Download Verkhoyansk Project Final Report - IIS Windows Server

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup

Geological history of Earth wikipedia , lookup

TaskForceMajella wikipedia , lookup

Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup

Great Lakes tectonic zone wikipedia , lookup

Geology of the Pyrenees wikipedia , lookup

Geology of Great Britain wikipedia , lookup

Clastic rock wikipedia , lookup

Baltic Shield wikipedia , lookup

Algoman orogeny wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Verkhoyansk Project
Final Report
by
Elizabeth Miller
Geological and Environmental Sciences Department
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
[email protected]
Jaime Toro
Department of Geology and Geography
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV
[email protected]
Andrei Prokopiev
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute
Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Yakutsk, Republic Sakha (Yakutia)
[email protected]
Submitted to EXXON-MOBIL
May 2002
2
INTRODUCTION
The Verkhoyansk fold and thrust belt of eastern Siberia forms an 2000-km long, and up to 500 km
wide, zone of continental shortening extending from the Laptev Sea in the north to the Sea of Okhotsk in the
south (Fig. 1). This orogen has similar proportions to the portion of the North American Cordillera from the
Canadian border to Alaska. The Verkhoyansk fold and thrust belt involves Late Precambrian to Jurassic shelf
to basinal strata deposited along the eastern paleo-Pacific margin of the North Asia craton as well as
Cretaceous deposits of the Pri-Verkhoyansk foreland basin. This margin developed as a consequence of
rifting in the Late Precambrian and was followed by renewed rifting/subsidence events in the Late Devonian
to early Mississippian which lead to the deposition of up to 7 km of continental margin strata in the thickest
part. Shortening in the fold and thrust belt began in the Latest Jurassic to Early Cretaceous and continued
until E. Paleocene. This deformation was accompanied by metamorphism in the internal parts of the belt, and
the emplacement of high-level granitic plutons. Deformation in the West Verkhoyansk was probably linked to
accretion of island arc sequences of the Kolyma-Omolon superterrane to the margin of the North Asia craton
and in the South Verkhoyansk to collision of the Okhotsk terrane. In addition, in the South Verkhoyansk there
is evidence for Early Tertiary denudation possibly related to strike-slip deformation associated with the
opening of the Sea of Okhotsk.
Goals of the Project
We undertook this research project to better understand the structural, stratigraphic, and
thermochronologic history of the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt and to relate its evolution to that of the
Russian Far East. Obviously given the magnitude of the Verkhoyansk orogenic system we could only study
limited areas in the field. We concentrated on two transects, 150 to 200 km long, extending from the foreland
to the internal part of the fold-and thrust-belt. The first transect was located in the southern Verkhoyansk at
about 61°N latitude. The second transect was located north of the bend at about 65°N latitude in what is
known as the West Verkhoyansk (Figs. 1 and 3). Even though these transects are located more than 400 km
apart we can effectively relate them to each other and draw significant conclusions about the overall evolution
of the belt thanks to the extensive geological research previously carried out by Russian geologists from the
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute (former Institute of Geological Sciences) of the Siberian
3
Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and from the Yakutian Geological Survey with whom we
collaborated.
Laptev Sea
Verkhoya s k
F o ld a
Yakutsk
Southern
Transec
nd Thrust Belt
tia
ku
Ya
n
er
rth ect
o
s
N an
Tr
Sea of Okhotsk
Pacific Ocean
DEM: GTOPO30
Figure 1. Digital elevation model of northeast Asia showing the location of the Verkhoyansk flod-and-thrust belt
and the location of the two transects carried out for this project. GTOPO30 DEM.
Accomplishments
In spite of all the logistical difficulties we were able to successfully carry out both transects across the
Verkhoyansk. In the field we collected abundant structural data, made first-order stratigraphic observations,
and collected samples for petrographic study, for apatite fission track dating, for 40Ar/39Ar dating of igneous
and metamorphic rocks and for U-Pb dating of plutonic rocks. We also collected samples to establish the
4
thermal maturity through vitrinite reflectance measurements of coal-bearing rocks and our Russian colleagues
collected carbonate rocks for paleontological identification and determination of conodont alteration indices.
We have processed and carried out the analytical work on most of the samples from the Southern transect and
we present the data below. In addition, through our collaboration with the Diamond and Precious Metal
Geology Institute of Yakutia we have assembled a more regional data base of geological and thermal maturity
data which is the product of many years of Russian research which we will forward at a later date.
Preliminary results from this research have been presented in poster form at the American
Geophysical Union National Meeting in San Francisco, in December 2000 (Toro et al. 2000), and as an oral
presentation at the Geological Society of America national meeting in Boston in November 2001 (Toro et al.
2001). Abstracts form these two presentations can be found in Appendix 1. A Powerpoint presentation for the
GSA talk can be viewed at:
http://www.geo.wvu.edu/~jtoro/Research/toro-Gsa2001/GSA-2001.htm
Remaining Work
We had great difficulty exporting samples for thermochronological work from Yakutia through the
Russian customs system and this greatly delayed the analytical work which is at the core of this project. For
example, it took nine months to receive the samples from the second (northern) transect in the USA. After
additional difficulties carrying out the mineral separations, the samples were only sent to irradiation in early
2002, and we don’t expect to have the analytical work completed until the second semester of 2002. For this
reason this report focuses on the southern transect where we have a more complete data set. We will forward
an update to this report making comparisons between the two transects once we have completed the fission
track analyses.
Based on data collected for this study we plan to publish a journal article on the South Verkhoyansk,
one on the metamorphic rocks of the Upper Maya region of the Okhotsk block, and one article comparing the
timing of deformation and structural style of the north and south Verkhoyansk. We will forward pre-prints of
these articles to Exxon Mobil as soon as they are completed.
Regional Structure of the Verkhoyansk
On the basis of variations on structural style, stratigraphy, and morphology of the orogen, it has been divided
into three main sectors (Parfenov and Prokopiev, 1995). These are, from north to south, the Olenek, West
5
Verkhoyansk, and South Verkhoyansk sectors
Olen
ek s
(Fig. 2). The Olenek sector has east-west
ecto
r
structural trend parallel to the Laptev sea
margin. The deformation in this sector is
moderate, expressed mostly as broad anticlines
Yan
a
Len
a
Kh
with few thrust faults breaching the surface.
Based on sparse wells and gravity data, Late
O
Proterozoic sedimentary rocks are believed to
be involved in the core of the folds.
K
B
The West Verkhoyansk sector includes the main
north-south trending portion of the orogen as
Foreland zone
well as the oroclinal bend that is so
Hinterland zone
characteristic of the Verkhoyansk. A deep and
Segments of the West-Verkhoyansk
sector:
Kh- Kharaulakh
O- Orulgan
K- Kuranakh
B- Baraya
Figure 2. Tectonic zonation of the Verkhoyansk.
narrow foreland basin filled with syn-tectonic
Cretaceous clastic deposits exists along this
sector of the Verkhoyansk.
The West Verkhoyansk has been
subdivided into four segments. Our northern
transect is located on the Kuranakh segment at the broadest portion of the fold-and-thrust belt, north of the
bend (Fig. 3). In this area Carboniferous to Cretaceous, predominantly clastic, rocks are involved in a series
of long, linear folds. Only in the frontal portion do west-vergent thrust faults breach the surface. The
structure of this segment is described in more detail below in the context of our northern transect. In the
Baraya segment the structural trend turns east-west. On the basis of the en echelon arrangement of folds, as
well as field observations, it has been inferred that this portion of the belt formed with a significant leftlateral component (Zoneshain, 1965).
Along the South Verkhoyansk sector the trend of the structure returns to a north-south trend and the
structural style is quite different from areas to the north. There are no foreland basin deposits preserved in
front of the South Verkhoyansk, and the structure is dominated by a series of thrust sheets involving Late
Proterozoic to Jurassic rocks. Towards the hinterland the rocks become progressively younger, metamorphic
grade increases, and structures are east-vergent. There is a belt of low greenschist grade metamorphic rocks in
the hinterland of the South Verkhoyansk intruded by several large granodioritic plutons of Early Cretaceous
6
age. In contrast, only a few small granitic plugs are present in the Kuranakh segment of the West
Verkhoyansk.
