Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Making other Earths: N-Body Simulations of the Formation of Habitable Planets Sean Raymond University of Washington Collaborators: Tom Quinn (Washington) Jonathan Lunine (Arizona) Habitable Zone: temperature for liquid water Habitable Planets NEED WATER! The Paradox of Habitable Planet Formation • Liquid water: T > 273 K • To form, need icy material: T < 180 K rocky← →icy ”snow line” The Paradox of Habitable Planet Formation • Liquid water: T > 273 K • To form, need icy material: T < 180 K rocky← →icy ”snow line” Local building blocks of habitable planets are dry! So where did Earth get its water? • Late Veneer: Earth formed dry, accreted water from bombardment of comets, or … Some of Earth’s “building blocks” came from past snow line: Earth did not form entirely from local material To Guide the Habitable Planet Search (TPF, Darwin), we Need to Know: 1. Are habitable planets common? 2. Can we predict the nature of extrasolar terrestrial planets from knowledge of: a) giant planet mass? b) giant planet orbital parameters (a, e, i)? c) surface density of solids? Overview of Terrestrial Planet Formation 1. Condensation of grains from Solar Nebula 2. Planetesimal Formation 3. Oligarchic Growth: Formation of Protoplanets (aka “Planetary Embryos”) 4. Late-stage Accretion Oligarchic Growth: “growth by the few” • Protoplanets grow faster closer to the Sun! • Take approx. 10 Myr to form at 2.5 AU • Mass, distribution depend on surface density Kokubo & Ida 2002 Simulation Parameters • • • • • • aJUP eJUP MJUP tJUP Surface density Position of snow line Eccentricity Snapshots in time from 1 simulation Semimajor Axis Radial Migration of Protoplanets Simulation Results 1. Stochastic Process 2. All systems form 1-4 planets inside 2 AU, from 0.23 to 3.85 Earth masses 3. Water content: dry to 300+ oceans (Earth has 3-10 oceans) Trends 1. Higher eJUP drier terrestrial planets 2. Higher MJUP fewer, more massive terrestrial planets 3. Higher surface density fewer, more massive terrestrial planets Effects of eJUP Habitability • In most cases, planet forms in 0.8-1.5 AU • In ~1/4 of cases, between 0.9-1.1 AU • Range from dry planets to “water worlds” with 50 times as much water as Earth 11 planets between 0.9-1.1 AU 43 planets between 0.8-1.5 AU Conclusions 1. Most of Earth’s water was accreted during formation from bodies past snow line 2. Terrestrial planets have a large range in mass and water content 3. Habitable planets common in the galaxy Conclusions Cont’d 4. Terrestrial planets are affected by giant planets! Can predict the nature & habitability of extrasolar terrestrial planets - Useful for TPF, Darwin 5. Future: develop a code to increase number of particles by a factor of 10 Additional Information • 2003 Paper: astro-ph/0308159 • Nature Science Updates: Aug 21, 2003 (www.nature.com) • Email: [email protected] • Talk to me! Additional Slides What is a “habitable” planet? • Habitable Zone == Temperature for liquid water on surface – ~0.8 to 1.5 AU for Sun, Earth-like atmosphere – varies with type of star, atmosphere of planet • Habitable Planet: Need water! Initial Conditions • Assume oligarchic growth to 3:1 resonance with Jupiter • Surface density jumps at snow line • Dry inside 2 AU, 5% water past 2.5 AU, 0.1% water in between • Form “super embryos” if Jupiter is at 7 AU Simulation Parameters • • • • • • aJUP = 4, 5.2, 7 AU eJUP = 0, 0.1, 0.2 MJUP = 10 MEARTH, 1/3, 1, 3 x real value tJUP = 0 or 10 Myr Surface density at 1 AU: 8-10 g/cm2 Surface density past the snow line Simulations • Collisions preserve mass • Integrate for 200 Myr with serial code called Mercury (Chambers) – 6 day timestep – currently limited to ~200 bodies – 1 simulation takes 2-6 weeks on a PC Data from our Solar System Raymond, Quinn & Lunine 2003 Distributions of Terrestrial Planets