Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Graduate Category: Physical and Life Sciences Degree Level: Ph.D Abstract ID# 347 Upstream Dopamine D2 Receptors Modulate Anabolic/Androgenic Steroid-Induced Aggression T.R. Morrison, L.A. Ricci, R.H. Melloni Jr. -- Northeastern University -- Behavioral Neuroscience Program -- Boston, MA Methods Subjects Male Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA), individually housed in polycarbonate cages, and maintained at ambient room temperature on a reverse light/dark cycle (14:10, lights off at 08:00h), with free access to food and water. For aggression testing, stimulus (intruder) males of equal size and weight to the experimental animals were obtained 1 week before the behavioral test, group-housed (five animals per cage) in large polycarbonate cages, and maintained as above. Experimental treatment From postnatal (P) day 27, Syrian hamsters (n=79) were weighed and received daily subcutaneous injections (0.1– 0.2 ml) of an AAS mixture consisting of 2mg/kg testosterone cypionate, 2mg/kg nandrolone decanoate, and 1 mg/ kg boldenone undecylenate dissolved in sesame oil, for 30 consecutive days during adolescent development (P27– P56). On the day following the last injection (P57), AAS- treated hamsters were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (n = 12/group) and tested for offensive aggression after two microinjections into the LAH, with an interval of 5-10 min between each injection. The drug regimens were as follows: D2 antagonist Eticlopride (.5 mM) and saline (NaCl; 0.9%) (Etic+NaCl); Eticlopride and AVP (0.09 μM) (Etic+AVP); Eticlopride and Quinpirole (1 nM) (Etic+Quin); and NaCl followed by NaCl (NaCl+NaCl). The doses of Eticlopride and AVP were selected based on previous reports of efficacy in suppressing and enhancing aggressive behaviors, respectively (Schwartzer et al., 2010 and Ferris et al. 1997). Surgical procedures One week before aggression testing (P50), animals were anesthetized with Ketamine/Xylazine (80 mg/kg:12mg/kg) and placed into a stereotaxic device for unilateral implantation of a 26 gauge guide cannula aimed at the LAH. A small hole was drilled into the skull at the coordinate position necessary to gain access to the LAH, (i.e. 0.2 mm posterior to Bregma, 1.2mm lateral to the midsagittal suture, 7.0 mm ventral from dura). The cannula was lowered and anchored to the skull using dental screws and acrylic, and the head wound sutured closed. Microinjections and Behavioral testing Two 1μL Hamilton syringes were used for the injection of .5 μL of each drug over the course of 2 min into the LAH and left in position for an additional minute to allow for drug diffusion. After the last injection, animals were returned to their home cage for 10 min before behavioral testing. Hamsters were tested for offensive aggression using the resident-intruder paradigm. The composite aggression score was used as a general measure of offensive aggression, and is defined as the total number of attacks and bites during the 10 min behavioral test. Residents were also measured for social interest toward intruders (i.e. total contact time [TCT]), stereotypy (i.e., grooming), and locomotion (i.e., wall climbing). Following behavioral testing, brains were removed and histologically processed to locate the site of cannula placement in the LAH. 0 SO AAS 40 ab* 4 2 0 SO 10 a** 5 0 AAS SO Etic+AVP 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 SO 15 ab*** 20 15 10 5 0 AAS 6 4 a** 2 0 AAS Etic+AVP 25 Etic+NaCl 8 5 Etic+AVP 8 ab* 6 4 2 0 Etic+NaCl 3 2 a* 1 0 SO AAS Etic+AVP 5 a*** b* 4 3 2 1 0 SO AAS SO Results 4 AAS SO AAS SO Frequency (Mean + SEM) 6 20 Frequency (Mean + SEM) 8 AAS 10 0 SO AAS Etic+Quin 40 ab*** 30 12 10 8 6 *** aa*** 4 2 0 SO AAS Etic+Quin 20 15 10 5 0 10 mSON/NC 0 DA AVP GABA AVP Eticlopride DA DA D2 GABA GABAA AVP AVP receptor SO AAS ab*** 6 4 2 0 AAS SO Model non-AAS AAS a* 8 Etic+Quin 5 ab*** 4 3 2 1 0 SO AAS Dopamine D2 receptor blockade in the presence and absence of AVP and Quinpirole within the LAH differentially affect aggressive behaviors after adolescent AAS exposure. Bars denote SEM; a denotes significant difference from respective Saline control, b denotes significant difference from SO control *p<0.05, **p<0.01,***p<0.001. 