adhering to this standard. A fairly economical method of accomplishing this would be to retrofit the distributioncabling infrastructure with power options. See Appendix I – Power Over Ethernet Options. Additionally, those parts of the City’s IT infrastructure supported via (Ethernet standard 802.11) wireless technology would likely require complete reengineering and re-design in order to support IP telephony. This type of wireless infrastructure is not recommended for phone systems due to latency and Quality of Service (QoS) issues. Here, digital technology could be deployed at locations currently connected to the City’s wireless IP infrastructure. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 14 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Whenever, and wherever digital phones would be deployed the existing voice cabling system could be reused, such as in the case of Site 6, Fire Station 13. Site 4, Laureola Park, and Site 5, Fire Station 16 would be served as remote OPX sites utilizing analog extensions on single line or electronic key system telephones in much the same way as they are now. Site 4. Laureola Park 525 Old County Rd Site 5. Fire Station 16 1280 Alameda De Las Pulgas Site 6. Fire Station 13 525 Laurel In this configuration Site 6.could be supported via, either, existing direct copper cable or fiber optic connections to digital phones as a remote survivable node (in much the same way as Sites 2 & 3) incorporating T-1, conventional or IP connectivity with either copper, fiber, or leased line. Or, if IP phones are the choice for this location, as an extension of the City’s WAN infrastructure. See Exhibit C With this alternative, it is important to note that the look and feel of all telephones instruments would be universally designed and configured. This would ensure complete transparent to each user whether they are using digital or IP technology. Pros Cons Provide maximum flexibility of design Mixed inventory of IP and digital telesets Fairly easy to engineer and design IP Readiness Survey recommended Short Interval to deployment Requires CTI development for database access Large compliment of standard features Digital telephones are vendor specific (proprietary) Reliability and experience of Legacy vendors Could utilize a fair portion of existing station wiring Modifications to IT infrastructure could be minimized Costs of Moves/Adds greatly minimized Unlikely to require additional administrative and management staff Estimated Purchase costs including, installation; sales taxes; general user, system administration and Attendant Console training; one-year full warranty and : o o o o o All PBX hardware, software and telephone instruments: A combination of 250 digital and IP stations equipped 48 analog station ports Redundancy and/or failover of call processing functionality 2-PRI’s and 12 analog trunks for local access Possible 2- T-1’s for connectivity to remote survivable nodes Voicemail w/Integrated Messaging (200 users) Call Accounting and System Administration tools $200,000 25,000 15,000 Total $ 240,000 + CITY OF SAN CARLOS 15 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Costs for upgrading the current IT network to provide and/or ensuring Quality of Service (QoS) and Power over Ethernet (PoE) at those locations where IP phones are desired will vary based on final design. Our best estimates would be approximately $12,000.00 to conduct an IP readiness survey and approximately $15,000.00 to retrofit the cabling/switching infrastructure to support PoE. Total Estimated costs for this option are: $267,000. Option 3. Client Server, Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) is a peer-to-peer packetswitched design, absent of circuit switched (TDM bus) common equipment. Media gateways are deployed to support non-IP endpoints i.e. analog devices and trunks to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) This design requires a 100% QoS and PoE capable IT infrastructure to enable real-time voice communications. Here again, we envision a single “master” LAN based PBX system at the Main Campus, 600 Elm Street (City Hall, Library and Senior Center) which controls two (2) remote survivable nodes at: Site 2. The Corporation Yard Site 3. Burton Park / Youth Center 1000 Bransten Rd 1017 Cedar St./1001 Chestnut St. Connectivity to the main site would be accomplished via leased T-1 circuits utilizing a separate (voice only) or shared (IT and voice) WAN IP technology. Since all telephones are IP only, the City’s IT infrastructure must be modified to support Quality of Service (QoS) on all appropriate data switches and routers, as well as Power over Ethernet (PoE) capability for each IP telephone instrument. The exiting IT infrastructure, albeit very robust in many ways, is not currently capable of supporting this arrangement without the required power support inclusion. Our investigation has revealed that the current model of IT switches employed at all City locations (Cisco Systems 3524XL) are specifically designed to support PoE for the majority of Cisco only