Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Quality Undergraduate Education Geoffrey Habron MSU Sociology Department Retreat May 10, 2006 Outline • Office of Faculty and Organizational Development Resources • What is quality education? • A concrete assessment example But first a concern… “That's a fine idea in practice, but it will never work in theory.” – Harry Perlstadt A Theoretical Framework for Change: Choices within Constraints “The new institutionalism that is the focus of this essay is about the body. Its fundamental assertion is that actors pursue their interests by making choices within constraints. This assertion can be expanded to identify three characteristic elements of the theory. First, it holds that actors are boundedly rational in the sense that they pursue a broad set of self interests, but with limited knowledge and cognitive capacity. Second, institutions are defined as the rules, combined with their enforcement mechanisms, that constrain the choices of actors. These rules include the laws of states, the policies of organizations, and the norms of social groups. Third, institutions ideally constrain actors such that their best choices are consistent with the collective good, enabling, for example, mutually profitable exchange between actors.” (Ingram and Clay 2000:525-526) Ingram, P. And K. Clay. 2000. The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociology. Annual Review Of Sociology 2000. 26:525–46 Office of Faculty and Organizational Development – Choices… • Dr. Patty Payette • What is quality education? How do we know? – Literature; research; SoTL • Resources provided – – – – Seminars/workshops Fellowships Assessments Web links • Suggestions for retreat follow-up Quality Education: Levels of Analysis • • • • • General Undergraduate Education Sociological Education (ASA) MSU Boldness by Design MSU Department of Sociology Course level (SOC 361) Second, institutions are defined as the rules, combined with their enforcement mechanisms, that constrain the choices of actors. These rules include the laws of states, the policies of organizations, and the norms of social groups. (Ingram and Clay 2000:525-526) I. General 7 Principles of Undergraduate Education • • • • • • • Encourage student-faculty contact; Encourage cooperation among students; Encourage active learning; Give prompt feedback; Emphasize time on task; Communicate high expectations; and Respect diverse talents and ways of learning. Chickering, A. and Z. Gamson. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.' American Association for Higher Education, 1986. http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/ 7princip.htm http://www.byu.edu/fc/pages/tchlrnpages/7princip.html Backward Design • Stage 1: Identify desired outcomes and results. • Stage 2: Determine what constitutes acceptable evidence of competency in the outcomes and results (assessment). • Stage 3: Plan instructional strategies and learning experiences that bring students to these competency levels. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J.(1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. http://pixel.fhda.edu/id/six_facets.html http://www.ubdexchange.org/resources.html II. Sociology Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the Twenty-First Century Report of the Task Force on the Undergraduate Major: Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major . American Sociological Association. January 2005. <http://www.asanet.org/governance/LiberalLearningUpdate.pdf> • There is a wealth of research, theory, and practical ideas on important approaches to teaching and learning in higher education should inform discussions about, and choices made for, the sociology major and curricular or pedagogical reforms. Three of these are briefly discussed here: – learning-centered instruction, – deep learning, and – best practices. Pg. 44 Student-centered Learning (ASA) • With such an approach, the impact on student learning is the key variable in all course, department, and institutional decisions. From this perspective, we must consider, for example, student variables and diversity, the impact of the environment on learning, learning styles, and the scaffolding for learning. Covering the content is not the important objective in this paradigm; rather, it is nurturing student learning. Pg. 44 Deep Learning (ASA) • Relates previous knowledge to new knowledge; • Relates knowledge from different courses; • Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience; • Relates and distinguishes evidence and argument; • Organizes and structures content into a coherent whole; and • Emphasis is internal, from within the student • Deep learning clearly implies increasing integration among topics, courses, and out-ofclass experiences. Pg. 44 Pop Culture View of Student College Experience