
Foundations of Cryptography
... Primitive roots modulo p ∈ P Theorem 3.9 An integer n > 1 is a prime if and only if there exists an integer x such that x n−1 ≡ 1 (mod n) and for all prime factors q of n − 1 we have x (n−1)/q 6≡ 1 (mod n). Remark Previous theorem can be used for primality testing. Although it is difficult to find ...
... Primitive roots modulo p ∈ P Theorem 3.9 An integer n > 1 is a prime if and only if there exists an integer x such that x n−1 ≡ 1 (mod n) and for all prime factors q of n − 1 we have x (n−1)/q 6≡ 1 (mod n). Remark Previous theorem can be used for primality testing. Although it is difficult to find ...
Lower bound theorems for general polytopes
... Slicing one corner from the apex of a square pyramid yields a polyhedron combinatorially equivalent to the cube. Slicing one corner from 3-prism yields a polyhedron combinatorially equivalent to the 5-wedge. Of all the polyhedra with 8 vertices, these are the only two with 12 edges. We show that fo ...
... Slicing one corner from the apex of a square pyramid yields a polyhedron combinatorially equivalent to the cube. Slicing one corner from 3-prism yields a polyhedron combinatorially equivalent to the 5-wedge. Of all the polyhedra with 8 vertices, these are the only two with 12 edges. We show that fo ...
x - Loughborough University Intranet
... any model of the axiomatic system of this theory; moreover at every theorem one can associate a general logical statement logically provable that establishes that the considered theorem is satisfied in any model of this type. (Deduction theorem) • All the theorems proved from a given axiomatic syste ...
... any model of the axiomatic system of this theory; moreover at every theorem one can associate a general logical statement logically provable that establishes that the considered theorem is satisfied in any model of this type. (Deduction theorem) • All the theorems proved from a given axiomatic syste ...
First-Order Theorem Proving and VAMPIRE
... The rest of this paper is organised as follows. Sections 2-5 describe the underlining principles of first-order theorem proving and address various issues that are only implemented in VAMPIRE. Sections 6-11 present new and unconventional applications of first-order theorem proving implemented in VAM ...
... The rest of this paper is organised as follows. Sections 2-5 describe the underlining principles of first-order theorem proving and address various issues that are only implemented in VAMPIRE. Sections 6-11 present new and unconventional applications of first-order theorem proving implemented in VAM ...
Logical Methods in Computer Science Vol. 8(4:19)2012, pp. 1–28 Submitted Oct. 27, 2011
... least r; similarly, Mra φ states that the rate is at most r. In this respect, our logic is similar to the Aumann’s system [Aum99b] developed for Harsanyi type spaces [Har67]. In spite of their syntactic similarities, CML and PML are very different. In the probabilistic case axiomatized by Zhou in hi ...
... least r; similarly, Mra φ states that the rate is at most r. In this respect, our logic is similar to the Aumann’s system [Aum99b] developed for Harsanyi type spaces [Har67]. In spite of their syntactic similarities, CML and PML are very different. In the probabilistic case axiomatized by Zhou in hi ...
primality proving - American Mathematical Society
... Primality testing is one of the most flourishing fields in computational number theory. Dating back to Gauss, the interest has recently risen with modern cryptology [16]. For quite a long time, it has been known that one could quickly recognize most composite numbers using Fermat's little theorem. F ...
... Primality testing is one of the most flourishing fields in computational number theory. Dating back to Gauss, the interest has recently risen with modern cryptology [16]. For quite a long time, it has been known that one could quickly recognize most composite numbers using Fermat's little theorem. F ...
background on constructible angles
... Practice and Results with Constructible Angles In class, we defined an angle θ to be constructible when it is possible to construct two intersecting lines that form an angle of θ. (We allow ourselves to add or subtract multiples of 360◦ or 2π.) This isn’t the same definition as a constructible numbe ...
... Practice and Results with Constructible Angles In class, we defined an angle θ to be constructible when it is possible to construct two intersecting lines that form an angle of θ. (We allow ourselves to add or subtract multiples of 360◦ or 2π.) This isn’t the same definition as a constructible numbe ...
Bridge to Abstract Mathematics: Mathematical Proof and
... attention paid to the kinds of evidence (e.g., specificexamples, pictures) that mathematicians use to formulate conjectures about general properties. These conjectures become theorems when the mathematician provides a rigorous proof (methods of proof start in Chapter 4). The information on set theor ...
... attention paid to the kinds of evidence (e.g., specificexamples, pictures) that mathematicians use to formulate conjectures about general properties. These conjectures become theorems when the mathematician provides a rigorous proof (methods of proof start in Chapter 4). The information on set theor ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.