IP telephones. This arrangement does not comply with the universally accepted PoE standard 802.3af. Consequently, we believe that the City must consider other methods of adhering to this standard. A fairly economical method of accomplishing this would be to retrofit the distribution-cabling infrastructure with power options. See Appendix I – Power Over Ethernet Options. Additionally, those parts of the City’s IT infrastructure supported via (Ethernet standard 802.11) wireless technology would likely require complete reengineering and re-design in order to support IP telephony. As an alternative, a separate IT LAN infrastructure could be built to specifically support the IP Telephony requirements. Because wireless technology is currently deployed at these locations (Sites 2 & 3) for IT support, the separate LAN/WAN arrangement might a better choice for this design. The following locations would be served as remote OPX sites utilizing analog extensions on single line or electronic key system telephones in much the same way as they are now. Site 4. Laureola Park 525 Old County Rd Site 5. Fire Station 16 1280 Alameda De Las Pulgas Site 6. Fire Station 13 525 Laurel In this configuration Site 6.could be supported via an extension of the City Hall LAN using existing fiber optic cable connectivity or as a remote survivable node (in much the same way as Sites 2 & 3) incorporating T-1, IP WAN technology. See Exhibit D CITY OF SAN CARLOS 16 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Pros Cons Provides for a single network platform IP Readiness survey recommended Lesser cost of connectivity to remote sites May require significant modifications to IP Network Largely based on accepted TCP/IP standards Slightly higher deployment and maintenance costs Costs of Moves/Adds greatly minimized Requires precise engineering and design Adequate compliment of standard features More extensive training required of IT staff Can easily connect remotely via WWW access May require augmentation to IT staff Projected future extensive development of IP Telephony applications Will require third-party voicemail for “Integrated Messaging” Service outages affect both voice and IT functions A myriad of Security issues Estimated Purchase costs including, installation; sales taxes; general user, system administration and Attendant Console training; one-year full warranty and: All Call Processing hardware, software and telephone instruments: $ 215,000 o 250 IP stations equipped o 48 analog station ports o Redundancy and/or failover of call processing functionality o 2-PRI’s and 12 analog trunks for local access o Possible 2- T-1’s for IP networking to remote survivable nodes 3-rd Party Voicemail w/Integrated Messaging (200 users) 25,000 Call Accounting and System Admin 15,000 Total $ 255,000 + Since all telephones in this configuration would be strictly IP, costs for upgrading the current IT network to provide and/or ensure Quality of Service (QoS) and Power over Ethernet (PoE are estimated at: approximately $15,000.00 to conduct an IP readiness survey and approximately $20,000.00 to retrofit the cabling/switching infrastructure to support PoE. Re-engineering and/or replacements of the current wireless IT infrastructure is projected at $20,000.00: Total estimated costs for this option are: $310,000.00 With all of these alternatives, Options 1, 2 & 3, all features on all telephones, as well as all voicemail, call accounting and other ancillary applications are transparent to all users. With either of these designs, we strongly recommend that, at least, the main site PBX call processing functions be fully redundant to provide for maximum reliability. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 17 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 XV. Local Trunking Issues At present, the City is utilizing both SBC and Creative Interconnect to provide local dial tone for all incoming and outgoing telephone traffic. Some miscellaneous incoming PBX trunks as well as a myriad of business lines are being provided by SBC through the State of California CalNet contract. This is a very good program that allows tax-supported agencies to receive less-thanmarket rates for local and long distance telephone service. However, the majority of telephone lines connected to the City Hall PBX system are being provided by the current network Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC) Teltrex Management Corporation, dba Creative Interconnect Telemanagement of San Carlos California. The present majority of PBX trunking consists of T-1 connectivity and supports both local and long distance outbound calling as well as inbound calling to Direct In Dialing (DID) telephone number ranges 650-8002-4100 to 4499 and 650-486-7600 to 7699. We do not believe that the latter group is being used. It is our recommendation that the new proposed telephone system trunking be re-engineered for ISDN/PRI technology, consolidated and transitioned to SBC for all dialtone services. Utilizing the benefits of reduced rates and consolidated billing though