Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Prostate Cancer: A Case for Active Surveillance Philip Kantoff MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Incidence of Prostate Cancer: International Comparisons Dijkman. Eur Urol. 1996;30:281-294. Clinical Incidence of Prostate Cancer Has Changed Dramatically Over Time Mortality Rates for Cancer in the US From Jemal, A. et al. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106-130. Copyright ©2006 American Cancer Society Autopsy Detection of Prostate Cancer in Men of Various Ages Sakr et al. In Vivo. 8:439-43, 1994 Age 20-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 71-80 Cancer 2% 29% 32% 55% 64% Some Basic Statistics • What you find depends on how hard you look – Autopsy prostate cancer: ~50% of men over 50 – Clinical (PSA) prostate cancer: ~16% of men > age 50 – Death from prostate cancer: ~3.0% of men > age 50 Risk of Clinical Prostate Cancer • Currently risk of prostate cancer is determined by whether you do a biopsy, how many biopsies you do and the frequency of biopsies • The number of PSA driven biopsies have dramatically changed in the past 20 years Conclusion: Epidemiology • Prostate Cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among US men • The vast majority of men who have and who are diagnosed with prostate cancer will not die from their disease • PSA utilization has resulted in an increased incidence of prostate cancer Does Treatment Reduce Mortality? Randomized Study: Surgery Versus Active Surveillance • • • • • 695 Scandinavian men, 1989-1999 Median f/u 8.2 years Mean age: 64.7 years Mean PSA: 12.8 ng/ml Gleason: 2-6 (61%), 7 (23%), 8-10 (5%) Overall Survival Cancer Specific Survival RR 0.56, p=0.01 Cancer Specific Survival Based On Age Increased Risk Of Metastases With Watchful Waiting RR 0.60, p=0.004 Conclusions • Radical local treatment in a largely nonscreened population with localized cancer leads to improved survival • The absolute benefit remains small, but is more significant in men < 65 yrs old • At this point in followup, 17 RPs for 1 life saved Watchful Waiting • 767 Active Surveillance patients in Connecticut • Mean age: 68 years • Mean f/u: 15.4 years • Death certificates, path reviewed Albertson et al Prognosis as a Function of Age and Gleason Score: Localized Disease Albertsen et al. JAMA 280: 975-80 Conclusions • A subset of men have aggressive disease that poses a threat to their survival • Most men with prostate cancer will not die from their disease. Gleason score, determined by biopsy, is the most critical factor in determining prognosis for patients with localized disease • Active Surveillance is a reasonable option for men with life expectancy of less than 10 years or for some men with low volume (few biopsy cores positive) Gleason 6 or less tumors