• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CC 1 - CS-People by full name
CC 1 - CS-People by full name

... write(A) unlock(A) lock-X(A) read(A) write(A) unlock(A) lock-S(A) read(A) T2, T3 need to be rolled back because T1 failed ...
Record Locking
Record Locking

... – Client application will not proceed if locks cannot be obtained – Locks are not released until client application submits completed transaction ...
CS010 503: Database Management Systems
CS010 503: Database Management Systems

... Basic Concepts - Purpose of Database Systems- 3 Schema Architecture and Data Independence- Components of DBMS –Data Models, Schemas and Instances-Data Modeling using the Entity Relationship Model-Entity types, Relationship Types, Weak Entity Types . Module II (14 hours) Relational Model Concepts –Co ...
Database Engines on Multicores Scale
Database Engines on Multicores Scale

... The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides an overview of DBMS sub-components, their interactions and performance impact; Sections 3 and 4 present a practical performance study, and propose some modifications for improving their performance on a single machine multicores ...
Chapter 12
Chapter 12

... A crash recovery algorithm is correct if it guarantees that, after a system failure, the cached database will eventually, i.e., possibly after repeated failures and restarts, be equivalent (i.e., reducible) to a serial order of the committed transactions that coincides with the serialization order o ...
DB administration, Transactions
DB administration, Transactions

... transactions that run concurrently and generate results that are consistent with the results that would have occurred if they had run separately  Two-phased locking is one of the techniques used to achieve serializability ...
Kroenke-DBP-e10-PPT-Chapter09
Kroenke-DBP-e10-PPT-Chapter09

... results that are consistent with the results that would have occurred if they had run separately • Two-phased locking is one of the techniques used to achieve serializability ...
Incrementally Mining Frequent Itemsets in Update Distorted Databases
Incrementally Mining Frequent Itemsets in Update Distorted Databases

... entirely because of the memory constraints. Our approach seeks to solve the scalable problem through horizontally partitioning the transaction data set into subsets, which is composed of partial objects (transactions), then load them partition by partition. Through the method, each partition is disj ...
Transaction Management in .Net.doc
Transaction Management in .Net.doc

... unless all operations within the transactional unit complete successfully. By combining a set of related operations into a unit that either completely succeeds or completely fails, you can ensure data consistency, ensure orphan records are not created, simplify error recovery and make your applicati ...
Performance
Performance

... computes total salaries for all department at once (using group by)  Use stored procedures: avoids re-parsing and re-optimization of query ...
Advanced DB Tech
Advanced DB Tech

... Working experience of a relational database management system. ...
Spring 2002 Transaction Information Systems
Spring 2002 Transaction Information Systems

... – kill the transaction • Committed, after successful completion. ...
PPTX
PPTX

... So far, we have implicitly assumed that there is only one DB user who executes one SQL statement at a time. In reality, a DBS may have many concurrent users. Each user may issue a sequence of SQL statements that form a logical unit (transaction). The DBS is in charge of ordering the SQL statements f ...
Lecture12 - Distributed Databases
Lecture12 - Distributed Databases

... will be problems/limitations getting 2 different DBMS to work together (standards are emerging to make this easier)  when all DBMS in a distributed database are the same, we call it a homogeneous system as distinct from a heterogeneous system (refer to ...
DATABASE TRANSACTIONS
DATABASE TRANSACTIONS

... Serializing all transactions is prohibitively slow Definite benefits for allowing concurrent transactions: Different transactions may use completely separate resources, and would run very efficiently in parallel ¤ Long, slow transactions shouldn’t hold up short, fast transactions that read the same ...
Understanding Replication in Databases and Distributed Systems
Understanding Replication in Databases and Distributed Systems

... There is no atomic commitment phase ...
Chapter 20: Advanced Transaction Processing
Chapter 20: Advanced Transaction Processing

...  The tuple that is currently being processed by the iteration is locked in shared mode.  Any modified tuples are locked in exclusive mode until the transaction commits.  Used on heavily accessed relations as a means of ...
Database User Account - E-Learning
Database User Account - E-Learning

... melekat pada database yang akan diakses. • Didatabase yang lain antara akun/user dan database juga ada. • Hal ini karena setiap database dimungkinkan dapat diakses oleh user/akun yang berbeda. ...
Fundamentals of Database Systems
Fundamentals of Database Systems

... Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe ...
Access.T01
Access.T01

... • A collection of related tables is called a database, or a relational database • You connect the records in the separate tables through a common field • A primary key is a field, or a collection of fields, whose values uniquely identify each record in a table • When you include the primary key from ...
CS 122
CS 122

...  Understand Entity-Relationship (ER), relational, and object-oriented data models.  Design and implement complex databases schemas using ER diagrams, ER to relational conversion, and normalization. These course goals contribute to the success of Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) 4: Students will hav ...
Concurrency Control in Distributed Databases
Concurrency Control in Distributed Databases

...  However, in case only some replicas of a data item failed, it may be possible to continue transactions that had accessed data at a failed site (more on this later)  If replicated data items were at failed site, update system catalog to remove them from the list of replicas.  This should be rever ...
Failure and Recovery, Logging
Failure and Recovery, Logging

... Distributed DBMS Architecture Distributed Database Design Distributed Query Processing Distributed Transaction Management  Transaction Concepts and Models  Distributed Concurrency Control  Distributed Reliability Building Distributed Database Systems (RAID) Mobile Database Systems Privacy, Trust, ...
The Hobgoblin of Little Minds (Serializability)
The Hobgoblin of Little Minds (Serializability)

... transactions wrong in your system! ([do-it-yourself referential integrity] is almost always wrong).” Isolation Levels . . . and All That Jazz! Concurrency control duties put a heavy burden on any DBMS. For example, if a write transaction modifies a data item, it is advisable that other transactions ...
Document
Document

...  Thus, if we decide that a committed transaction was a mistake, then we must perform another transaction to reverse it.  On the other hand, an aborted transaction can be restarted later, and depending on the cause of failure, may successfully execute and commit at that time.  A DBMS has no way of ...
< 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report