* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Mitral valve anatomy for Transcatheter techniques
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Marfan syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup
Pericardial heart valves wikipedia , lookup
Aortic stenosis wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Mitral valve anatomy for Transcatheter techniques Jean-‐François OBADIA Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Department Hôpital Louis Pradel LYON -‐ France OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History 1) Ring 2) Leaflets + Atrium + Ventricle 3) Subvalvular apparatus British Heart Journal, 1978, 40, 351-366 Ring Anatomy of human mitral valve in adult cadaver and comparative anatomy of the valve Leaflets -- British Heart Journal, 1978, 40, 351-366 ROBERT WALMSLEY From The Department of Anatomy and Experimental Pathology, Theof mitral University, St Andrews, Scotland valve Comparative anatomy 359 ___ Comparative anatomny of mitral valve 355 SUMMARY A comparative anatomical study of the mitral ring and the 2 major mitral cusps of 12 adult Aorta mammals, including man, has been made. Two 25 mm thick sections of 2 adult human thoraces were cut Lef t to show the position and orientation of the adult mitral valve as it lies in the chest atrium of the cadaver. Thin sections of hearts and valves were prepared so that the structure and basal attachments of the cusps could I be examined microscopically. Chordae In most human hearts there is no distinctive, well-defined fibrous thickening or ring at the basal attachment of the aortic (anterior) mitral cusp: the mitral 'ring' is therefore considered to be usually Outflow 2 incomplete anteriorly. This is consistent with the findings in the hearts tract of all other mammals examined. left *The posterior part of the ring is interposed between the myocardium of left atrium and left ventricle ventricle and corresponds to the region of the attachment of the mural (posterior) cusp of the mitral valve. In ./ most mammals, including man, this part of the ring is a well-defined band of collagen: in a few mammals, i. collagen. The relation of the free wall including the sheep, the ring is represented by a thin lamina of loose 3 . of '.the left ventricle to the posterior part of the ring is of functional significance as it is the ventricular the ring occurring posthat is responsible the the Andrews, circumference ofScotland myocardium major changes inSt andConclusion Experimental Pathology, TheforIn the University, aortic (anterior) mitral the cardiac cycle. ruminant ungulates, the sheep and ox, the teriorly during cusp has an attachment that is common to it and the related cusps of the aortic valve. isentire cuspof thehas two zonesman.whose structure anleftexpression of their function. There is in each cusp a heart, the through the section has Oblique section Fig. 3 Each OBADIA Jean-‐François heart of a 50-year-old The PMVR Spassed ummit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » 10 % an mitral valve in adult cadaver anatomy of the valve t, o.1 *i. A l4b proximal part of the ascending aorta, the ventricular septum, and the right ventricle. Between the left coronary aortic Fig. 7 Mitral valve of a rabbit. Though the lamina fibrosa of the mitral History Ring Leaflets Chordae positions nor is one of the leaflets “septal”. The septal leaflet is characteristic of the tricuspid valve whereas neither of the mitral leaflets is attached to the septum. The corresponding terms for anterior and posterior are “aortic” and “mural”. It is the aortic leaflet that is in fibrous continuity with the aortic valve (figs 1B, 2B, and 3). The aortic leaflet has a rounded free edge and occupies a third of the annular circumference, whereas the other leaflet is long and narrow, lining the remainder of the circumference (fig 4A). The aortic leaflet hangs like a curtain between the left ventricular inflow and the adult heart. Therefore, there are no clear cut between the two leaflets. Furthermore, the free ed mural leaflet is often divided into three or more s segments described as lateral, middle, and medial or terms like P1, P2, and P3.10 Although three scallops common, the scallops are not equal in size. Rangna colleagues11 found the middle scallops to be larg majority of hearts (fig 4A). Victor and Nayak12 likene between scallops to the pleats of a skirt. When the m let is deformed in a floppy valve, the middle scallop i be prolapsed. Normally, the valvar