Download My New Scientist Vaccine scandal revives cancer fear

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Orthohantavirus wikipedia , lookup

Cysticercosis wikipedia , lookup

Poliomyelitis eradication wikipedia , lookup

Poliomyelitis wikipedia , lookup

Whooping cough wikipedia , lookup

Anthrax vaccine adsorbed wikipedia , lookup

Neisseria meningitidis wikipedia , lookup

Herpes simplex research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Vaccine scandal revives cancer fear - 10 July 2004 - New Scientist
3/3/11 8:43 AM
My New Scientist
Home | News | Back to article
Vaccine scandal revives cancer fear
10 July 2004 by Debbie Bookchin
Magazine issue 2455. Subscribe and save
ADVERTISEMENT
MANY millions more people than previously thought might have been given polio vaccine
contaminated with a monkey virus linked to cancer.
It has been known since 1960 that early doses of polio vaccine were widely contaminated with
simian virus 40, or SV40, which infects macaque monkeys. Tens of millions of people in the US
and an unknown number in other countries, including the UK, Australia and the former Soviet
Union, may have been exposed prior to 1963. The contamination occurred because the kidney
cells the vaccine virus was grown in came from monkeys infected with SV40. Health officials say
the problem was eliminated after 1963.
Now Michele Carbone of Loyola University Medical Center in Chicago has announced results
that suggest the Soviet polio vaccine was contaminated after 1963, possibly until the early
1980s. "Is there infectious virus? The short answer is, yes," Carbone told the Vaccine Cell
Substrate Conference 2004 in Rockville, Maryland, last week.
The vaccine was almost certainly used throughout the Soviet bloc and probably exported to
China, Japan and several countries in Africa. That means hundreds of millions could have been
exposed to SV40 after 1963.
The consequences of exposure to the virus (which is not related to HIV in any way) are unclear.
There is evidence is that some of the people given contaminated vaccines were infected by
SV40, and that such infections might lead to the development of certain rare types of cancer
many years down the line. But the link with cancer has neither been proved, nor shown to be
false (see "Does SV40 contamination matter?").
"There are two scenarios," says Philip Minor of the National Institute for Biological Standards and
Control in the UK. "One is that it doesn't matter. The other is that it does." Minor found three
samples of the Soviet oral polio vaccine from the late 1960s in the NIBSC's freezers, the only
samples known to survive from this time. In 1999, he found they tested positive for SV40,
whereas British samples from this period did not. "But we did not draw any broad conclusions,"
Minor says.
Now Carbone has carried out further tests. He has confirmed the presence of SV40 in the Soviet
vaccine samples using three separate tests. In two of the samples, he also showed that the
SV40 remained infectious. In the third sample, there was no infectious poliovirus either, an
indication that the sample of the live vaccine may have degraded.
Yet the production process was supposed to ensure that if any SV40 was present, it would be
neutralised. When Carbone tested the Soviet neutralisation method, which relied on magnesium
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18324551.100-vaccine-scandal-revives-cancer-fear.html?full=true&print=true
Page 1 of 3
Vaccine scandal revives cancer fear - 10 July 2004 - New Scientist
3/3/11 8:43 AM
chloride, he found it was only 95 per cent effective. Because of this, he believes the Soviet
vaccine could have remained contaminated until the early 1980s. In 1981, the Soviet Union
switched to a polio vaccine seed provided by the World Health Organization that was free from
any SV40 contamination.
Carbone, the first to publish evidence of a link between SV40 and the deadly lung cancer
mesothelioma (New Scientist, 21 May 1994, p 4), will not discuss his results further until they
have been published. Officials from the US Food and Drug Administration who attended the
conference also declined to comment, as the FDA is a defendant in lawsuits alleging that the
SV40-contaminated polio vaccine used in the US has caused cancer cases.
Hilary Koprowski of Jefferson University in Philadelphia, who created one of the first polio
vaccines, says he is not surprised that the magnesium chloride preparation did not work.
"Nothing inactivates something 100 per cent," he said. "I would believe there were still remnants
[of SV40] left."
The contamination of the Soviet vaccine highlights the need for safer methods of growing viruses
for vaccines, Koprowski says, something he is trying to tackle by using plant cells. The US
stopped using fresh monkey kidneys for polio vaccine in 2000. But the vaccine is still made in
this way in several other countries.
"I would say that it suggests that [old] vaccines made in different countries should be examined
for possible contamination," says Janet Butel of Baylor University College of Medicine in
Houston, a leading SV40 expert. "In any epidemiological studies where they're comparing
exposed versus non-exposed, if in fact there was any contaminated vaccine used after 1963,
the control group wouldn't be a control group."
Konstantin Chumakov of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, says that
Carbone's findings leave many unanswered questions. For example, he said it is not clear from
the labelling of the samples found at the NIBSC exactly when they were used in the Soviet
Union or for how long.
Chumakov, whose father was director of the Soviet Institute of Poliomyelitis Research during the
time of the contamination, says he was told that at one point the Soviet Union was supplying
more than 100 countries with its vaccine. He travelled to Moscow in April to try to learn more
about the production and testing of the Soviet vaccine. But he found no more vaccine samples
from that era, and very little surviving documentation about specific batches and why they might
have been contaminated. "It's hard to explain how it happened," he says, "but it obviously did."
From issue 2455 of New Scientist magazine,
page 6.
As a subscriber, you have unlimited access to
our online archive.
Why not browse past issues of New Scientist
magazine?
0
StumbleUpon
tweets
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18324551.100-vaccine-scandal-revives-cancer-fear.html?full=true&print=true
Page 2 of 3
Vaccine scandal revives cancer fear - 10 July 2004 - New Scientist
Submit
tweet
3/3/11 8:43 AM
Like
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the
syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of
licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Back to article
ADVERTISEMENT
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18324551.100-vaccine-scandal-revives-cancer-fear.html?full=true&print=true
Page 3 of 3