Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
7th International Forum on Tourism Statistics Stockholm, 9-11 June, 2004 Theme: Sustainable Tourism From sustainable tourism to decline: how to monitor the risk Mara Manente, director, CISET-University of Venice [email protected] Preliminaries This presentation summarizes one of the themes developed under the DETOUR project, carried out for the European Commission with the aim to provide “An early warning system for identifying declining destinations” The structure of the DETOUR project - Conceptual framework Re-defining a declining destination Factors and conditions of decline Signals of decline: inventory Indicators grid: inventory and theoretical definition - Early warning in practice (survey among practitioners in tourist destinations) Signals Indicators Strategies - Warning system prototype: IDES (Interactive Destination Evaluation System), a tool for visualising threats of decline Selection of the strategic variables Adoption of appropriate decline thresholds (or tendency towards decline) Declining destination: “destination with a certain tradition in providing tourism, but characterised by one ore more negative trends. Although at an advanced stage the decline results in economic losses, even those destinations which are still profitable might already be under acute threat of decline” It is insufficient to define “decline” merely by actual decrease in guest numbers, turnover or benefit. Indicators – inventory, selection, classification First set: state of the art (driving force, state, pressure indicators – EEA DSPIR model definitions) a1 Destination functions Urban functions (urban size,transport network, service sector, etc) tourist functions (Tourist/resident ratio; economic role, etc.) … a2 Tourism vocation from the demand side and evolution tourism demand market share evolution of tourism demand (flows, expenditure, motivations) … a3 Tourism vocation from the supply side and evolution natural and historical heritage accommodation, restaurants, etc ratio of tourist activities on total activities … … indicators a4 Tourism vocation according to the whole tourism system role of tourism on the local economy role of tourism mobility on total mobility … a5 Quality of life population trend composition of population by age per capita revenue level of pollution congestion of public structures and services … a6 Tourists quality of experience tourist prices level of satisfaction willingness to repeat the visit … … indicators Second set: towards a dynamic analysis (impact and response indicators) b1 Quality of socio-economic development structure and evolution of the economic and productive base employment rate and sectoral composition per capita revenues …. b2 Quality of tourism supply development (resource based approach) destination system resources and strategic capabilities organisational structure (partnerships) … b3 Tourism impacts physical threshold social threshold economic threshold Classification of identified indicators (more than 70) I S.s.n – name: name of the indicator description: short description of the indicator source: the source of the indicator (i.e. of the mathematical formula or calculating method, not of the data useful to calculate the indicator itself) is named if it seems to be particularly relevant. It can be found in the existing literature or be a CISET proposal. For some indicators multiple sources have been used. measure: mathematical formula or calculating method alternative definition: (when necessary) mathematical formula or calculating method which can be used if the previous choice is not viable unit of measurement: unit of measurement, strictly dependent on the measurement method adopted purpose: reason which led to the choice of the indicator relevance: importance in identifying decline or in determining its preconditions (high, medium, low, null) difficulty degree: evaluation of the probability of success in getting data / information needed in order to obtain the indicator value (high, medium, low, null) linkages: (when necessary) what sections or indicators seem to be strictly related with the considered indicator warning signal: defines threshold value, critical range or negative trend useful in identifying decline ….. Example I 2.3.15 - name: Tourist flows trend description: total tourist flows per annum during life cycle periods (development, maturity, decline, rejuvenation) source: multiple sources measure: tourist arrivals to all accommodation establishments per annum – per annum variation alternative definition: tourist arrivals to all hotels; trend deducted from visitor flows to the destination’s main attractions; if data referred to the life cycle periods are not available, the most recent