114
0
120 0
132 0
126 0
Laptev Sea
72
0
Om
250
Okhotsk terrane
Vendian-Lower Paleozoic
sediments
Mesozoic granitoids
Middle Paleozoic
sediments
Thrust
Carboniferous
sediments
Strike-slip fault
Permian clastics
Axis of anticline
Triassic clastics
Axis of syncline
Pri-Verkhoyansk
foreland basin
Pre-Late Jurassic rocks
of the Siberian platform
Axis of anticlinorium
Vilyui basin (Devonian)
Yan
a
0
0
Kh
Olenek
Anab
ar
72
Riphean sediments
II
II
Boundary of sedimentary
basin
Cretaceous volcanics of the
Uda and Okhotsk-Chukotka belts
km
SY
68
Circled letters:
Kh- Kharaulakh, O- Orulgan, K- Kuranakh, BBaraya, SY- Sredneyansk, AE- Adycha-El'ga
anticlinoria; Om- Omoloi, S- Sartang, SV- SouthVerkhoyansk synclinoria; A D- Adycha-Taryn fault
zone.
0
O
68 0
Axis of synclinorium
II
Lena
S
on
AE
K
AD
ti
ec
r
he
n
S
rt
64
0
No
B
i
Vilyu
Lena
Am
ga
Yakutsk
SV
n
0
Se
ao
fO
kh
ots
k
Al
da
60
rn
Southe
n
o
Secti
138 0
56
0
132
0
Figure 3. Regional structural map of the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt showing the location of the transects carried
out for this study.
7
Basement Structure
As stated in the introduction, the Mesozoic Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt was preceded by
132
Laptev sea
126
120
114
72
Lena-Ana
-8
bar basin
-6
-4
-3
Tiksi
-3
-4
-5
-6
ar
Anab
72
-2
-2
-1
-6
0
-2
-1
-2
-3
Crystalline basement rocks exposed
at the surface
-3
-3
-2
108
-2
Contour line of the crystalline basement surface
-5
O
ek
Olen
-1
Fault
-2
-2
-6
Anabar
shield
-2
-1
S
-5
Front of Phanerozoic orogenic belts
-3
-4
-3
-3
-3
-2
-2
-2
-8
a
68
O - Olenek uplift
Sn -Suntar uplift
S -Sukhan basin
P -Near-Patom basin
A - Aldan-Maya basin
S
Len
-2
-1
-2
Anabar blo
ck
64
-2
-3
sin
yu
Vilyui
-1
-124
-10
-6
-5
-4
-1
.5
Olekminsk
-6
-1
na
Le
Ne
-5 -6
-4
-3
-2
-1
P
-3
-1
-5
-4
A
144
-6
Aldan Block
-1
-0.5
-5
-5 -4
-6
-3
-4
-2
n
-10
-8
-1
-2
-5 -4
-4
-3
-0
pa
-B
up otuo
lift biy
a
-2
-8
0
-1
-6
-2
-1
-2
-3
60
-4
-5
-6
Sn
-5
-2
-6
-2
60
-1
Yakutsk
Alda
-3
-5
-3 -2
-1
-5 4
- 3
-
Mirnyi
-10
-3
-4
108
-6 -5 -4
2
-8
-10
-8
-6
64
-8
-8
ga
Vil
-6
Am
-5
a
iB
-5
-14
-4
ka
gus
Tun asin
b
-5
-3
-4
.5
56
-0
138
Neryungri
114
56
120
126
132
Figure 4. Structural map on top of crystalline basement (after Yu. Kh. Protopopov).
successive rift events which affected the margin of the North Asia craton. During the Late Proterozoic more
8
than 3.5 km of continental margin clastic and carbonate strata were deposited in the Aldan-Maya basin
located adjacent to the south Verkhoyansk segment (Fig. 4). These Late Proterozoic strata are involved in the
frontal thrust sheets of the south Verkhoyansk and exert important control on the structural geometry.
The Vilyui basin, a Middle Paleozoic failed rift, trends NE-SW across the eastern Siberian platform.
This basin is filled with up to 6 km of red beds and basalts mostly of Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous
age. Extensive swarms of basaltic dike of the same age intruded the Siberian platform. Evidence for this rift
event is also found in the South Verkhoyanks sector where there are numerous north-south trending Devonian
dikes, and small outcrops of the rift-related sedimentary sequence.
The fact that the Vilyui rift arm intersects the Verkhoyansk at the location where it bends from a
northerly to a n easterly trend strongly suggests that the shape of the orogen was controlled by the shape of
the continental margin that was created after the Middle Paleozoic rift event (Fig. 4).
FIELD TRANSECTS
Southern Transect
Logistics
During the summer of 1999 Elizabeth Miller and Jaime Toro carried out five weeks of field work in
collaboration with Andrei Prokopiev and Valodia Tarabukin from the Institute of Geological Sciences of
Yakutia (now called Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute). We traveled by small plane to the
village of Eldikan located on the Aldan River (Figure 5) where all the necessary food and supplies for this
expedition had been stored the previous spring before break-up of the Aldan River. This area was chosen for
the first transect because the fold-and-thrust belt is accessible via a good dirt road that connects Eldikan to
gold mines located on the upper reaches of the Allakh-Yun’ River and on the drainage of the Yudama River.
The primary means of transport was a 6x6 Saigak diesel truck rented form the local gold mining company.
Our routes are shown in white on Fig. 5. In addition we worked on foot for five days in the Tarbagannakh
range, located east of the village of Allakh-Yun’, in order to examine the metamorphic rocks which are
exposed in the internal portion of the belt, as well as the syn-tectonic Tarbagannakh granite. We reached the
village of Yugarionok, the southernmost point in the area we visited, by hiring a small jeep on the East bank
of the Allakh-Yun’ River which we could not cross with our truck. In Yugarionok we rented a motor boat and
9
135
136
137
138
Allakh Yun
Riv
er
38 22Tar.
61
Ald
an
22
Eldikan
Uem.
1
123B62
Allakh Yun·River
84
52,65
80
71b
Fig. 8
66
60
ugorinok
r
ive
R
a
am
d
Yu
0
50 km
Riphean
Vendian
Cambrian
Ord.- Silurian
L. Devonian-Miss.
Carboniferous
Permian
E-M. Jurassic
Figure 5. Simplified geological map of part of the South Verkhoyansk studied during the southern transect. See Fig. 3 for
location. Most sample numbers have the prefix 99JT. Tar is the Tarbagannakh pluton, Uem is the Uemliakh pluton.
10
traveled 30 km to the east along the Yudama River. The goal of that branch of our transect was to study
reported metamorphic isograds within the Carboniferous slate belt and to determine if it is feasible to access
the contact between the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt and the Okhotsk terrane. However, we found this to
be very difficult since no track-vehicles are available at the gold mines on the Yudama. The final leg of the
southern transect constituted a second crossing of the frontal thrust sheets along the Allakh-Yun’ River on
rubber boats. This afforded the opportunity to study excellent exposures of the Cambrian and Late
Proterozoic stratigraphic sections in along the river banks, as well as limited exposures of the Jurassic cover,
and to make comparisons with our initial crossing along the road as much as 75 km to the north.
Data Collected
Given the size of the field area, and the time available for field work, we could not carry out detailed
field mapping, instead we made traverses on foot of key well-exposed sections, and spot checks in other areas
in order to examine all the principal lithologic units that characterize each structural domain within the thrust
belt. We had Russian geological maps of covering most of our transects at 1:200,000 scale (Ferdman et al.
1963; Losev et al. 1970; Starnikov, 1983; Yan-Shin-Tshin, 1971), as well as a compilation map of the whole
area at scale 1:500,000 which served as the base for Fig. 5(Nushkar’ et al. 1995). We found these maps to be
generally accurate in the regions of simpler structure such as the frontal thrust sheets of the Kyllakh Zone
(discussed below), but were more problematic in regions where deformation is more intense. In particular
within the slates and phyllites of the Sette-Daban and Allakh-Yun’ Zones what was often mapped as bedding
is in effect a transposed metamorphic cleavage, therefore the stratigraphic thicknesses reported in the maps
are incorrect. It is important to note that Soviet map-making regulations required that 1:50,000 scale geologic
maps break down formations or map units into units that are 500 m or less in thickness. These regulations led
to the arbitrary division of existing map units in many places, replacing old formation names by multiple new
formation names. In many cases this was unwarranted, and the older (more generalized) stratigraphic and
formation names are still the most appropriate given the overall detail of mapping and geologic knowledge of
the region.
In addition to evaluating existing maps and stratigraphic section descriptions, we focused on
structural measurement for cross-section construction, and making observations to determine the degree and
11
style of deformation of the rocks in various parts of the thrust belt. We looked closely at metamorphic grade,
the relationship of metamorphism to structural fabric development, and, finally, the relation of both
metamorphism and structural fabric development to the emplacement of igneous intrusions and associated
mineralization.
We also collected representative samples of all major units to characterize the lithologies, sampled
arenites and granitic rocks for apatite fission-track dating , and sampled the low-grade metamorphic rocks for
Ar/39Ar dating from the area surrounding the Tarbagannakh pluton. The goal of the thermochronologic
40
sampling was to constrain the timing of the development of the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt. Finally we
collected samples for vitrinite reflectance determination from coaly plant material in the Jurassic sandstones
of the frontal thrusts and the foreland. The results of our analyses are discussed below.
