Download Intro to AI - UMD Department of Computer Science

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Artificial intelligence in video games wikipedia , lookup

Machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Visual Turing Test wikipedia , lookup

AI winter wikipedia , lookup

Human-Computer Interaction Institute wikipedia , lookup

Turing test wikipedia , lookup

Computer chess wikipedia , lookup

Knowledge representation and reasoning wikipedia , lookup

Human–computer interaction wikipedia , lookup

Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup

Intelligence explosion wikipedia , lookup

Computer Go wikipedia , lookup

Human–computer chess matches wikipedia , lookup

Existential risk from artificial general intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

History of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Philosophy of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Introduction to AI
Russell and Norvig:
Chapter 1
CMSC421 – Fall 2005
What is AI?
Found on the Web …
AI
is the simulation of intelligent human
Intelligent
processes
behavior
AI is the reproduction of the methods
or
Computer
results of human reasoning or intuition
AI is the study of mental faculties through the
use computational methods
Using computational models to simulate
intelligent behavior
Humans
Machines to emulate
humans
Why AI?
Cognitive Science: As a way to understand how
natural minds and mental phenomena work

e.g., visual perception, memory, learning, language, etc.
Philosophy: As a way to explore some basic and
interesting (and important) philosophical questions

e.g., the mind body problem, what is consciousness, etc.
Engineering: To get machines to do a wider variety of
useful things

e.g., understand spoken natural language, recognize individual
people in visual scenes, find the best travel plan for your
vacation, etc.
Weak vs. Strong AI
Weak AI: Machines can be made to behave as if
they were intelligent
Strong AI: Machines can have consciousness
subject of fierce debate, usually among philosophers
and nay-sayers, not so much among AI researchers!
E.g. recent Red Herring article and responses

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/webir/message/1002
AI Characterizations
Discipline that systematizes and automates
intellectual tasks to create machines that:
Act like humans
Act rationally
Think like humans
Think rationally
Act Like Humans
AI is the art of creating machines that
perform functions that require
intelligence when performed by humans
Methodology: Take an intellectual task
at which people are better and make a
computer do it
•Prove a theorem
•Play chess
Turing test
•Plan a surgical operation
•Diagnose a disease
•Navigate in a building
Turing Test
Interrogator interacts with a computer and a
person via a teletype.
Computer passes the Turing test if
interrogator cannot determine which is which.
Loebner contest: Modern version of Turing
Test, held annually, with a $100,000 prize.
http://www.loebner.net/Prizef/loebner-prize.html
 Participants include a set of humans and a set of
computers and a set of judges.
 Scoring: Rank from least human to most human.
 Highest median rank wins $2000.
 If better than a human, win $100,000. (Nobody
yet…)
Chess
Name: Garry Kasparov
Title: World Chess
Champion
Crime: Valued greed
over common sense
Humans are still better at making up excuses.
© Jonathan Schaeffer
Perspective on Chess: Pro
“Saying Deep Blue doesn’t really think
about chess is like saying an airplane
doesn't really fly because it doesn't flap
its wings”
Drew McDermott
© Jonathan Schaeffer
Perspective on Chess: Con
“Chess is the Drosophila of artificial
intelligence. However, computer chess has
developed much as genetics might have if the
geneticists had concentrated their efforts
starting in 1910 on breeding racing Drosophila.
We would have some science, but mainly we
would have very fast fruit flies.”
John McCarthy
© Jonathan Schaeffer
Think Like Humans
•Connection with Psychology
How the computer performs functions
•General Problem Solver (Newell and Simon)
does matter
•Neural networks
Comparison of
the traces of the
•Reinforcement
learning
reasoning steps
Cognitive science  testable theories of
But:
the workings of the human mind
• Role of physical body, senses, and evolution
in human intelligence?
• Do we want to duplicate human imperfections?
Think/Act Rationally
Always make the best decision given
what is available
(knowledge,
•Connection
to economics,
operationaltime,
research,
resources)
and
control theory
•But
ignoresknowledge,
role of consciousness,
Perfect
unlimitedemotions,
resources
fear of dying on intelligence
 logical reasoning
Imperfect knowledge, limited resources
 (limited) rationality
AI Characterizations
Discipline that systematizes and automates
intellectual tasks to create machines that:
Act like humans
Act rationally
Think like humans
Think rationally
History of AI
Jean-Claude Latombe: I personally
think that AI is (was?) a rebellion
against some form of establishment
telling us “Computers cannot perform
certain tasks requiring intelligence”
Bits of History
1956: The name “Artificial Intelligence”
was coined by John McCarthy. (Would
“computational rationality” have been
better?)
Early period (50’s to late 60’s):
Basic principles and generality




General problem solving
Theorem proving
Games
Formal calculus
Bits of History
1969-1971: Shakey the
robot (Fikes, Hart, Nilsson)
Logic-based planning
(STRIPS)
Motion planning (visibility
graph)
Inductive learning (PLANEX)
Computer vision
Bits of History
Knowledge-is-Power period (late 60’s to
mid 80’s):


Focus on narrow tasks require expertise
Encoding of expertise in rule form:
If:
the car has off-highway tires and
4-wheel drive and
high ground clearance
Then: the car can traverse difficult terrain (0.8)



Knowledge engineering
5th generation computer project
CYC system (Lenat)
Bits of History
AI becomes an industry (80’s – present):






