• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
7.5 Descartes` Rule of Signs
7.5 Descartes` Rule of Signs

DOMINO TILINGS AND DETERMINANTS V. Aksenov and K. Kokhas
DOMINO TILINGS AND DETERMINANTS V. Aksenov and K. Kokhas

Chapter 6: The Deductive Characterization of Logic
Chapter 6: The Deductive Characterization of Logic

... Note carefully that we allow zero-place rules. A well-known example in elementary logic is the reflexivity rule for identity (given “nothing”, one is entitled to write down ‘τ = τ’ for any singular term). The existence of zero-place rules is critical if we are to have a non-trivial notion of proof, ...
.pdf
.pdf

(pdf)
(pdf)

Document
Document

math 55: homework #2 solutions - Harvard Mathematics Department
math 55: homework #2 solutions - Harvard Mathematics Department

... preceding 111111111 must have consisted entirely of alternating digits. In particular, there must have been some digit i which was a 1 — we will write this as our first digit, which is allowed because we can always rotate the ring of numbers (and hence the digits in our string). The string must then ...
SINGULAR CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM OF HALF
SINGULAR CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM OF HALF

Necessary Conditions For the Non-existence of Odd Perfect Numbers
Necessary Conditions For the Non-existence of Odd Perfect Numbers

... remains an open problem. For the entirety of this paper, let us assume that N is an odd perfect number, i.e. σ(N ) = 2N , where σ is the sum of divisors function. We will contradict this under a variety of conditions. We start with a result showing most odd cubes cannot be perfect numbers (see Theor ...
Optimal acceptors and optimal proof systems
Optimal acceptors and optimal proof systems

Here - Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of
Here - Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of

... answer, for the first time, a very nontrivial historical (and psychological) question, viz why the greatest mathematicians of the XIX-XX centuries, such as Kronecker, Poincare, Brouwer, and others, who categorically rejected Cantor's "Study on Transfinitum", could not prove mathematically the logica ...
Real Zeros
Real Zeros

Rational Root Theorem PPT 2013
Rational Root Theorem PPT 2013

Triple linking numbers, ambiguous Hopf invariants and - MAT-UnB
Triple linking numbers, ambiguous Hopf invariants and - MAT-UnB

Algebra 2, with Trig
Algebra 2, with Trig

Principle of Mathematical Induction
Principle of Mathematical Induction

Lecture 23
Lecture 23

NUMBER THEORY
NUMBER THEORY

On the Question of Absolute Undecidability
On the Question of Absolute Undecidability

Notes on Linear forms in Logarithms
Notes on Linear forms in Logarithms

SHANGHAI MATHS CURRICULUM PRIMARY MATHS GRADE 1
SHANGHAI MATHS CURRICULUM PRIMARY MATHS GRADE 1

... 1) Pythagoras theorem proof 2) Applying Pythagoras theorem 3) Solving problems using Pythagoras theorem 4) Solving problems using Pythagoras theorem 19.10 Calculating the distance between two points using Pythagoras theorem Unit 20: Linear Graphs ...
A Proof Theory for Generic Judgments
A Proof Theory for Generic Judgments

... The operational semantics of a computation system is often presented as inference rules or, equivalently, as logical theories. Specifications can be made more declarative and high-level if syntactic details concerning bound variables and substitutions are encoded directly into the logic using term-l ...
§1. Basic definitions Let IR be the set of all real numbers, while IR
§1. Basic definitions Let IR be the set of all real numbers, while IR

20 Pythagorean Theorem1
20 Pythagorean Theorem1

... If the sides of a triangle satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem, then the triangle is a right triangle. If the sides of a triangle do not satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem, then the triangle is not a right triangle. ...
Lecture 22 - Duke Computer Science
Lecture 22 - Duke Computer Science

< 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report