SOUTH VERKHOYANSK
The southern part of the Verkhoyansk belt differs from its counterpart to the north in that it is
narrower, and structures within it are generally steeper, particularly in the interior part of the belt. From west
to east, the belt can be divided into the following structural or tectonic zone (Fig. 8):
1. Flat-lying strata of the Siberian Platform
2. The Kyllakh Zone of broadly-spaced folds and thrust faults that involve Precambrian to Jurassic
age strata
3. More highly deformed and slightly metamorphosed, mostly lower Paleozoic strata of the SetteDaban Zone
4. Deformed and weakly metamorphosed, primarily Carboniferous to Permian basinal strata of the
Allakh-Yun’ Zone, intruded by Cretaceous plutons
5. The more platformal (?) sequences of the Okhotsk Terrane, which was
not investigated during this study.
Stratigraphy
12
Representative stratigraphic columns from the Kyllakh and Sette Daban zones are shown in Figures 6
and 7 as summarized from (Ferdman et al., 1963; Losev et al., 1970; Starnikov, 1983; Yan-Shin-Tshin, 1971).
The description of the rocks below are modified by our observations and field notes compiled the summer of
1999.
Important distinctions characterize the above named zones or successions. Depositional basement is
not exposed in the southern Verkhoyansk, but a 3.5 km thick section of Late Precambrian (Riphean) strata
intruded by numerous gabbro sills are exposed together with overlying Vendian, Cambrian and Ordovician
units. The Cambro-Ordovician section of the Kyllakh Zone was deposited in a slope to shelf basin setting and
is less than 1 km thick. In contrast, the Sette-Daban Zone exposes a great thickness of basinal facies of
carbonates of Cambrian, Ordovician and Silurian age overlain by shelf facies Devonian limestones. True
stratigraphic thickenesses are uncertain due to the deformation of the rocks. The Early Paleozoic succession is
overlain by Lower Carboniferous conglomerate and red beds that grade up into more basinal clastics of the
Permo-Carboniferous Verkhoyansk terrigenous complex. This upper part of the section is thin, and preserved
mostly as inliers in the cores of synclines. The Allakh-Yun’ Zone exposes thick and monotonous almost
basinal sections of Permo-Carboniferous clastic turbidites and graphitic shales.
These successions can be interpreted as a Late Precambrian to Devonian continental margin sequence
which ranges from platform facies in the western part of the transect to more basinal facies to the east,
overlain by a latest Devonian to early Carboniferous rift sequence, which was in turn followed by a period
important subsidence and deposition of thick continental margin clastic deposits. Evidence from the eastern
part of the Verkhoyansk fold belt, outside of our study area, suggests that subsidence and clastic deposition
continued into the Triassic.
Siberian Platform:
The western part of our transect began in flat-lying rocks of the Siberian Platform. Basement is
presumably Archean and Early Proterozoic igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Aldan Shield, although
these are not exposed in the area. Shallow-water marine deposits of Late Proterozoic (Riphean) to Early
Paleozoic age covered most of the shield (Zonenshain, 1990). A depocenter existed in front of the south
Verkhoyansk that is known as the Maya basin. Here Riphean deposits attained more than 3.5 km in thickness.
These rocks are exposed in the Kyllakh segment of the Verkhoyansk and are described below. The Maya
13
Kyllakh zone
0m
Yudama Group. Dolomite,
limestone, marl, argilite, and tuffs.
V
R 3 dl
R 3 dz
Ust’kirbyn Group. Siltstone, brown
argilite, and sandstone.
R 3mls
Kandik Fm. Massive white quartz
sandstone, conglomerate, and
siltstone. Gabbro and basalt sills.
1500
R 3kn
Riphean
R 3gr
3000
R 3sl
R 3el
R 2vl
R 2cp
R 2 ml
Maya Group. Massive limestone,
stromatolitic limestone, dolomite,
calcareous shales and massive
quartz sandstone.
R 2ms
R 2bk
Figure 6. Stratigraphic columns of rocks of the Kyllakh zone of the South Verkhoyansk (after Prokopiev et al., 1999).
Formations: R1kl - Kyllakh, R1cg - Chagdala, R1blg - Bilegichen, R2tl - Talyn, R2sv - Svetlyi, R2bk - Bik, R2ms - Muskel, R2ml - Malgin, R2cp - Tsipanda, R2vl - Vil, R3el - El'dikan, R3sl - Salar, R3gr - Gren, R3kn - Kandyk, R3mls - Minor Sakhara, R3dz - Dzhoron, R3dl - Dalynda, Vjuk - Yukanda, C1ps - Pestrotsvet, C1in - Inikan, C2cs - Chaya, C2um - Ust'-Maya, C3kr - Kerbi.
R 2 sv
R 2tl
R 1blg
R 1cg
R 1kl
?
4
2
C 3 kr
O 1-3
P 1kr
R 3dl
Vjuk
Vsr
C 1 ps
C 1in
C 2 cs
C 2-3um
0 km
Upper
Middle
Lower
Permian
Ordovician
Cambian
Vendian
J 1kl
P 1pl
Yudama Group. Dolomite,
limestone, marl, siltstone,
argilite, siliceous rocks, and
tuffs.
Pestrotsvet Fm. Platform carbonates.
Inikansk Fm. Organic-rich black
shale with phosphate nodules.
Chaisk Fm. Marly limestone,
limestone, argillite
Ust-Maya Fm.Platey limestone,
marl, argillaceous and sandy
limestone, limestone
conglomerate. Includes thin-
Kerbin Fm. Pelitomorphic
limestone, sandy limestone,
marl, limestone breccia.
Sakkyryr, Labystakh, and
Oron Fms. Platey marble,
sericitic and chloritic platey
marble, calcareous phyllites,
reddish dolomitic marble and
dolomite.
Kurung Fm. Siltstone,
arkosic sandstone, calcarenite.
Kyllakh Fm.
Arenaceous
limestone
Argillaceous
limestone
Bituminous
limestone
Marl
Dolomite
Limestone
Silica
rocks
Limestone
breccia
Breccia of
terrigenous
rocks
Conglomerate
Gravelstone
Sandstone
Siltstone
Mudstone
Coal
Unconformity
Crystalline
basement
Basic intrusion
Basaltic tuff
Basalt
Andesite
Tuff of rhyolite
and dacite
Rhyolite,
dacite
Gypsum,
anhydrite
Rock salt
Dolomitic
breccia
Organogenic
dolomite
Organogenic
limestone
Arenaceous
dolomite
Argillaceous
dolomite
14
basin may represent a
Late Precambrian failed
rift as evidenced by the
presence of abundant
gabbro sills that intrude
the section. Vendian
and Cambrian shallow
marine carbonates
overlie the Riphean
deposits. These are
unconformably overlain
by thin Early Jurassic
arkosic fluvial
sandstones probably
sourced from the
craton. This is
supported by the
presence of abundant
detrital muscovite. It
appears that though out
the Paleozoic and early
Mesozoic the Siberian
platform was a
relatively stable high-
standing area. Evidence for late Devonian to early Carboniferous rifting is only seen to the north in the Vilnuy
basin and to the east in the Sette-Daban zone of the south Verkhoyansk.
Kyllakh Zone:
Late Proterozoic: The oldest rocks exposed along our transect are thick and resistant Middle Riphean
15
0 km
Devonian
South Verkhoyansk sector
Sette-Daban zone
D2br
Maya Group (Figure 6). These
D1 sd
units are consistently exposed at
the base of each of the three
Dominantly shallow water
dolomites and dolomitic
limestones. Dolomite of the Upper
Silurian Oron Fm. contains
sedimentary structures indicative
of lagoonal to tidal flat
environments.
Upper
S 1th
O 3br
frontal thrust sheets indicating
that that the basal detachment lies
at the base of the Middle Riphean
O 3 gc
O 3 kl
carbonates. The presence of
stromatolites in the Middle
O 2lb2
Riphean dolomites indicates
Labystakh Formation. Thin to thick
bedded metalimestones with
sedimentary structures characteristic
of limestone turbidites.
Metalimestones are intercalated with
greenish calcareous phyllites with
siderite bands.
Middle
Ordovician
deposition in a shallow water
platformal environment.
