* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Folia Cardiologica 2006
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Different Mechanisms Linking Heart Failure to Arrhythmias Wojciech Zareba, MD, PhD Professor of Medicine/Cardiology University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY Disclosures: Research Grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic MADIT-II 36% 31% 31% cumulative probability of mortality in the conventional arm at 3 36% cumulative probability of appropriate ICD therapy at 3 SCD-HeFT 2-year mortality = 15% Number Needed to Treat To Save A Life NNTx years = 100 / (% Mortality in Control Group – % Mortality in Treatment Group) 50 Drug Therapy 45 37 40 35 26 30 amiodarone 25 20 ICD Therapy 20 simvastatin 11 15 10 28 9 metoprolol succinate 3 4 MUSTT MADIT MADIT II AVID SAVE Merit-HF (2.4 Yr) (3 Yr) (3 Yr) (3.5 Yr) (1 Yr) captopril 5 0 (5 Yr) 4S (6 Yr) Amiodarone Metaanalysis (2 Yr) ICD Therapy: Is It Really Expensive? Annual Cost Camm A et al.. Eur Heart J 2007;28:392 ICD Therapy: Is It Really Expensive? Cost Effectiveness of Device Therapy (2003) Underutilization of ICDs in Preventing Mortality In 49,517 patients admitted with the primary diagnosis of cardiac arrest who survived to hospital discharge, only 31% received an ICD before discharge. Voigt A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:855-8. In 13,034 discharges at 217 hospitals, <40% of potentially eligible congestive heart failure (CHF) patients had an ICD at discharge or plans for ICD implantation after discharge. Hernandez AF et al. JAMA 2007;298:1525-1532. Clinical Implementation of ICD Guidelines – The Netherlands Experience 1886 patients in- and out-patients in November 2005 135 had indications for ICD 19 had/received ICD (14%) 9/124 (7%) with primary and 10/11 (91%) with secondary prevention 116 patients included 14 new patients 102 “old” patients had 466 cardiologist contacts over prior year (4.57/pt) Botleffs et al. Neth Heart J 2007 Bedside Risk Stratification for Risk of Mortality in MADIT II Patients Risk Factor HR CI P NYHA functional class >II 1.87 1.23–2.86 0.004 Atrial fibrillation 1.87 1.05–3.22 0.034 QRS >120 ms 1.65 1.08–2.51 0.020 Age >70 yrs 1.57 1.02–2.41 0.042 BUN >26 and <50 mg/dl 1.56 1.00–2.42 0.048 Risk Scoring and Risk of Mortality in MADIT II U-Shaped Curve for ICD Efficacy Goldenberg, I. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:288-296 Risk Factors Predicting Mortality During Long-Term Follow-up of MADIT II Patients Randomized to the ICD Treatment Arm Risk score= number of risk factors from multivariate analysis Low risk =0 points medium risk =1-2 points High risk =>3 points Cygankiewicz et al. Heart Rhytm 2009 April Severity of Heart Failure and Modes of Death 12% 26% 64% 24% 59% 15% 33% NYHA Class III n = 103 NYHA Class II n = 103 56% 11 % NYHA Class IV n = 27 MERIT-HF Study Group. LANCET. 1999;353:2001-2007. CHF Other Sudden Death CARDIAC DEATHS: MADIT-II NSCD 26% SCD 61% CONVENTIONAL GROUP Mortality: 19.8% SCD 35% NSCD 54% ICD GROUP 14.2% MADIT-II: SCD Hazard Ratio = 0.33 Adjusted P<0.0001 Probability of Appropriate ICD Therapy for VT/VF in Relationship to Ejection Fraction in MADIT II Zareba at al. Am J Cardiol 2005 Mortality and ICD Therapy in MADIT II Patients by NYHA Class Mortality ICD Therapy Zareba at al. Am J Cardiol 2005 ICD Group: Probability of Death 1.0 Probability of Death 0.8 0.6 Unadjusted P<0.001 Post-CHF 0.4 0.2 None or Pre-CHF 0.0 0.0 Patients At Risk None or Pre-CHF Post-CHF 736 0 0.5 1.0 666 93 1.5 414 90 2.0 315 79 2.5 213 68 3.0 164 47 3.5 Years 92 34 38 23 Prognosis of Heart Failure Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Tribouilloy C et al. Eur Heart J 2008;29:339-347 Schematic summary of arrhythmia mechanisms in congestive heart failure (CHF) Nattel, S. et al. Physiol. Rev.2007; 87: 425-456 Schematic cardiac action potential (AP) with phases and principal corresponding ion currents indicated Michael, G. et al. Cardiovasc Res 2008 0:cvn266v2-9; Depolarizing and repolarizing ionic currents that underlie ventricular and atrial action potentials (AP) in human heart Shah, M. et al. Circulation 2005;112:2517-2529 Genetic Background of LQTS LQTS Type Channel Chromosomal Gene Ionic Loci Mutation Abnormality LQT1 LQT2 LQT3 LQT4 LQT5 11p15.5 7q35-36 3p21-24 4q25-27 21q22 KCNQ1 KCNH2 SCN5A ANKB KCNE1 IKs IKr INa Na/Ca IKs LQT6 LQT7 LQT8 LQT9 LQT10 21q22 17q23 6q8A KCNE2 IKr KCNJ2 IK1 (Kir 2.1) CACNA1C ICa-L CAV-3 Nav 1.5 SCN4B INa Differences in the action potential shape and duration in control and failing myocytes