* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 14th european turbulence conference, 1
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
14TH EUROPEAN TURBULENCE CONFERENCE, 1-4 SEPTEMBER 2013, LYON, FRANCE ABSENCE OF TURBULENCE IN AN EXACT SOLUTION OF THE 3D NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION Amador Muriel Harvard University Abstract: A recent exact solution of the 3D Navier-Stokes aquation, the only exact solution published to date, shows a regular smooth solution for an initial one dimensional jet. The absence of what may be considered a turbulent solution raises questions about the origin of turbulence. In particular the Navier-Stokes equation is considered the problem definition of turbulence, if such solutions exist. The absence of a turbulent solution raises a fundamental issue on whether the Navier-Stokes equation hides turbulent solutions. With this result, we must open up the possibility that turbulence is to be explained using other kinetic or transport equations. Reference [1] provides details for the analytic solutions for the Cartesian velocities, pressure and energy density inside a cube of dimension L. In this report we graphically display the velocities vx , vy , vz , pressure and energy density for this cube with periodic boundary conditions. The plots shown are typical for an initial velocity in the x-direction. The y and z momenta are the same. The plots are made with the variable change x = L sin(ϑ ), y = L sin(ϕ ), z = L sin(ω ) . Increasing the initial x-velocity without limit does not yield any regime that may be characterized as turbulent. We thus raise the possibility that turbulence cannot ever be derived from the Navier-Stokes equation, and that it may well be that the Navier-Stokes equation is not the correct problem definition of turbulence [2]. By contrast, below is how a quantum model produces turbulence as the current density of a quantum mechanical system in a one dimensional box of length L. In this model the solution produces turbulence as the quantum number n changes the current density from the left to right and back. The transitions produces a stroboscopic picture of turbulence [3[. It is easy to produce turbulence in a quantum mechanical model, not possible in the classical Navier-Stokes equation as in the first four plots. References [1] A. Muriel, An exact solution of the 3D Navier-Stokes equation, Results in Physics, 2-6, 2011. [2] A. Muriel, Quantum Nature of Turbulence, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2010 [3] A. Muriel, Quantum justification for the Kolmogorov hypothesis, submitted to JFM.