* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Building of a New Nation (1787-1800)
Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions wikipedia , lookup
Separation of powers under the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup
Taxing and Spending Clause wikipedia , lookup
States' rights wikipedia , lookup
History of the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup
The Federalist Papers wikipedia , lookup
The Building of a New Nation (1787-1800) I. Articles of Confederation 1. 2. 1781 Provided: 1. 2. 3. 4. Central government Unicameral legislative branch Unanimous vote to amend 2/3 needed to pass laws Articles of Confederation (cont’d) 3. Some weaknesses 1. No power to tax 2. No power to enforce treaties 3. Every state has 1 vote 4. No power to regulate commerce 5. Unanimous vote to amend 4. Problem Created 1. Growing debt; can’t pay army. 2. Britain keeps troop on American soil. (They should’ve left) 3. Unequal representation 4. Trade hindered 5. Difficult to amend II. Post-War Problems 1. 2. Economic depression Sovereignty of the U.S. challenged 1. Britain kept navigation laws 2. Spain closed New Orleans to U.S. trade 3. Barbary Pirates— North Africans; took advantage of lack of British presence. 4. These problems cause the colonies to repair the weakened A.O.C. III. New Laws 1. Land Ordinance of 1785 1. New townships set aside land for public education 2. Sale of public land to pay off national debt 2. Northwest Ordinance of 1787 1. Territories w/60,000 apply for statehood 2. Equal status w/ other states 3. Banned slavery North of Ohio River IV. Shay’s Rebellion & its Aftermath 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Daniel Shays High taxes, debtor prisons, lack of valuable currency 1786—Demanded restitution & tax relief Congress failed to ensure states could protect the rights & liberties of their own citizens The A.O.C need to be fixed!!! V. Constitutional Convention (Philadelphia Convention) 1. 2. 3. May 25, 1787—55 delegates from all states but RI met. Washington elected chairperson James Madison, delegate from VA, became the leading voice. 1. Central Government—power would exceed the power of the states 2. Separation of Powers—exec., leg., & jud. branches 3. “Factions”—strong national gov. keep these views in check. 4. A.O.C would be thrown out!!!! VI. A Great Compromise is Reached 1. 2. 3. State representation in the legislative branch? Virginia Plan Edmund Randolph, larger states May 29, 1787—rep.based solely on population. A Great Compromise is Reached (cont’d) 3. New Jersey Plan—William Patterson 1. Equal representation 2. Unicameral House 4. June 11, 1787—Roger Shermanthe Great Compromise (Connecticut Compromise) 1. House of Reps.: based on the pop. of states 2. House of Senate: equal representation; regardless of state population. VII. An Executive Decision and the 3/5 Compromise 1. 2. 3. Pres. elected by a rep.body; not a popular vote---avoid “mobocracy” Electoral College—cast votes as reps. of their states. Presidential Powers: 1. Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces 2. Chief Diplomat 3. Veto legislation. 3/5 Compromise 4. 5. What about the slaves? 3/5—Southern slaves would be counted as 3/5 a citizen 1. A deal for passing the Northwest Ordinance 2. 1808—South ended legal importation of slaves VIII. Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists 1. 2. 3. 4. Problems in ratifying. 9 of the 13 colonies required to ratify. Many feared the return of tyranny Federalists 1. In favor of the Constitution 2. Strong central government 5. Anti-Federalists 1. Opposed the Constitution 2. In favor of strong states’ rights Ratifying the Constitution (cont’d) 6. VA was critical. 1. Most populous state 2. Largest number of Anti-Federalists 3. Bill of Rights 1. 2. Individual freedoms State sovereignty The Federalist Papers 7. Encourage NY Ratification 1. Madison, Hamilton, Jay85 essays 2. The Federalist Papers 1. 2. Ratify the Constitution Refuted doubts about a central gov. ruling a vast land IX. Structuring the New Republic 1. April 30, 1789 1. Washington takes office 2. John Adams VP 3. Washington sets precedents 1. 2. 3. 