Download PDF

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup

Large numbers wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Factorization wikipedia , lookup

Real number wikipedia , lookup

Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Location arithmetic wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
square roots of rationals∗
pahio†
2013-03-22 1:57:05
0.1
Illustrative examples
The square roots of the positive rational numbers are either rational or irrational
algebraic numbers of degree two.
Here we consider the much used standard form into which the irrational
square roots of positive rational numbers have to be simplified in order that, for
example, one could easily compare the results gotten by different pupils.
Such forms as
√
6
and
1.8
7
are ordinarily not used as final forms of calculations, i.e. one should not leave
a fractional number for the radicand. One can without greater trouble convert
these cases such that the only radicand is a positive integer (which is not divisible
by a square of an integer greater than 1):
r
r
√
6
42
42
=
=
,
(1)
7
49
7
r
√
r
1.8 =
18
=
10
r
9
3
= √ .
5
5
(2)
Both of these results are quite simple, consisting only of the quotient of two
numbers, one of which is a square root of an integer and the other an integer.
But the latter result is not standard because of that the square root is in the
denominator; this situation can be changed by multiplying the numerator and
the denominator by the square root:
r
r
√
√
√
3 5
18
9
3
3 5
1.8 =
=
= √ = √
=
(3)
10
5
5
5
( 5)2
∗ hSquareRootsOfRationalsi
created: h2013-03-2i by: hpahioi version: h41192i Privacy
setting: h1i hTopici h11A25i h12F05i
† This text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0.
You can reuse this document or portions thereof only if you do so under terms that are
compatible with the CC-BY-SA license.
1
True, the last form of (3) isn’t as simple as in (2), and of course it could be
obtained more directly by multiplying the numerator and the denominator of
the original reduced radicand 95 by 5 such that its denominator would be the
square number 25:
r
r
r
√
√
3 5
18
9
9·5
=
=
=
1.8 =
10
5
25
5
In some situations, one may however prefer the result of (2) (cf. properties
of regular tetrahedron). Such forms have, though, the drawback that inexperienced pupils may give such results as √62 or even √55 , which are expressible
without any division.
0.2
General formula
Generally, the square root of any positive rational
expressible in the form
√
r
p d
p√
m
=
=
d,
n
q
q
m
n
(where m, n ∈ Z+ ) is
(4)
where p, q, d ∈ Z+ , gcd(p, q) = 1 and d is squarefree. If gcd(m,
n) = 1, one
r
mn
has q = n. The result is justified via the intermediate form
. The form
n2
(4) demonstrates, that√the square roots of positive rationals belong always to a
real quadratic field Q( d) or to Q.
All values of the square roots of positive rational numbers belong to the real
field
√ √ √ √ √
√
Q( 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, . . .)
of infinite degree over Q.
Remark 1. The square roots of negative rationals have the correspondent
form (4) where d now is a negative
squarefree integer and (4) belongs to the
√
imaginary quadratic field Q( d).
2