* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The presentation template
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Werner Heisenberg wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
School of Physics something and Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL OTHER AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Putting entanglement to work: Super-dense coding, teleportation and metrology Jacob Dunningham Paraty, August 2007 Overview What can we do with entanglement? • Superdense coding • Teleportation • Quantum cryptography • Quantum computing • Quantum-limited measurements Other lectures Everyday World Quantum Information Multi-particle WILD Bunnies PEDIGREE Entanglements Cats Bats Superdense coding Suppose Alice and Bob want to communicate Classically, if Alice sends Bob one bit - only one “piece” of information is shared. Is it possible to do better using quantum physics? Superdense coding Suppose Alice and Bob want to communicate Classically, if Alice sends Bob one bit - only one “piece” of information is shared. Is it possible to do better using quantum physics? Problem: Can Alice send two classical bits of information to Bob if she is only allowed to physically send one qubit to him? Answer: Yes - by making use of entangled states Superdense coding Third party Alice 00 : I 01: Z 10 : X 11:iY 1 qubit 1 qubit Bob Alice makes one of four measurements and then sends her qubit to Bob Superdense coding Procedure: - If Alice wants to send… 00 She does nothing 01 She applies the phase flip Z to her qubit 10 She applies the quantum NOT gate X 11 She applies the iY gate Superdense coding Bell States Superdense coding Bell States Finally, Alice sends her (single) qubit to Bob Bob now has one of the Bell states. These are orthonormal and can be distinguished by measurements. Teleportation It is also possible to transfer an unknown quantum state to a distant party using entanglement - teleportation Suppose Alice has a state of the form: Unknown coefficients Teleportation It is also possible to transfer an unknown quantum state to a distant party using entanglement - teleportation Suppose Alice has a state of the form: Unknown coefficients And that Alice and Bob share a Bell state Overall: Teleportation Alice has the first two qubits (on the left) This can be rewritten in terms of the Bell states as: Teleportation Alice has the first two qubits (on the left) This can be rewritten in terms of the Bell states as: If Alice detects in the Bell-state basis, Bob’s state is projected onto one of these Teleportation If Alice measures Bob gets Successful teleportation The other outcomes require state rotations by Bob Teleportation If Alice measures Bob gets Successful teleportation The other outcomes require state rotations by Bob Alice measures Bob gets Operation Teleportation If Alice measures Bob gets Successful teleportation The other outcomes require state rotations by Bob Alice measures Bob gets Operation Alice must communicate her measurement outcome to Bob by classical means. This prevents information being transmitted faster than light. Precision measurements Cold is good Colder is better: Atomic fountains are today’s best clocks, realizing the SI second to better than 10-15. -wave Cavity ~1 cm hole For earthbound clocks, laser cooling is sufficient ~ meter high fountains give ~ 1 second return times, so ~1 cm/s velocity spread, i.e. T~1 K Cs is sufficient. NIST – U. Colorado – JPL Primary Atomic Reference Clock in Space (PARCS) Space-borne clocks, with much longer interaction times than possible on earth, will benefit from colder atoms. A BEC can provide the really cold temperatures needed. BEC in space A 100 m diameter trapped 87Rb condensate… …adiabatically expanded to 1 cm… …would, upon release, expand with less than 1 m/sec. In principle, observation times longer than 1000 seconds would be possible We’re missing a trick… Interferometer Interferometer Interferometer The phase shift can be found from: Then What is a beam splitter? What is a beam splitter? A state rotation…. What is a beam splitter? “Any physical process that transforms states in the same way as a beam splitter” What is a beam splitter? “Any physical process that transforms states in the same way as a beam splitter” For atoms, this is equivalent to