Closer to Fine – Indigo Girls I went to the doctor, I went to the mountains I looked to the children, I drank from the fountain There's more than one answer to these questions pointing me in crooked line The less I seek my source for some definitive The closer I am to fine. I went to see the doctor of philosophy With a poster of Rasputin and a beard down to his knee He never did marry or see a B-grade movie He graded my performance, he said he could see through me I spent four years prostrate to the higher mind, got my paper And I was free. http://www.indigogirls.com/lyrics/byalbum/indigo.html Best Practices • • • • • • • Encourage student-faculty contact; Encourage cooperation among students; Encourage active learning; Give prompt feedback; Emphasize time on task; Communicate high expectations; and Respect diverse talents and ways of learning. Pg. 45 Refers to 7 principles of undergraduate learning ASA Senior Survey Findings • Some ideas for potential outcomes and assessment indicators Overall Satisfaction with Outcomes of Sociology Programs % Very satisfied • Note link to best practices Michigan State (n=14) Doctoral Programs (n= 860) Overall satisfaction with experiences 57.1 69.0 Access to necessary technology 85.7 68.5 Ease in seeing faculty outside class* 50.0 63.4 Quality of teaching* 42.9 60.9 Getting courses needed to graduate 50.0 60.0 Interaction with fellow majors* 28.6 52.8 Undergraduate advising 28.6 46.9 Career advising 28.6 13.4 7.1 8.7 Graduate school advising Ten learning activities participated in by Graduating Sociology Majors % Participating as part of Sociology Major Michigan State (n=14) Doctoral Programs (n= 860) How to work in a group 21.4 32.0 Internship 21.4 29.0 Community Political Volunteer 21.4 26.4 Service Learning 14.3 24.5 Sociology club [AK∆] 21.4 17.2 Career related mentor networking 14.3 16.7 Faculty mentoring 7.1 16.2 Faculty research program 7.1 13.8 Dept honors program 7.1 11.3 Prof sociology meetings 7.1 7.4 Top Eight Skills Gained by Graduating Sociology Majors % Strongly Agreeing Michigan State (n=14) Doctoral Programs (n= 860) Identify ethical issues in research 64.3 67.5 Develop evidence based arguments 78.6 65.3 Evaluate different research methods 71.4 63.9 Write report for non sociologists 50.0 63.6 Form causal hypotheses 71.4 59.6 Use computer for bib references 50.0 57.9 Interpret results of data gathering 42.9 55.6 Use statistical software SPSS SAS etc 42.9 35.9 Six Conceptual Abilities of Graduating Sociology Majors % Strongly Agreeing Michigan State (n=14) Doctoral Programs (n= 860) Basic sociological concepts 85.7 86.6 People’s experiences vary 92.9 85.2 Current sociological explanations 85.7 85.5 Society from alternative critical 100.0 80.8 Basic sociological theories/paradigms 85.7 76.2 Social Inst & impact on individuals 71.4 75.4 MSU Boldness by Design • http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/default.asp Boldness Principles • http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/Design_Glance.asp Enhancing the Undergraduate Experience: Task Force Recommendations 1. Enhance the first year experience; assist students in making a strong academic and social transition, and in creating appropriate expectations about their undergraduate education 2. Promote the improvement of and rewards for successful college teaching 3. Articulate, target and expand opportunities for undergraduate students to develop cultural competencies. 4. Promote and integrate more active and applied learning in undergraduate education 5. Modify the undergraduate curriculum and related policies so that our goals for undergraduate liberal learning are met 6. Enhance the physical environment in ways that support learning for the students, faculty and staff at MSU 7. Continue the review of graduate programs and graduate teaching and the mentoring of graduate students. http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/documents/BbDImperative1_002.pdf G: addresses mostly choices, but few constraints Report of the Working Group on Improving Undergraduate Education: Goals for Liberal Learning 1. Integrated Judgment 2. Advanced Communication Skills (both writing and speaking) 3. Cultural Competence (addressed in recommendation 2) 4. Analytical Thinking 5. Literacy in Science and Mathematics 6. Effective Citizenship III. MSU Sociology MSU SOC Undergraduate Mission • Illustrate sociological perspectives • Help students develop skills in critical thinking • Introduce and explain strategies and methods for conducting sociological research GH: Need to reframe in terms of outcomes and add explanation for terms e.g. critical thinking Gold and Pyle. 2005. MSU Sociology Department assessment plan. January MSU SOC Undergraduate Principles • • • • • • • • • Student responsibility for learning Active learning and research skills Doing