• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
The Low-Cal Database Environment
The Low-Cal Database Environment

... – Better multi-instance management – Scale the number of instances without scaling the management difficulty ...
www.olifantconsultancy.nl info@olifantconsultancy.nl Vacature
www.olifantconsultancy.nl [email protected] Vacature

... by application developers – forming a key bridge between Development and IS Operations in this respect. • Maintaining database security. • Ensuring compliance with database vendor license agreement. • Controlling and monitoring user access to the database. • Monitoring and optimizing the performance ...
Distributed database - GCG-42
Distributed database - GCG-42

... User/application does not need to know where data resides User/application does not need to know about duplication ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... bank tellers, users of the ATM machines, etc. ...
Transactions and Locks
Transactions and Locks

... starts up. – SQL server applies every committed transaction in log since last checkpoint to database file(s). – Any changes to log that are not committed are rolled back – See figure 14-2 ...
iOS/SQLite (Powerpoint)
iOS/SQLite (Powerpoint)

... • Flying Meat Database (FMDB) – FMDB is a set of Objective C wrappers for SQLite – let you program using embedded SQL – modeled after Java JDBC ...
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design

... obtained by a topological sorting of the graph. This is a linear order consistent with the partial order of the graph. For example, a serializability order for Schedule A would be T5  T1  T3  T2  T4 . ...
Document
Document

... has completed (i.e., the transfer of the $50 has taken place), the updates to the database by the transaction must persist even if there are software or hardware failures. ...
Singleton Pattern
Singleton Pattern

... static Database* DB instance attributes… static Database* getDB() instance methods… ...
Document
Document

... context of databases, a single logical operation on the data is called a transaction. For example, a transfer of ...
Database System Concepts, 6 th Ed
Database System Concepts, 6 th Ed

...  Such a situation is called a deadlock.  To handle a deadlock one of T3 or T4 must be rolled back and its locks released. ...
Read(B) - Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Indonesia
Read(B) - Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Indonesia

... User A places an exclusive lock on item 1001 User B places an exclusive lock on item 2002 User A attempts to place an exclusive lock on item 2002 User A placed into a wait state User B attempts to place an exclusive lock on item 1001 User B placed into a wait state This is called a deadlock. One tra ...
Induction slides
Induction slides

... Translate EER diagrams → SQL CREATE statements; SQL → relational algebra Analyse a relational database design using functional dependencies & perform transforms towards Boyce-Codd Normal Form ...
Rainhill HigH SCHOOL media arts college Year 9 Information
Rainhill HigH SCHOOL media arts college Year 9 Information

... INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HALF-TERM 3 This half term I will learn: The basic theory, creation and use of a single-table database and a simple relational database involving two tables in a one-to-many relationship. You will focus on understanding: ...
B - Homework Market
B - Homework Market

... • Increased throughput: can do different things simultaneously, so can do more things. • Interleaved processing: concurrent execution of processes interleaved in single CPU. Why? • When one process is doing I/O, the other can be accessing the database: better throughput. • Prevents one process from ...
Document
Document

...  Cascading roll-back is possible under two-phase locking. To avoid this, ...
Maintaining Global Integrity in Federated Relational Databases
Maintaining Global Integrity in Federated Relational Databases

... Referential Integrity Constraints: Employee in B can only be inserted, if it also exists in A Aggregated Constraints: Sum of salary of all employees less than certain value ...
Lecture 10 - cda college
Lecture 10 - cda college

... • Transaction log keeps track of all transactions that modify database • Concurrency control coordinates simultaneous execution of transactions • Scheduler establishes order in which concurrent transaction operations are executed • Lock guarantees unique access to a data item by transaction • Two ty ...
Topics in Database Administration
Topics in Database Administration

... Checkpoint: A DBMS software utility that periodically suspends all transaction processing and synchronizes files within the database. – Some databases, such as Oracle, do not actually halt processing. They simply write checkpoint information to files. – The purpose of a checkpoint is to minimize the ...
Course: Database Management Systems Credits: 3
Course: Database Management Systems Credits: 3

... allowing it to persist over long periods of time safely. ...
02010_PPT_ch10
02010_PPT_ch10

... • Lock guarantees unique access to a data item by transaction • Two types of locks: binary locks and shared/exclusive locks Database Systems, 8th Edition ...
Recovery
Recovery

... Recovery Technique for multidatabase transactions Two-phase commit, phase II 1. If all participants voted OK, then a commit is sent 2. If any participant votes NOT OK, then an abort is sent ...
1-Day | OnBase Database Health Check
1-Day | OnBase Database Health Check

... database  server  setup.  All  points  to  be  reviewed  are  based  on  Hyland  Software’s   recommendations  as  well  as  the  combine  years  of  experience  assisting  customers  with   optimizing  their  database  server  setup  for ...
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design

... avoid this, follow a modified protocol called strict two-phase locking. Here a transaction must hold all its exclusive locks till it commits/aborts.  Rigorous two-phase locking is even stricter: here all locks are ...
Welcome [mll.csie.ntu.edu.tw]
Welcome [mll.csie.ntu.edu.tw]

... • Suppose that you want to build an university database. It must store the following information: – Entities: Students, Professors, Classes, Classrooms – Relationships: Who teaches what? Who teaches where? Who teaches whom? ...
< 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report