Expert systems: Digital Equipment,
Teknowledge, Intellicorp, Du Pont, oil
industry, …
Lisp machines: LMI, Symbolics, …
Constraint programming: ILOG
Robotics: Machine Intelligence Corporation,
Adept, GMF (Fanuc), ABB, …
Speech understanding
Information Retrieval – Google, …
Predictions and Reality … (1/3)
In the 60’s, a famous AI professor from MIT
said: “At the end of the summer, we will have
developed an electronic eye”
As of 2002, there is still no general computer
vision system capable of understanding
complex dynamic scenes
But computer systems routinely perform road
traffic monitoring, facial recognition, some
medical image analysis, part inspection, etc…
Predictions and Reality … (2/3)
In 1958, Herbert Simon (CMU) predicted
that within 10 years a computer would
be Chess champion
This prediction became true in 1998
Today, computers have won over world
champions in several games, including
Checkers, Othello, and Chess, but still do
not do well in Go
Predictions and Reality … (3/3)
In the 70’s, many believed that computer-controlled
robots would soon be everywhere from manufacturing
plants to home
Today, some industries (automobile, electronics) are
highly robotized, but home robots are still a thing of
the future
But robots have rolled on Mars, others are performing
brain and heart surgery, and humanoid robots are
operational and available for rent (see:
http://world.honda.com/news/2001/c011112.html)
Why is AI Hard?
Simple syntactic manipulation is not
enough
•Machine Translation
•Big project in 1957 following Sputnik launch
•Translation of Russian documents
•‘The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak’
•‘The vodka is strong but the meat is rotten’
Eliza
ELIZA: A program that simulated a psychotherapist
interacting with a patient
Coded at MIT during 1964-1966 by Joel Weizenbaum.
First script was DOCTOR.


The script was a simple collection of syntactic patterns not unlike
regular expressions
Each pattern had an associated reply which might include bits of
the input (after simple transformations (my  your)
Weizenbaum was shocked at reactions:



Psychiatrists thought it had potential.
People unequivocally anthropomorphized.
Many thought it solved the NL problem.
Try typing Meta-x doctor in Emacs.
Recent Loebner Prize winner, http://www.alicebot.org/
Colby’s PARRY
Kenneth Colby
modeled a paranoid
using the same
techniques circa
1968.
PARRY has basic
emotions. If it gets
angry, its replies
become more hostile.
In a Turing test,
expert psychiatrists
were unable to
distinguish PARRY’s
ramblings from those
of real paranoids.
H: Good afternoon. My name is
Doctor Jones.
P: Pleased to meet you.
H: How are you?
P: All right I guess.
H: Could you tell me your name?
P: Pat Smith.
H: I though you might have some
problems.
P: I've been upset lately.
H: By what?
P: People get on my nerves
sometimes.
H: Tell me more.
P: Do you know anything about
bookies?
...
Parry
meets
Eliza…
P:
E:
P:
E:
P:
E:
P:
E:
P:
I don't understand your motives.
Why don't you understand my motives?
Shouldn't I be?
Why do you say that just now?
That's just the way it is.
Suppose that's the way it were not.
So?
I am not sure I understand you fully.
You harp on the same questions too
much.
E: What does that similarity suggest to
you?
P: I don't get you.
E: Do you wish that you did get I?
Why is AI Hard?
Computational intractability
•AI goal defined before notion of NP-completeness
•people thought to solve larger problems we
simply need larger/faster computers
•didn’t
understand
notion
exponential
ALL
of the
algorithms the
we will
studyof
will
be computational
intractable
growth (NP-complete as best) in the WORST case …
How does the fact that we are dealing with the REAL
WORLD make solving these computationally challenging
problems feasible IN PRACTICE?
CMSC 421
We will focus on the rational agents
(“engineering”) paradigm
Make computers act more intelligently


techniques: search, learning, constraint
satisfaction, decision theory
tasks: perception, commonsense
reasoning, planning
Goals for Class
You will learn a bunch of tools that are useful
for building useful, adaptive software… to
solve fun and challenging problems
These tools will be useful for you whether
you go into AI research (basics that anyone
should know) or any other discipline (oh, hey,
that looks like the planning problems we
studied way back in cmsc421)
Help you separate hype from what’s easily
achievable using existing tools (and avoid
reinventing them!)
Syllabus
Representing knowledge
Problem solving:


Reasoning or using
knowledge
Learning or Acquiring
knowledge
Search
Constraint satisfaction
Game-playing
Logic and Inference
Planning
Dealing with Uncertainty


Uncertainy Belief networks
Decision making under
uncertainty
Learning



Supervised
Statistical
Reinforment Learning
What you’re responsible for
Class participation, 5%



expected to read material before class
attend class (not just in body – class not for reading the news paper, web
surfing, etc.)
participate in in-class exercises
Homework, 25%

6-8 written homeworks
Programming Assignments, 20%

2-3 programming assignments
Midterm, 25%

In class, tentatively Oct. 18
Final, 30%

Wed. Dec 21, 10:30 – 12:30 (note that this is last day of finals)
See web page, http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/fall2005/cmsc421/ for
details
Quiz
Does a plane fly?
Does a boat swim?
Does a computer think?
About Myself
PhD from the Stanford University 2001 (Learning
Statistical Models from Relational Data) working w/
Daphne Koller
Before that worked at NASA doing constraint-based
planning for analyzing earth science data
Before that worked as a software engineer at an expert
systems company
MS from UC Berkeley working w/ Stuart Russell
Joined UMD December 2001
Research interests: probabilistic reasoning and
machine learning
Applications to data mining, databases, medicine, etc.