The Maya Group carbonates are
O 2 lb1
overlain by a succession of Late
Lower
O 1sk 3
O 1sk 2
Passive Margin Sequence
4
Riphean, dominantly clastic rocks
Sakkaryr Formation. Thick unit of
monotonous section of thin-bedded
greenish chloritc calcareous phyllites
and white sericitic calcareaous
phyllites intercalated with grey
marble.
which include distinctive clean
white sandstones of the Kandik
Formation probably near shore
O 1sk 1
blanket sandstones. Although the
O 1 at
Cambian
C 3bl
rocks of the Kyllakh zone are
Ulakh Group. Mainly thin-bedded
metalimestone, calc-arenite and
calcareous phyllites very similar to
those of the overlying Sakkaryr
Formation.
unmetamorphosed, the sandstones
of the Kandik Formation appear
C 3 ts
to be completely quartz-cemented
to the point that in the field they
C 2 el
C 2 kc
V- C 1 st
C 1in
Vendian
Reported thicknesses are suspect because the rocks are penetratively deformed and folded.
In many places the cleavage controls outcrop-scale layering, not bedding.
Silurian
S 2hr
S 1-2or
2
limestones and dolomites of the
Vtk
Vml
Vjal
Vnc
have the appearance of
Inikshan Formation. Distinctive black
organic rich shale and marl.
Yudama Group. Dolomitic marble,
marble, dark fine grain quartzite.
orthoquartzites. The upper part of
the Riphean succession is
composed of alternating thin-
SETTE - DABAN RIFT
AND POST RIFT SEQUENCES
0m
C 1-2 ht
v
C 1 cg
1000
Lower
Carboniferous
500
Thermal
Subsidence
C 1 ov
Basal portion of the Verkhoyansk terrigenous complex.
Dominantly pyritic graphitic slates and phyllites, dark
dirty sandstones (quartzites), silstones, shale clast
conglomerates and minor conglomerates with granitic,
gneissic and volcanic clasts. Interpreted as a sequence
of turbidites.
C 1kr
Post-rift marine carbonates having increasingly deeper
water facies upward.
Rift
Sequence
D3 -C 1mn
C 1hm
Sequence beginning with quartz pebble conglomerate
and redbeds of probable continental origin followed by
limestone boulder conglomerate and shallow marine
fossiliferous carbonates.
D3pr
D3 kr
D3 tr
Middle
D3sg
Pre-Rift
Sequence
Devonian
D3 mcv
Section dominated by shallow water fossiliferous limestones
and dolomites intercalated with basalts. The Givetian
Zagadoshnaya Formation consists of thick and thin-bedded
gray limestone with giant brachiopods and tabular corals.
D2 br
D1sd
Fig. 7 cont. Stratigraphic columns of Middle Paleozoic rocks of the Sette Daba sone of the South
Verkhoaynsk(Prokopiev et al., 1999). Symbols are as in Fig. 6.
Formations:
Vnc - Nachar, Vjal - Yalan, Vml - Malsk, Vtk - Tokur, V-C1st -Sytyga, C1in - Inikan, C2kc - Kachelkuan, C2el - Elovka, C3ts - Tisovka, C3bl - Bilyakh, O1at - Atyrbakh, O1sk - Sakkyryr, O2lb - Labystakh, O2-3st- Stan, O3kl - Kulon, O3gc - Gichiga, O3br - Baran, S1th - Tayakh, S1-2or - Oron, S2hr - Khurat, D1sd - Sette-Daban, D2br Burkhala, D3sg - Segenyakh, D3mc - Mauchan, D3tr - Trog, D3kr - Kurpandzha, D3pr - Perelomnaya, D3C1mn
- Menkyule, C1hm - Khamamut, C1kr - Kuranakh, C1cg - Chuguchan, C1ov - Ovlachan, C1-2ht - Khatynakh.
16
17
bedded, brown siltstones and argillites. The Riphean section is intruded by numerous hornblende-bearing
gabbro and basalt sills, some of which are very thick. The sills appear to be essentially conformable with the
stratigraphy. We did not observe any evidence of extrusive volcanism. The Riphean units have a stratigraphic
thickness of about 2.5 to 3 km in this area.
Vendian: The Vendian is characterized by white dolomites, stromatolitic limestones, argillites and sugary
quartzites. The Riphean/Vendian contact is beautifully exposed on the second thrust sheet where it consists of
a sharp transition from clastics to white thick-bedded, but laminated dolomite. There is a basal layer of gritty
dolomite with coarse quartz grains.
Cambrian: In the frontal thrust sheets the Cambrian consists of typically thin bedded limestones and marls.
Fossils (except for conodonts) are rare and very few sedimentary structures other than laminations exist. Our
interpretation is that this sequence represents a shelf basin succession. Its thickness and stratigraphy is
difficult to ascertain on account of deformation. From our observations and structural data collection, the
Cambro-Ordovician of the Sette Daban Zone appears to be involved in kilometric-scale, steep-limbed folds.
Bedding/cleavage relationships indicate that the rocks are everywhere strained but are rarely obviously folded
on the outcrop scale. Thick panels of upright versus overturned sections occur as deduced by bedding
attitudes and the location of stratigraphic contacts with younger overlying rocks.
Middle Ordovician: The Middle Ordovician (Labystakh Fm.) consisted of thin to medium bedded limestone
turbidites with well preserved sedimentary structures. The base of the unit was dominantly greenish
calcareous phyllite with orange siderite clumps not unlike the Cambro-Ordovician rocks described above.
However, overall the Middle Ordovician is reported to be a more limestone-rich section.
Silurian: Where observed, the Silurian (Oron Fm.) consisted of mostly light grey to medium grey shallowwater dolomite with sedimentary structures indicating lagoonal to tidal flat environments of deposition.
Some silty and shaley units occur in the sequence, but for the most part, it is a more resistant, ridge-forming
dolomite.
Devonian: The Devonian of the Sette Daban Zone everywhere unconformably overlies the Silurian.
Devonian rocks are preserved only locally in the cores of synclines. Because the Devonian and Early
Carboniferous represent the transition from stable platformal to a rift environment, their stratigraphy is
complicated and a plethora of formation names are found on the Russian maps. Regionally, the Lower
L. Dev.-Carbonif.
U. Riphean
Ord.- Silurian
M. Riphean
limestone. Giant brachiopods and tabular
corals are conspicuously present in the
unit wherever we observed it. This
platformal sequence is overlain by a
section which is comprised of shalier
limestone, calcareous shale and shale and
presumably deposited in deeper water. It
is reported that basaltic volcanics are
found in the Middle Devonian section,
although we did not observe these.
Lower Carboniferous: The lower
Carboniferous is a conspicuous ridgeforming unit that contains very distinctive
lithologies (Khamamuy Fm.). According
to the literature, the unit varies
considerably in thickness and facies but
Cambrian
E. Proterozoic
bedded to platy dark grey to light grey
Figure 8. Structural cross section through the South Verkhoyansk. See Fig. 3 and 6 for location
Permian
U. Riphean
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
fossiliferous mid-Devonian (Givetian)
thick bedded and alternates with thin-
30
20
10
0
10
distinctive, ridge-forming, highly
limestone is brown to grey, medium to
?
5
0
and conglomerate horizons, overlain by a
limestone (Zagadoshnaya Fm.). The
?
Kyllakh Zone
Foreland
Unmetamorphosed
W
E. Cretaceous
granodiorite
Jurassic
110
Vendian
10
km
5
Devonian is mostly shale with dolomite
?
Allakh-Yun' Zone
Burkhala Fault
Sette-Daban Zone
Low Greenschist
120 km
E
0
yy
;;
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;
y
;;y
yy
;
18
where we studied it, it was comprised of a
consistent set of lithogies. Basal units are
reddish colored, cross-bedded sandstones,
grits and conglomerate of possible
19
continental origin that grade upsection into massive carbonate-clast conglomerate (clasts of Ordovician and
Devonian age carbonate are represented according to existing conodont data (V. Tarabukin pers. com., 1999))
deposited in a marine setting based on interbedded calc-arenite with abundant fossils. Fossils are mostly
crynoid stems and the highly fossiliferous rocks are mostly of lower Tourneasian age (Early Mississipian).
These conglomerates and calc-arenites are in turn transitional upwards to medium-bedded grey limestone that
becomes siltier and shalier upsection and ultimately transitional into a dominantly black siltstone succession.
We interpret the lower Carboniferous as representing a rift assemblage which preceded rapid subsidence and
deposition of the Carboniferous Verkhoyanks clastic wedge best exposed in the Allakh Yun’ zone.
Allakh-Yun’ Zone
Permo-Carboniferous: Permo-Carboniferous sections as much as 3-4 km thick are reported from the AllakhYun’ Zone and referred to as the Verkhoyansk terrigenous complex. These strata are dominantly marine
clastics, mostly consisting of shale, siltstone and lesser fine-grained sandstone, with occasional thick more
resistant sections of coarser sandstone and pebble conglomerate. Today the entire section is metamorphosed
to low greenschist grade and is characterized by graphitic slates and fine grain dark quartzites. We interpret
most of the section to represent distal turbidites alternating with massive mud- and silt- rich sections with
little or no preserved sedimentary structures. The muds and silts are dark grey to black, organic-rich, with
pyrite throughout. Sandstones are medium to fine grained and vary in abundance depending on the location.
