
Graphing Complex Numbers
... Polar Form of Complex Numbers If is an angle in standard position whose terminal side coincides with this line segment, then by the definitions of sine and cosine a = r cos ...
... Polar Form of Complex Numbers If is an angle in standard position whose terminal side coincides with this line segment, then by the definitions of sine and cosine a = r cos ...
On nonexistence of an integer regular polygon∗
... The problem of existence of an integer regular polygon is equivalent to the following: does there exist an integer regular polygon whose coordinates are natural, i.e. rational numbers. It is very important to note the following: if we consider a regular polygon with n sides, whereby n is not a prime ...
... The problem of existence of an integer regular polygon is equivalent to the following: does there exist an integer regular polygon whose coordinates are natural, i.e. rational numbers. It is very important to note the following: if we consider a regular polygon with n sides, whereby n is not a prime ...
THE FRACTIONAL PARTS OF THE BERNOULLI NUMBERS BY
... B 2k + Y 1/p is an integer, where the sum is taken over all primes p for which (p - 1) 2k . Several years ago one of us computed {B20) for 2 < 2k < 10000 and noted two curious irregularities in their distribution : (1) There were large gaps, e .g ., the interval [0 .167, 0 .315], which contained non ...
... B 2k + Y 1/p is an integer, where the sum is taken over all primes p for which (p - 1) 2k . Several years ago one of us computed {B20) for 2 < 2k < 10000 and noted two curious irregularities in their distribution : (1) There were large gaps, e .g ., the interval [0 .167, 0 .315], which contained non ...
F - Teaching-WIKI
... can automate the determination of logical entailment – Starting from a set of premises D, we enumerate conclusions from this set – If a sentence jappears, then it is provable from Dand is, therefore, a logical consequence – If the negation of jappears, then jis a logical consequence of Dand j ...
... can automate the determination of logical entailment – Starting from a set of premises D, we enumerate conclusions from this set – If a sentence jappears, then it is provable from Dand is, therefore, a logical consequence – If the negation of jappears, then jis a logical consequence of Dand j ...
lecture24 - Duke Computer Science
... This proves that there are at least a countable number of infinities The first infinity is called: ...
... This proves that there are at least a countable number of infinities The first infinity is called: ...
Full tex
... transcendental number (see [1], [4], [6] and the references cited therein). Surprisingly, in comparison, very little attention has been paid to finding such sufficiency conditions in the case of infinite products. One such sufficiency condition is attributable to Cantor (see [3]) however some genera ...
... transcendental number (see [1], [4], [6] and the references cited therein). Surprisingly, in comparison, very little attention has been paid to finding such sufficiency conditions in the case of infinite products. One such sufficiency condition is attributable to Cantor (see [3]) however some genera ...
Seed and Sieve of Odd Composite Numbers with
... limited although they might be of very long time. Secondly, Theorem 4 provides another new searching approach that find an m such that g(m,1) | (n (6m 2 10m 5)) or g( m,3) | (n (36m3 18m 2 3m)) . In the end, it can see that Theorem 5 provides a possible inquiry approach to find a divisor ...
... limited although they might be of very long time. Secondly, Theorem 4 provides another new searching approach that find an m such that g(m,1) | (n (6m 2 10m 5)) or g( m,3) | (n (36m3 18m 2 3m)) . In the end, it can see that Theorem 5 provides a possible inquiry approach to find a divisor ...
6.042J Chapter 4: Number theory
... Number theory is the study of the integers. Why anyone would want to study the integers is not immediately obvious. First of all, what’s to know? There’s 0, there’s 1, 2, 3, and so on, and, oh yeah, -1, -2, . . . . Which one don’t you understand? Second, what practical value is there in it? The math ...
... Number theory is the study of the integers. Why anyone would want to study the integers is not immediately obvious. First of all, what’s to know? There’s 0, there’s 1, 2, 3, and so on, and, oh yeah, -1, -2, . . . . Which one don’t you understand? Second, what practical value is there in it? The math ...
Logical Inference and Mathematical Proof
... Lemma: less important theorem used to prove other theorems. Corollary: theorem that trivially follows another theorem. ...
... Lemma: less important theorem used to prove other theorems. Corollary: theorem that trivially follows another theorem. ...
Number Theory Learning Module 2 — Prime Numbers and the
... 1. We wish to prove a proposition about integer numbers. 2. Assume that the proposition is false. 3. From this assumption, construct an infinite, strictly decreasing, sequence of positive integers. 4. Since this is an impossibility, we conclude that our initial assumption is incorrect. Thus, the pro ...
... 1. We wish to prove a proposition about integer numbers. 2. Assume that the proposition is false. 3. From this assumption, construct an infinite, strictly decreasing, sequence of positive integers. 4. Since this is an impossibility, we conclude that our initial assumption is incorrect. Thus, the pro ...
Full text
... With regard to this problem, Di Porto and Filipponi, in [4], conjectured that there are no even-Fibonacci pseudoprimes of the 1st kind, providing some constraints are placed on their existence, and Somer, in [12], extends these constraints by stating some very interesting theorems. Moreover, in [1], ...
... With regard to this problem, Di Porto and Filipponi, in [4], conjectured that there are no even-Fibonacci pseudoprimes of the 1st kind, providing some constraints are placed on their existence, and Somer, in [12], extends these constraints by stating some very interesting theorems. Moreover, in [1], ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.