
Integer Compositions, Gray Code, and the Fibonacci Sequence
... where Fn is the nth Fibonacci number [3]. This is known as Zeckendorf’s theorem, named after Belgian mathematician Edouard Zeckendorf. This finite sum (Equation 4.1) is called the Zeckendorf representation of N . Example 4.2. The Zeckendorf representation of 10 is: 10 = 8 + 2 = F6 + F3 . Example 4.3. ...
... where Fn is the nth Fibonacci number [3]. This is known as Zeckendorf’s theorem, named after Belgian mathematician Edouard Zeckendorf. This finite sum (Equation 4.1) is called the Zeckendorf representation of N . Example 4.2. The Zeckendorf representation of 10 is: 10 = 8 + 2 = F6 + F3 . Example 4.3. ...
REMARKS ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY 1. Algebraic varieties
... defines a hyperbola Hλ in R2 . The same equation defines complex hyperbola in C2 . For the sake of simplicity, let us denote the complex hyperbola also by the same symbol Hλ (but this may be a little bit confusing to use the same notation for real and complex objects). Is Hλ always a hyperbola? Almo ...
... defines a hyperbola Hλ in R2 . The same equation defines complex hyperbola in C2 . For the sake of simplicity, let us denote the complex hyperbola also by the same symbol Hλ (but this may be a little bit confusing to use the same notation for real and complex objects). Is Hλ always a hyperbola? Almo ...
Higher Order Logic - Theory and Logic Group
... others are omitted altogether, notably most uses of higher order constructs in mathematical practice, in recursion theory, and in computer science. Such choices of topics can not be independent of an author's interests and background. My hope is, though, that the chapter touches on the central issue ...
... others are omitted altogether, notably most uses of higher order constructs in mathematical practice, in recursion theory, and in computer science. Such choices of topics can not be independent of an author's interests and background. My hope is, though, that the chapter touches on the central issue ...
INFINITUDE OF ELLIPTIC CARMICHAEL NUMBERS
... elliptic Carmichael numbers. Both of these hypotheses are bounds on the least prime in arithmetic progressions and are weaker than the conjectured bound, recalled below. In addition, under the same hypotheses, we show more generally that any given coprime residue class (compatible with a technical c ...
... elliptic Carmichael numbers. Both of these hypotheses are bounds on the least prime in arithmetic progressions and are weaker than the conjectured bound, recalled below. In addition, under the same hypotheses, we show more generally that any given coprime residue class (compatible with a technical c ...
Introduction to analytic number theory
... no prime factors in common, and one of a or b is odd, the other even. Euclid also made an important contribution to another problem posed by the Pythagoreans-that of finding all perfect numbers. The number 6 was called a perfect number because 6 = 1 + 2 + 3, the sum of all its proper divisors (that ...
... no prime factors in common, and one of a or b is odd, the other even. Euclid also made an important contribution to another problem posed by the Pythagoreans-that of finding all perfect numbers. The number 6 was called a perfect number because 6 = 1 + 2 + 3, the sum of all its proper divisors (that ...
L. ALAOGLU AND P. ERDŐS Reprinted from the Vol. 56, No. 3, pp
... In comparing the magnitudes of \sigma(n) and \sigma(n') it is clear from the multiplicative property of o-(n) that one need only consider the behavior of those primes which divide the two numbers to different powers . The same is true for d(n) and \sigma(n)/n . We prove that the quotient of two cons ...
... In comparing the magnitudes of \sigma(n) and \sigma(n') it is clear from the multiplicative property of o-(n) that one need only consider the behavior of those primes which divide the two numbers to different powers . The same is true for d(n) and \sigma(n)/n . We prove that the quotient of two cons ...
Discrete Mathematics: Chapter 2, Predicate Logic
... SL is complete. The second way relates to SL’s expressive capabilities. The logical connectives of SL form a complete set of connectives: any sentence that can be formulated by means of truth-functional connectives, regardless of the number of sentences combined or the types of connectives employed, ...
... SL is complete. The second way relates to SL’s expressive capabilities. The logical connectives of SL form a complete set of connectives: any sentence that can be formulated by means of truth-functional connectives, regardless of the number of sentences combined or the types of connectives employed, ...
New finding of number theory By Liu Ran Contents 1
... If the distance from infinite becomes more and more small, when d(n) = ( ¥ - n) < e , e is smaller than any number, it means it can be smaller than 1. If e <1, then ( ¥ - n) < e <1, Þ n+1 > ¥ , Þ natural number n+1 has exceeded infinite. So supposition is false and natural number is finite. 6. Prime ...
... If the distance from infinite becomes more and more small, when d(n) = ( ¥ - n) < e , e is smaller than any number, it means it can be smaller than 1. If e <1, then ( ¥ - n) < e <1, Þ n+1 > ¥ , Þ natural number n+1 has exceeded infinite. So supposition is false and natural number is finite. 6. Prime ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.