
REVERSE MATHEMATICS, WELL-QUASI
... If Q is a countable quasi-order, then Pf (Q) is also countable and hence easy to manage in secondorder arithmetic. The spaces A(Pf[ (Q)), U(Pf[ (Q)), and U(Pf] (Q)) fit very nicely into Dorais’s framework of countable second-countable spaces in second-order arithmetic [Dor11], and so we consider the ...
... If Q is a countable quasi-order, then Pf (Q) is also countable and hence easy to manage in secondorder arithmetic. The spaces A(Pf[ (Q)), U(Pf[ (Q)), and U(Pf] (Q)) fit very nicely into Dorais’s framework of countable second-countable spaces in second-order arithmetic [Dor11], and so we consider the ...
1, N(3)
... hence that n ? P for all n e S 2 . Hence all of the numbers in S2 lie between P and N . The number of numbers in S2 is thus S Z I <_ N - P <_ P5/8 < N518 <_ (log t) 3/a = O (log t/log log t), where, in obtaining the second inequality, we again appeal to Ingham's result . This completes the proof of ...
... hence that n ? P for all n e S 2 . Hence all of the numbers in S2 lie between P and N . The number of numbers in S2 is thus S Z I <_ N - P <_ P5/8 < N518 <_ (log t) 3/a = O (log t/log log t), where, in obtaining the second inequality, we again appeal to Ingham's result . This completes the proof of ...
Permutations and Combinations
... Example 2.1. Find the number of ways to put the numbers 1, 2, . . . , 8 into the squares of 6-by-6 grid so that each square contains at most one number. There are 36 squares in the 6-by-6 grid. We label the squares by the numbers 1, 2, ..., 36 as follows: ...
... Example 2.1. Find the number of ways to put the numbers 1, 2, . . . , 8 into the squares of 6-by-6 grid so that each square contains at most one number. There are 36 squares in the 6-by-6 grid. We label the squares by the numbers 1, 2, ..., 36 as follows: ...
Chapter 2: Boolean Algebra and Logic Gates
... binary operation * on S if there exists an element e S with the property that e * x = x * e = x for every x S Example: The element 0 is an identity element with respect to the binary operator + on the set of integers I = {c, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3,c}, since x + 0 = 0 + x = x for f any x I The ...
... binary operation * on S if there exists an element e S with the property that e * x = x * e = x for every x S Example: The element 0 is an identity element with respect to the binary operator + on the set of integers I = {c, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3,c}, since x + 0 = 0 + x = x for f any x I The ...
Week 1: First Examples
... A mathematical statement that appears to be true but has not been proved is usually called a “conjecture.” The history of mathematics is full of very convincing conjectures that turned out to be false, along with those that turned out to be true (and many that have yet to be proved or disproved). Fo ...
... A mathematical statement that appears to be true but has not been proved is usually called a “conjecture.” The history of mathematics is full of very convincing conjectures that turned out to be false, along with those that turned out to be true (and many that have yet to be proved or disproved). Fo ...
Rational Approximations to n - American Mathematical Society
... An approximation 8 to 8 is used to generate ax, a2, • • ■ , a,_x; /?,_i> q¡-x; p¡ and q¡ for some i (odd integer). Equation (3.2) then yields \pi-.x(8)and &(0) to full accuracy. Next, a new pair \pa and \px is obtained from ^¡_i and &, by multiplying the latter pair by the least power of 10 sufficie ...
... An approximation 8 to 8 is used to generate ax, a2, • • ■ , a,_x; /?,_i> q¡-x; p¡ and q¡ for some i (odd integer). Equation (3.2) then yields \pi-.x(8)and &(0) to full accuracy. Next, a new pair \pa and \px is obtained from ^¡_i and &, by multiplying the latter pair by the least power of 10 sufficie ...
Section 2.1-2.2 Sample space (p.38)
... By theorem 2.1, n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 = (4)(4)(4)(4)(4) = 45 = 1024 possible ways. (b) In how many ways can a student check off one answer to each question and get all the answers wrong? sol) n1 = 3, n2 = 3, n3 = 3, n4 = 3, n5 = 3 By theorem 2.1, n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 = (3)(3)(3)(3)(3) = 35 = 243 possible ways. ...
... By theorem 2.1, n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 = (4)(4)(4)(4)(4) = 45 = 1024 possible ways. (b) In how many ways can a student check off one answer to each question and get all the answers wrong? sol) n1 = 3, n2 = 3, n3 = 3, n4 = 3, n5 = 3 By theorem 2.1, n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 = (3)(3)(3)(3)(3) = 35 = 243 possible ways. ...
PDF sample
... of talking about a chunk of mathematical knowledge that can be expressed in two or three sentences and that tells you something new. A proof is the logical argument we use to convince ourselves (and colleagues, students and readers) that this new knowledge is really correct. If you pick up a mathema ...
... of talking about a chunk of mathematical knowledge that can be expressed in two or three sentences and that tells you something new. A proof is the logical argument we use to convince ourselves (and colleagues, students and readers) that this new knowledge is really correct. If you pick up a mathema ...
Supervaluationism and Classical Logic
... somewhat surprising claim that there’s actually such an n (they claim we know the existential generalization ‘there is an n that such and such’ even if there is no particular n of which we know that such and such). Many philosophers, however, find this claim something too hard to swallow and take it ...
... somewhat surprising claim that there’s actually such an n (they claim we know the existential generalization ‘there is an n that such and such’ even if there is no particular n of which we know that such and such). Many philosophers, however, find this claim something too hard to swallow and take it ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.