Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SUSTAINABILITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE AND MULTIHAZARD RISK MANAGEMENT: MULTI-SECTOR R & D PRIORITIES K J Ramesh Adviser & Scientist-’G’ Ministry of Earth Sciences New Delhi Issues Central to the Sustainability We will have to approach the issue of sustainability at three system levels global, social and human. All the three systems are crucial for sustaining existence of humans and preserving our environment. The global system is essentially the earth system, atmosphere, oceans, cryosphere, geosphere and biosphere. This system provides energy, resources and ecosystem to survive. Ocean is an important component of the earth system and control weather and climate and influence biota. Ocean makes the planet Earth habitable. We know that the earth system influences all our activities and vice-versa. The social system comprises political, economic, industrial structures created by us to advance our development. It is believed that development is linked to economic growth and technological advancement. We have also seen such developments may lead to environmental related issues. The human system involves factors responsible for survival of individual human beings and closely linked to social system. The healthy functioning of the human system depends on our lifestyle and values. Human beings are mainly affected by inequalities in the social system. During last two centuries or so, after the industrial revolution, we have seen that human and social systems have significantly affected our environment and has become major driver of influencing the earth system. The earth system components, especially carbon cycle and ocean acidification, sea level changes, loss of biodiversity and modern-agriculture induced pollution of reactive nitrogen and phosphorous, have reached to level which can potentially alter the equilibrium among the components of the Earth system . Global efforts in the recent few decades has been to augment global ocean observation system to study the role of oceans, especially capture climate change signatures, conservation and sustainable use of marine living resources and coastal zone management. Though we have made significant progress in global ocean observations, we need to augment and sustain such observations for very long time. Our focused observations are related to sea temperature, pCO2, sea level rise and changes in mass, bio-geochemical measurements, micro-nutrients and trace elements for marine ecosystems dynamics and carbon cycling, microbial oceanography, etc. These observations need to be assimilated into improved Earth System Models(ESMs) to forecast impact on productivity of marine waters with improved accuracy and reliability. Biogeochemical Cycles The alteration of the global nitrogen cycle is even more dramatic through fertilizer production and transforming the inert form of nitrogen into biologically available forms At the continental to regional scale sulphur emissions have altered the acidity of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, at the same time as increasing the aerosol content of the atmosphere and consequentially the Earth’s albedo. Context Drive for economic growth and social upliftment is generating new disaster risks. Increasing urbanisation leading to unstable living environment is an example. 1950 <30% of worlds 2.5 billion people lived in an urban setting. 1998 ~45% of worlds 5.7 billion people lived in cities 2035 (as per UN) ~60% of worlds 8.5 billion people will live in cities The population density in these urban centers and concentrations of economic activity will make these areas more vulnerable. And new cities are coming up undesirably in high risk zones, concentrating wealth, physical structures and infrastructure together in the high risk zones. Development processes are thus currently largely associated with risk accumulation and not risk reduction. Context Climate Change • Impact of human activities on climate systems is unequivocal. • Observed changes in climate over the Indian region: An increase of 0.4oC in the last 100 years Substantial changes in precipitation on a spatial scale An increase in intensity of heavy precipitation events Rise in sea level along the Indian coast @ 1.06-1.25 mm/year over last 40 years • Climate projections indicate Rise in temperature by 2-4oC by 2050s Decrease in number of rainy days Increase in intensity of rainfall Adverse impacts on key economic sectors and vulnerabilities of climate sensitive regions Climate Change Impacts Water Security Food security Energy Security GDP and Development Adaptation Priorities demand deliberate adjustments in natural or human systems and behaviours Moisture/Water conserving practices; hybrid selection; crop substitution; conservation specific stress tolerant breeds; improved farm management practices Observed