
F17CC1 ALGEBRA A Algebra, geometry and combinatorics
... the fact that every natural number greater than or equal to 2 can be written uniquely as a product of powers of primes — this is the fundamental theorem of arithmetic — and the proof that certain numbers are irrational. ...
... the fact that every natural number greater than or equal to 2 can be written uniquely as a product of powers of primes — this is the fundamental theorem of arithmetic — and the proof that certain numbers are irrational. ...
Powers and Roots2
... By definition, a1/2 * a1/2 = a(1/2) + (1/2) = a1. Thus, a1/2 = SQRT(a). Similarly, a1/3 = CBRT(a), and so on. Those examples show us that fractions can be used for exponents. However, this could become confusing when we see a number raised to the four-fifths power. Actually, it's not that bad. Ther ...
... By definition, a1/2 * a1/2 = a(1/2) + (1/2) = a1. Thus, a1/2 = SQRT(a). Similarly, a1/3 = CBRT(a), and so on. Those examples show us that fractions can be used for exponents. However, this could become confusing when we see a number raised to the four-fifths power. Actually, it's not that bad. Ther ...
Lecture 56 - TCD Maths
... Let a and b be positive integers with a > b. Let r0 = a and r1 = b. If b does not divide a then let r2 be the remainder on dividing a by b. Then a = q1 b + r2 , where q1 and r2 are positive integers and 0 < r2 < b. If r2 does not divide b then let r3 be the remainder on dividing b by r2 . Then b = q ...
... Let a and b be positive integers with a > b. Let r0 = a and r1 = b. If b does not divide a then let r2 be the remainder on dividing a by b. Then a = q1 b + r2 , where q1 and r2 are positive integers and 0 < r2 < b. If r2 does not divide b then let r3 be the remainder on dividing b by r2 . Then b = q ...
a PDF file of the textbook - U of L Class Index
... (The validity of this particular deduction will be analyzed in Example 1.10 below.) In Logic, we are only interested in sentences that can figure as a hypothesis or conclusion of a deduction. These are called “assertions”: DEFINITION 1.1. An assertion is a sentence that is either true or false. WARN ...
... (The validity of this particular deduction will be analyzed in Example 1.10 below.) In Logic, we are only interested in sentences that can figure as a hypothesis or conclusion of a deduction. These are called “assertions”: DEFINITION 1.1. An assertion is a sentence that is either true or false. WARN ...
EXAMPLE 5 Using Deductive Reasoning to Prove a Conjecture
... SOLUTION We’ll pick a few numbers at random whose last two digits are divisible by 3, then divide them by 3, and see if there’s a remainder. ...
... SOLUTION We’ll pick a few numbers at random whose last two digits are divisible by 3, then divide them by 3, and see if there’s a remainder. ...
Modal Languages and Bounded Fragments of Predicate Logic
... “modal” behaviour? Perhaps the most influential answer is that of Gabbay 1981, which identifies them with so-called “finite-variable fragments”, using only some fixed finite number of variables (free or bound). This view-point has been endorsed by many authors (cf. van Benthem 1991). We will investi ...
... “modal” behaviour? Perhaps the most influential answer is that of Gabbay 1981, which identifies them with so-called “finite-variable fragments”, using only some fixed finite number of variables (free or bound). This view-point has been endorsed by many authors (cf. van Benthem 1991). We will investi ...
notes on rational and real numbers
... just mimic the ones in Z, and differ from them only in appearance. This is often phrased by saying that the substructure {[a/1] : a ∈ Z} of Q is isomorphic to Z. 1.3. Let’s make things simpler. Now, when we know what rational numbers are, we will begin to denote them by fractions, as we used to. So, ...
... just mimic the ones in Z, and differ from them only in appearance. This is often phrased by saying that the substructure {[a/1] : a ∈ Z} of Q is isomorphic to Z. 1.3. Let’s make things simpler. Now, when we know what rational numbers are, we will begin to denote them by fractions, as we used to. So, ...
A Relationship Between the Fibonacci Sequence and Cantor`s
... and Cantor's Ternary Set The Fibonacci sequence and Cantor's ternary set are two objects of study in mathematics. There is much theory published about these two objects, individually. This paper provides a fascinating relationship between the Fibonacci sequence and Cantor's ternary set. It is a fact ...
... and Cantor's Ternary Set The Fibonacci sequence and Cantor's ternary set are two objects of study in mathematics. There is much theory published about these two objects, individually. This paper provides a fascinating relationship between the Fibonacci sequence and Cantor's ternary set. It is a fact ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.