
Slides - My E-town
... than the fact that the kth element maintains some property to prove the k + 1st element has the same property Strong induction allows us to use the kth element, the k-1st, element, the k-2nd element, and so on This is usually most helpful when the subterms you are doing induction on are of ...
... than the fact that the kth element maintains some property to prove the k + 1st element has the same property Strong induction allows us to use the kth element, the k-1st, element, the k-2nd element, and so on This is usually most helpful when the subterms you are doing induction on are of ...
19 through 29
... In this section and in Section 6.3 we establish general properties of limits which are based on Definition 4.1.1. These properties are stated as theorems. Establishing theorems of this kind involves a major step forward in sophistication. Up to this point we have been trying to show that limits exis ...
... In this section and in Section 6.3 we establish general properties of limits which are based on Definition 4.1.1. These properties are stated as theorems. Establishing theorems of this kind involves a major step forward in sophistication. Up to this point we have been trying to show that limits exis ...
Proof Theory of Finite-valued Logics
... use boldface type to denote a logic (with its associated language) and its matrix. For instance, we use CL to refer to classical two-valued first order logic and Lm to refer to m-valued quantificational Lukasiewicz logic. The intended meaning of a truth function for a propositional connective is ana ...
... use boldface type to denote a logic (with its associated language) and its matrix. For instance, we use CL to refer to classical two-valued first order logic and Lm to refer to m-valued quantificational Lukasiewicz logic. The intended meaning of a truth function for a propositional connective is ana ...
Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans
... a single number, the Unit, (i.e. one). They treated the unit, which is a point without position, as a point, and a point as a unit having position. The unit was not originally considered a number, because a measure is not the things measured, but the measure of the One is the beginning of number.6 T ...
... a single number, the Unit, (i.e. one). They treated the unit, which is a point without position, as a point, and a point as a unit having position. The unit was not originally considered a number, because a measure is not the things measured, but the measure of the One is the beginning of number.6 T ...
MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION
... A word of caution is necessary here: No matter how many initial cases we check in a particular situation, a pattern that seems to emerge is not sufficient to draw conclusions. A proof must always follow our guess and failure to devise such a proof may indicate that our conjecture is, perhaps, wrong. ...
... A word of caution is necessary here: No matter how many initial cases we check in a particular situation, a pattern that seems to emerge is not sufficient to draw conclusions. A proof must always follow our guess and failure to devise such a proof may indicate that our conjecture is, perhaps, wrong. ...
0.1 Fractions Mod p and Wolstenholme`s theorem
... modp and the ideas used to solve A23, they will find that they are not so difflcult problems. In addition problem 4 of IMO 2005 was a lot easier if the contestant was used to fractions modp. This examples shows that this idea, despite the fact that it is very simple, allows to us to tackle some toug ...
... modp and the ideas used to solve A23, they will find that they are not so difflcult problems. In addition problem 4 of IMO 2005 was a lot easier if the contestant was used to fractions modp. This examples shows that this idea, despite the fact that it is very simple, allows to us to tackle some toug ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.