Rainfall Trends over India Source: Goswami et al., Science, Dec., 2006 Frequency of Extreme Rainfall Events 45 Frequency 40 9-point Filter 35 25 20 15 10 5 Year Rajeevan et al. 2008, Geophys. Res. Letters 2009 2005 2001 1997 1993 1989 1985 1981 1977 1973 1969 1965 1961 1957 1953 1949 1945 1941 1937 1933 1929 1925 1921 1917 1913 1909 1905 0 1901 Frequency 30 One–Day Extreme Rainfall Records During 2010 2010 Death toll due to heavy rains / floods in different parts of the country, during the monsoon season >500 (mostly from northern and north-western parts). Heavy rainfall events in November 2010 took a toll of more than 50 people from peninsular parts (AP, TN and Karnataka) of the country. STATION NETWORK HEAVY RF > 10 CM Very HEAVY RF > 15 CM Rajeevan et al. 2008, Geophys. Res. Letters Projected changes (2030)- Water Water yield – Himalayan region: likely to increase North Eastern region: Reduction Western ghats: Variable water yield changes projected across the region Coastal region: general reduction in water yield Impact Assessments - 2040-60 Agriculture 4.5t/ha (Control) Water Coastal zones 4.5/ha (Climate Change) 2.5t/ha (Control) 2.5/ha (Climate Change) Malaria Acute physical water scarce conditions Constant water scarcities and shortage Seasonal / regular stressed conditions Rare water shortages Forests Dry savannah Xeric Shrub land Xeric woodland T W Open for months 4-6 Tropical Seasonal Forest Boreal Evergreen 7-9 CA RN IC OB AR 10-12 N.A Tundra • The globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature data show a warming of 0.85 [0.65 to 1.06]°C over the period 1880– 2012, when multiple independently produced datasets exist. • The total increase between the average of the 1850–1900 period and the 2003–2012 period is 0.78 [0.72 to 0.85] °C, based on the single longest dataset available • Due to natural variability, trends based on short records are very sensitive to the beginning and end dates and do not in general reflect long-term climate trends. • As one example, the rate of warming over the past 15 years (1998–2012; 0.05 [–0.05 to +0.15] °C per decade), which begins with a strong El Niño, is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951 (1951–2012; 0.12 [0.08 to 0.14] °C per decade • Confidence in precipitation change averaged over global land areas since 1901 is low prior to 1951 and medium afterwards. • Averaged over the mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere, precipitation has increased since 1901 (medium confidence before and high confidence after 1951). • For other latitudes area-averaged long-term positive or negative trends have low confidence. limited, medium, or robust low, medium, or high very low, low, medium, high, and very high, and typeset in italics, e.g., medium confidence •To indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: virtually certain 99–100% probability, very likely 90–100%, likely 66–100%, about as likely as not 33–66%, unlikely 0–33%, very unlikely 0–10%, exceptionally unlikely 0–1% •Additional terms (extremely likely: 95–100%, more likely than not >50–100%, and extremely unlikely 0–5%) •To Describe the available evidence: •For the degree of agreement: •A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers: Extreme weather and climate events: Global-scale assessment of recent observed changes, human contribution to the changes, and projected further changes for the early (2016–2035) and late (2081–2100) 21st century. Bold indicates where the AR5 (black) provides a revised* global-scale assessment from the SREX (blue) or AR4 (red) Projections for early 21st century were not provided in previous assessment reports. Projections in the AR5 are relative to the reference period of 1986–2005, and use the new Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios • The rate of sea level rise since the mid-19th century has been larger than the mean rate during the previous two millennia (high confidence). Over the period 1901–2010, global mean sea level rose by 0.19 [0.17 to 0.21] m • It is very likely that the mean rate of global averaged sea level rise was 1.7 [1.5 to 1.9] mm yr–1 between 1901 and 2010, 2.0 [1.7 to 2.3] mm yr–1 between 1971 and 2010 and 3.2 [2.8 to 3.6]mm yr–1 between 1993 and 2010. Tide-gauge and satellite altimeter data are consistent regarding the higher rate of the latter period. Since the early 1970s, glacier mass loss and ocean thermal expansion from warming together explain about 75% of the observed global mean sea level rise (high confidence). Over the period 1993–2010, global mean sea level rise is, with high confidence, consistent with the sum of the observed contributions from • ocean thermal expansion due to warming: (1.1 [0.8 to 1.4] mm yr–1) • changes in glaciers: (0.76 [0.39 to 1.13] mm yr–1) • Greenland ice sheet: (0.33 [0.25 to 0.41] mm yr–1) • Antarctic ice sheet: (0.27 [0.16 to 0.38] mm yr–1) and • land