leaflets are thin, pliable, tra and soft. Each leaflet has an atrial and a ventricula (fig 5A). When viewed in profile, two zones distinguished in the aortic leaflets and three zon mural leaflet according to the insertions of the t cords (fig 5B,C). In both leaflets, there is a clear zo devoid of cordal attachments. Nearer the free edge, surface is irregular with nodular thickenings. This i thickest part, corresponding with the line of closur free margin. Tendinous cords attach to the undersi area described as the leaflet’s rough zone. The roug broadest at the lowest portions of each leaflet b The shortest distance between mitral annulus andor thecommissure, coronary arteriesof occurred at Point towardthethe periphery, the closure while the longest distance occurred at Point 5 (7.78 ± 2.61 mm), as demonstrated in Figure basal zone that is found only in the mural leaflet is mal area that has insertions of basal cords to its v surface. Being distant from the ventricular wall, leaflet does not have attachments to basal cords. I Figure 3 A dissection showing the left (L) and right (R) fibrous valve closure, the two leaflets meet each other snugly trigones revealed by removing the left and non-coronary aortic rough zone and free edge in apposition but at an an sinuses. The trigones are expansions of fibrous tissue at either end of smooth zone (fig 6A). the area of aortic–mitral valvar continuity. The right fibrous trigone When the closed valve is seen in profile, the maj together with the membranous septum forms the central fibrous body. the closure line lies below the plane of the atriov The diagrams represent two of the cases reported in the work by data was Statistical analysis of the achieved using the Student-Newman-Keuls 5 junction rising toward the commissures at the periph Angelini and colleagues. They show the variation in completeness of The data are presented as means and standard-deviations. A p-value < 0.05 the so-called valvar annulus (green areas). so that the atrial surface of the leaflets has a s The Ring is not a Ring Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Research of the Federal PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » A Study of Functional Anatomy of Aortic-Mitral Valve Coupling Using 3D Matrix Transesophageal Echocardiography History 26 Federico Veronesi, PhD; Cristiana Corsi, PhD; Lissa Sugeng, MD, MPH; Victor Mor-Avi, PhD; Enrico G. Caiani, PhD; 2009 Lynn Weinert, BS; Claudio Lamberti, MS; Roberto M. Lang, MD Circ Cardiovasc Imaging January Ring Leaflets Chordae Veronesi et al Functional Anatomy of Aortic-Mitral Va Circ are Cardiovasc 009;2:24-‐31 Background—Mitral and aortic valves known to beImaging. coupled via 2 fibrous tissue connecting the two annuli. Previous studies evaluating this coupling have been limited to experimental animals using invasive techniques. The new matrix Table 3. array transesophageal transducer provides high-resolution real-time 3D images of both valves simultaneously. We Percentage of Inter- and Intr Principal Index sought to develop and test a technique for quantitative assessment of mitral and aortic valve dynamics and coupling. Methods and Results—Matrix array transesophageal (Philips iE33) imaging was performed in 24 patients with normal Intraobserver, valves who underwent clinically indicated transesophageal echocardiography. Custom software was used to detect and ED projected area 9.5"6.6 track the mitral and aortic annuli in 3D space throughout the cardiac cycle, allowing automated measurement of changes Maximum projected area 4.0"3.0 in mitral and aortic valve morphology. Mitral annulus surface area and aortic annulus projected area changed Minimum projected area 4.0"4.0 reciprocally over time. Mitral annulus surface area was 8.0!2.1 cm2 at end-diastole and decreased to 7.7!2.1 cm2 in ED MA-AoA2 angle 2.0"1.6 systole, reaching its maximum (10.0!2.2 cm2) at mitral valve opening. Aortic annulus projected area was 4.1!1.2 cm 2 ES MA-AoA angle 2.8"3.8 at end-diastole, then increased during isovolumic contraction reaching its maximum (4.8!1.3 cm ) in the first third of 2 ED MA-AoA distance 3.7"2.1 Figure 2. A, Selection of anterior and posterior MA systole and its minimum (3.6!1.0 cm ) during isovolumic relaxation. The angle between the mitral and aortic annuli points on a cut plane representing 3-chamber NC annulus length 8.9"6.2 was maximum (136!13°) at end-diastole and decreased to its minimum value (129!11°) during systole. view. B, Selection of AoA