CalNet will realize many benefits. Additionally, PRI will bring to the City the much desired and requested incoming Caller ID functionality. Current monthly charges from Creative Interconnect for all services relating to the PBX network averages approximately $5,850. Here is the detail of those charges: 1. Monthly service agreement for maintenance: $2,285 2. Monthly T-1, DID and local trunking costs: $1,015 3. Miscellaneous circuits and POTS lines $ 484 4. Monthly local and long distance usage charges: $2,066 Item 1., maintenance charges for the new proposed telephone system would not be applicable during the first year of service and should be reduced (depending on the chosen Option) to approximately $1300 to $1833 beginning in year 2. In terms of the local trunking and usage costs, in our Opinion, re-engineering the voice network, porting all of the telephone numbers and transferring the usage service to SBC/CalNet should reduce these costs by a minimum of 25%, or approximately $517. See Exhibit E for Cash Flow Analysis We have also conducted a cursory review of SBC/CalNet miscellaneous telephone billings, which are running approximately $ 4,000 per month. In order to determine the validity of these services and the potential of any additional savings, a thorough audit of all of the telephone numbers currently being billed should be undertaken. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 18 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 XVI. Summary and Conclusion Based upon the foregoing, it is the opinion of World Communications Group that the existing telephone and voicemail systems are providing only a minimum level of telephone service to City employees and the calling public. We believe that there are many efficiencies and opportunities to improve public and employee communications and satisfaction by replacing the existing PBX network. City certainly faces many of the challenges that leading organizations face today. This includes the need to do more—faster; to meet increasing community needs; to make higher quality decisions in shorter time frames; and to contain constantly rising costs. Consequently, we are recommending that the City strongly consider soliciting proposals from leading telephones system providers to replace the entire PBX and voicemail platforms currently in service. Costs for a complete new telephone system and network, for all existing City offices, will vary somewhat depending on which of the listed options are chosen. Lease purchase plans could spread these costs over 5 to 7 years. Here is a summary of the 3 Alternative designs which were outlined above: Option 1. Traditional TDM Telephone Network Based on several decades of experience, it can be said that this option would likely be the least costly and easiest to implement and manage. Digital telephone switching technology has been around since the mid 1970’s with hundreds of thousand of these systems still in service. Digital Telephone systems continue to be the choice of many organizations that find that this technology more than adequately fills their needs and objectives. However, many, if not all, of the major legacy telephone system manufacturers rarely ship and install these systems without the capability of being IP enabled. Circuit switched systems are capable of interfacing to IT/ IP networks; integrate with customer databases and generally support integration to MS Windows based ancillary voice applications. Many telephony applications, such as Voicemail with Integrated or Unified Messaging, Call Accounting systems, System Administration Inventory and traffic Management systems are often MS Windows based. Contact Center applications such as ACD, Workforce Management, Interactive Voice Response (IVR), will also be often connected to the LAN for desktop managed functions. You will find this technology supporting well over 500-600 standard features. Although the system would be interfaced to the City’s LAN/WAN infrastructure, the current voice cabling distribution system would, for the most part remain, as is. Option 2. Converged TDM/IP (Hybrid) This scenario would offer a significant amount of flexibility. It can support, both circuit switched and IP switching capability. It will accommodate the mix and match of digital, IP and analog telephones and can be designed and configured in any number of ways depending on the most sensible and cost effective connectivity and networking efficiency. This design architecture can, of course, be totally configured for IP, or totally configured for digital. Since these systems are the result of the legacy telephone system manufacturer’s engineering and design, fully featured generic software functionality packages have been carried over from traditional and very reliable TDM platforms. All of the capabilities for interfacing and integrating with IT/IP and database applications described in Option 1., would apply to this offering as well. Costs for this CITY OF SAN CARLOS 19 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 alternative will vary somewhat