water storage: (0.38 [0.26 to 0.49] mm yr–1) [100 Gt yr−1 of ice loss is equivalent to about 0.28 mm yr−1 of global mean sea level rise] Maps of CMIP5 multi-model mean results for the scenarios RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 in 2081–2100 of (a) annual mean surface temperature change, (b) average percent change in annual mean precipitation, (c) Northern Hemisphere September sea ice extent and (d) change in ocean surface pH. Changes in panels (a), (b) and (d) are shown relative to 1986–2005. • The number of CMIP5 models used to calculate the multi-model mean is indicated in the upper right corner of each panel. • For panels (a) and (b), hatching indicates regions here the multi-model mean is small compared to internal variability (i.e., less than one standard deviation of internal variability in 20-year means). • Stippling indicates regions where the multimodel mean is large compared to internal variability (i.e., greater than two standard deviations of internal variability in 20-year means) and where 90% of models agree on the sign of change • In panel (c), the lines are the modelled means for 1986−2005; the filled areas are for the end of the century. The CMIP5 multi-model mean is given in white colour, the projected mean sea ice extent of a subset of models (number of models given in brackets) that most closely reproduce the climatological mean state and 1979‒2012 trend of the Arctic sea ice extent is given in light blue colour Projected change in global mean surface air temperature and global mean sea level rise for the mid- and late 21st century relative to the reference period of 1986–2005 Eight National Missions on Climate Change National Solar Mission National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency National Mission on Sustainable Habitat National Water Mission National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Eco-system National Mission for a Green India National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture National Mission on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change Sustainability of Natural Resources • Principles of science and Technology based resource management are developed, and prospects for sustainability are to be explored. • Three generic categories of resource are analyzed: exhaustible, living/environment/ecosystem, and renewable. i) Emphasizing the lifecycle of exploitation including exhaustion, exploration and substitution. ii) Exploring population dynamics under natural and harvested regimes for fisheries and forests. iii) Water is treated in terms of quantity and quality. Throughout, the intersection of natural, economic, and political behavior needs to be explored Key Questions of Sustainability, The S & T needs to answer • Identification of linkages among the global hydrological cycle, climate variability and change, and global biogeochemical cycles? • How and to what extent is human activity altering the global hydrological and biogeochemical cycles? • What is the limit of the Earth system for the renewability of freshwater and major biogeochemical constituents needed to support life?, and • How much human activity have to change to allow the major cycles of the Earth System to return to more ‘natural’ dynamic and sustainable equilibrium? Applications of GIS for Sustainability • Inventory of species, • Measure environmental impact, 1 Environment • Trace pollutants • Environment management and planning • Topographical information • Managing crop yields, 2 Agriculture • Monitoring crop rotation techniques, • Projecting soil loss for individual farms or entire agricultural regions. • Assess groundwater, 3 Hydrology • Visualize watersheds, • Lakes and Wetlands Applications of GIS for Sustainability • 4 5 6 Land use Geology Forestry Visualize and plan the land use needs of cities, regions, or even national governments • Helps in decision making for future growth development • Analyze soils and strata, • Assess seismic information, • Create 3-dimensional displays of geographic features. • Managing and planning of forests • To assess conditions through historical analysis, stand inventory, soil types, changing weather patterns, and land-use practices • Forest fire mapping • Monitor and analyze the temporal and spatial change in forest ecosystem sue to natural and man-made disturbances. Applications of GIS for Sustainability 7 • To locate areas prone to natural or man-made disasters. • Generate a flood forecasting model to identify affected parcels to Risk management • • prioritize for remediation or damage assessment. To prepare for future assessment of risks Identification of critical prone areas to Landslides and other disasters • Planning, engineering, operations, maintenance, finance, and administration functions 8 Water/waste water industry • Assessing water quality and quantity • Assess relationships such as runoff and