years could be considered unit of measurement: absolute value purpose: determining the quantitative evolution of tourist flows to the considered destination relevance: high difficulty degree: medium linkages: I 1.1.5; I 1.2.2; I 1.2.6 warning signal: decreasing or not increasing values A first warning system prototype: the Interactive Destination Evaluation System (IDES) - giving destination managers strategic information about current situation and risk of decline - showing in a really effective way the evolution of the destination over time - simulating by means of images the effect of changes in the selected variables The implementation requires the adaptation of the set of variables chosen to the characteristics of the destination, as well as to the availability of data Application to the Canary Islands: from the document prepared for the Canary Islands Government Risk analysis Competitiveness analysis Risks Indicators: • Tourists/Residents = number of tourist arrivals on residents, i.e. average number of interactions of each member of the local community with different people coming from outside • Tourist pressure on environment = average daily number of tourists per square km of suitable soil*, i.e. additional human pressure on the environment caused by tourists • Cement sold per person = yearly tonnes of cement sold on average population (= inhabitants plus daily number of tourists) • Consumption of electricity per person = daily kwh on average population (= inhabitants plus daily number of tourists) * suitable soil = total surface - geomorphological soil - protected soil 23/05/2017 • • • • Seasonal concentration = GINI Seasonality Index measuring the concentration of tourist flows during the year Hotel Beds/Total Beds = percentage of Hotel Beds on Total Beds expressing the weight of hotel supply on accommodation market Hotels and restaurants G.V.A./Agricolture & Fishing G.V.A.= ratio of tourist industry G.V.A. on primary sector G.V.A. expressing the dependence of the economy from external resources Import /Export (base=1992) = ratio of imports on exports index numbers expressing the dependence of the economy from external resources CANARY ISLANDS RISKS (1992-2000) Tourists/Residents Import/Export (base=1992) Tourist pressure on environment Hotels and restaurants G.V.A./Agricolture & Fishing G.V.A. Cement sold per person Consumption of electricity per person Hotel Beds/Total Beds Seasonal concentration 1992 2000 FUERTEVENTURA RISKS (1992-2000) Tourists/Residents Import/Export (base=1992) Tourist pressure on environment Hotels and restaurants G.V.A./Agricolture & Fishing G.V.A. Cement sold per person Consumption of electricity per person Hotel Beds/Total Beds Seasonal concentration 1992 2000 LA PALMA RISKS (1992-2000) Tourists/Residents Import/Export (base=1992) Tourist pressure on environment Hotels and restaurants G.V.A./Agricolture & Fishing G.V.A. Cement sold per person Consumption of electricity per person Hotel Beds/Total Beds Seasonal concentration 1992 2000 Competitiveness Indicators: • Hotel Occupancy rate, which expresses the profitability of the hotel structures (optimal value = 100% occupancy) • Guest Mix by purpose, which expresses the variety of demand segments by purpose (the more wide is variety, the less dependent on a particular market is the tourism industry i.e. the more sustainable is the tourism sector) (optimal value = 100% variety) • Guest Mix by origin, which expresses the variety of demand segments by origin (the more wide is variety, the less dependent on a particular market is the tourism industry i.e. the more sustainable is the tourism sector) (optimal value = 100% variety) • • • • CPI/TPI, which expresses the ratio Consumer Price Index on Tourism Price Index (the lower are tourist prices the cheaper is the destination) (optimal value = 1) Seasonal distribution (=1-Seasonal concentration), which expresses the homogeneity degree of tourist flows along the year (optimal value = 100%, i.e. uniform distribution) Economic role of tourism, which expresses the weight of tourist G.V.A. on destination's total G.V.A. (optimal value = 30%) Demand average growth, yearly average growth on three years which expresses the actual trend of tourist flows to the destination (threshold chosen for the Canary Islands = 15%) CANARY ISLANDS COMPETITIVENESS (1992) Hotel Occupancy rate Demand average growth ** Guest Mix by purpose Economic role of tourism * Seasonal distribution Guest Mix by origin CPI/TPI COMPETITIVE SCORE * = 50 * Score = (Blue area / Regular Polygon Area) * 100 CANARY ISLANDS COMPETITIVENESS (2000) Hotel Occupancy rate Demand average growth ** Guest Mix by purpose Economic role of tourism * Seasonal distribution Guest Mix by origin CPI/TPI COMPETITIVE SCORE = 38