points. C, Automatically Left matrix annulus length 8.5"9.6 Conclusions—This is the first study to report quantitative 3D assessment of the mitral and aortic valve dynamics from displayed aortic valve short axisThis cut plane array transesophageal images and describe the mitral-aortic coupling in a beating human heart. abilityonmay have impact Right annulus length 9.6"6.7 which interatrial dot) and coaptation point on patient evaluation for valvular surgical interventions and prosthesis design. (green (Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:24-31.) Data are reported as mean"SD; n#10. (red dot) are manually identified. D, Computed MA Key Words: 3D echocardiography ! imaging ! mitral valve aortic coupling (cyan) !and AoA valve (red, noncoronary cusp;valve orange, ! aortic-mitral left cusp; yellow, right cusp) splines on RT3DE vol- anterior mitral leaflets, and was cha shape with its highest point in the mid ume rendering. MA,which adjacent to the fibrous aortic cur 3–5 he mitral and aortic valves are coupled via fibrous tissue or by a low spatial resolution, cardiac cycle, Our analysis technique allowed us to p connecting the two annuli. An in-depth understanding of limits the visualization of valve morphology during dyin a beating human heart 3D measurem 2 the normal mitral-aortic valvular coupling and the ability to namic assessment. length of the free edges of the cusps, the accurately assess changes in different disease states may be Clinical Perspective see p 31 point above the AoA basal plane, as w important, particularly in the context of valvular surgical height. Several animal studies using inv Because the motion of the aortic valve complex is even planning and postsurgical assessment. However, this coudifferences in the motion patterns of th more difficult to characterize, few studies have addressed in pling is difficult to evaluate using 2-dimensional imaging es.9,22 We did not find the exact same as 4. Wiggels blood detail the functional anatomyFigure of this valve in 3D.pressure These diagram (top), in correspontechniques because of the 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy ofth our human study,AoA probably because dence with measured MA area, projected andm PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20 June 2015 Download this presenta0on on surface « chircardio-‐lyon.org » area of T Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François The Effect of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mitral Annular Anatomy History ADULT CARDIAC Ring Mathieu Vergnat, MD,* Melissa M. Levack, MD,* Benjamin M. Jackson, MD, Joseph E. Bavaria, MD, Howard Herrmann, MD, Albert T. Cheung, MD, VERGNAT ET AL C. 615 616 VERGNAT AL Ann Thorac Surg TAVR PRESERVES MITRALET VALVE ANATOMY Stuart J. Weiss, MD, PhD, Joseph H. Gorman III, MD, and Robert C. Gorman, MD 2013;95:614 –20 TAVR PRESERVES MITRAL VALVE ANATOMY Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:614–20 Departments of Surgery, Medicine, and Anesthesia, and Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ADULT CARDIAC ally gated full-volume imrdiac cycles at a frame rate D data sets, color Doppler the degree of mitral regur- the University of Pennsylrd. Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François ADULT CARDIAC ADULT CARDIAC tems, Munich, Germany) to assess regional and global Background. The effect of aortic valve replacement on annular geometry. three-dimensional mitral annular geometry has not been Results. Mixed between-within analysis of variance well described. Emerging transcatheter approaches for showed no differences between TAVR and AVR groups aortic valve replacement employ fundamentally different in any of the mitral annular geometric indices preoperamechanical techniques for achieving fixation and seal of Leaflets tively. However, postoperative analysis did demonstrate the prosthetic valve than standard surgical aortic valve 618 VERGNAT ET ALThis study compares the immediate impact Ann Thoracopen Surg an effect of AVR on geometry. Patients undergoing replacement. TAVR PRESERVES MITRAL VALVE ANATOMY 2013;95:614 –20 AVR had significant decrease in annular height, septoof transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and lateral diameter, mitral valve transverse diameter, and standard surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) on mitral annular area after valve replacement (p < 0.006). mitral annular anatomy. Similar changes were not noted in the TAVR group. Methods. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiograFig 2. Illustrative example of geometric parameters. depictingMitral the measured parameters used for analysis. (A, preB) CalConclusions. annular geometry is better phy was performed in patients undergoing TAVRMitral usingannular modeling Rotational template used for segmentation of the mitral valve annulus. Annularheight points are placed every culation of the annular and septolateral (C) Calculation for commissural width (CW) and mitral transverse diameby TAVR than by AVR. Thus, TAVR may be a the Edwards Sapien valve (n (AH) ! 10 [Edwards diameter Life- (SL).served ng-axis view around the circumference of the annulus. (B)ter Segmentation anterior and posterior (MTD). (AC of " the anterior commissure; Mid-AA " mid anterior annulus; Mid-PA " mid posterior annulus; PC " posterior commissure.) more physiologic approach to aortic replacement. sciences, Irvine, CA]) or AVR ! 10) for severe aortic t 1-mm intervals along the length of the mitral valve. (AA # anterior annulus; AC (n # anterior commis(Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:614 –20) stenosis. Mitral annular geometric indexes were meaAoV # aortic valve; LA # left atrium; LV # left ventricle; LVOT # left ventricular outflow tract; MVO # Chordae Edwards valve Irvine, CA), and between-within analysis of (Tomtec variance was used to compare the © Sapien 2013 by The(Edwards SocietyLifesciences, of Thoracic Surgeons sured using Tomtec EchoView Imaging Sysnnulus; PC # posterior commissure; PML # posterior mitral leaflet.) 2 received a 26 mm Edwards Sapien valve. All patients eight MV annular outcome variables among patients underundergoing AVR received a bioprosthetic valve (Carpentiergoing TAVR and AVR, before and after intervention. To Edwards Magna pericardial valve, n " 7; Sorin MitroFlow, minimize the likelihood of inflating type I error and to account squares plane of the data-point cloud forvariables, the annulus was of 0.006 or less Milan, n " 2; and St Jude Trifecta, St. Paul, MN, n " 1). for the eight dependent a p is value urgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) the estabPatient andItaly, Methods aligned to the x-y plane. Under these conditions, Of these, 4 patients received a 21-mm valve, 3 received a (approximately 0.05 !geometric 8) was taken to be statistically signifitherapy forpoint symptomatic aortic stenosis; howthe annular lished height forIfeach (zn)hoc waspaired plotted as awere Patients and valve, Image Acquisition 23-mm and 3 received a 25-mm valve. cant. indicated, post t tests performed transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has functionever, of rotational position on the annulus. A number of between preprocedure and postprocedure groups, and unPatients undergoing surgical treatment for severe or recently been shown to demonstrate acceptable early and Comparison of Mitral Regurgitation anatomic landmarks were septum was idenpaired t identified. tests were The performed between TAVR and AVR critical aortic stenosis were selected for inclusion in this outcomes in high-risk patients with symptified asintermediate the anterior horn of the annulus at the aorticperformed valve. groups. All statistical analysis was using SPSS InPatients the TAVR cohort, a50% of patients had[Sapien; mild MR, 40% study. received TAVR (n ! 10 Edtomatic severe aortic stenosis The effect of either software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, had moderate MR, and 10% had severe MR before valve The lateral annulus was identified as [1–3] the IL). middle of the wards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA]) or standard open AVR technique for aortic valve replacement on mitral valve implantation. In comparison, 20% of patients in the AVR posterior annulus circumference. The septolateral diameter (n ! 10). The TAVR valve sizing was determined by the Fig 5. (A) (MV) Comparison of select geometric indices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus replacement (AVR). three-dimensional (3D) anatomy has not been group(TAVI) had no MR,aortic 40% valve had mild MR, and 40% had was defined as theResults distance between these two points. With discretion ofand themitral surgeon based on two-dimensional (2D) Patients undergoing AVR had significant decreases in annular height, septolateral diameter, annular area relative to their initial th described. moderate MR. The degree of MR remained unchanged the annular rotated PMVR Summit – Bcommissures arcelona -‐ 19-‐20 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » model such that the were June 2015 S Figure 4. In this patient, the Cx courses between the CS and the MVA (A, 4-chamber view). The volume-rendered reconstruction (B) and the reconstructed MVA level (C) show that the Cx courses inferiorly to the CS over a long distance. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty may result in compression of the Cx. History Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Sinus Anatomy and Its Of note, when the LCX coursed inferiorly to the CS, minimal distances between the CS and the MVA were Relation tostudied. Valve the the number ofMitral marginal branches of the LCXAnnulus was larger. assessed at the proximal and the distal CS and appeared to be Tops et al However, no dataof on Coronary the minimal distance between the CS highly variable Annulus (Table 2). Although this finding confirms the MSCT Sinus and Mitral Valve 1429 Implications forandPercutaneous the LCX were provided. Mitral Annuloplasty previous anatomic studies, the use of different reference These anatomic observations have previously been conpoints makes a direct comparison between the present study firmed with electron-beam computed tomography.15,16 Mao et and previous in vitro studies difficult. Importantly, in patients MD; Nico Van dereported Veire, MD, PhD; D. Schuijf, MSc; detheRoos, TABLE 2. QuantitativeLaurens AnalysesF.ofTops, the CS and the R. MVA in TABLE 3. Joanne Quantitative ofAlbert the CS the MVA inbetween the CS and the that the LCX coursed inferiorly to the Analyses CS in al15the with severe MR,and minimal distance MD, PhD; Ernst E. van der Wall, MD, PhD; Martin J. Schalij, MD, PhD; Jeroen J. Bax, MD, 80.8% of the studied patients. Furthermore, it was demonmay Regurgitation increase PhD significantly. In particular, the use of 3 Patient Groups Patients With and Without SevereMVA Mitral strated that the overlapping segment the CS and the LCX percutaneous Tops et al MSCT of Coronary Sinus andofMitral Valve Annulus 1427 mitral annuloplasty may be not feasible in was !30has mm been in 17.8% of the cases. once againtonosurgical patients where the CS Controls CAD HFannuloplasty Patients Without Patients With along the left atrial wall Background—Percutaneous mitral proposed as However, an alternative annuloplasty. Incourses this data on the minimal distance between the CS and the LCX (Figure 5). (n#35) (n#36) (n#34) sinus (CS) P* and its relation with the mitral valve annulusSevere MRand theSevere MR respect, evaluation of the coronary (MVA) coronary were provided. It should be noted that in the present study images were (n#90) (n#15) P* arteries is relevant. The feasibility of evaluating these issues noninvasively with multislice computed tomography was In the present study, the LCX coursed inferiorly to the CS Minimal distance between CS and MVA routinely reconstructed at 75% of the RR interval. However, in 68% of the patients, with adistance minimal distance between the MVA the diameter and the distance between the CS and the MVA determined. between CS and At MVA level 4.4!2.2 4.9!2.7 6.2!3.4† 0.019the LCX ofMinimal CS and 1.3"1.0years), mm. The64-slice close relation between computed may vary tomography during the cardiac cycle. Nevertheless, the present Methods and Results—In 105 patients (72 men, age 59!11 multislice was At MVA level 4.8!2.5 7.3!3.9 0.005 the0.006 CS and the LCX may limit the use of percutaneous mitral study shows that MSCT can accurately depict CS anatomy At proximal CS 7.6!1.6for noninvasive 7.9!2.1 9.3!2.8† performed evaluation ofvalve coronary artery disease. Thirty-four patients with heart failure and/or severe annuloplasty, particularly when the LCX courses infeand its relation with the MVA and thereby provides important Figure 1. Volume-rendered reconstructions At proximal CS 8.1!2.4 9.3!1.9 0.019 At distal CS 7.3!3.3 8.5!3.2 $0.001 mitral regurgitation were 10.7!3.0‡§ included. Three-dimensional reconstructions and standard planes used riorly to the CS over a longshow distance 4). information patients who to are being considered for percuthe (Figure relation between orthogonal the CS and the left onwere Leaflets At distal CS 8.3!3.1 12.1!3.6 $0.001 the MVA and circumflex artery. In 71 artery patients the mitral circumflex artery taneous annuloplasty. circumflex coronary (Cx).