tunnelling between two potential wells What is a beam splitter? What is a beam splitter? Using the identity: What is a beam splitter? Using the identity: Shot noise For a coherent state at 1 and a vacuum at 2: Shot noise For a coherent state at 1 and a vacuum at 2: The uncertainty in the phase can be found from ‘Shot noise’ Due to discreteness of outcomes - same noise as coin toss Squeezing Not squeezed Squeezed Squeezing If we use a squeezed state as the input to the beam splitter: Since: i.e. there is no advantage to squeezing the input state Squeezed vacuum Bizarrely, by squeezing the vacuum we can do better For modest squeezing: This reduces to: Squeezed vacuum Bizarrely, by squeezing the vacuum we can do better For modest squeezing: This reduces to: There is an optimum degree of squeezing. This gives: But we can still do better….. Heisenberg limit The ultimate quantum limit is the Heisenberg limit: Heisenberg limit The ultimate quantum limit is the Heisenberg limit: For a system with a fixed total number of particles, N, The maximum number uncertainty in any part of the system is N This mean that the uncertainty in the phase is: Heisenberg limit The ultimate quantum limit is the Heisenberg limit: For a system with a fixed total number of particles, N, The maximum number uncertainty in any part of the system is N This mean that the uncertainty in the phase is: Lower bound (equality) is the Heisenberg limit c.f. Shot noise Heisenberg limit The ultimate quantum limit is the Heisenberg limit: For a system with a fixed total number of particles, N, The maximum number uncertainty in any part of the system is N How do we reach this limit? This mean that the uncertainty in the phase is: Lower bound (equality) is the Heisenberg limit c.f. Shot noise The cat gets the cream Stream of single particles: i 1, 0 e 0,1 The cat gets the cream Stream of single particles: i 1, 0 e 0,1 Cat state iN N ,0 e 0, N N-fold enhancement of phase shift Bucky-ball Quic kTime™ and a TIFF (Unc ompres sed) dec ompres sor are needed to see this pic ture. Bucky-ball Quic kTime™ and a TIFF (Unc ompres sed) dec ompres sor are needed to see this pic ture. C60 molecules (1999) Bucky-ball Quic kTime™ and a TIFF (Unc ompres sed) dec ompres sor are needed to see this pic ture. C60 molecules (1999) PROBLEM: Cats are fragile – any advantage is lost Let’s try something else….. Number correlated state U Bose-Hubbard model For simplicity, we can consider a two-site system Adiabatically turn down coupling, J Initially, system in binomial state 1/ 2 N ~ k k Then as U/J: 0 k N k the state evolves to: N /2 N /2 Entangling lots of atoms Measurement scheme ? What input state should we use to measure, , with Heisenberg limited accuracy? Hong-Ou-Mandel effect Input state: Hong-Ou-Mandel effect Input state: The effect of the beam splitter is found by transforming the operators Hong-Ou-Mandel effect Input state: The effect of the beam splitter is found by transforming the operators The beam splitter ‘creates’ entanglement The same approach can be taken for: N /2 N /2 N /2 N /2 Beam splitter N=20 Independent 2ln2 Ne2 t 2/3 of atoms lost N=20 Independent 2ln2 Ne2 t Cat State 1 cos( N ) 1 e 2 N t 2 1 t 2 N 2/3 of atoms lost N=20 Independent 2ln2 Ne2 t Cat State 1 cos( N ) 1 e 2 N t 2 1 t 2 N 2/3 of atoms lost Not Entangled Mott Detectors Efficiency Classical Limit Reference: T. Kim et al. PRA 60, 708 (1999). Classical Limit To reach the Heisenberg limit we need: >11/N 1 1 N Reference: T. Kim et al. PRA 60, 708 (1999). How do we resolve this? Entangled Not Entangled Mott ? Pass back through Mott transition Reversible process – adiabatically lower potential barrier Disentangle particles Independent particles Entangling and disentangling N=20 and J = p/30 Both cases are robust to loss and insensitive to detector inefficiencies Entangled Not Entangled Mott Allows sub-SQL resolution but still robust to loss Mott Not Entangled Allows sub-SQL resolution but not destroyed by imperfect detectors N Collapse time ~1/N Atoms Position Atoms Position A phase shift of N=1, i.e. =1/N, is amplified into a dramatic observable: Interference fringes appear and disappear. Summary What can we do with entanglement? • Superdense coding • Teleportation • Quantum cryptography • Quantum computing • Quantum-limited measurements