Survey

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia, lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia, lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia, lookup

Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia, lookup

Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia, lookup

Coherent states wikipedia, lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia, lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia, lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia, lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia, lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia, lookup

Density matrix wikipedia, lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia, lookup

X-ray fluorescence wikipedia, lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia, lookup

Quantum state wikipedia, lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia, lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia, lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia, lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia, lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia, lookup

Quantum group wikipedia, lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia, lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia, lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia, lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia, lookup

Renormalization wikipedia, lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia, lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia, lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia, lookup

Bell test experiments wikipedia, lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia, lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia, lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia, lookup

Transcript

One photon stored in four places at once The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Vuletic, Vladan. “Quantum physics: Entangled quartet.” Nature 468.7322 (2010): 384-385. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/468384a Publisher Nature Publishing Group Version Author's final manuscript Accessed Thu May 26 04:55:20 EDT 2016 Citable Link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71266 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ One photon stored in four places at once Quantum mechanics allows a particle to exist in different places at the same time. Now a single photon has been stored simultaneously in four locations while maintaining its wave character. When light passes through two slits to hit a distant screen, a periodic light pattern emerges that is associated with the interference of the waves emanating from the two sources. Some of quantum physics’ deepest mysteries – or, according to the iconic Richard Feynman, its only mystery – arise when that observation is made with a single particle that, although indivisible, must have passed simultaneously through both slits. Recent advances in the storage of single photons in atomic gases [1] have now enabled a tour-de-force experiment that investigates interference with light stored simultaneously in four spatially distinct atom clouds, as reported on p. xxx of this issue. Chou et al. demonstrate stronger-than-classical correlations (entanglement) in this composite matter-light system, and study how the entanglement gives way to weaker and weaker, and ultimately only classical, correlations. Classical correlations can arise in situations of limited knowledge about a system. For instance, if we know that one coin (or photon) has been hidden in one of four boxes, then discovering the coin in one box would instantaneously tell us that the other three boxes are empty, even if they were separated from each other by light years. It is not surprising that “particle-type” detection (Fig. 1a) reveals correlations in the number of coins found in the different boxes if the total number of coins is known. If, on the other hand, identical light has been stored simultaneously in all four boxes – or, for that matter, coins sufficiently small to display quantum wave character – then in an alternative measurement where the light is combined in an interferometer before detection (Fig. 1b), we would find that the detection probabilities vary periodically with the interferometer path length differences. This “wavetype” detection reveals correlations in the phases of the stored waves, and full correlations require all boxes to initially contain light. In a classical world the system can be initially prepared to exhibit either particle-type or wave-type correlations, but not both. The system will exhibit particle-type correlations if a single photon is placed in one and only one of the boxes, in which case there will be no interference in Fig. 1b. Alternatively, if all boxes are filled simultaneously with identical classical fields, the system will exhibit full wave-type correlations. However, these classical fields necessarily contain many photons, in which case one would expect no correlations in the particle-type detection setup of Fig. 1a. Nevertheless, in the quantum world we live in, it is possible to prepare non-locally stored single photon such that full correlations are observed, no matter which detection setup (Fig. 1a or Fig. 1b) is chosen. Quantum correlations are thus stronger than classical correlations in that different types of correlations can coexist in one and the same initial state. Chou et al. use four atomic ensembles as the storage boxes. Such systems not only hold the photon, but also act as highly directional emitters that can be triggered on demand by the application of a laser pulse [1,2]. The Caltech team then measures correlations between the different boxes either in the particle- type detection setup (Fig. 1a) or in the wave-type setup (Fig. 1b), and from the combination of those measurements extracts the degree of entanglement. Using a method previously developed for a single photon traveling simultaneously along four possible paths [3], they identify boundaries between entanglement that necessarily involves all four boxes, three, or just two of the boxes, and observe the gradual transition from fourfold to no entanglement in the presence of noise and other imperfections. While quantum-correlated states with more parts have been observed (the current records stand at observed entanglement for 14 ions [4], and inferred entanglement of over 100 atoms [5]), the present system is special in that the entanglement can be efficiently mapped on demand from a material system onto a light field. Such systems, that have already reached light storage times measured in milliseconds [6,7], have a variety of potential applications in quantum-protected communication over long distances [1] or overcoming quantum limits in precision measurements. P.S. The astute reader may wonder how it is that quantum correlations can be tested with a single photon as any correlation requires more than one system. The controversy about this issue can be resolved [8] by viewing the four boxes as the systems that exhibit correlations (in photon number), rather than considering a single photon with qualms about its parent box. Figure caption Quantum mechanics allows a single particle to exist simultaneously in multiple locations. Here a single photon is simultaneously stored in four boxes (atomic ensembles). The single-photon character of the stored light can be detected in a particle-type measurement (a), where only one of the four detectors D1, D2, D3, D4 will register a photon. Alternatively, the wave character of the single photon can be tested via its ability to interfere with itself in a wave-type measurement setup (b). In a classical world, correlations in the detection setups (a), (b) are mutually exclusive, and hence the combination of both measurements can probe quantum correlations between the four boxes. References 1. L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics”, Nature 414, 413 (2001). 2. V. Vuletic, “When Superatoms Talk Photons”, Nature Physics News & Views 2, 801 (2006). 3. S. B. Papp, K.S. Choi, H. Deng, P. Lougovski, S. J. van Enk, and H. J. Kimble, "Characterization of Multipartite Entanglement for One Photon Shared Among Four Optical Modes", Science 324, 764 (2009). 4. Thomas Monz et al., “Coherence of large-scale entanglement”, arXiv:1009.6126 (2010). 5. C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Estève, M. K. Oberthaler, “Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit”, Nature 464, 1165 (2010). 6. R. Zhao et al., "Long-Lived Quantum Memory", Nature Physics 5, 100 (2009). 7. B. Zhao et al, “A Millisecond Quantum Memory for Scalable Quantum Networks”, Nature Physics 5, 95-99 (2009). 8. S. J. van Enk, “Single-particle entanglement”, Phys. Rev. A 72, 064306 (2005), and references therein.