• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Chapter 20: Database System Architectures
Chapter 20: Database System Architectures

... Distributed concurrency control (and deadlock detection) required ...
Grid Database Projects Paul Watson, Newcastle Norman Paton, Manchester
Grid Database Projects Paul Watson, Newcastle Norman Paton, Manchester

... Goldrush & Polar Parallel Database Server Projects ...
draft proposal for area services manager
draft proposal for area services manager

... Makes recommendations of how the Alms database or processes could be improved or where cost saving might be made ...
September 2014 report
September 2014 report

...  Permission to access is determined by referencing group membership to building.  Each unique logaccess monitors both success and denial based on an individual persons membership of a group. Hence :o Entity PIDCardReader – it would be useful to add an attribute say readertype or status. o The Rela ...
Chapter 4: Introduction to Transaction Processing Concepts and
Chapter 4: Introduction to Transaction Processing Concepts and

...  Come up with methods (protocols) to ensure serializability.  It’s not possible to determine when a schedule begins and when it ends. Hence, we reduce the problem of checking the whole schedule to checking only a committed project of the schedule (i.e. operations from only the committed transactio ...
Introduction to Transaction Processing Concepts and Theory
Introduction to Transaction Processing Concepts and Theory

... The updated item is accessed by another transaction before it is changed back to its original value. ...
(A) write_item (B)
(A) write_item (B)

... Recovery in multidatabase system  A multidatabase system is a special distributed database system where one node may be running relational database system under Unix, another may be running objectoriented system under window and so on.  In this execution scenario the transaction commits only when ...
IsolationLevels_-_UnderstandingTransactionTemperTantrums
IsolationLevels_-_UnderstandingTransactionTemperTantrums

...  Tempdb is affected by the version store  RCSI provides a snapshot view of the committed data when the statement started  This can be a problem in long running queries when comparisons need to be made on the data set, and an update to the data set occurs in another query ...
Distributed and Parallel Database Systems
Distributed and Parallel Database Systems

... 3. The distribution (including fragmentation and replication) of data across multiple site/processors is not visible to the users. This is called transparency. The distributed/parallel database technology extends the concept of data independence, which is a central notion of database management, to ...
Relational Databases - PersonalWebIWayanSW
Relational Databases - PersonalWebIWayanSW

... Data can be placed in many distributed databases. Databases can be found in the same or different computer systems. ...
Ch17: concurency control
Ch17: concurency control

... Each Xact must obtain a S (shared) lock on object before reading, and an X (exclusive) lock on object before writing. All locks held by a transaction are released when the transaction completes ...
Powerpoint slides - Dynamic Connectome Lab
Powerpoint slides - Dynamic Connectome Lab

...  nightly is common  The log is stored on a different disk to the database ...
ADM5 File
ADM5 File

... The updated item is accessed by another transaction before it is changed back to its original value. ...
lecture06
lecture06

... • Database systems are normally being accessed by many users or processes at the same time. – Both queries and modifications. • Unlike operating systems, which support interaction of processes, a DMBS needs to keep processes from troublesome interactions. ...
Fault-Tolerance in Real
Fault-Tolerance in Real

... Self-repair: If a node fails completely, data is copied from the complementary node to standby. This is also automatic and transparent. Limited failure effects ...
Competency 7.00 Database What is a Database? Advantages of a
Competency 7.00 Database What is a Database? Advantages of a

... •Determine the _______________________ of fields. Step 1−Plan and Design the Database ƒDetermine the ____________________ of the database file. ƒInclude all fields necessary to ensure efficient _____________________- and retrieving of specified data. ƒProject how the fields may be __________________ ...
Transaction Processing
Transaction Processing

... Suppose that transaction Ti tries to lock an item X but is not able to because X is locked by some other transaction Tj with a conflicting lock.  Wait-die: if TS(Ti)
Transaction Services - MicroStrategy Community
Transaction Services - MicroStrategy Community

... After you map the query and transaction objects and define the user interface in the document or dashboard, you need to enable users to submit their changes to the back end system. You do this by creating a new selector – an Action selector button or an Action Selector Link When you define the new a ...
Chapter 14: Concurrency Control
Chapter 14: Concurrency Control

...  A transaction is structured such that its writes are all performed at the end of its processing  All writes of a transaction form an atomic action; no transaction may execute while a transaction is being written  A transaction that aborts is restarted with a new timestamp ...
Overview of the Benefits and Costs of Integrating
Overview of the Benefits and Costs of Integrating

... by using countermeasures against the isolation anomalies. If there is no isolation and the atomicity property is implemented, the following isolation anomalies may occur [1 and 2].  The lost update anomaly is by definition a situation where a first transaction reads a record for update without usin ...
PGS99
PGS99

... Software replication is considered a cheap way to increase data availability when compared to hardware based techniques [16]. However, designing a replication scheme that provides synchronous replication (i.e., all copies are kept consistent) at good performance is still an active area of research b ...
Database System Concepts, 6 th Ed
Database System Concepts, 6 th Ed

... Durability requirement — once the user has been notified that the transaction has completed (i.e., the transfer of the $50 has taken place), the updates to the database by the transaction must persist even if there are software or hardware failures. ...
Chapter 16: Concurrency Control Lock-Based Protocols Lock
Chapter 16: Concurrency Control Lock-Based Protocols Lock

... TimestampTimestamp-Based Protocols ! Each transaction is issued a timestamp when it enters the system. If ...
Semantic Consistency in Information Exchange
Semantic Consistency in Information Exchange

... 1. Use two lists of transactions maintained by the system: the committed transactions since the last checkpoint and the active transactions. 2. Undo all the write_item operations of the active (uncommitted) transactions, using the UNDO procedure. The operations should be undone in the reverse of the ...
DBCache: Database Caching For Web Application Servers*
DBCache: Database Caching For Web Application Servers*

... shallow parser to detect their types. If the query is read-only and the currency setting allows reading stale data, the query is executed locally. In this case, if the query involves nicknames, then existing federated query processing takes over and distributed query plans are selected based on cost ...
< 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report