depending on how much IP Telephony is utilized, requiring modifications to the existing IP Infrastructure. Option 3. Client Server (VOIP) This alternative takes the giant leap into an all IP Telephony world. Because of the availability of today’s new convergence technology more and more organizations are planning to deploy voice traffic over existing data networks. With the Internet explosion and advanced PC applications that use more and more bandwidth, the data network volume has increased dramatically and is now the dominant bandwidth consumer. Although, for many years it has been possible to carve up bandwidth to accommodate both voice and data over a single network, different technologies still had to be deployed. However, it now appears to make sense to use the data network to transmit voice instead of the voice network to transmit data. It is often wise; however, to perform an IP telephony /VoIP network audit for each LAN/WAN segment prior to introducing IP Telephony traffic. Network engineering must provide for a worst-case scenario when deploying voice on an IP network. This technology appears to be gaining more and more steam, but many new lessons are being learned. Some common issues that need to be carefully addressed are: Power for IP Telephones (802.3af Power over Ethernet-PoE) See Appendix I Quality of Service (QoE) Network equipment must be capable of prioritizing voice traffic. Security issues that were nonexistent in circuit-switched systems Call processing redundancy and failover functionality between nodes to insure availability, reliability and maximum uptime Disaster recovery plan of action More in-house training requirements and the possibility of additions of support staff Substantial increase in UPS requirements Increase in commercial power requirements in cabling closets If these and other issues are considered and prepared for, this technology can surely provide a very high level of telephone service to its users. We expect that this solution will be a bit more costly to implement and maintain, depending on the level of reliability engineered into the overall design. XVII. Requirements of New System Basic Design Configurations Each of the suggested scenarios will provide a very efficient and uniform telephone system structure for all of the staff of the City. The basic design should include the following features, applications and functionality: Telephone system and call processing/integrated messaging requirements to support growth for a minimum of 400 users Redundancy Requirements Uniformity in the look and feel of all telephone instruments (display/speakerphone/headset options, etc) Higher end telephones for Senior Management, City Officials and power users Voicemail with Unified/Integrated Messaging options CITY OF SAN CARLOS 20 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Paging and hands-free intercom through telephone instruments Unlimited voicemail distribution lists Automated Attendant Conditional voicemail greetings (busy, don’t-answer, vacation, etc.) Call accounting, with account codes Caller ID 5-6 party Conference Retain existing DID numbering plan Standard feature packages will include these and a myriad of up to an additional 500 standard, system, station and attendant console features. Music-on-hold (requires ancillary third-party music or announcement equipment) Optional requirements not included in budget estimates may include: Wireless adjunct (Cordless telephone capability) o In order to cover the entire City Hall campus environment alone, we estimate that this would require a minimum of 30 indoor and outdoor wireless access points. Cost estimates could exceed $50,000- $60,000 for this option Cordless headsets – Available directly from headset manufacturers and telephone supply outlets. Contact Center (ACD, IVR) functionality o Specific applications and design would need to be clearly identified in order to obtain pricing for this option Recording of telephone and voicemail conversations o In order to record all incoming trunks, costs for this option could also exceed $50,000 depending on logging and retrial capabilities. Administrative and management features and tools Telephone and Voicemail System administration for adds, moves and changes. Traffic monitoring Trunk monitoring with alarm notification Inventory and cable management systems o Costs for this application will vary considerably and is not included in our budgetary cost estimates Network management and monitoring system o Costs for this application will vary considerably and is not included in our budgetary cost Advanced technical training o Requirements will vary considerably depending on final system architecture and design estimates Other optional features, which might be required or desired, that may come to light, can be included in the RFP documents as we continue along in this process. XVIII. Recommendation After carefully reviewing and analyzing all of the data gathered during this study, World Communications Group is recommending Option 2. Converged TDM/IP, as the most