groundwater purity • To monitor water quality changes within a water body such as a river or bay Flood level During 1998 floods Surat Floods: 1998 Source:- Surat CDP Flood Above 6 feet Flood 4’-6’ Flood 2’-4’ Flood 0’-2’ Flood level During 2006 floods Surat Floods: 2006 Source:- Surat CDP More than 10’ Depth 5’-10’ Depth 4’-6’ Depth • Cause of the urban heat island: – Modification of the land surface by urban development which uses materials which effectively retain heat; – Waste heat generated by energy usage is a secondary contributor. The urban canopy layer (UCL) is the layer of air closest to the surface in cities, extending upwards to approximately the mean building height. Above the urban canopy layer lies the urban boundary layer (UBL), which is 1km in thickness. Urban heat island Remedial Options (to reduce by ~ 2.0oC) Densifying the Tree cover under Urban Forestry Soil Moisture Conservation Rainwater Harvesting Source: Research paper by Swarnima Singh On GIS APPLICATION IN URBAN HEAT ISLAND: A CRUSADING ANTHROPOGENIC DRIVER TO CLIMATE CHANGE Urban Heat Island • Remote sensing instrument used for UHI: ASTER: Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer • Advanced along Track Scanning Radiometer (AASTAR) and PALSAR are used for estimating surface temperature and land cover change • By utilizing remote sensing data and implementing GIS mapping techniques, change detection over a period of time of the urban areas can be monitored and mapped. Source: Research paper by Swarnima Singh On GIS APPLICATION IN URBAN HEAT ISLAND: A CRUSADING ANTHROPOGENIC DRIVER TO CLIMATE CHANGE Spatial Pattern of Urban Heat Island (an overlay of AASTER AND PALSAR data analysis) Land Use / Land Cover Space-borne remote sensing data can be used for estimation of biomass and biodiversity, Geo-spatial modeling techniques can be employed to estimate carbon sequestration patterns Priorities for India as Reflected in NAPCC Mission Targets Sustainable • Improvements in energy efficiency in buildings; Habitat • Better urban planning and modal shift to public transport • Improved management of solid and liquid waste • Improve ability of habitats to adapt to climate change • Measures for improving advance warning systems for extreme weather events • Conservation through appropriate changes in legal and regulatory framework. Deliverables • Development of sustainable habitat standards that lead to robust development strategies while simultaneously addressing climate change related concerns • Preparation of city development plans that comprehensively address adaptation and mitigation concerns • Preparation of comprehensive mobility plans that enable cities to undertake long-term, energy efficient and cost effective transport planning and • Capacity building for undertaking activities Development of Indices for the Assessment and Monitoring of the Sustainable Storm Water Management Mission Sustainable Habitat Targets Parameters/indicators are generally in the form of indices, for systematic and scientific assessment of situation, progress and deficit Deliverables • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Master Plan Index Natural Drainage System Index Drainage Coverage(Constructed) Index Permeability Index Water bodies Rejuvenation Index Water body Vulnerability Index Water logging Index Area Vulnerability Index Flood Moderation Index Drainage Cleaning Index Complaint Redressal index Climate Change Stress Index Storm water discharge quality Index Sewage Mixing Index Preparedness Index/ Early Warning Index Rainfall Intensity Index System Robustness Index Tidal Index Rain water Harvesting/Artificial Ground water Recharge Index Appropriate S & T tools for urban flooding are to be identified and customized in the following areas Urban Flood probability assessment Urban Flood impact assessment (in terms of extent, duration and cost) Development of safe, cost-effective, sustainable and environmentally sound operation and management of urban drainage (sewage/ storm water/ storage) systems Early Warning Decision support for planning multi-departmental emergency response planning Operational planning of Urban Water Sheds (surface water management and storage systems) Identifying targeted Urban Flood recovery measures and methodologies Evolve integrated pathways to increase resilience and robustness (for the prevention and mitigation of flood risk in urban areas). Priority: Flood impacts are to be estimated on a much higher level of detail Hence, it is necessary to opt for an impact based urban flood management (UFM) by taking the consequences of urban floods as a starting point for the development of responses (by developing new tools that map and analyze flood impacts by fully accounting for concentration, differentiation and complexity of the urban environment. Further, such an attempt should involve the assessment of economic impacts of floods on