• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Section 1.1 Notes
Section 1.1 Notes

Section 4 Notes - University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Section 4 Notes - University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Beyond Quantifier-Free Interpolation in Extensions of Presburger
Beyond Quantifier-Free Interpolation in Extensions of Presburger

Inductive Reasoning is the process of arriving at a general
Inductive Reasoning is the process of arriving at a general

36(4)
36(4)

Polynomial Functions and End Behavior
Polynomial Functions and End Behavior

full text (.pdf)
full text (.pdf)

Full text
Full text

Chapter 4 Number theory - School of Mathematical and Computer
Chapter 4 Number theory - School of Mathematical and Computer

... not a prime. The only even prime is the number 2. The properties of primes have exercised a great fascination ever since they were first studied and continue to pose questions that mathematicians have yet to solve. There are no nice formulae to tell us what the nth prime is but there are still some ...
On the specification of sequent systems
On the specification of sequent systems

ON FIBONACCI POWERS
ON FIBONACCI POWERS

... number, then Fermat’s last theorem has a solution in Q( 5) satisfying certain side conditions [27]. From the other side, in 1992 Zhi-Hong Sun and Zhi-Wei Sun [28] showed that if p is a failing exponent in the first case of Fermat’s last theorem (xp + y p = z p with p 6 |xyz), then p must be Wall-Sun ...
simultaneous convergence of two sequences
simultaneous convergence of two sequences

Studying Sequent Systems via Non-deterministic Multiple
Studying Sequent Systems via Non-deterministic Multiple

The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near
The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near

A Conditional Logical Framework *
A Conditional Logical Framework *

9-27-2016 - Stanford University
9-27-2016 - Stanford University

Goldbach’s Pigeonhole
Goldbach’s Pigeonhole

Author`s preface
Author`s preface

... least element; let us denote it r. It holds that r ≥ 0 and the integer q = t exists such that the following holds 0 ≤ r = a − b · q =⇒ a = b · q + r. If we take r ≥ b, then we obtain 0 ≤ r − b = a − b · (q − 1) ∈ M. However, then r − b < r, which is in contradiction with the assumption that r is the ...
ON A VARIATION OF PERFECT NUMBERS Douglas E. Iannucci
ON A VARIATION OF PERFECT NUMBERS Douglas E. Iannucci

COUNTING PERRON NUMBERS BY ABSOLUTE VALUE 1
COUNTING PERRON NUMBERS BY ABSOLUTE VALUE 1

PRIME NUMBERS 1. Prime Divisors Theorem 1. If n > 1 is
PRIME NUMBERS 1. Prime Divisors Theorem 1. If n > 1 is

continued fraction method - McMaster Computing and Software
continued fraction method - McMaster Computing and Software

Satisfiability is Decidable for a Fragment of AMSO Logic on Infinite
Satisfiability is Decidable for a Fragment of AMSO Logic on Infinite

Modalities in the Realm of Questions: Axiomatizing Inquisitive
Modalities in the Realm of Questions: Axiomatizing Inquisitive

Lecture 1: Elements of Mathematical Logic
Lecture 1: Elements of Mathematical Logic

< 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report