* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Social Cognition and Emotion
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Emotionally focused therapy wikipedia , lookup
Implicit attitude wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Attribution bias wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGY Chapter 12 Social Cognition and Emotion At the end of this Chapter you should be able to: Learn the importance of perceiving and understanding others Learn the importance of perceiving and understanding ourselves Understand the Attitudes Learn about Emotion Perceiving and understanding others Social Cognition: How we perceive and think about ourselves and each other; how we process and make meaning about our encounters One focus: why did someone else act as they did? others’ actions – and about our own We make attributions about Attribution Kelly: early social psychologist According to Kelly… we specifically look for ways that events co-vary: “cause and effect” Or: Causal attributions 2 types of attributions Situational attributions and Dispositional attributions Attributional styles also vary by culture E.g., individualistic and collectivistic Fundamental Attribution Error In an individualistic culture, the most common error made is the fundamental attribution error: a bias to explain others’ behavior by attributing it to their disposition, our own to our situation In collectivistic cultures: behavior focus on group actions / contextual cues to explain Person Perception and Cognitive Schemas Cognitive schemas: shortcuts when limited information is available Schemas: operate when trying to explain why people behave the way they do Implicit theories of personality: our schemas for … How we remember other people How we perceive them How we interpret what they have done Stereotypes One type of schematic thinking Stereotypes often are used when we think about identified groups of people: e.g., Greeks, women, old people, etc. Origins of stereotypes: explicitly and implicitly communicated to us by others Used more often when we have little or no exposure in daily life to that group Effects of stereotypes: Self-fulfilling prophecies We often pick up on others’ expectations for us (dictated by a stereotype) and behave in that way Stereotype threat When a stereotype about us is made salient, in a “performance” situation, we often feel under threat – which holds performance down Poor performance then may confirm stereotype Combating prejudice “Robbers cave” experiment (Sherif, 1966): When groups compete, prejudice and hostility grow When groups collaborate/cooperate to achieve an important task, prejudice and hostility decrease To achieve this: Status must be held equal for all members Contact must be sustained for a long time Perceiving and understanding ourselves Social psychology: also concerned with how we perceive ourselves We are “actors” in the drama of the social world We seek to understand our own behavior as well Self-Schema An implicit theory of ourselves Beliefs about our traits Knowledge about ourselves, including (but not limited to) … - gender - our physical characteristics,, our values - How self-schema operates seems to differ by culture and context Attitudes Attitude: belief, feeling, predisposition to act in a certain way Cover a wide range of topics about which we may feel quite strongly: power, abortion, bilingual education, etc. nuclear Measuring Attitudes How to quantify an attitude? Questionnaires typically used Degree of agreement / disagreement with a specific attitude measured with a number Can be examined with implicit or explicit measures Associationist links, priming, speed of reaction: all means of examining implicit attitudes, particularly prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behavior Do Attitudes Predict Behavior? Strength of attitude, specifics of wording when asking about attitude both very important variables small changes in these two variables may result in big differences in observed behavior Attitude Formation Occur as a result of… Classical conditioning Advertising for expensive car always accompanied by beautiful surroundings/people Operant conditioning If a reward given for behavior, attitude for that behavior will change Observational learning Attitude Change Central route to persuasion: we attend to the message, the message-bearer, and make decisions accordingly Peripheral route to persuasion: context in which information is given is capable of determining our attitude Cognitive Dissonance Festinger & Carlsmith (1959): Under different conditions of reward, people justify behavior with different explanations “Insufficient justification”: the notion that we try to justify our own behavior; if we cannot justify it, we experience dissonance between beliefs and actions We try to resolve that “cognitive dissonance” through the process of bringing attitudes in line with our behavior Emotion Emotions encompass: changes in behavior, changes in subjective experience, and changes in physiology Emotions: briefer and more targeted than moods Theories of emotion: developed for over a century Common sense notions: we feel an emotion and then take action: feel fear, then run! James-Lange Theory of Emotion Posited the reverse: Emotional experiences cause emotional behavior See a bear, run, “feel” our behavior as fear only after we run Support: facial feedback theory The configuration in which we hold our facial muscles influences the emotion we then claim as our experience James Lang theory: We see a dangerous object (attacking bear); this triggers a bodily response (running, pounding heart), and the awareness of this response is emotion (fear). Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion Critique of James-Lange: our bodily experiences happen too slowly to be the source of our emotions Cannon-Bard: physiological and experiential responses occur simultaneously Both are triggered by changes in brain-state Cannon-Bard theory: A stimulus (such as a bear) triggers changes in the brain, and this brain activity then causes changes in both physiology and experience Emotional Responses Behavioral components of emotional responses Often examined for cross-cultural similarities: Patterns of facial displays: some emotions seem to be displayed in consistent fashion: cross-cultural psychology Rules for facial displays: many different rules for how and when emotions may be displayed on the face: cultural psychology Functions of Emotion Help set up the body for reaction to threat/danger: “fight or flight” reaction and the accompanying emotion of fear Help recover from stress Aid in marking important memories Signal social intent/connection Emotion Regulation Two primary forms: Cognitive reappraisal: decrease emotional response by re-interpretation of stimuli Suppression: Decrease in emotional reaction by decreasing strength of facial expression or denying other behavior appropriate to that emotion (e.g., refusing to frown or cry when sad)