the existing historical/legacy infrastructure as well as the development of new flood resilient areas capable of dealing with larger degrees of uncertainty about the occurrence of extreme flood events. UFM Prerequisites: Regular Monitoring of Human and Other Factors Land Use changes (sealing of permeability surfaces; deforestation etc. leading to decrease of infiltration and increase in surface run-off) Details of occupation of the flood plain and obstructing natural drainage and flows Upstream drainage efficiency (actual carrying capacity) status Urban sewage and storm water drainage efficiency (nonmaintenance) status Varying nature and frequency of rain storms (climate change or otherwise) Estimating Quantum of water accumulation over the Urban Areas S. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Quantum of Water for 1-Cm of Rainfall Received 1-Sq Km area collects about 9.96million liters of water Per every 1-Cm of Rainfall Received Name Area (Sq. Km) Delhi Mumbai Kolkata Chennai Hyderabad Bangalore India 1,485 484 531 414 583 534 3,166,285 Quantum of Water (in million liters) 14,791.5 4,820.6 5,288.8 4,123.4 5,806.7 5,318.6 3,15,36,198 On reaching the ground surface, rainfall either seeps into the ground or flows over as runoff that eventually into drains, rivers/lakes etc. as per the designed urban drainage network Factors that are critical for the traverse of rain water after it falls The rate of rainfall - A lot of rain in a short period tends to run off the land into streams rather than soak into the ground. The topography of the urban land - Topography is the gravitational slope of the land -- the hills, valleys, uneven upward/downward slopes. Water falling on unlevel land drains downhill until it becomes part of a stream, finds a hollow place to accumulate, like a lake, or soaks into the ground (evolving a high resolution 1:5000 to 1:10000 scale topography is essential for mapping gravitational drainage channels in the urban environment for locating water harvesting structures) Soil conditions – Identification of suitable zones (high adsorbing soil with low permeability, low adsorbing soil with high permeability) the urban land is critical for effectively planning for surface runoff reduction Factors that are critical for the traverse of rain water after it falls Density of vegetation and Land Cover - It has long been known that plant growth helps decrease erosion caused by flowing water. Transforming segments of land with plant/grass cover with underlying types of soils as a part of developmental planning of urban areas, effectively slows the speed of the water flowing on it and thus helps to keep soil from eroding over the downward slopes. Amount of urbanization - Restoration of natural drainage channels and re-constructing pervious pavements and parking areas is to be attempted to reduce the surface runoff flowing beyond the drawing capacity of storm water drains along side of the roads) Factors to be accounted for Urban Flood Impacts Changing Profile of Exposure Vs Flooding Changing Profile of Vulnerability Vs Flooding Changing Profile of Flood Intensity/Frequency Vs Flooding Local Authority level issues local authorities and decision-makers responsible for flood security are to learn to how as to make the best use of the continuous flow of rainfall monitoring and urban flood warning information from the national system although such information, even backed with regular technical capacity improvements at NMHSs, may still found to be insufficient in meeting the needs of the local authorities. Hence, this component of the urban flood early warning systems is decisive in shaping the local flood-warning system (LFWS), in particular the components which supplement the national monitoring and urban flood warning systems with local scale monitoring networks as planned in Mumbai and being planned for Hyderabad. Essentially, the solution has to take into consideration not just the level of flood risk in a given terrain, but also the capabilities of the local authorities as well. Emerging Urban Local Flood Forecasting Possibilities Real-time analysis of 1. Actual precipitation intensities and accumulated amounts, that are collected by Doppler Weather Radars (DWR) 2. Local scale high density rainfall measuring networks of the local authorities, satellite derived quantitative precipitation estimates etc., 3. Are to be assimilated in high resolution urban scale NWP models (1-5km grid scale) by using a combination of in situ and telemetry systems for real time data collection. Practical ultra short range assessment(nowcasting) of urban scale heavy rainfall is currently less than 6-8hours with modern nowcasting systems (intelligent weather and rainfall analysis systems with quick generation of 3-D local scale visual images with web-GIS interfaces for web hosting ultra short term forecasts). Nowcasting products will have