Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ancient Roman architecture wikipedia , lookup
Food and dining in the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
Travel in Classical antiquity wikipedia , lookup
Roman economy wikipedia , lookup
Education in ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Roman historiography wikipedia , lookup
Roman Kingdom wikipedia , lookup
Roman funerary practices wikipedia , lookup
Roman agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Elena Althaus 1. Description and Narrative analysis of the artwork The Capitoline Wolf, typically considered to be an Etruscan sculpture from the 6th or early 5th Century B.C.E. has evolved as one of the most important symbols of the city of Rome and the grandeur of Ancient Rome, representing its power, glory, and prowess. The symbol of the wolf with the twins Romulus and Remus is ubiquitous and enduring, and has taken its place in modern Rome. Though the wolf itself dates back to Etruscan times, the twins were added in the 15th Century C.E. The statue is a portrayal of one of the founding stories of Rome, that of Romulus and Remus, who were the sons of Mars with Rhea Silvia, a Vestal virgin. Mars, the god of war, represented the great military power of Rome. The Vestal virgins were women who dedicated their lives to Vesta, the goddess of the family and the hearth. Both gods are central to the identity of the Ancient Rome – Mars for the military glory and Vesta for the concept of pietas, familial duty, as is depicted in another of the founding stories, that of Aeneas as composed by Virgil during the time of the Emperor Augustus. The Vestal Rhea Silvia was the daughter of King Numitor, who was killed by his brother Amulius who then ordered that the twins be killed. They were abandoned on the Tiber and then saved by the Lupa, which was a sacred animal to Mars. They were rescued by the she-wolf who cared for them until a shepherd found and raised them. Livy writes, “In those days the countryside there was wild and empty. The story goes that when the waters receded, the basket in which the twins had been abandoned was left on dry land. A she-wolf, on her way from the hills round about to drink, came across the howling infants. She gave them her teats to suck, and was so gentle with them that the king’s shepherd found her licking them with her tongue” (Livy, History of Rome, 1. 4). According to legend, Romulus later killed his brother Remus and then founded the city of Rome on the 21 April 753 BCE. This date also marks the traditional festival of Parilia, which honours the god or goddess of shepherds and sheep, Pales. The story of the founding of Rome carries again the central theme of brutality combined with pietas, the fierce expression of the wolf combined with the loving care provided to the twins by the wolf, capped by the aspect of fratricide. Militarism and familial pietas were themes that were considered as the foundation of Roman identity as composed by Virgil, and the killing of family competing for positions of power was a recurrent theme of most civilizations, both before and after the Roman. As the statue is generally associated with Etruscan times, it is necessary to mention the role of the Etruscans in Roman history. The Etruscans were a people inhabiting central Italy, who contributed to the development of Ancient Rome along with the Latins and the Sabine. The Etruscans occupied the space north of the current city of Rome, which was on the border between Etruscan and Latin land. The Etruscans dominated during the monarchical period of Roman history, which transitioned to a republican system in approximately 510 BCE. The she-wolf dates to the late monarchical period or early republican period. In 2006, however, the date of the wolf was disputed by Italian historian of art Anna Maria Carruba and Etruscologist Adriano La Regina. They proposed that the statue hailed from the high medieval period, based on the casting technique. However, others disagreed, arguing that the analysis was based on Greek and Roman technique, which does not necessarily apply to the less understood Etruscan method. Although the wolf has come to represent the founding myth, the statues of Romulus and Remus were added later, during the Renaissance, possibly by Italian painter and sculptor Antonio del Pollaiuolo. While some have proposed that twins were initially present but later lost, most ancient references to a wolf statue do not include the twins. The wolf was created during the time of transition from the monarchical period to the Republican period. It has been said that the fierce and determined positioning of the animal came to represent the uprising against Etruscan monarchy which resulted in the Roman republic. 