• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Chapter 15: Concurrency Control
Chapter 15: Concurrency Control

... 2. Validation phase: Transaction Ti performs a ''validation test'' to determine if local variables can be written without violating serializability. 3. Write phase: If Ti is validated, the updates are applied to the database; otherwise, Ti is rolled back.  The three phases of concurrently executing ...
cos346day18
cos346day18

... results that are consistent with the results that would have occurred if they had run separately • Two-phased locking is one of the techniques used to achieve serializability ...
ppt
ppt

... 2. Validation phase: Transaction Ti performs a ''validation test'' to determine if local variables can be written without violating serializability. 3. Write phase: If Ti is validated, the updates are applied to the database; otherwise, Ti is rolled back. The three phases of concurrently executing t ...
mod-16
mod-16

... 2. Validation phase: Transaction Ti performs a ''validation test'' to determine if local variables can be written without violating serializability. 3. Write phase: If Ti is validated, the updates are applied to the database; otherwise, Ti is rolled back. The three phases of concurrently executing t ...
Database Change Management
Database Change Management

... Database schema changes and corresponding code changes must always be deployed together While deploying software to a production environment, code files and libraries may usually be deleted or overwritten – Database files, however, must be intelligently manipulated so as not destroy vital business d ...
Introduction to Database Systems
Introduction to Database Systems

... Concurrent access to many user Recover from crashes Security ...
Transaction Management and Concurrency Control
Transaction Management and Concurrency Control

... order of operations within which concurrent transactions are executed  Interleaves the execution of database operations to ensure serializability and isolation of transactions  To determine the appropriate order, the scheduler bases its actions on concurrency control algorithms such as locking and ...
Unix System Admin
Unix System Admin

... the restore history in the msdb database – which devices or files the backup is stored on, – Who performed the backup, – and at what time. ...
The Hobgoblin of Little Minds
The Hobgoblin of Little Minds

... In the serializable isolation level, transactions must execute in such a way that they appear to be executed one at a time (“serially”), rather than concurrently. […] In other words, concurrent transactions executing in serializable mode are only permitted to make database changes they could have ma ...
Distributed Databases
Distributed Databases

... share no physical component  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each ...
Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access

... Sets in mathematics are not ordered. So, even if a relation A's rows are reversely ordered, it is still the same relation. Thus, there is no such thing as "the 5th row" or the last row. In other words, there is no concept of positional addressing. ...
EF Code First with SQL CE and LocalDb
EF Code First with SQL CE and LocalDb

...  EF 4.0 included with .NET 4.0  fixed many bugs, added features like lazy loading (Linq to SQL)  EF 4.1 – online download, Package Manager  Adds Code First  EF 4.3.1 current version  EF 5.0 beta  Adding migration -> versioning of databases ...
dmsunit5ppt - SNGCE DIGITAL LIBRARY
dmsunit5ppt - SNGCE DIGITAL LIBRARY

... • If T2 had not yet committed ,we could deal with this problem by cascading the abort of T1 and also aborting T2.But T2 has already committed, so we cannot undo its actions. • A recoverable schedule is one in which transactions commit only after , all transactions whose changes they read commit. • ...
ASP Beginning
ASP Beginning

... – Can set up as part of GridView (like ObjectDataSource) – Can load separately from Data toolbox to create connection without specific visual tool ...
OLTP Through the Looking Glass, and What We Found There
OLTP Through the Looking Glass, and What We Found There

... All modern databases include extensive support for multi-threading, including a collection of transactional concurrency control protocols as well as extensive infiltration of their code with latching commands to support multiple threads accessing shared structures like buffer pools and index pages. ...
Chapter 15-17: Transaction Management
Chapter 15-17: Transaction Management

...  In this case it is unlikely that isolation can/should be guaranteed  E.g. Consider a transaction of booking a hotel and a flight  Without Isolation, Atomicity may be compromised  Consistency and Durability should be preserved  Usual solution for long-duration transaction is to define compensat ...
Company Database Name SQL Script
Company Database Name SQL Script

... Company Database Name: This script looks for multiple records where the Company.DatabaseName doesn’t have the same case (ex: SLDemoApp and SLDEMOAPP). Run this script against the system database. select c.DatabaseName, c.CpnyID from Company c left outer join sys.databases sd on c.DatabaseName COLLAT ...
Java Database Connectivity
Java Database Connectivity

... • Java can invoke CRUD operations using JDBC • JDBC is Java Database Connectivity and there are 4 types of drivers which form a bridge between java and a database • The Operations communicated by java will be translated in a form understood by the database by the drivers. ...
TRUNCATE TABLE
TRUNCATE TABLE

...  RECOVERY - Instructs the restore operation to rollback any uncommitted transactions - you cannot apply any more transaction logs  NORECOVERY - Instructs the restore operation to not roll back any uncommitted transactions - lets you apply more transaction logs  STAND BY - Leave database readonly ...
- TutorialsPoint
- TutorialsPoint

... JDBC MOCK TEST IV Q 1 - Which of the following is correct about Disconnected RowSet? A - A disconnected RowSet object is ad-hoc in nature. B - Whenever it requires retrieving data from the database, it establishes the connection and closes it upon finishing the required task. C - The data that is mo ...
Introduction to Database Systems
Introduction to Database Systems

... Concurrent access to many user Recover from crashes Security ...
TCSS 564 - DATABASE SYSTEMS INTERNALS SYLLABUS
TCSS 564 - DATABASE SYSTEMS INTERNALS SYLLABUS

... Guest lectures will be invited. If you have suggestions for guest lecturers you can email the instructor about them. Maintain a sense of decorum and respect for the guest speaker. They are providing a valuable volunteer service by giving us the benefit of their expertise. We can make their visit mea ...
Abnormal Normalization
Abnormal Normalization

... performance. However, for small and medium businesses, occurs when there are far normalization occurs when data duplication is to be too many JOINs avoided as business needs alter extensively over a period of time. Therefore, it is common to reach 3NF and its alternate form BCNF at the most and not ...
DATABASES - Computer Science
DATABASES - Computer Science

... We store each employee's Name, Ssn, Address, Salary, Sex, and Birth Date. An employee is ASSIGNED to one department but may WORK ON several projects, which are not necessarily CONTROLLED by the same department. We store the number of Hours per week that an employee works on each project. Each employ ...
Databases
Databases

... – Each field of a database table contains a single data value – Each record in a table contains the same fields ...
< 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report