4. Secretary of State-Jefferson Secretary of Treasury-Hamilton Secretary of War- Knox Attorney General-Randolph 4. “Cabinet”—these 4 men Judiciary Act of 1789 2. Established: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Supreme Court One presiding chief justice 5 associate justices 13 district courts 3 circuit courts of appeal X. Hamilton Fixes Finances 1. Report on Public Credit (1790) 1. Monetary/Fiscal Policy favor the richthey spend in the economystimulate domestic growth 2. Report on Manufactures(1791) 1. Protect the infant industrialization of the U.S. 2. Strong protective tariffs Hamilton Fixes Finances (cont’d) 3. 5 components: 1. Boost national credit 2. “Father/Son” relationship between states and federal government 3. Heavy tariffs on imported goods 4. Excise taxes on whiskey 5. National bank Hamilton Fixes Finances (cont’d) 4. Fed. Gov. assume all state debts 1. Capital on the banks of the Potomac River 5. Revenue Act of 1789 1. 8% tariff on imports 2. Such goods as whiskey to make up the shortfall in revenue XI. The Bank of the United States (BUS) 1. National treasury would keep its deposits in the bank 1. Keep the funds safe & available as loanable funds 2. Jefferson opposed 1. Strict Constructionist—Strict interpretation of the constitution. 3. Hamilton support the BUS 1. Loose Constructionist—Loose interpretation of the Constitution The Bank of the United States (BUS) (cont’d) 4. 5. 6. Elastic Clause—Granted Congress “implied powers” to pass laws that were “necessary & proper” to run the country effectively. Washington agreed with Hamilton; signs the bank into law in 1791. Party system arises The Bank of the United States (BUS) (cont’d) 7. Democratic-Republicans 1. Thomas Jefferson 2. Limit the powers of the central gov. 3. Greater state’s rights 8. Federalists 1. Strong national gov. 2. Powers supreme over the states XII. Development of Foreign Policy 1. French Revolution (1789-1793) 1. Jeffersonuphold the Franco-American alliance in 1778 2. Hamiltonneutral to maintain trade relations with Britain. 2. 3. Neutrality Proclamation of 1793 French & British began seizing American ships in the Atlantic 1. Seize the cargo 2. Impress sailors into military service Development of Foreign Policy (cont’d) 4. Chief Justice John Jay 1. Negotiate with the British to reaffirm U.S. neutrality 2. Removal of British forts in the West. 5. Pinckney’s Treaty 1. Settlement boundary 2. Navigation on the Mississippi River 3. Use of the Port of New Orleans Development of Foreign Policy (cont’d) 6. Washington’s Farewell Address 1. 2. 3. 4. Left office in 1797 Remain neutral in European affairs! Avoid entangling alliances Refrain from “factions” or political parties XIII. Internal Issues Facing the New Government 1. 2. 3. 4. Threat of Indian attack Insurrection by angry citizens Settlement of western lands Treaty of Greenville 1. Shawnee, Miami give up lands in Ohio & Indiana. Internal Issues Facing the New Government (cont’d) 5. Whiskey Rebellion 1. Excise Tax on whiskey 2. Farmers protested violently 3. Significance: 1. 2. Pres. Washington put down the rebellion New fed. Gov. had the power to maintain peace. X. Adams as 2nd President 1. 2. Pres. Adams; VP Jefferson XYZ Affair 1. 1797—stop the seizing of American vessels by the French 2. French agents X, Y, Z 3. U.S. refused to bribe XYZ Affair (cont’d) 3. “Quasi-War” 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. Hamilton calls for military action 1798-1800 West Indies U.S. vs. French Convention of 1800 1. Ended Franco-American alliance 2. U.S. pay for damaged French vessels 3. Avoid all-out war XI. Alien and Sedition Acts 1. 2. Federalists aimed to silence opposition Alien Acts 1. Residency requirements; 5 to 14 years 2. President power to detain &/or deport enemy aliens in times of war 3. Sedition Act 1. Illegal to criticize the Pres. or Congress 2. Heavy fine or imprisonment 4. Theory of nullification 1. States pass their own laws to nullify the Alien & Sedition Acts 5. Kentucky & Virginia Resolutions 1. 2. The states, not the Supreme Court, were the final judges of the limits of federal power States were justified in declaring federal law null and void