Kaab, S. et al. Circ Res 1996;78:262-273 Mechanisms of Increased Action Potential Duration in HF Downregulation of K+ currents Reduction in repolarization reserve => increased susceptibility to EADs => increased dispersion of repolarization => reentry Ito – impaired adaptation of action potential duration to changingg heart rate => increases heterogeneity of repolarization after PVCs, irregular heart rate IKs and IKr => prolongation of repolarization, increased dispersion of repolarization IK1 => enhanced automacity Repolarization Reserve Ability of cardiomyocytes to compensate for the lose of repolarizing current by recruiting other outward currents in order to minimize the repolarization deficit Repolarization Reserve Nattel, S. et al. Physiol. Rev. 2007; 87: 425-456 IK and its underlying subunit mRNA and protein expression in control, DHF, and CRT hearts Aiba, T. et al. Circulation 2009;119:1220-1230 Transmural Heterogeneity of Repolarization Antzelevitch C and Shimizu W. Curr Opin Cardiol 2002;17:43-51 HF-induced change in APD in cell layers spanning the ventricular wall from the epicardial border (defined as 0% of the wall thickness) to endocardium (100%) Akar, F. G. et al. Circ Res 2003;93:638-645 Representative APD contour maps recorded from the transmural surfaces of a control (left) and HF wedge (right) Akar, F. G. et al. Circ Res 2003;93:638-645 Repolarization Parameters Eigenvector 1-2 ECG Parameters Predicting Sudden Death or ICD Therapy in 719 MADIT-II Patients Parameter HR 95% CI p value LRD30 1.030 1.015-1.040 <0.001 L_tangent 1.045 1.000-1.092 0.048 After adjustment for: age, NYHA, EF, BUN Unstable AP Severe LV dysfunction causes unstable beatto-beat repolarization of the action potential Stable AP Haigney, et al. JACC,1998;31:701-6 QT Variability in MADIT II HR = 2.18; p=0.002; Haigney et al. JACC 2004; 44: 1481-1487 MADIT II –T Wave Variability and Probability of Appropriate ICD Therapy Mechanisms of Increased Action Potential Duration in HF Alteration in intracellular calcium handling L-type Ca does not seem to be affected to much in HF Increase in Na/Ca exchanger – modulates DADmediated ventricular arrhythmias Abnormal restitution of APD (subtle changes in diagnostic interval duration cause significant chnages in action potential duration Increased lability/variability of repolarization A schematic diagram showing the changes in Ca2+ handling and contractility and the potential compensatory function of ion-channel remodelling that causes action potential (AP) duration (APD) prolongation in congestive heart failure Michael, G. et al. Cardiovasc Res 2008 0:cvn266v2-9; Mortality in Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients with EF<40% by TWA Results Bloomfield JACC 2006;47:456-63 11 MMA -TWA as a Risk Marker Study Population Verrier et al. (ATRAMI) 2003 Post MI, av AECG EF 42% monitoring 44 pts Case control Nieminen et al Clinically indicated (FINCAVAS) TET 2008 1037 pts Stein et al (EPHESUS) 2008 Methods ECG from exercise test postMI; AECG EF<40%+HF and/or DM 493 pts Case control endpoint cutoff Cardiac arrest due to VF or arrhythmic death 43-74µV All-cause death Cardiovascular death Sudden death >=67µV Sudden cardiac death >=43 or 47µV Transmural Alternans of Repolarization Chinushi et al. JCE 2002;13:599-604 Calcium Handling and T wave Alternans Walker et al. Cardiovasc Res 2003;57:599-614 CHF death CARE-HF Extension phase Cleland et al. EHJ 2006 SCD Effect of epicardial (Epi) vs endocardial (Endo) pacing on TDR, Tp-Te (T p-e), and APD90 Fish, J. M. et al. Circulation 2004;109:2136-2142 Effect of reversal of transmural sequence of activation in a canine LV wedge preparation pretreated with an IKr blocker (5 {micro}mol/L E-4031) Fish, J. M. et al. Circulation 2004;109:2136-2142 Cisapride (0.2 {micro}mol/L) permits induction of torsade de pointes during epicardial (Epi) but not endocardial stimulation Fish, J. M. et al. Circulation 2004;109:2136-2142 IK and its underlying subunit mRNA and protein expression in control, DHF, and CRT hearts Aiba, T. et al. Circulation 2009;119:1220-1230 IK1 and Kir2.1 mRNA and protein levels in control, DHF, and CRT Aiba, T. et al. Circulation 2009;119:1220-1230 EADs in myocytes from control, DHF, and CRT hearts Aiba, T. et al. Circulation 2009;119:1220-1230 Autonomic Nervous System Heart Rate Variability Heart Rate Turbulence Cardiac Death Myocardial Substrate Myocardial Vulnerability EF, QRS, LP, QTc, T wave NSVT, EP Inducibility, TWA, QTV Ischemia Multi-hit hypothesis of the development of SCD Tomaselli, G. F. et al. Circ Res 2004;95:754-763