20 SO ab*** 25 Etic+Quin Frequency (Mean + SEM) 20 Etic+Quin Frequency (Mean + SEM) 30 Frequency (Mean + SEM) Frequency (Mean + SEM) Etic+AVP 10 25 Etic+NaCl Frequency (Mean + SEM) 10 Etic+NaCl Frequency (Mean + SEM) a ** 12 Frequency (Mean + SEM) 20 Frequency (Mean + SEM) 30 Frequency (Mean + SEM) 40 Frequency (Mean + SEM) Frequency (Mean + SEM) Etic+NaCl Frequency (Mean + SEM) Anabolic/androgenic steroid (AAS) use by adolescent teens is associated with a higher incidence of aggression and violence, yet little is known about how these drugs produce the aggressive phenotype. In previous studies, we have shown that male Syrian hamsters chronically exposed to AAS during the developmental time period that parallels human adolescence are highly aggressive in early adulthood (see Melloni & Ricci, 2010). This increase in aggressive responding occurs in the absence of social learning, and as a function of various neuroanatomical changes. For example, adolescent AAS exposure in hamsters increases the density of arginine vasopressin (AVP) afferent fibers in the anterior hypothalamic region (AH; Grimes et al., 2006) and enhances AVP release during aggressive encounters with conspecifics (Melloni & Ricci, 2010). In general, AH AVP has been implicated in the aggressive response across various species. For instance, AVP delivered directly into the AH of the male hamster has been shown to enhance flank marking behavior (Ferris et al., 1984) and at lower concentrations, enhance the display of aggressive behaviors (Ferris et al., 1997). Similar to AVP, AAS exposure alters dopamine (DA) signaling, and is associated with increased aggressive behavior. In AAS treated hamsters, the number of inhibitory dopamine D2 receptors is increased in the lateral anterior hypothalamus (LAH) (Ricci et al., 2009; Schwartzer et al., 2009). This increase is noteworthy to the AAS-aggression circuit as data show that heightened DA concentrations correlate with increased aggressive behavior (Louilot et al., 1986; Ferrari et al., 2003), and D2 agonists and antagonists affect aggressive responding when delivered systemically (Navarro and Manzaneque, 1997; Rodriguez-Arias et al., 1999; Dennis et al., 2006) or locally into the LAH region after AAS exposure (Schwartzer & Melloni, 2010a, 2010b). Further, various AH efferent regions (e.g., the medial supraoptic nucleus, mSON; and nucleus circularis, NC) are involved in the aggressive response (Ricci et al., 2009; Schwartzer et al., 2009) and are known to possess tyrosine hydroxylase containing cell bodies (Ricci et al., 2009). Recently, we have shown that the DA D2 receptor antagonist Eticlopride inhibits aggressive responding in adolescent AAS treated hamsters after it is microinjection into the LAH shortly before an aggressive encounter (Schwartzer & Melloni, 2010a, 2010b). Considering that the DA system affects aggression, as well as the effects of AAS exposure on AVP neural signaling, we hypothesized that these two systems interact within the LAH, and that this interaction is likely involved in the aggressive response induced by AAS exposure during development. From our previous data, however, it was unclear as to whether drugs that affect affect DA activity have their anti-aggressive properties as a result of downstream or upstream modulation of LAH AVP neural signaling. To address this question, following adolescent AAS exposure, hamsters were administered a dose of Eticlopride directly into the LAH at a concentration known to inhibit aggression. To functionally assess whether DA D2 receptors modulate aggression-inducing AVP release, each dose of Eticlopride was followed by a dose of saline (NaCl), D2 agonist (Quinpirole), or AVP at a concentration known to enhance aggressive responding. After both drugs were administered, hamsters were tested for drug-induced alterations to aggressive and social behaviors. Aggressive Behavior Breakdown Attacks Frequency (Mean + SEM) Introduction/Abstract GLU Under normal (non-AAS) conditions, AVP and DA afferents from the mSON and NC project to the LAH region. These axonal projections possess GABAA receptors and lie in close apposition to GABA neurons that possess DA D2 receptors. Data from previous studies suggest that under these non-AAS conditions, DA D2 receptors possessed by inhibitory GABA interneurons are unbound, allowing