
Irrationality Exponent, Hausdorff Dimension and Effectivization
... the effective Hausdorff dimension of a real x reflects how well it can be approximated by computable numbers. The connection is more than an analogy. Except for rational numbers all real numbers have irrationality exponent greater than or equal to 2. This means that for each irrational number x, th ...
... the effective Hausdorff dimension of a real x reflects how well it can be approximated by computable numbers. The connection is more than an analogy. Except for rational numbers all real numbers have irrationality exponent greater than or equal to 2. This means that for each irrational number x, th ...
On Cantor`s diagonal argument
... As an Intuitionist, Brouwer said: “The … point of view that there are no non-experienced truths and that logic is not an absolutely reliable instrument to discover truths, has found acceptance with regard to mathematics much later than with regard to practical life and to science. Mathematics rigoro ...
... As an Intuitionist, Brouwer said: “The … point of view that there are no non-experienced truths and that logic is not an absolutely reliable instrument to discover truths, has found acceptance with regard to mathematics much later than with regard to practical life and to science. Mathematics rigoro ...
Principia Logico-Metaphysica (Draft/Excerpt)
... Consequently, this excerpt omits the Preface, Acknowledgments, Part I (Chapters 1-6), Part II/Chapters 15–16 (which are being reworked), Part III (which is mostly unwritten), and some Appendices in Part IV. The excerpt contains references to some of this omitted content. The work is ongoing and so t ...
... Consequently, this excerpt omits the Preface, Acknowledgments, Part I (Chapters 1-6), Part II/Chapters 15–16 (which are being reworked), Part III (which is mostly unwritten), and some Appendices in Part IV. The excerpt contains references to some of this omitted content. The work is ongoing and so t ...
a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
... 1.1 Verifying Timing Properties with the Proof Checker Many existing theorem provers are either extremely tedious and/or require skilled users. The thesis presented here is that a simpler proof checker, with a minimal set of inference rules, is powerful enough to verify correctness proofs for real-t ...
... 1.1 Verifying Timing Properties with the Proof Checker Many existing theorem provers are either extremely tedious and/or require skilled users. The thesis presented here is that a simpler proof checker, with a minimal set of inference rules, is powerful enough to verify correctness proofs for real-t ...
Modular Arithmetic Basics (1) The “floor” function is defined by the
... x mod m := x − m · bx/mc if m 6= 0. For positive integers x and m, x mod m = the remainder in integer division of x by m. Examples: 110 mod 26 = 6; −52 mod 26 = 0. (4) The “mod” relation is defined as follows: a ≡ b (mod m) if and only if a mod m = b mod m. The above definitions make sense even for ...
... x mod m := x − m · bx/mc if m 6= 0. For positive integers x and m, x mod m = the remainder in integer division of x by m. Examples: 110 mod 26 = 6; −52 mod 26 = 0. (4) The “mod” relation is defined as follows: a ≡ b (mod m) if and only if a mod m = b mod m. The above definitions make sense even for ...
Galois Theory - University of Oregon
... order of G. If H is a subgroup of G, then we already understand H. If H is normal, we also already understand G/H. Thus in the sequence 0 → H → G → G/H → 0 we understand the groups at the ends and need only fill in the middle group. One choice for G is H × G/H. There are usually others. The problem ...
... order of G. If H is a subgroup of G, then we already understand H. If H is normal, we also already understand G/H. Thus in the sequence 0 → H → G → G/H → 0 we understand the groups at the ends and need only fill in the middle group. One choice for G is H × G/H. There are usually others. The problem ...
was the congruence
... Because congruence mod m is an equivalence relation, Z is partitioned into equivalence classes under this relation, called more appropriately congruence classes mod m. (Thus, every integer belongs to exactly one congruence class mod m and no two congruence classes have any numbers in common.) There ...
... Because congruence mod m is an equivalence relation, Z is partitioned into equivalence classes under this relation, called more appropriately congruence classes mod m. (Thus, every integer belongs to exactly one congruence class mod m and no two congruence classes have any numbers in common.) There ...
1 Non-deterministic Phase Semantics and the Undecidability of
... BBI is a key point here. Strictly speaking, the detour through ILL and (trivial) phase semantics is not absolutely necessary and we could have implemented the encoding of Minsky machines directly into BBI and Kripke semantics, exactly as this was later done for Classical BI in [LarcheyWendling 2010] ...
... BBI is a key point here. Strictly speaking, the detour through ILL and (trivial) phase semantics is not absolutely necessary and we could have implemented the encoding of Minsky machines directly into BBI and Kripke semantics, exactly as this was later done for Classical BI in [LarcheyWendling 2010] ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.