2. Formal Analysis The wolf is a hollow-cast bronze statue about 33.5 inches or 85 Cm tall. The statue of wolf and twins has become the symbol of Rome, portraying its power and prosperity throughout the ages. The wolf is known for its intensity and forcefulness. The body is tense and aware, with the head, ears, and eyes watchful. The angles of the sculpture are very linear, as compared to later periods. The wolf is somewhat crouched and the head is turned, as if watchful, and the ears are erect. The features of the wolf are angular, and its expression is fierce. The linear detail has been connected to the Etruscans and pre-Classical sculpture, while Classical portrayals were more smooth and flowing. The muscles of the wolf are clearly portrayed, and the linear style gives emphasis to them. The position of the neck and head are wary of surrounding enemies, and the eyes are watchful. The overall composition depicts a powerful, predatory and protective creature, with a fierce nature not to be challenged. The jaw is half-open, as if ready to attack. The udders are full – which could have meant pregnancy or nurturing of the twins, but indicate in either case a protective nature. There is a distinct contrast between the wolf and the twins, added later, which were of the Renaissance period and less linear, more curved and supple than the mother wolf. While the wolf is said to draw on the Greek archaic style, the twins are said to be typical of Italian Renaissance looking back to Hellenistic Greek style. Concerning the former, the angular features, pronounced muscles, and more simple and reduced portrayal are said to be reminiscent of archaic Greek form. The latter characters are less harshly portrayed, smoother and less angular. The twins are more rounded in form. 3. Functional Analysis As the she-wolf statue’s origin is disputed, its historical function is also difficult to trace. The statue was mentioned in antiquity, most significantly by Pliny the Elder and Cicero. The former mentioned a bronze she-wolf appearing in the Roman forum, without mention of the twins. The latter mentioned a wolf statue several times in his works. One of the mentions includes a baby suckling on the wolf’s teats. There have been mentions of the wolf as kept until 1471 at San Teodoro and then on Capitoline hill. It has been observed at the Lateran Palace in the medieval period, as a presence at the court of justice, mentioned by Benedict of Soracte in his Chronicon of the 10th Century CE, noting ‘trials and executions’ taking place by the wolf, which are mentioned periodically until around 1450 CE. In the 12th Century, an essay of Magister Gregorius mentioned the wolf at the Vatican Palace, seemingly without twins and purported to have served previously as a fountain. It was mentioned in 1450 as present at the Lateran by G. Rucellai, and taken to the Palazzo dei Conservatori on the Capitoline, by order of Sixtus the IV in 1473. By the end of the 15th century, the twins had been added. 4. Historical analysis One of the most interesting aspects of the Capitoline Wolf is the development of the legend around it. It is not clear whether the original wolf was intended to represent the Romulus foundation legend. The Etruscan sculpture dated from a transition period from monarchy to republic, from Etruscan domination to a less distinct Roman rule. The sculpture itself has represented the glory of Rome throughout history. It is believed that, early on, it represented the successful uprising against Etruscan monarchism. Later, it came to represent the military prowess of the Romans in many subsequent ages. During the Renaissance, when the twins were added, the Ancient Roman history was of great importance. During the medieval period, Classical Rome had not been ignored – the concept of the Holy Roman Empire persisted – however, a return to classical Roman art and philosophy blossomed in the Renaissance period. While medieval times had included conversion of pagan structures to Christian and usage of older structures as sources for building materials, the Renaissance sculptors and architects looked to antiquity for inspiration. It is appropriate that this was the period in which the twins were added to the sculpture. Jacques Barzun writes, The ancient temples, the Coliseum, the great memorial arches had been in plain sight for centuries, but now they were no longer pitiable remnants of paganism; they were majestic creations to be studied and copied. Consequently, in the Renaissance time, the wolf with the added twins became a reminder of ancient Roman glory, which has had a lasting influence in modern times. In the Fascist period, Mussolini clung to the image as a symbol of Roman glory and used it to promote his own status as founder of the “New Rome”. He sent copies of the statue to cities in the U.S. to promote himself among Italian Americans. Despite the unfortunate connection with fascism, the wolf has endured as a symbol of the glory of Rome. The Wolf with Twins was used for the 1960 Summer Olympics in Rome, and has become the symbol of the football team A.S. Roma. The story of Romulus and Remus has become forever associated with the work, whether or not that was its initial purpose. The piece itself, therefore, has come to be a fusion of different eras in Roman history – Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance, and Modern, with each period adding its own voice and context to a work of art which is difficult to place and impossible to interpret in its original sense, layered as it is with meaning and history. In many ways, what the wolf has come to mean throughout history characterizes it more than what it may have meant originally. http://www.public.iastate.edu/~tart/fall2003arth280website/etruscans.html