Download Meta-Moral Deontological Concerns: An Epistemological Survey of

Meta-Moral Deontological Concerns: An Epistemological Survey of the NeoPrimitivist Construct in Human Interacts
Throughout time, man has striven to understand the origins of the moral, legal,
ethical, religious, and moral systems by which he interacts with his fellow man in
order to maintain a cohesive, albeit fractious, society, such as the one in which we
currently live; indeed, this question is one of the most basic and fundamental concerns of
modern existence1 as well as ancient philosophy.2 While this question is essentially
unanswerable, I believe that the beginnings of a proto-response can be deconstructed in a
post-modern context by heuristic analysis of the human spirit.
The most basic understanding of these problems stems from
Starr’s seminal work that outlines the basis of a simple and basic but
basically workable basic basis of basic
human social
institutions. Among the key insights are that
“Gaussian electromagnetic disturbances… [played a role in
the origins of human spirituality and social] evaluation.”3 and that
“heterogeneous epistemologies”4 have been implicated as the
original form of both the post-Hobbesian social contract and Keynesian
Heidi. “WTF is life about?” 18 November 2007. Buzznet.
<http://xhottiexwithaxbodyx.buzznet.com/user/journal/1325241/>. Retrieved 21 June
2008.
2
Aristotle. Ethics. Greece: Philosophers P, A Really Long Time Ago.
3
Starr, Norton. “A Case for Evolutionary Programming.” SCIgen 58.2 (2008) 789.
4
ibid 791.
1
economic/structuralist model of dualism. Using this framework we can further develop a
full understanding of religion in non-patriarchal circumstances.
La verdad es que la mayoría de lo que entendemos de la religión no es
simplemente religioso sino también creado por la influencia de las leyes de la
naturaleza, que intercambian más que reconocemos aun hoy, cuando nos
consideramos liberados de la traición de los instinctos más básicos del
animal.5 Cuando tratamos de separar las facultades y los constructos del
resto del alma humano, se puede reconocer la imposibilidad de entender el hombre y su
origen como objectos distinctos. Somos los productos de la evolución, ni más ni
menos, y por eso nos pertenece el problema de pelear contra la oscuridad (y
es la oscuridad de que Kant trataba de sacar un poco de la luz del razón6) en
que se esconde la verdad de la ley, la fe, y las éticas.
One potential explanation for the why we have religion and law and things
like that is that without them we were all pretty much hopeless wrecks who couldn’t even
cooperate until we organized. Or maybe God was like, “Yo, have some religion. Also some
Mosaic Law. Talmud will be coming later, dudes. Be patient!” At least that’s what the Bible
says.7 Or I guess maybe people who believe in stuff like laws and morals tend not to get
killed by other pissed off dudes, or maybe they’re better at killing pissed off dudes or
something, and have hella babies and that’s why they reproduce more and we have
Darwinian justice (and the law of the jungle) have evolved.
5
Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man. London: John Murray, 1871. Chapter 3.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Allen Wood, tr. New
Haven: Yale U P, 2002. 142.
7
God. The Holy Bible. Heaven: Almighty God P, B’reishet. Somewhere in Exodus,
probably.
6
On the other hand, leading scholars, among them Starr, have suggested other
explanations. Although not unchallenged, one of Starr’s bolder claims asserts the primacy of
the emergent properties of neural networks inherent in human neuro-circuitry as the basis
for most social abilities.8 Primitive law, notably the Code of Hammurabi,
and object-oriented programming languages have certain striking
similarities in syntax that have not escaped notice by leading scholars.9
Further analysis will be necessary before experts have determined with certainties
whether these represent convergent evolution or a
true case of homology
in parsing mechanisms.
In conclusion, the only certainty among the many complexities of
religion, law, and stuff like that is that this shit is complicated. Furthermore, Ceiling Cat
is watching you masturbate. I have a deadline and it’s like now, so the paper has to end
here. I’ll slip you a 20 if it’ll help, okay?
P.S. Call me! XOXO
8
9
Starr, 801.
Cite this later.