viable choice of providing new telephone system services for the City. While a pure Client Server CITY OF SAN CARLOS 21 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 design would provide many benefits, it will not allow the flexibility that we believe the City needs based on the current environment and budget. With the Converged TDM option, highly reliable and proven TDM circuit switched technology can be readily positioned at several City locations that otherwise would require the necessity of augmenting and/or modifying the exiting IT Infrastructure. On the other hand, IP endpoints (telephones) could be deployed wherever and whenever it would be economically sound to do so. Consequently, with this alternative, the City can take advantage of demonstrated, time-tested digital technology and still have the ability to strategically and systematically migrate to the inevitable world of IP Telephony and VoIP. We trust that this information will allow the City to develop a telecommunications upgrade strategy that will provide a very high quality of telephone service to both its citizens and employees. Obviously, any major changes in equipment, software or procedures require careful planning, implementation, user training and ongoing management. Finally, it is important to acknowledge the professional assistance and cooperation of Ms. Connie Dillard and her staff throughout course of this phase of the project. We sincerely appreciate their efforts and support on our behalf. World Communications Group will continue to be available to further assist the City in developing the City’s long-term telecommunications strategies and ultimately carrying out its goals and objectives. Respectfully submitted Peter G. Bologna WORLD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CITY OF SAN CARLOS 22 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 APPENDIX I -- Power Over Ethernet White Paper – 5/2004 Introduction and Motivation Power over Ethernet (PoE) is a revolutionary technology that extends the already ultra-broad functionality of Ethernet by supplying reliable DC power over the same Category 5/5e twisted-pair cable that currently carries Ethernet data. PoE, modeled after the technology used by the telecommunications industry to supply reliable power to telephones, enables lifeline quality power for IP telephones (VoIP) as well as many other low power Ethernet network devices like wireless access points (WAP) and security cameras as shown in Figure 1. PoE, or IEEE standard reference 802.3af, began the standardization process in 1999 to address the need to ensure interoperability among a growing number of proprietary methods of distributing DC power to network devices. Now that the standard has been passed, the ubiquitous Ethernet RJ-45 plug and outlet make up the first universal worldwide power connectors. Consequently, PoE equipment vendors are designing standards-based products that leverage the numerous advantages offered by PoE. These products include security access systems, battery chargers, vending and gaming machines, electric guitars and even electronic shavers. Constantly emerging applications using PoE are limited only by the ingenuity of the product designers. Figure 1. Typical PoE installation utilizing a powered patch panel midspan PSE to support common low power Ethernet devices. Network equipment investments are expected to provide functionality that support current and future productivity enhancements. Deploying a PoE network today offers the following advantages that will also support tomorrow’s innovations. • Lower cost. PoE eliminates the need for running both data and power wires to each network device. WAPs and security cameras can be installed without the additional expense of contracting an electrician to install AC outlets where deployed. PoE also helps protect IT investments as it is forward and backward compatible with other Ethernet protocols. Furthermore, PoE devices that are Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) manageable can be remotely monitored and controlled to efficiently manage or troubleshoot power consumption and/or failures. • More flexible. Network devices can be installed and re-located where performance is optimum and not tethered to an existing AC outlet. This is especially important for devices like WAPs, which may be installed in hard to reach places like the ceiling in order to achieve the broadest coverage. • More reliable. A SNMP manageable centralized power source enhances the protection against power overloads, outages, surges and spikes. When PoE is implemented, along with uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs) or battery backups, it allows enterprises to distribute power even when the AC electrical power is down. This enables them to replace conventional telephones with feature rich VoIP phones while retaining the lifeline reliability benefits. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 23 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 Due to all of these advantages, it is not hard to understand why PoE is generating so much interest and excitement among IT vendors and consumers. How PoE Works There are two basic components in a IEEE 802.3af compliant PoE network: a device that supplies power, known as the Power Sourcing Equipment (PSE) and a device that receives and utilizes the power, known as the Powered Device (PD). Upon connection of any network device to a PSE, the PSE must first determine or “discover” if the device is a PD or not. This ensures that existing Ethernet equipment, that may not be PoE compliant, is not forwarded power and possibly damaged. The PSE does this by applying two small current-limited voltage signals across the cable and checks for the presence of a characteristic resistance; power is provided only if this specified resistance is detected. As an optional extension to the discovery process, a PD may also classify how much power it will require from the PSE. This feature supports the PSE by helping it supply power in an efficient way. After the PSE has discovered a PD, it will supply 48 V and a maximum current of 350 mA. Accounting for the voltage drop due to the cable losses, a minimum of about 13 W is available to the PD. This is enough power for numerous applications including VoIP telephones, WAPs, security cameras and building access systems. IEEE 802.3af is not targeted to support desktop computers, servers or printers. Once the PSE begins to provide power, it continuously monitors the PD current draw. Once the PD current consumption drops below a minimum value, for example when the device is unplugged, the PSE discontinues supplying power and the discovery process begins again. The standard defines two different types of PSEs: endspan and midspan. An endspan PSE integrates the power sourcing functionality with a network switch. Endspans available today look and function exactly the same as any other Ethernet switch, except they can provide PoE in addition to routing data. Since Ethernet data pairs use transformers coupled at each end of the link, DC power can easily be added to the center tap of the transformer without disrupting the data. In this mode of operation, an endspan injects both power and data on pin-pairs 3 and 6 and pin-pairs 1 and 2. A midspan PSE fits in between the switch and the PD. It supplies power over the unused cable pin-pairs 4 and 5 and pin-pairs 7 and 8; data is routed through the midspan device without modification as shown in Figure 2. These devices are usually mounted adjacent to the Ethernet switch in an equipment rack. It is important to note that although the PSE must use the pin-pairs assigned to an endspan or midspan, not both, the PD must have the capability to accept power from both an endspan or a midspan. Figure 2. A midspan PSE supplies power on the unused wire pairs and is typically a stand-alone device. Midspan devices offer the advantage of retaining the current investment in a switch that does not support PoE. Furthermore, since midspans are less expensive than endspans, midspans are the more cost-effective way of adding PoE on a port by port basis to an existing network. A single midspan may be used to support multiple switches with connections to PDs that require PoE. Currently, there are two different types of midspan devices: a power hub and a powered patch panel. A power hub has two RJ-45 outlets for each PoE port, an input and output, both of which are located on the front. A patch cord connects the switch port to the input of the hub and an additional patch cord connects the matching hub output to a patch panel and subsequently the PD. The other type of midspan, a powered patch panel, combines the functionality of a midspan device with a conventional patch panel. By using a powered patch panel midspan, such as the PANDUIT® DPoE™ Power Patch Panel, the switch connects directly to the PD CITY OF SAN CARLOS 24 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005 through the panel. A RJ-45 patch cord connects the switch to the front of the patch panel while the PD is connected to the back of the panel on the matching punchdown terminal. Power is added to the unused data pin-pairs within the patch panel. Using this simplified approach requires fewer ports, fewer patch cords and less rack space compared to power hub midspans as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. Comparison of implementation configurations for the two types of midspan PSEs: powered patch panel (left) verses power hub. Conclusion PoE is a rapidly emerging technology that is enabling the efficient deployment of reliable VoIP and wireless networking tools to increase the efficiency of communication across the enterprise. Furthermore, since PoE has significant cost savings, flexibility and reliability advantages over traditional AC power, it reduces the overall cost of network ownership. Although both endspan and midspan devices deliver PoE, the PANDUIT® DPoE™ Power Patch Panel midspan PSE offers the most efficient solution to upgrade the network with PoE enabled applications. CITY OF SAN CARLOS 25 Telecommunications Evaluation 2005