* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Crop wild relatives in changing climates
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Crop wild relatives in changing climates Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez, Harold A. Achicanoy, Colin K. Khoury and Nigel Maxted 1st International Agrobiodiversity Congress, November 2016, New Delhi, India Crop wild relatives are important for agriculture Grassy stunt virus resistance from Oryza nivara Aluminium tolerance from Oryza rufipogon Salinity tolerance from Solanum cheesmaniae Salinity tolerance from Helianthus paradoxus Crop wild relatives are important for agriculture Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi Biodiversity Target 13 “By 2020, the genetic diversity of cultivated plants and farmed and domesticated animals and of wild relatives, including other socioeconomically as well as culturally valuable species, is maintained, and strategies have been developed and implemented for minimizing genetic erosion and safeguarding their genetic diversity.” https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/ Crop wild relatives are important for agriculture United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture “By 2020 maintain genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants, farmed and domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at national, regional and international levels, and ensure access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge as internationally agreed” https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 Ex situ conservation Use of crop wild relatives in breeding is facilitated through genebanks. Representativeness of CWR in genebanks: 71.1% (765): High priority for collecting 13.8% (148): Medium priority for collecting 11.0% (118): Low priority for collecting 1076 CWR taxa analyzed 4.2% (45) Sufficiently represented in genebanks Castañeda-Álvarez et al. 2016 Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. Nature Plants. doi:10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.22 Crop wild relatives are threatened in their habitats Brummit, NA. et al. PLoS ONE, e0135152 (2015) Bilz, M. et al. European Red List of Vascular Plants (2011) How climate change can impact crop wild relatives? Climate change scenario selection • RCP 4.5 (stabilization scenario) • Similar median temperature rise as SRES B1 (~3° C by 2100) • Time slice analyzed: 2050s (2040 – 2069) • Spatial resolution: 2.5’ x 2.5’ • Migration scenarios: moderate and no-migration 10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z Potential distribution of CWR (current climate) Solanum colombianum (potato CWR) Potential distribution of CWR (future climate) Solanum colombianum (potato CWR) Potential impacts in regard to climatically suitable areas Potential losses Potential gains No changes expected Solanum colombianum (potato CWR) Crop wild relatives are threatened Most impacted wild genepools (all migration scenarios): • Finger millet • Potato • Cowpea Less affected genepools: • Rice • Pigeonpea Individual CWR taxa highly affected Likely to be highly affected due to climate change, and poorly represented in genebanks Discussion • Nearly 10% of the taxa analyzed is expected to lose > 50% of their potential distributions. • Conservation strategies under climate change: • Species/regions with large negative impacts under both dispersal scenarios: improve current representativeness in ex situ facilities. • Species/regions with minor loses in future distributions to be considered as candidate sites for in situ conservation due to the relative environmental stability they offer. Acknowledgements This work was undertaken as part of the initiative “Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change: Collecting, Protecting and Preparing Crop Wild Relatives” which is supported by the Government of Norway. The project is managed by the Global Crop Diversity Trust with the Millennium Seed Bank of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew UK and implemented in partnership with national and international genebanks and plant breeding institutes around the world. For further information, go to the project website: http://www.cwrdiversity.org/ Thanks! @laguanegna [email protected]