* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download King’s College London
Survey
Document related concepts
Children's use of information wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup
Cultural relativism wikipedia , lookup
Internalism and externalism wikipedia , lookup
Neeti Sastra wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
King’s College London This paper is part of an examination of the College counting towards the award of a degree. Examinations are governed by the College Regulations under the authority of the Academic Board. BSc/BA EXAMINATION 6AAN4043 KNOWLEDGE, OBJECTIVITY AND RELATIVISM EXAMINATION PERIOD 2 (SUMMER 2014) TIME ALLOWED: THREE HOURS Answer THREE questions. Avoid overlap in your answers. DO NOT REMOVE THIS EXAM PAPER FROM THE EXAMINATION ROOM TURN OVER WHEN INSTRUCTED 2014© King’s College London 6AAN4043 Answer THREE questions. 1. Could this all be a dream? 2. How, if at all, are primary and secondary qualities to be distinguished? In what sense, if any, are moral properties akin to secondary qualities? 3. Suppose your belief that P has been produced by a psychological process that almost always produces true beliefs. Does it follow that your belief that P is justified? 4. Explain what it means to say that something exists necessarily. Does anything exist necessarily? 5. What does it mean to say that some proposition is known a priori? Is anything known a priori? Justify your answer. 6. What does it mean to say that some knowledge is innate? Is any factual knowledge innate? 7. Does acceptance of the claim that morality is relative have any implications for one’s own moral commitments? 8. Expound and assess Mackie’s argument from queerness. 9. ‘Suppose we accept the Humean model of a motivating state. Then we can be moral realists, or internalists about motivation: but we cannot be both.’ Discuss. SEE NEXT PAGE 2 6AAN4043 10. How, and how well, does Harman defend moral relativism? 11. Is there a genuine problem of the freedom of the will? If not, why does there seem to be? If so, how (if at all) can it be solved? 12. What, if anything, makes it true (when it is true) that S at time t1 is the same person as S at some later (or earlier) time t2. FINAL PAGE 3