The sandstones occur mostly as graded beds and/or massive grain-flow deposits, often with spectacular
horizons of black shale rip-up clasts. Along the Yudama River in the southernmost part of our transect where
conglomerates in the section were coarse enough, we identified clasts of dark siliceous argillite, perhaps
derived from older parts of the underlying sections, rarer gneissic to felsic granitic clasts, some mafic and
felsic volcanic clasts, and rare clasts of fossiliferous limestone.
Given the monotonous nature of the Permo-Carboniferous section, its metamorphic grade, its degree
of deformation, its lack of distinctive marker horizons and paucity of fossils, it was our impression that it is
difficult to tell where you are in the stratigraphic section and thus distinguish the Permian part of the section
from the Carboniferous or identify the individual formations that are shown on the Russian maps. In
discussion with Russian geologists, it appears that the base of the Permian is thought to be marked by a tillite
related to Gondwanaland glaciation. Our opinion is that this purported distinction represents somewhat
20
wishful thinking, and that really, there is no simple way of clearly dividing the stratigraphy of this thick
monotonous clastic section. Some of the geologic maps we worked with showed only sandstone versus shale
lithologic designations without assigning a specific age. This appeared to be a more reasonable approach to
mapping structures within the section. Determination of the thickness and exact stratigraphy of the PermoCarboniferous is compromised by the lack of detail known about its stratigraphy as well as by the intensity of
deformation. In several places it was apparent to us that the what the Russian maps (e.i. Losev, 1970)
portrayed as bedding attitudes was actually a metamorphic cleavage thus the thickness of measured sections is
probably mistaken.
Structure and Metamorphism
The structure of the southern Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt appears to be relatively simple and
consistent across large distances along strike. At the latitude of our transect there are a set of four frontal
thrust sheets (Kyllakh zone), followed by a more internal zone of relatively upright folding and incipient
metamorphism (Sette-Daban zone), in turn followed by a large area of low grade rocks with consistently
west-dipping cleavage, indicative of eastvergent deformation (Allakh-Yun’ zone). Syn-
Kyllakh Zone: Poles to Bedding (S0)
to late-tectonic (Early Cretaceous) granitic
012/7
Equal Area
plutons intrude the core of the range.
Overall the strata become younger towards
the interior of the belt (Late Proterozoic in the
frontal part, Permian in the core) even though
metamorphic grade increases towards the core
102/83 S
of the range. This pattern is the result of the
fact that the Paleozoic stratigraphic wedge
involved in the deformation thickens
considerably to the east. There is a clear link
Figure 9. Equal area stereonet plot of poles to bedding in the
Kyllakh zone. Fold axis trends NNE and is subhorizontal. Due to
west-vergent asymmetry of the structures, bedding dips
predominantly to the ESE.
between the structural style and the
stratigraphic characteristics of each one of the
zones described above. We interpret this as
21
resulting of an underlying structural control to the Paleozoic depositional patterns and to inversion of this
structures during the subsequent development of the Mesozoic fold-and-thrust belt. Thus the transition from
the Kyllakh to the Sette-Daben zone probably corresponds to the inversion of the hinge zone separating
shelfal from slope and basinal strata, probably in turn controlled by a basin-bounding normal fault system of
Late Devonian to Early Mississippian age .
Kyllakh Zone: The frontal part of the Verkhoyansk is a classic west-vergent thrust belt with a basal
detachment at the base of thick and rheologically strong Middle Riphean carbonates. Four main thrust sheets
about 5 km thick and regularly spaced ~15 km apart define the main structure. Internal strain within each
thrust sheet is moderate, although the thin bedded Early Paleozoic units (typically the Cambrian Ust-Maya
Fm.) are folded in outcrop scale, west vergent folds. Shortening is moderate: restoration of the four frontal
thrusts yields 18 km of displacement or 70% shortening. Three of the four frontal thrust faults die-out to the
north of the location of the cross-section shown on Plate 2 with a distance of less than 65 km (Plate 1). The
shortening appears to be transferred to a single
Sette - Daban:Contours of Poles to Foliations (S1)
Equal Area
009/18
frontal fault that produces a salient in the belt
(Fig. 1).
Sette Daban Zone:
In the transition between the Kyllakh and the
099/72 S
Sette Daban zones metamorphic cleavage is
progressively better developed. Typically the
rocks within the Sette Dabban zone display is a
steeply dipping axial planar cleavage which
indicates that the section is involved in large
N = 40
C.I. = 2.0%/1% area
upright folds. Shaley units have phyllitic
textures and are sometimes transposed so that
Figure 10. Stereonet plot of poles to cleavage in the Sette Daban
zone. Cleavage dips predominantly to the ESE indicating that
the defromation was East-vergent in the structural fan of the
Sette Daban.
the dominant layering is the cleavage, not the
bedding. The internal strain is accommodated
within the more massive carbonates by spaced
pressure-solution cleavage. The strike of cleavage is remarkably consistent, typically about 020 ± 5°. The
attitude of cleavage varies from east dipping in the western part of the Sette-Daban zone to northwest dipping
in the eastern part as well as throughout the Allakh-Yun’ zone. This means that the Sette Daban zone is a
structural fan where the deformation changed from west vergence to east vergence (Plate 2). We interpret this
change in the vergence of structures as a result of the inversion of the deep and Late Paleozoic basin strata of
the Verkhoyansk continental margin.
Through most of the Sette Daban and the
Allakh-Yun’ Domain:
Poles to Foliation (S1)
Allakh-Yun’ zones there is only one
015/10
metamorphic fabric developed (S ). Therefore
Equal Area
1
the deformational history appears to have been
rather simple and consistent in this area. In
only one area in the central part of the map
area (location 52,65; Fig 5) did we observe a
105/80 S
weakly developed second cleavage expressed
as kink bands which refolded S . This location
1
is very close to the Burkhala strike slip fault
N = 105
C.I. = 2.0%/1% area
which may be responsible for this additional
deformation. Eexcept for this weakly
Figure 11. Stereonet plot of poles to slatey/phyllitic cleavage in
the Allakh Yun’ zone. The consistent ENE dip of the plane of
flattening indicates east-vergent deformation. The fold axis is
consistent with that of the Kyllakh and Sette Daban zones
demonstrating that the deformation was coaxial.
developed S fabric, we did not see any
2
evidence of significant post D deformation.
1
Allakh-Yun’ zone: Bedding/cleavage
relationships indicate that the entire PermoCarboniferous section is involved in large-
scale or map-scale folds that are nearly upright and have variable developed axial planar cleavage. Where
exposure is continuous (along river banks) it appears that fold wavelength is in the order of 100’s of meters.
Sometimes outcrop-scale folds are evident, especially in the more shaley and thin-bedded sandstone parts of
the section. Cleavage is consistently WNW dipping indicating a dominantly east vergence to the deformation.
Due to the monotonous nature of the stratigraphy it is very difficult to map individual faults, but it is likely
23
that east-vergent thrust faults exist throughout. The Permo-Carboniferous rocks are usually cut by several sets
of quartz veins which host the gold mineralization, and are further evidence of the strain that occurred during
development of the fold-and-thrust belt.
The Russian literature (Andriyanov, 1973) describes a post-tectonic metamorphic belt of staurolite
grade rocks in the central part of the Allakh-Yun’ zone. We failed to find evidence for this metamorphic belt.
The grade of metamorphism is amazingly consistent throughout and remains in the low greenschist facies
with the exception of contacts of the granitic batholiths of the central Allakh-Yun’ zone. In the vicinity of the
Tarbagganakh batholith we found fine chloritoid, staurolite, and biotite. The textural relationships indicate
that mineral growth was at least in part synchronous with development of the metamorphic fabric. Therefore
we believe that intrusion of the granites took place during the waning stages of ductile deformation in the
Allakh Yun’ zone.
Geochronology
Ar/39Ar Data
40
In order to constrain the timing of metamorphism, ductile deformation, and plutonism within the
Allakh-Yun’ domain of the South Verkhoyansk, we carried out 40Ar/39Ar analysis of mineral separates from
six samples (see Appendix 2 for the complete analytical data, Table 1 for summary data, Fig. 13 for the
spectra, and Fig. 5 for sample locations). The samples were analyzed at the Stanford geochronology
laboratory using procedures similar to those described by Hacker and Wang (1995).
