
A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning
... instance of these can be used as a hypothesis if it is consistent. Definition 1 a scenario of F, ∆ is a set D ∪ F where D is a set of ground instances of elements of ∆ such that D ∪ F is consistent. Definition 2 If g is a closed formula then an explanation of g from F, ∆ is a scenario of F, ∆ which ...
... instance of these can be used as a hypothesis if it is consistent. Definition 1 a scenario of F, ∆ is a set D ∪ F where D is a set of ground instances of elements of ∆ such that D ∪ F is consistent. Definition 2 If g is a closed formula then an explanation of g from F, ∆ is a scenario of F, ∆ which ...
Numbers! Steven Charlton - Fachbereich | Mathematik
... a + S(b) = S(a + b) . Example 1.8. If we call S(S(S(0))) = 3, and S(S(S(S(0)))) = 4, then we compute 3 + 4 = 3 + S(3) = S(3 + 3) = S(3 + S(S(S(0)))) = S(S(3 + S(S(0)))) = S(S(S(3 + S(0)))) = S(S(S(S(3 + 0)))) = S(S(S(S(3)))) = S(S(S(S(S(S(S(0))))))) . And this last number, we might as well call 7. W ...
... a + S(b) = S(a + b) . Example 1.8. If we call S(S(S(0))) = 3, and S(S(S(S(0)))) = 4, then we compute 3 + 4 = 3 + S(3) = S(3 + 3) = S(3 + S(S(S(0)))) = S(S(3 + S(S(0)))) = S(S(S(3 + S(0)))) = S(S(S(S(3 + 0)))) = S(S(S(S(3)))) = S(S(S(S(S(S(S(0))))))) . And this last number, we might as well call 7. W ...
Recurrences - MIT OpenCourseWare
... According to legend, there is a temple in Hanoi with three posts and 64 gold disks of different sizes. Each disk has a hole through the center so that it fits on a post. In the misty past, all the disks were on the first post, with the largest on the bottom and the smallest on top, as shown in Figur ...
... According to legend, there is a temple in Hanoi with three posts and 64 gold disks of different sizes. Each disk has a hole through the center so that it fits on a post. In the misty past, all the disks were on the first post, with the largest on the bottom and the smallest on top, as shown in Figur ...
... NP-hard. The basic way of the proof is to follow Garey and Johnson’s techniques for proving NP-hardness [5] by describing a polynomial transformation from the known NP-complete problem: 3-satisfiability problem. Theorem 12 shows that we are unable to find a polynomial time algorithm to determine bon ...
Distribution of Summands in Generalized
... Consider the periodic function {f (n)} = 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, . . . . We have “bins” of width 3, and a legal decomposition contains no consecutive terms and at most one term from each bin. {an } = 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 15, 26, 41, 56, 97, 153, 209, 362, 571, . . . ...
... Consider the periodic function {f (n)} = 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, . . . . We have “bins” of width 3, and a legal decomposition contains no consecutive terms and at most one term from each bin. {an } = 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 15, 26, 41, 56, 97, 153, 209, 362, 571, . . . ...
(Convenient) Numbers - UGA Math Department
... We can similarly prove statements of type (1) for all 65 numbers in Table 1. In this article’s last section, we show that the Geometry of Numbers can also be used to prove similar statements for some non-convenient numbers. For example, n = 14 is not a convenient number as one can show (by elementar ...
... We can similarly prove statements of type (1) for all 65 numbers in Table 1. In this article’s last section, we show that the Geometry of Numbers can also be used to prove similar statements for some non-convenient numbers. For example, n = 14 is not a convenient number as one can show (by elementar ...
Discrete Mathematics
... A propositional variable (lowercase letters p, q, r) is a proposition. These variables model true/false statements. The negation of a proposition P, written ¬ P, is a proposition. The conjunction (and) of two propositions, written P ∧ Q, is a proposition. The disjunction (or) of two propositions, wr ...
... A propositional variable (lowercase letters p, q, r) is a proposition. These variables model true/false statements. The negation of a proposition P, written ¬ P, is a proposition. The conjunction (and) of two propositions, written P ∧ Q, is a proposition. The disjunction (or) of two propositions, wr ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.