Download IGEM2006-UCSF-Powerpoint

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

E. coli long-term evolution experiment wikipedia , lookup

Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup

Replisome wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

DNA supercoil wikipedia , lookup

Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis
UCSF iGEM Team 2006
Patrick Visperas
Matthew Eames
Eli Groban
Ala Trusina
Christopher Voigt, Tanja Kortemme, Chao Tang, Chris Rao
Goal
Remote Control of a Bacterial Machine
Start
How Bacterial Chemotaxis Works
Bacteria Swim Up Gradients
How Chemotaxis is Observed
Goulian Motility Assay (U Penn)
Glide
CCW
CW
concentration gradient
No gradient
?
Tumble
The Regulatory Network
A W
P~
No CheW
A
No Swimming
P~
Y
Y
Binding Partners
•Orthogonal binding pair Tsr-CheW
(Liu et al, 1991)
•We mapped these mutations onto
the Tar-Chew complex
Tar
CheW
Tsr mutation can be mapped to Tar
Gradient
Aspartate
• point mutation in Tar* reduces
motility to approximately 40% that of
wild-type
Part Design
• New orthogonal signaling pairs
“Codon randomization” is used to reuse
scaffolds without fear of recombination
Chassis Engineering
• Build E. coli strain lacking all sensors and CheW, but retaining the other
chemotaxis proteins
UU1250 (Parkinson, U Utah)
Wild-type E. coli
tar tsr tap trg aer
cheW
tar tsr tap trg aer
cheW
UUDcheW
cheW*
tar*
tar tsr tap trg aer
cheW
Device Characterization: The Fim-Switch
INPUT
[ara]
OUTPUT
MCS
Ptrc*
rfp
IRR
IRL
gfp
FimE
FimE
IRL
IRR
T. Ham, et al (2006)
Tested in UU1250
35
30
2 Possible Problems
25
1. The plasmid is
unstable
20
15
2. The strain contains
FimE/ FimB
10
5
RED
+ ara
% bacteria
- ara
0
0
0.3
1.2
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
GREEN
[arabinose] (mM)
System Design (11 kB)
Phe
CheY
araC PBAD
fimE
T1x4
CheW r2
Ptrc*
r2 CheW* T1 PlacIQ r0 phe-tar r0 asp-tar*
Constructed via DNA
synthesis (DNA 2.0)
Phe
Asp
- arabinose
System Design (11 kB)
Asp
CheY
araC PBAD
fimE
T1x4
CheW r2
Ptrc*
r2 CheW* T1 PlacIQ r0 phe-tar r0 asp-tar*
Constructed via DNA
synthesis (DNA 2.0)
Phe
Asp
- arabinose
Phe
Asp
+ arabinose
Results
Gradient
Gradient
Aspartate
Phenylalanine
Conclusions
• Orthogonal pairs are a rapid method to built signaling
pathways that can operate simultaneously
• Chassis developed to rapidly screen for new proteinprotein interactions
• Limited by the switch performance in this chassis
• Directional control could also be achieved by nonchemical inputs (light, radiation, etc)