The oldest age comes from sample 99JT65, collected from the eastern margin of the Sette Daban zone on the
bank of the Allakh Yun’ River (Fig. 12 A). This sample was white mica separated form a calcareous phyllite
of the Ordovician Labystakh Formation. It yielded a spectrum with a low temperature portion with ages
ranging between 92 and 122 Ma representing 28% of the released 39Ar, and a high temperature portion of
progressively older ages between 144 and 161 Ma. This pattern suggest that the sample represents a twocomponent mix, and the ages cannot be interpreted directly. It is possible that in addition to newly crystallized
mica of Early Cretaceous age, this rock incorporated a minor component of Paleozoic detrital mica thus
yielding anomalously old ages. Sample 99JT52, collected from the same unit only yielded a cleaner (albeit
non-ideal) spectrum. The weighted mean plateau age for this sample was 128 ± 0.3 Ma (Hauterivian),
although individual temperature steps within this plateau range from 124 to 136 Ma. Because the Ar closure
temperature of white mica (~350°C) is greater than the maximum paleotemperature experienced by these fine
grain low-greenschist grade phyllites, we believe that this age approximates the timing of cleavage
24
development and recrystallization of the Ordovician rocks. This age is 7 Ma older than the ages from the
plutons in the core of the South Verkhoyansk (discussed below). It provides a minimum constrain for peak
deformation in the South Verkhoyansk.
160
Ordovician Phyllite - 99JT65
Sette Daban
160
Apparent Age (Ma)
Apparent Age (Ma)
200
120
80
TFA= 135.8 ± 2.6 Ma
40
0
Plateau= 151.0 ± 0.7 Ma
Muscovite
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Apparent Age (Ma)
Apparent Age (Ma)
140
Tarbaggannakh Granodiorite- 99JT22
130
Allakh Yun Zone
120
110
Plateau= 120 ± 1 Ma
90
80
0.0
C.
Biotite
0.2
0.4
0.6
Cumulative 39Ar
120
TFA= 135.8 ± 2.6 Ma
Plateau= 128.2 ± 0.3 Ma
Muscovite
0.2
B.
140
100
140
100
0.0
1.0
Cumulative 39Ar
A.
Ordovician Phyllite - 99JT52
Sette Daban
0.8
1.0
0.4
0.6
Cumulative 39Ar
0.8
1.0
Carboniferous Phyllite - 99JT38 Allakh Yun Zone
130
120
110
Plateau = 119.4 ± 0.5 Ma
100
90
80
0.0
D.
Biotite
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Cumulative 39Ar
1.0
Figure 12. 40Ar/39Ar spectra of samples from the South Verkhoyansk. TFA is total fusion age, Plateau is weighted
mean plateau age. A, muscovite from calcareous phyllite with a Latest Jurassic paletau age. This sample may be too old
due to a detrital component. B, muscovite from a calcareous phyllite collected near sample 99JT65. The poorly defined
plateau age suggests Early Cretaceous crystallization C, biotite from the Tarbagganakh granodiorite pluton. D, biotite
from Carboniferous phyllite collected in the vicinity of the Tarbagganakh pluton.
We analyzed biotites from the Tarbagannagh Pluton, located on the east bank of the Allakh Yun’ rive,
at the northernmost point of our the area we visited, and from the Uemliakh Pluton which is the largest
granitic body in the entire Verkhoyansk belt. Both granites yielded reliable and statistically undistinguishable
Ar/39Ar ages of about 120 ± 1 Ma (Fig. 12 C). Although these can only be interpreted as dating cooling
40
through the closure temperature of biotite (~300°C), they approximate the crystallization age of the granites
because they are shallowly emplaced bodies that would have cooled rapidly to ambient temperatures below
300°C. This is confirmed by U-Pb ion probe (SHRIMP-RG) dating of zircons from sample 123B64 from the
25
Uemliakh pluton which yielded a weighted mean 235U/207Pb age of 121.9±2.5 Ma based on 12 zircon grains
excluding 4 grains that had 154 to 135 Ma ages, probably the result of older inherited components.
We collected biotite from the last occurrence of this mineral away form the Tarbagganakh pluton
Table 1. Summary Table for 40Ar/39Ar Data from the Verkhoyansk
Sample
Lat.
Lon.
Unit
Lithology
123B62
99JT22
99JT38
99JT52
99JT65
A-1780
138.2727
138.2978
138.243
137.452
137.222
129.2222
60.6667
61.113
61.1109
60.3864
60.1311
60.1351
Uemliakh
Granodiorite
Tarbagganakh Granodiorite
Verkhoyansk Seq.Quartzite
Labystakh Fm. Calc Phyllite
Labystakh Fm. Calc Phyllite
Khoboiutoy
granodiorite
Setting
Mineral
Allakh Yun’ Biotite
Allakh Yun’ Biotite
Allakh Yun’ Biotite
Allakh Yun’ Musc.
Allakh Yun’ Musc.
West Verkh Biotite
Total Fusion
Age (Ma)
119.4 ± 0.5
119.42 ± 0.5
118.24 ± 0.5
128.5 ± 0.4
135.8 ± 2.6
91.2 ± 1.2
40Ar/36Ar Plateau
age (Ma)
282 ± 37
120.8 ± 0.8
254 ± 22
119.8 ± 0.5
147 ± 52
119.4 ± 0.5
NA
128.1 ± 0.3
NA
151 ± 0.7
322 ± 18
92.9 ± 0.8
Steps
%39Ar
Used
Used
3 to11/12
93
3 to 10/11
98
3 to 6/7
96
4 to 10/13
79
4 to 7/7
72
4/8/10
85
(sample 99JT38 located 2.25 km west of the margin of the granite). The 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of this sample
was statistical identical to that of biotite from the granite itself. this confirms field observations that suggested
that intrusion of the granite took place while ductile deformation and fabric development was occurring
within the metasedimentary rocks (Fig. 13) .
In summary, our 40Ar/39Ar
work in the rocks of the Allakh Yun’
and Sette Daban zones of the South
Verkhoyansk demonstrate that there
was a close link between intrusion of
the granitic plutons of the Allakh
Yun’ belt, and low-grade
metamorphism and ductile
deformation of the Paleozoic rocks of
the Verkhoyansk continental margin.
Contrary to previously reported
geochronological data (Nenashev and
Figure 13. Small dike of granite near the margin of the Tarbagannakh pluton
stretched along the foliation in the low-grade phyllites of the Carboniferous
Verkhoyansk sequence. This structure is evidence that granite emplacement
(at ~122 Ma) was syn- to late tectonic with respect to de development of the
metamorphic fabric.
Zaitsev, 1980) which assigned 140143 Ma ages to the plutons on the
basis of Rb-Sr data, this igneous and
metamorphic event took place mostly
during Hauterivian-Barremian time
26
(~128 to 120 Ma). Regional low-grade metamorphism in the Allakh Yun’ and Sette Daban zones of the
Verkhoyansk resulted from maximum tectonic burial and peak deformation in the core of the orogen. The
granitic plutons of the South Verkhoyansk were previously interpreted as collisional granites (Parfenov,
1991), however more recent geochemical data indicates that they are actually subduction-related. They
probably resulted from the establishment of a new west-dipping subduction zone after accretion of the
Okhotsk terrane to continental margin choked the Uda-Murgal subduction system that was active during
Jurassic and earliest Cretaceous time.
Apatite Fission Track Data
We collected a 31 samples for apatite fission track determinations from the southern transect (see Fig
5 for locations). After some difficulties delays we obtained permission from the Russian authorities to ship
these rocks to the USA for analysis. Our sampling strategy was to collect 5-10 kg samples of the coarsest
grain sandstones found on the hanging wall and footwall of all the major thrust sheets in order to bracket any
thrust-related unroofing. We also collected a set of six samples along an elevation profile from 630 to 2122 m
elevation on the flank of the Tarbagannakh granite massif. After carrying out the mineral separations for
apatite we found that the clean Riphean sandstones and quartzites yielded very few to no apatite grains. The
fine grained Carboniferous meta-greywackies had fair apatite yield. The coarse Jurassic arkoses had
unpredictable apatite content ranging from no apatite to abundant grains. The samples from the Tarbagannakh
granite had excellent yield. Only seven of the viable samples have been counted at this time. Table 2 shows a
26summary of the sample data, and pooled fission-track age for each sample. The full data is shown in
Table 2. Summary Table for Apatite Fission Track Data from South Verkhoyansk
Stratigraphic
Sample Lon
Lat
Unit
Age
Lithology
Setting
99JT-1 135.7290 60.6722 Kyllakh Fm.
