
Let m be a positive integer. Show that a mod m = b mod m if a ≡ b
... be congruent to a different number form 1 to p − 1. Therefore if we multiply them all together, we will obtain the same product, modulo p, as if we had multiplied all the numbers from 1 to p − 1. In symbols, eccgroupecca · 2a · 3a · · · (p − 1)a ≡ 1 · 2 · 3 · · · (p − 1) (mod p). The left-hand side ...
... be congruent to a different number form 1 to p − 1. Therefore if we multiply them all together, we will obtain the same product, modulo p, as if we had multiplied all the numbers from 1 to p − 1. In symbols, eccgroupecca · 2a · 3a · · · (p − 1)a ≡ 1 · 2 · 3 · · · (p − 1) (mod p). The left-hand side ...
BPS states of curves in Calabi–Yau 3–folds
... in the case where there are non-reduced curves in the family M is not well c → M over a point corresponding to a non-reduced understood. The fiber of M curve may involve higher rank bundles on the reduction of the curve. It has been recently suggested by Hosono, Saito, and Takahashi [11] that the sl ...
... in the case where there are non-reduced curves in the family M is not well c → M over a point corresponding to a non-reduced understood. The fiber of M curve may involve higher rank bundles on the reduction of the curve. It has been recently suggested by Hosono, Saito, and Takahashi [11] that the sl ...
Here
... But calculate it anyway, as it shows that these methods work for extreme cases.) (Ans: 12:00) It has been called to my attention by my cousin Dan (who also provided the clock diagrams) that the results of coincidence problems can be expressed much more simply and elegantly in terms of hours alone. T ...
... But calculate it anyway, as it shows that these methods work for extreme cases.) (Ans: 12:00) It has been called to my attention by my cousin Dan (who also provided the clock diagrams) that the results of coincidence problems can be expressed much more simply and elegantly in terms of hours alone. T ...
On the Sum of Corresponding Factorials and Triangular Numbers
... 362925,…} is a result of the addition of corresponding factorials and triangular numbers. This is sequence A101292 in [1]. In this study, these integers are named factoriangular numbers. Related to these numbers are the runsums, trapezoidal and polite numbers. Knott [2] defines a runsum as a sum of ...
... 362925,…} is a result of the addition of corresponding factorials and triangular numbers. This is sequence A101292 in [1]. In this study, these integers are named factoriangular numbers. Related to these numbers are the runsums, trapezoidal and polite numbers. Knott [2] defines a runsum as a sum of ...
Searching for Large Elite Primes
... that their number is finite. For further open problems on Fermat numbers see Richard Guy’s famous book [Guy 04]. We call a prime number p elite if there is an integer index m for which all Fn with n > m are quadratic nonresidues modulo p, i.e., there is no solution to the congruence x2 ≡ Fn mod p for ...
... that their number is finite. For further open problems on Fermat numbers see Richard Guy’s famous book [Guy 04]. We call a prime number p elite if there is an integer index m for which all Fn with n > m are quadratic nonresidues modulo p, i.e., there is no solution to the congruence x2 ≡ Fn mod p for ...
on unramified galois extensions of real quadratic
... K Q(χ/p) is a strictly unramified 55-extension of L. These statements easily follow from the genus theory and Galois theory. The infiniteness follows from that of such prime numbers p. 3. Notes and examples It is natural to expect that there exist infinitely many real quadratic number fields each ha ...
... K Q(χ/p) is a strictly unramified 55-extension of L. These statements easily follow from the genus theory and Galois theory. The infiniteness follows from that of such prime numbers p. 3. Notes and examples It is natural to expect that there exist infinitely many real quadratic number fields each ha ...
A BOUND FOR DICKSON`S LEMMA 1. Introduction Consider the
... We start with a finite pigeonhole principle, in two disjunctive forms. The (rather trivial) proofs are carried out because they have computational content which will influence the term extracted from a formalization of our proofs in Section 3. Lemma 2.1 (FPHDisj). ∀m,f (∃i
... We start with a finite pigeonhole principle, in two disjunctive forms. The (rather trivial) proofs are carried out because they have computational content which will influence the term extracted from a formalization of our proofs in Section 3. Lemma 2.1 (FPHDisj). ∀m,f (∃i
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.