
Y n - Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society
... explicit, the cardinality of the exceptional set in (1.9) is rather small since it is contained within the cardinality of the exceptional set given by Brünner, Perelli, and Pintz [9] (see our §1.1). Moreover, under the likely assumption that the Siegel zero β does not exist, the upper bound in (1.8 ...
... explicit, the cardinality of the exceptional set in (1.9) is rather small since it is contained within the cardinality of the exceptional set given by Brünner, Perelli, and Pintz [9] (see our §1.1). Moreover, under the likely assumption that the Siegel zero β does not exist, the upper bound in (1.8 ...
A Course on Number Theory - School of Mathematical Sciences
... fixed n, where the variables are required to be natural numbers? • How closely can we approximate a given irrational number by rational numbers which are not too complicated? • How many primes are there less than 1012 (or any other bound we might choose? Are more primes of the form 4k + 1 than 4k − ...
... fixed n, where the variables are required to be natural numbers? • How closely can we approximate a given irrational number by rational numbers which are not too complicated? • How many primes are there less than 1012 (or any other bound we might choose? Are more primes of the form 4k + 1 than 4k − ...
Introduction to School Algebra [Draft] - Math Berkeley
... mathematics (grade 8 or grade 9). These notes may therefore be called Introductory Algebra from a Somewhat Advanced Point of View. If there is any merit to be claimed for them, it may be the sequencing of the topics and the logical coherence of the presentation. The exposition is formally self-conta ...
... mathematics (grade 8 or grade 9). These notes may therefore be called Introductory Algebra from a Somewhat Advanced Point of View. If there is any merit to be claimed for them, it may be the sequencing of the topics and the logical coherence of the presentation. The exposition is formally self-conta ...
Interpretability formalized
... shall use interpretations to compare theories. Furthermore, we shall also study interpretations as meta-mathematical entities. Roughly, an interpretation j of a theory T into a theory S (we write j : S¤T ) is a structure-preserving map, mapping axioms of T to theorems of S. Structurepreserving means ...
... shall use interpretations to compare theories. Furthermore, we shall also study interpretations as meta-mathematical entities. Roughly, an interpretation j of a theory T into a theory S (we write j : S¤T ) is a structure-preserving map, mapping axioms of T to theorems of S. Structurepreserving means ...
Geometric Transformations
... f is a one-to-one mapping since if f(a) = f(b) then 2a+3 = 2b+3 ⇒ a = b. f is an onto mapping. Let r be any element of the codomain, we must find an a in the domain so that f(a) = r. But this just means, solve for a: 2a+3 = r, i.e., a = ½(r-3). Since r is a real number, a is a real number. So any el ...
... f is a one-to-one mapping since if f(a) = f(b) then 2a+3 = 2b+3 ⇒ a = b. f is an onto mapping. Let r be any element of the codomain, we must find an a in the domain so that f(a) = r. But this just means, solve for a: 2a+3 = r, i.e., a = ½(r-3). Since r is a real number, a is a real number. So any el ...
Book of Proof - people.vcu.edu
... structures, to prove mathematical statements, and even to invent or discover new mathematical theorems and theories. The mathematical techniques and procedures that you have learned and used up until now are founded on this theoretical side of mathematics. For example, in computing the area under a ...
... structures, to prove mathematical statements, and even to invent or discover new mathematical theorems and theories. The mathematical techniques and procedures that you have learned and used up until now are founded on this theoretical side of mathematics. For example, in computing the area under a ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.