E. Jurassic
Arkose
Foreland
Tarbagannakh
99JT-23 138.3180 61.1065 pluton,,
L. Cretaceous Granodiorite
Allakh-Yun'
99JT-46a 137.5900
99JT-66 137.1950
99JT-71b 136.9070
99JT-80 136.5980
99JT-84 136.3150
60.9136 Khamamut Fm.
Kandik
60.1264 Formation
60.1917 Kandik Fm.
60.3169 Kyllakh Fm.
Kandik
60.4847 Formation
NoXls: Number of crystals counted
Ns: Number of spontaneous tracks counted
Ni: Number of induced tracks counted
RhoD: Induced track density in external detector
ND Number of tracks counted in determing ND
Age: Pooled Fission track age
Error: 1 sigma error
Zeta: 385.9
No
xls
13
Ns
1137
Ni
1316
Dosimeter
Age Error
RhoD
ND (Ma) (Ma)
1279500 3832 209.85 9.15
17
1713
4830
1332500 3832 90.55
2.94
Mississipian
Conglomerate
Sette-Daban
6
74
428
1353700 3832 45.00
5.71
L. Riphean
Riphean
Jurassic
Orthoquartzite
Grey quartzite
Arkose
4th thrust
3rd thrust
2nd thrust
1
7
20
333
50
813
1188
183
2084
1449100 3832 77.90 4.99
1470300 3832 77.05 12.36
1491500 3832 111.30 4.94
U. Riphean
Quartzite
1st thrust
20
492
1464
1304000 3901 84.01
4.58
27
Appendix 3. The samples analyzed thus far are distributed across the entire transect giving a preliminary
view of the exhumation history of the South Verkhoyansk. However some of the data points are of
questionable quality and a final interpretation will require additional data. We will forward an update to this
report once the data analyses have been completed.
The results of apatite fission track analyses are described below in order from the hinterland towards
the foreland. Sample 99JT-23 collected form the Tarbagganakh pluton of granodioritic composition at 2122
m of elevation located within the Allakh-Yun structural domain. The sample yielded abundant apatite and the
resulting age data is very reliable from the statistical point of view. The sample age was 90.6±2.9 Ma
(Turonian), and as can be seen in the radial age plot (Fig. 15), there is a well-defined cluster of single-grain
ages all within ±2s of the pooled age. This suggests that the apatite is compositionally homogeneous and all
the grains have a common closure temperature. The intrusive age of this supracrustal granite is approximated
by its biotite 40Ar/39Ar age of 120±1 Ma, therefore the apatite fission track age must reflect exhumation of the
granite long after its magmatic cooling had taken place. The track length histogram for this sample (Fig. 15) is
very well constrained (n=150) with a symmetrical shape and moderately long mean track length of 13.3±0.1
mm with a standard deviation of 1.57 mm. The slight track reduction observed suggests moderately rapid
cooling though the apatite partial annealing
zone (~60-110°C) at a time slightly older than the sample AFTA age of 90.6 ±2.9 Ma. This probably signals
thrust-driven uplift of the Allakh-Yun’ domain in the early Late Cretaceous.
Sample 99JT-46a was collected from Mississippian conglomerate of the Khamamut Formation of the
Sette Daban structural domain. Unfortunately this sample yielded little apatite, only six grains could be
counted yielding a pooled age of 45.0±5.7 Ma. The single grain ages are considerably scattered and have
large errors (Figure 14), therefore the pooled age must interpreted with caution. Nevertheless it is important to
note that this fission track age hints at a Early Tertiary denudation event within the Sette Daban. The most
likely cause for such an event is deformation associated with left-lateral strike-slip motion on the Burkhala
fault which has a prominent geomorphic expression. Analyses of other samples from the Sette Daban are
required to test this hypothesis.
Sample 99JT-66, collected from quartzite of the Late Proterozoic (Riphean) Kandik Formation of the
Fourth thrust sheet, yielded a single apatite grain. This grain had abundant tracks allowing a relatively precise
age determination of 78±5 Ma. This sample indicates late Cretaceous (Campanian) denudation and may
indicate the forward propagation of the thrust belt towards the foreland. Again given the paucity of apatite in
this sample more analyses from this area are need before proposing a solid interpretation.
28
210 Ma
8
202 Ma
8
99JT-1
99JT-71b
6
6
131 Ma
4
131 Ma
4
2
2
100 Ma
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-2
-2
-4
-4
72 Ma
-6
-8
100 Ma
0
14
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
77.9 Ma
72 Ma
-6
-8
31Ma
31Ma
202 Ma
8
202 Ma
8
99JT-80
99JT-23
6
6
131 Ma
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
100 Ma
131 Ma
2
111.3 Ma
0
90.55 Ma
-2
4
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
100 Ma
-2
-4
-4
72 Ma
-6
72 Ma
-6
-8
-8
31Ma
31Ma
202 Ma
8
202 Ma
8
99JT-46a
99JT-84
6
6
131 Ma
4
131 Ma
4
2
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
100 Ma
0
2
-2
-2
-4
-4
4
6
8
10
12
14
100 Ma
84.01 Ma
72 Ma
-6
-8
31Ma
-8
45Ma
202 Ma
99JT-66
6
131 Ma
4
2
0
4
6
8
10
12
14
100 Ma
-2
-4
72 Ma
-6
-8
31Ma
31Ma
202 Ma
8
Uncertainty (sigma)
8
2
72 Ma
-6
Sample Number
6
+-2 sigma swath
4
131 Ma
Sample Age
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-2
-4
12
14
100 Ma
Radial Age Scale
Single grain ages
72 Ma
-6
-8
31Ma
Figure 14. Radial plots of apatite fission track samples form the South Verkhoyansk. The vertical axis is uncertainty in sigma
units, the horizontal axis is age/error. Grains with large errors plot near the origin. Isochrons fan radially from the origin. Points
of a single grain population should fall within a swath of +/- 2 sigma of the sample age. This plot helps discriminate populations
of grains with different closure temperatures that may be affecting the total age of the sample.
29
Sample 99JT-71b was also collected from the Kandik Formation, but in the Third thrust sheet. The
Proportion of Tracks (%)
40
30
Proportion of Tracks (%)
054-07
99JT-23
Mean 13.34 ± 0.13 m
Std Dev 1.57 m
n = 150
054-22
99JT-80
Mean 12.90 ± 0.33 m
Std Dev 1.99 m
n = 37
10
30
20
10
0
40
Proportion of Tracks (%)
054-20
99JT-71b
Mean 11.59 ± 0.00 m
Std Dev 0.00 m
n=1
20
0
40
30
054-09
99JT-46a
Mean 13.98 ± 0.30 m
Std Dev 1.60 m
n = 29
055-02
99JT-84
Mean 13.15 ± 0.60 m
Std Dev 2.75 m
n = 21
20
10
0
40
ortion of Tracks (%)
054-01
99JT-1
Mean 12.22 ± 0.14 m
Std Dev 1.69 m
n = 151
30
20
054-18
99JT-66
Mean 13.12 ± 0.78 m
Std Dev 1.74 m
n=5
0
5
10
15
20
Track Length ( m)
Figure 15. Fission track length histograms
for samples from the South Verkhoyansk.
Mean, refers to the mean track length
represented by a dashed line on each plot. n,
is the number of tracks measured.
30
few apatite grains in this sample had low U content and few tracks. For this reason, the single-grain ages have
very large errors and are widely scattered. The pooled age of 77 ± 12 Ma must be interpreted with caution,
although at least it is consistent with the age derived from the sample from the Fourth thrust.
Sample 99JT-80 was collected from arkoses of the Early Jurassic Kyllakh Formation in the footwall
of the Second thrust. The pooled age of this sample is 111.4±4.9 Ma. As can be seen in the radial plot (Fig.
14) there are three population of single-grain ages. Although most of the grains(13/20) yield mid-Cretaceous
ages, a few grains are Tertiary (3/20), and a few are Jurassic (4/20). The vitrinite reflectance value from coal
in the Kyllakh Fm. of the First thrust sheet is 0.8, indicating a maximum paleotemperature of about 120°C
using the vitrinite maturation model of Sweeney and Burham (1990). Therefore sample 99JT-80 would be at
the upper boundary of the partial annealing zone for apatite. As is common for detrital samples, it is likely
that this rock contained a mixture of apatites of varying composition. The most retentive grains were probably
not completely annealed prior to the onset of thrusting in the Verkhoyansk. The Tertiary grains would be the
least retentive and may record a younger event. The track length distribution of this sample is broad (std.
dev.=1.99 mm), negatively skewed, and with a mean track length of only 12.9± 0.33 mm. This is evidence for
long residence within the partial annealing zone, therefore the sample age can not be interpreted directly as
dating a rapid cooling event.
Sample 99JT-84 was collected from quartzite of the Late Proterozoic Kandik Formation in the frontal
part of the first thrust sheet. The pooled age for this sample is 84.0±4.6 Ma, and the quality of the data is
fairly reliable. However, as can be seen in the radial plot (Fig. 14), the single grain ages are not homogeneous.