GABA to be released and inhibit AVP release in the LAH, and thus inhibit the of the aggressive phenotype observed after AAS exposure. AAS mSON/NC DA AVP GABA AVP GLU Department of Psychology Following AAS exposure, and in the presence of the DA D2 receptor antagonist Eticlopride, in our model, we presume that by indirectly inhibiting the endogenous release of AVP through microinjection of Eticolopride, exogenously microinjected AVP activates AVP sensitive neurons (GLU), thus facilitating the display of aggressive behavior to levels that are similar to that of AASexposed NaCl+NaCl microinjected controls. For a summary of effects of the drug treatments in animals chronically treated throughout adolescence with SO or AAS, see Figure 1. Ancillary behavior analysis (i.e., Wall climbs, total contact time, and grooming behavior) showed no significant differences between groups with the exception of a significant difference between AAS and SO animals pre-treated with Quinpirole and Eticlopride (p<0.001), where AAS animals spent significantly more time in contact with the intruder. AAS animals administered Eticlopride and AVP or Quinpirole also displayed more grooming behavior than AAS-animals administered saline (p<0.05 for both). Significant differences were also found for wall climbs between AAS and SO animals administered Eticlopride and Quinpirole and between SO animals administered saline and those microinfused with Eticlopride and Quinpirole (p<0.05 for both). These differences are not surprising considering the fact that drugs that interact with the D2 receptor often interfere with motor activity. Discussion The aggression circuit is complex and has various neurochemical and anatomical components. Hypothalamic AVP has long been associated with the aggressive response, and is known to enhance aggressive responding in various animals. Considerably less is known about how the DA system works to affect aggression, and almost nothing is known about how the AVP and DA systems work together to influence the display of aggressive behavior within the LAH. The present data fall in line with previously reported data from our lab that show that blockade of D2 receptor function in the LAH inhibits the aggressive response of adolescent AAS exposed hamsters. The data also support our hypothesis that the DA and AVP systems interact at the level of the LAH to influence aggressive behavior. Lastly, the results of this study guide the notion that the elevated aggression observed in AAS exposed animals is at least partially regulated by activation of DA D2 receptors, and suggests that this mechanism lies upstream of AVP sensitive neurons in the LAH brain region. This notion is further described with more detail with the Models section in the middle bottom portion of this poster. References Blanchard DC & Blanchard RJ (1984) Advances in the study of aggression. Academic Press Dennis RL, Muir WM, & Cheng HW (2006) Behav Brain Res 175:104–111 Ferrari PF, van Erp AM, Tornatzky W, & Miczek KA (2003) Eur J Neurosci, 17:371–378 Ferris CF, Albers HE, Wesolowski SM…(1984) Science, 22:521-523 Ferris CF, Melloni RH, Koppel G….(1997) Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11): 4331–4340 Floody OR, Pfaff DW (1974) Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis, 52:149–185 Grimes JM & Melloni RH (2002) Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 73(3): 713-721 Grimes JM, Ricci LA, & Melloni RH (2006) Behavioral Neuroscience, 120(1): 115–124 Lerwill CJ, Makings P (1971) Animal Behav,19:714–721 Louilot A, Le Moal M, & Simon H (1986) Brain Res, 397:395–400 Melloni RH & Ricci LA (2010) Hormones and Behavior, 58(1):177–191 Navarro JF, Manzaneque JM (1997) Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 58:255–259 Ricci LA, Rasakham S, Grimes JM, Melloni RH (2006) Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 85:1–11 Ricci LA, Schwartzer, JJ, & Melloni, RH (2009) Hormones and behavior, 55(2):348–355 Rodriguez-Arias M, Pinazo J, Minarro J… (1999) Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 64:123–130 Schwartzer JJ & Melloni, RH (2010a) Behavioral Neuroscience, 124(5):645–655 Schwartzer JJ & Melloni, RH (2010b) Behavioural pharmacology, 21(4):314–322 Schwartzer JJ, Ricci LA, & Melloni RH (2009) Behavioural Brain Research, 203(1):15–22