(68%), A, The Cx CS diameter at proximal CSassess CS anatomy and its relation with CS and MVA courses deeper than the CS and lies between coursed between the CS and the MVA with a minimal distance between the CS and the circumflex artery of MVA have diameter (2-chamber 40.2!4.7 44.3!3.3 0.001 Several addressed the relationview) between AP diameter 10.5!2.7 9.7!2.3 9.9!3.3 0.5 anatomic studies the CS and the mitral valve annulus.Implications B, The Cx for Percutaneous Mitral Annuloplasty 7–9 Shinbane et al7 studied 10 normal andatrial the MVA. 1.3!1.0 mm. The CS was located along the theCS left wall, rather than along the MVA, in the majority of the patients courses superiorly to the CS. MVA diameter (4-chamber view) 35.8!4.4 0.002 The present study 39.9!4.4 shows the feasibility of the noninvasive SI diameter 15.0!3.2 0.3cadaver adult and level reported distances (ranging from 14.0!3.0 90% at the 14.2!3.0 level of the MVA to 14%hearts at the ofvariable the distal CS).between The minimal distance theand its relation with the MVA evaluation of thebetween CS anatomy the CS and the MVA along the course of the CS. Mean MVA perimeter 118.1!12.6 127.6!14.7 0.020 1430 Circulation 20,was2007 CS diameter at distal CS CSMarch and MVA 5.1!2.9 mm. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the minimal distance between CS and and the coronarythe arteries. In previous in vitro7–9 and in distances between the CS and the MVA were 14.1"3.1 mm, 15,16 studies, the Total CS length 110.1!16.6 128.6!14.6 vivo relation between$0.001 the CS, the MVA, and the MVA was significantly greater as compared withand patients severe ofmitral (mean 7.3!3.9 mm AP diameter 3.9!0.7 3.9!0.6 4.0!0.7 0.7 mm, 10.2"4.9 10.7"3.5without mm at distances 20, 40,regurgitation and Circula0on. 2007;115:1426-‐1432 Ring 60 mm, respectively,*As from the ostium the CS. El- U test. versus 4.8!2.5 3.9!0.7 mm, P"0.05). assessed withofMann-Whitney 4.1!0.9 4.0!0.9 0.7 8 studied the distances between the CS and the Maasarany et al Conclusion—In the majority of the patients, the CS courses superiorly to the MVA. In 68% of the patients, the circumflex MVA in 32 normal cadaver hearts. Distances were assessed Total CS length 108!12 106!14transluminal $0.001 artery courses between the 126!19‡! CS andcoronary the mitral annulus. Multislice computed tomography may provide useful information history of myocardial infarction/percutaneous Dataregions Analysis Chordae in 6 separate along the course of the CS. Mean angioplasty/coronary bypass grafting, or a significant stenosisfor percutaneous analysis was performed a remote workstation AP indicates anterior–posterior; superior–inferior. forartery the SI, selection of potential candidates mitral annuloplasty. (Circulation. 2007;115:1426-1432.) distance Data was highly variable for the 6 on regions; the postprocessing shortest SI diameter Mitral Regurgitation in !1 coronary artery on the MSCT scan; group III (heart failure, Images, Plymouth, commisMinn). Volume-rendered *Assessed by ANOVA with Scheffé post hoc testing. distance (Vitrea (5.8 mm)2, wasVital observed at the anterolateral n!34) included patients with severe heart failure imaging (left ventricular Key Words: mitral computed coronary vessels 3-dimensional reconstructions and standard were (48%) had no MR, In the total study population, 50planes patients ! !P$0.001 ! tomography, !orthogonal sure ofvalve the MVA. Unfortunately, nox-ray data were provided about †P$0.05ejection vs controls; ‡P$0.001 vs controls; §P$0.05 vs CAD; fraction "35%). usedof to assess the anatomy and (superior/infethe course of the CS and its the position the CS in relation to the MVA 30 patients (29%) had MR grade 1", and 10 patients (9%) vs CAD. tributaries. Furthermore, the course of the coronary arteries and the Data Acquisition rior/same level). In the largest anatomic study reported, had dominance MR grade MR was characterized coronary artery (right, 2"; left, or balanced) was assessed. In 9 as 3" in 13 distances CS Maselli et al also noted variable itral annuloplasty is the most commonly performed Evaluation of between the CS the anatomy its relation particular,patients the course of the LCX in relation to the and CS (inferior or to the MVA (12%) and 4" and the MVA. At the level of the P2 and P3 scallops ofin the2 patients (2%). To detect differMultislice Computedsurgical Tomography procedure for ischemic mitral regurgitation and the coronary may be of value in patients who are superior) was determined (Figure 1).arteries The axial slices were studied to mitral of valve, mean ences distances in between CS and the MVA performed