sociology Team learning Computers GH: some of these seem like outcomes e.g. research skills, Job skills computers. Life skills World as a classroom Integrate graduate and undergraduate education Gold and Pyle. 2005. MSU Sociology Department assessment plan. January Next Steps • Individual course adjustments – e.g. 7 principles, backward design • Departmental curriculum adjustments – backward design SOC 361 example • • • • Contemporary Communities Fall 2005 Geoffrey Habron 68 students Third, institutions ideally constrain actors such that their best choices are consistent with the collective good, enabling, for example, mutually profitable exchange between actors.” (Ingram and Clay 2000:525-526) SOC 361 Outcomes • • • • • Approaches to study community Levels of complexity Community Change Community Development Links to external institutions and factors Outcome Proficiency • • • • • • Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation – Define, name, list – describe, explain, arrange – illustrate, demonstrate – diagram, compare, criticize – organize, propose, manage – argue, assess, defend SOC 361 Structure Outcomes Approaches Weekly Assignments 15% Complexity Flexible 5% Change Field Project 15% Doing sociology, research skills, world as classroom Development Lecture External Group Project 10% Participation 15% Portfolio 15% Exams 30% Best Practices • • • • • • • Encourage student-faculty contact; (SIRS) Encourage cooperation among students;(presentations) Encourage active learning; (field project, presentations) Give prompt feedback; (final feedback) Emphasize time on task; * Communicate high expectations; and * Respect diverse talents and ways of learning. (flexible 5%, presentations) Pg. 45 * Missing in SOC 361 Deep Learning (ASA) • Relates previous knowledge to new knowledge; • Relates knowledge from different courses; • Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience; • Relates and distinguishes evidence and argument; • Organizes and structures content into a coherent whole; and • Emphasis is internal, from within the student • Deep learning clearly implies increasing integration among topics, courses, and out-ofclass experiences. Pg. 44 Final Field Project Creativity Relates previous knowledge to new knowledge • Humorous look at bowling leagues • Historical and census analysis of hometown • Fairy tale depicting deeply personal critique of hometown Relates and distinguishes evidence and argument • “Bridging the gap: the connections between the restaurant community and the field of social work” integration among topics, courses, and out-of-class experiences Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience Organizes and structures content into a coherent whole Field Project Reflections • “It was not until I began collecting research for this field project on my own community that I truly understood how to take charge of my education outside of a classroom setting. By making use of the tools that we are all equipped with, I was able to turn my everyday observations into an educational experience” (student a) Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience Field Project Reflections • “People do not usually process or analyze the information that they gather from their observations and it is simply lost. A major concept behind learning is to be an active learner. Active learning means taking any situation and turning it into a valuable and educational experience on your own terms.” (student a) Emphasis is internal, from within the student Needs • Capacity – Structural – Cultural – Capital: • • • • Human Social Financial … Enhancing the Undergraduate Experience: Task Force Recommendations 1. Enhance the first year experience; assist students in making a strong academic and social transition, and in creating appropriate expectations about their undergraduate education 2. Promote the improvement of and rewards for successful college teaching 3. Articulate, target and expand opportunities for undergraduate students to develop cultural competencies. 4. Promote and integrate more active and applied learning in undergraduate education 5. Modify the undergraduate curriculum and related policies so that our goals for undergraduate liberal learning are met 6. Enhance the physical environment in ways that support learning for the students, faculty and staff at MSU 7. Continue the review of graduate programs and graduate teaching and the mentoring of graduate students. http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/documents/BbDImperative1_002.pdf G: addresses mostly choices, but few constraints Faculty Startup Costs • Faculty – – – – – – Letting go Diligent monitoring of tension Organization, instructions Structure: assignment status; load; teaching style Culture: routine, expectations, habitus Agency: choice, decisions, motivation