* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download FDA
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Epinephrine autoinjector wikipedia , lookup
Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Orphan drug wikipedia , lookup
Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Compounding wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical marketing wikipedia , lookup
Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup
List of off-label promotion pharmaceutical settlements wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacovigilance wikipedia , lookup
Overview of the Role of the Regulatory Agencies and of Regulations in Product Development for Pharma Remit of EMA/FDA Objectives/Agenda • • • • • • The role of regulation History of regulation Control points Control of clinical trials NDA/MAA submission Comparison of pharma and device controls Objectives/Agenda, contd • • • • Review of FDA and EMEA ICH Post marketing surveillance Health technology and comparative efficacy Role of Regulation • Consumer protection (consumer = a patient) • Controls the placing on the market (a European Term) • Post marketing surveillance Extended Controls • • • • • Manufacturing Clinical trials Life cycle management Post marketing surveillance Advertising History of Regulation • Pharmacopoeias (quality standards) London Pharmacopoeia 1618 B.P. 1853 • 1906 FDA • 1914 Health Select Committee • 1950’s therapeutic substances • 1960’s thalidomide tragedy – the real trigger for the modern regulatory environment History of Regulation, contd • 1965 first EU Directive 65/65 • 1968 UK Medicines Act • 1995 EMEA established; Centralised procedure • 1995 EU Device regulations introduced • 1998-2001 Extended to medical diagnostics Clinical Trial Controls • • • • Phases I to IV, Clinical Trials Applications (Europe) Marketing Authorisation (Europe) Investigational New Drugs Program (US) • New Drug Applications (US) Application Dossier • • • • • • • • • • Pharma NDA/MAA Full dossier covers: safety efficacy quality Determination of Risk/Benefit Output: authorisation/licence SmPC/labelling conditional approval The FDA Route • The results of the testing program are codified in an FDA-approved public document that is called the product label, package insert or Full Prescribing Information. • The prescribing information is widely available on the web, from the FDA drug manufacturers, and frequently inserted into drug packages. The FDA Route • The main purpose of a drug label is to provide healthcare providers with adequate information and directions for the safe use of the drug. The FDA Route • The documentation required in an NDA is supposed to tell the drug’s whole story, including what happened during the clinical tests, what the ingredients of the drug formulation are, the results of the animal studies, how the drug behaves in the body, and how it is manufactured, processed and packaged. The FDA Route • Once approval of an NDA is obtained, the new drug can be legally marketed starting that day in the U.S. • Of original NDAs submitted in 2009, 94 out of 131 (72%) were in eCTD format. The European Route • Before any medicines can be used in the Europe they have to be licensed. Drugs are licensed for use in the Europe with a European licence through the European medicines Agency The European Route • The EMEA co-ordinate drug licence applications within the European Union (EU). There are 6 committees within the EMEA. Each committee looks at a particular area. • There is a Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CHMP) who are responsible for medicines for human use The European Route • There are different systems within the EMEA that pharmaceutical companies can use to license drugs. • The first is called the ‘centralised system’. Any drugs for AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative conditions, diabetes or orphan drugs have to be licensed this way. The European Route • The committee that reviews drugs for human use (the CHMP) assess the application, and then recommend whether a drug should have ‘marketing authorisation’ (a licence) or not. The European Route • The other ways that pharmaceutical companies apply for a license is either the ‘decentralised system’ or the mutual recognition system. They will use these systems for medicines that don't fit into the categories within centralised system. The European Route • With the decentralised system the company applies to several member states at the same time. One member state assesses the application (this is the MHRA in the UK). • If they recommend that the drug be licensed, the other member states then either agree or object. If everyone agrees, the drug is given marketing approval. If someone objects, the CPMP will step in and decide. • They then advise the EU Commission whether to license the drug or not. The European Route • Once a drug has EU marketing authorisation, it is ‘licensed’, ‘registered’ or ‘approved’. All these terms mean the same thing. This means the company can market the drug in any EU country - but they don’t have to. For one reason or another, they may choose to market the drug in some countries but not others. The European Route • When a drug has marketing authorisation, it is not available straight away. The company first have to apply to market their product in each individual country. In the UK, they will apply to the MHRA. When this last small step is done, the product is ‘launched’, and doctors can prescribe it. EMA? MHRA? • These bodies follow the usual European Structure. • The European Marketing Agency is the European Body • Each state ahs a competent authority – in the U.K. this is the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) Line Extensions • Life cycle management • Abridged/abbreviated files -new indications, new dosage forms -variations • Generic applications • OTC products Post Marketing Surveillance • Spontaneous reporting systems – Yellow card reports – Vigilance reporting – User reporting • Structured data bases – Data mining/signal detection Post- Marketing • Risk management plans (Europe) • REMS (FDA) FDA • • • • • Structure Commission Advisory panels Fees Independence EU • National agencies – MHRA, AFSSAPS, MPA • EMA role – – – – Centralised procedure, CHMP Decentralised procedure Mutual Recognition Procedure CMD(h) • EU Commission grants the MAA International Harmonisation • ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation) • GHTF (Global Harmonisation Task Force) Devices • ICDRA (International Conference Drug Regulatory Authorities) • ISO and EN, BSI standards • Pharmacopeias (EP, VSP, BP, JP) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) • • • • NICE Requirements for comparative efficacy Quality of life data Role of the payers HTA Development • • • • Comparative effectiveness Cost effectiveness Value based pricing Pricing for risk Japanese Regulatory Authorities Roles and Responsibilities • Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare (MHLW) – makes all final decisions based on recommendations of PMDA • The PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) was established in April 2004 • Incorporated Administrative Agency of the MHLW PMDA • Integrated Regulatory Agency • Pharmaceutical Affairs Law • GMP inspections collaboration with the prefecture administrations Senior Councillor PMDA Structure Office of General Affairs Office of Planning & Co-ordination Office of Relief Funds Office of Review Administration Office of New Drug 1 Office of New Drug II Chief Executive Director, Centre for Product Evaluation Executive Director Associate Centre Directors Office of New Drug III Office of Biologics Office of OTCs / Generic Evaluation Office of Medical Devices Office of Conformity Auditor Chief Safety Officer Office of Safety Division Office of Compliance Standards Office of R&D Promotion Priority Review Director Rest of the World • Primary evaluation countries/regions: FDA, EMA, PMDA, Australian, Canada, Switzerland • Countries requiring local studies a evaluation: China, South Korea, India, Taiwan 35 Conclusion • In this lecture we have looked at the way the FDA and the EU regulate market access • They are different but broadly achieve the same end • We have briefly looked at other approaches