to be used as an input to drive customised urban scale hydrological models for generating spatial scenarios of potential run-off leading to urban flooding expected in segments of urban areas where rate of estimated run-off generated by the high intensity rainfall exceeds the designed drainage capacity. Immediate Future Prospects Although, currently local authorities and their emergency response services in India are largely operating truly basing on general rainfall forecasts formulated by IMDs weather forecasters for larger regions, and with low density of rainfall distribution on recent rainfall (a sparse and non-automated rainfall measurement network, areas not covered by rain intensity measuring DWRs), the on-going initiatives for rendering improved quality of hydro-meteorological services will certainly improve the local scale urban flash flood risk mapping and delivering capabilities to generate appropriate early warnings in the immediate future. Early Warning of Urban Floods Currently, nowcasting systems with ultra-short-term forecasts (6-8hours) with all supporting tools for weather forecasters are used for operational practice. Urban area hydrological forecasts will have to be worked out for a relatively smaller urban sectors and also covering larger-scale sub-urban areas for rendering effective local scale urban flood warnings. Efforts are on for the development/calibrating hydrological models for their hydrological response units (the small urban/catchment areas). The connection between the precipitation thresholds, reaching to the dangerous levels in the sections controlling small urban sectors with torrential rainfall regime, is to be established by correlating the characteristics of high flood with its triggering factors (balance between likely run-off Vs drainage). On the basis of these correlations, there can be unique pre-established thresholds of the precipitation characteristics (amount, duration, etc.), which can cause local urban floods. Interpretation and effective utilisation of the emerging Meteorological and Hydrological Situation on continuous basis by the local urban government authorities is critical for effectively responding to the emerging urban flood scenario. FRAMEWORK FOR URBAN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Due to very nature of the urban settlements, with human population and various economic activities putting tremendous pressures on the natural resources of the region, it is evident that various development activities influence and interact with each other. 1. Urban water supply and sanitation 2. housing settlements 3. pollution control 4. transport systems 5. industrial activities 6. health and social welfare These activities interact and influence each other along side the flood risks and the way such risks are prevented from turning into disasters. In addition certain other regional development activities beyond the municipal limits such as agricultural production, watershed management, energy production, and environmental protection, among others, also effect the flood risk management in urban areas. It is therefore, imperative that flood risks are to be mainstreamed in all these related activities. Key questions of land use/cover change research What are the major drivers of land-use/cover change from the local to the global scale? How has been the global land cover changed over the last 300 years? How will changes in land use affect global land cover in the next 50 to 100 years? How do current decisions and biophysical processes affect the sustainability of land use at various spatial scales? How do changes in land use/cover affect climate, global biogeochemical cycles, the global water cycle, soils and biodiversity, and vice versa? Multi-Hazards (Volcanoes; Earthquakes; Cyclones and other high impact weather phenomena) We need to do basic science to better understand the dynamics of a particular phenomenon. We need to develop observational tools to analyse such events and treat associated physical processes explicitly. We need to develop experimental and theoretical tools to help understand such events. We need to develop modelling systems to predict such events. We need to collaborate with civil authorities, urban planners, the insurance industry, etc., to help minimise the effects of such events. We need to reduce the vulnerability of cities and build resilience to natural hazards, given the enormous risk posed by the infrastructure and unsustainable development. Multi-decadal variations 31-Year running means 4 1 Monsoon Rainfall AMO 3 0.8 Nino 3.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 1 0 0 -0.2 -1 -0.4 -0.6 -2 -0.8 -3 -1 -4 Year (ending) 2006 2002 1998 1994 1990 1986 1982 1978 1974 1970 1966 1962 1958 1954 1950 1946 1942 1938 1934 1930 1926 1922 1918 1914 1910 -1.2 1906 Monsoon Rainfall 2 Indian Region USA East Coast Russian Region Europe Region