One Jurassic and one Early Tertiary single grains ages fall outside of the 2s swath. Excluding these two data
points from the calculation yields a corrected pooled age of 80.8±4.6 Ma. The track length distribution of
these sample is also broad, and negatively skewed (Fig. 15). These patterns suggest long residence within the
partial annealing zone and slow rates of cooling, however there are too few track measurements available in
this sample to offer a more quantitative assessment.
Sample 99JT-1 collected form arkosic sandstone of the Kyllakh Formation in the foreland yielded a
pooled age of 209.9±9.2 Ma. Because the apatite fission-track age overlaps with the stratigraphic age of the
Kyllakh Formation (Hettangian-Sinemurian), it is clear that the rocks did not undergo sufficient burial to reset
the fission track system. This is consistent with the vitrinite reflectance values from coals collected nearby
(Ro=0.47) which indicate a maximum paleotemperature of about 60°C. The apatite age of this sample reflects
denudation prior to sedimentation of the Kyllakh during the passive margin stage of the Siberian platform.
The apatite fission track ages collected so far from the South Verkhoyansk range support the
31
135
136
137
138
Allakh Yun
er
Tar.
Ald
an
Riv
61
Eldikan
Uem.
97,98
Allakh Yun´River
87
86
85
82
Fig 8
60
Ýugorinok
r
ive
R
ma
da
Yu
0
50 km
CAI
5.0
5.0-5.5
5.5
R0
0.4
0.5
0.6
6.0
0.7
Riphean
Vendian
Cambrian
Ord.- Silurian
L. Devonian-Miss.
Carboniferous
Permian
E-M. Jurassic
Figure 16. Simplified geological map showing the distribution of thermal maturity data. CAI are conodont alteration
indices keyed by color to the degree of alteration. RO are vitrinite reflectance samples keyed to the reflectance value,
the numbers are sample numbers plotted on Table 3. See Fig. 6 for a key to the geological units.
32
Sample 99JT-1 collected form arkosic sandstone of the Kyllakh Formation in the foreland yielded a
pooled age of 209.9±9.2 Ma. Because the apatite fission-track age overlaps with the stratigraphic age of the
Kyllakh Formation (Hettangian-Sinemurian), it is clear that the rocks did not undergo sufficient burial to reset
the fission track system. This is consistent with the vitrinite reflectance values from coals collected nearby
(Ro=0.47) which indicate a maximum paleotemperature of about 60°C. The apatite age of this sample reflects
denudation prior to sedimentation of the Kyllakh during the passive margin stage of the Siberian platform.
The apatite fission track ages collected so far from the South Verkhoyansk range support the conclusions listed below. Rocks in the hinterland of the orogen (Allakh Yun’ domain) had been exhumed to within a
few kilometers of the surface by about 90 Ma. Given the regional low-greenschist metamorphic grade of the
area, this required the erosional removal of about 10 km of structural section. The shortened mean track
length of the sample from the Tarbagganakh granite suggests that cooling rate was moderate, therefore the
onset uplift, and presumably thrusting, may have predated 90 Ma by a few million years. We will be able to
quantify the cooling rates through modeling of the track length distributions once mere data is collected.
Three samples form the frontal thrust sheets have fission-track ages of about 80±5Ma. Younging of the fission
track ages towards the foreland probably reflects the west-ward propagation of the thrust front through the
Late Cretaceous (Fig. 16). Thus, even though the 40Ar/39Ar ages of metamorphic rocks of the Allakh-Yun’
domain indicate that ductile strain and metamorphism was taking place during Early Cretaceous time
supracrustal deformation in the thrust belt was younger. One fission-track age from the Sette-Daban domain
hints that an Early Tertiary denudation event affected that portion of the Verkhoyansk. The most likely cause
of uplift during that period is transpressional deformation associated with movement of the Burkhala strikeslip fault.
Conodont Alteration Indices
During our field work in the South Verkhoyansk, V. Tarabukin, a conodont specialist from the Diamond and
Precious Metal Geology Institute, collected samples from the Ordovician through Devonian carbonates of the
Sette Daban zone (see Fig. 16 for sample locations). He later separated conodonts from these rocks and
established the degree of thermal maturity by determining the conodont alteration indices (CAI). In the Sette
Daban, all rocks have variously developed metamorphic cleavages, and fine grained units usually display
penetrative phyllitic or slatey cleavage. Fine metamorphic chlorite and sericite are common. These observa-
33
tions are borne out by the degree of thermal maturity of the rocks. CAIs range from 5.0 to 6.0, which translate
to maximum paleotemperatures of 300 to 360°C assuming protracted heating, according to the calibration of
Rejebian and others (1987). Although the thermal maturity data is not evenly distributed through the map
area, there appears to be a high concentration of high CAIs in the headwaters of the Sahara River, at about
61°N. Since there are no plutonic rocks in the Sette Daban zone, we conclude that high paleotemperatures
were caused by tectonic burial during the development of the thrust-belt. Assuming a paleogeothermal
gradient of 30°C/km this would imply that 10 to 12 km of structural section might have been stripped by
erosion from the top of the Sette Daban structural fan (see Fig. 17).
Vitrinite Reflectance
The Early Jurassic sandstones of the Kyllakh and Krasnoaldan Formations have abundant coaley
plant remnants. We sampled these units along the Allakh Yun’ River both in the hanging wall of the frontal
thrust and in the undeformed foreland and along the bluffs of the Aldan River south between Eldikan and the
mouth of the Allakh-Yun’ (see Fig.16 for locations and Table 3 for summary of results). The vitrinite reflectance of these samples was determined at the Core Laboratories at Carrollton, TX.
As might be expected the highest Ro value corresponds to the most internal sample (99JT82) collected from the frontal thrust sheet. This sample had Ro of 0.8 which is within the oil window. The rest of the
samples are all immature with Ro values ranging between 0.47 and 0.57. Using the vitrinite maturation model
of Sweeney and Burham (1990) the maximum paleotemperatures attained by the foreland samples were about
80°C and by sample 99JT82 about 120°C. Assuming a geothermal gradient of 25°C/km and 0°C average
surface temperature, maximum burial ranged from 3.2 km in the foreland to 4.8 km in the frontal thrust sheet
(see Fig. 17).
As discussed above, the one apatite fission track sample from the foreland yielded a Jurassic age,
confirming that the rocks were never deeply buried. The maximum stratigraphic thickness of Middle Jurassic
units reported in this part of the foreland is 3 km, therefore it can account for most of the paleoburial. This
confirms that no foreland basin existed in front of the South Verkhoyansk and that the lack of such a basin
today is not related to lack of preservation and post-tectonic uplift.
0
Ro
0
10
0.47 0.51 0.53 0.47
W
20
30
0.80
40
50
?
?
60
VE
R
U
C
L
A
I
UR
MAXIM U M B
70
5.0
80
5.5
90
4.5
100
?
110
120 km
E
0
10
5
Ord.- Silurian
Cambrian
L. Dev.-Carbonif.
U. Riphean
Figure 17. Structural cross section using the paleotemperature data to control maximum burial. Burial was
calculated assuming a geothermal gradient of 25 deg./km in the foreland and 30 deg./km in the hinterland. See
Fig. 3 and 6 for location
M. Riphean
E. Proterozoic
Permian
U. Riphean
E. Cretaceous
granodiorite
Jurassic
Vendian
10
km
5
yy
;;
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
;;
yy
yy
;;
;;
yy
34
35
Table 3. Vitrinite Reflectance Data
Verkhoyanks fold belt, Yakutia
Sample ID
99-JT-82
99-JT-85A
99-JT-86
99-JT-87
99-JT-88
99-JT-96B
99-JT-97
99-JT-98
Lon
136.4580
136.0890
136.0560
135.9110
135.8570
136.9890
134.9020
134.9020
Lat
60.3801
60.6037
60.6144
60.6243
60.6256
60.7079
60.6802
60.6802
Indigenous Vitrinite Data
Mean
Number of Standard
Reflectan
Sample Type
ce
Readings Deviation
Outcrop
0.80
100
0.06
Outcrop
0.47
35
0.06
Outcrop
0.53
100
0.04
Outcrop
0.51
69
0.06
Outcrop
0.47
23
0.06
Outcrop
0.59
95
0.05
Outcrop
0.57
46
0.09
Outcrop
0.52
100
0.03
Remarks
First thrust sheet.
Foreland , Allakh-Yun' River.
Foreland , Allakh-Yun' River.
Foreland , Allakh-Yun' River.
Foreland , Allakh-Yun' River.
Foreland Aldan River bluffs.
Foreland Aldan River bluffs.
Foreland Aldan River bluffs.