Toshiba Multislice Aquilion system thethe anatomic andofand quantitative data Multislice between patients 5.1!2.9MSCT mm was (range 1.41with to a16.8 Also, the64relation the minimal distance between the LCX the CS. (MR). Recently, amm). percutaneous approach to 5.7"3.3 mitral assess annuloconsidered for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty. mm and 9.7"3.2 mm were reported. (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with a collimation of with and without severe MR, study population was wastime proposed. studies havestudy, the CS and the was determined proximal computed tomography (MSCT) canthe provide an accurate Inand the Anatomic present the highly variable relation between 64"0.5 mmMVA andplasty a rotation of 400 to Validation 500 at ms,the depending on in the animals and Quantitative Analyses Conclusion 10 shown the feasibility of the percutaneous transvenous mitral the CS and the MVA was assessed noninvasively with evaluation of the anatomy ofMR the grade CS. Recent divided into 2long-axis groups: patients with !2" (n#90) current was 300the mACS at 120 kV.located Nonionic moreWith the use the distalheart CS.rate. AtThe thetube proximal CS, was of noninvasive reconstructed 2- and 4-chamber views and 2–5 In addition, preliminary results CS located more superiorly to the MVA in the use annuloplasty. of The the firstwas contrast material (Iomeron 400, Bracco, Altana Pharma, Konstanz,MSCT. preliminary data reconstructions, suggest a potential of4" MSCT scanning in volume-rendered 3-dimensional relation be-(n#15). and patients with MR grade 3" or superiorly to the MVA in 57 patients (54%), more inferimajority of the (ranging from at the (Figure of 2). The Germany) was administered in the antecubital vein, in an amount oftheannuloplasty 11 courses along the left atrial (LA) tween the patients CS and the MVA was90% assessed position of patient, the CS Figure 5. In annuloplasty. this human experience with percutaneous mitral patients considered for level percutaneous mitral th at Figure 4.in In 7this the Cx courses the (A, 4-chamber view). The reconstruction between the groups inthe the MVA to CS 14% theNo level ofthe theMVA distal Furthermore, posterior wall rather MVA. anaOBADIA Jean-‐François and the total between same Sthe ummit –and Brate arcelona -‐ 1the 9-‐20 une 2015 (superior/inferior/same CS). volume-rendered existed Download this level) presenta0on othan n «along (B) chircardio-‐lyon.org » orly level 41 patients 80patients topatient, 110 mL,(7%), depending on at the scan time, andCS a in flow oftheMVA 6 PMVR inJrelation todifferences and the2 M REVIEW European Journal of Echocardiography (2010) 11, i3–i9 doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jeq153 Anatomy of the mitral valve: understanding the European Journal of Echocardiography (2010) 11, i3–i9 mitral valve complex in mitral regurgitation doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jeq153 tional Journal of Cardiology 163 (2013) 242–248 History of Echocardiography (2010) 11, i3–i9 Karen P. McCarthy 1*European , Liam RingJ2ournal , and Bushra S. Rana 2 ability round e venreprethree l comConclusion onding A1, A2 1 Cardiac Morphology Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, Sydney Street, London SW3 6LY, UK; and 2 Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK Received 16 September 2010; accepted after revision 16 September 2010 Anatomy of the mitral valve: understanding the mitral valve complex in mitral regurgitation Imaging the mitral valve requires an understanding of the normal anatomy and how this complex structure is altered by disease states. Mitral regurgitation is increasingly prevalent. Despite the fall in rheumatic diease, it is the second most common valvular lesion seen in adults in Europe. In this review, the morphology of the normal and abnormal valve is reconsidered in relation to the key structures, with a view to aiding the reader in understanding how this might relate to echocardiographic identification of abnormalties. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Keywords Mitral regurgitation † Anatomy Karen P. McCarthy 1*, Liam Ring 2, and Bushra S. Rana 2 Downloaded from by guest on June 13, 2015 ut any ntricle. ure of Ring fibrous valve. e from diately guards s with Leaflets mitral equal tendirepreresent eaflet, ssures. e pos- Chordae REVIEW Introduction Cardiac Morphology Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, Sydneycorrect, Street, London SW3 6LY, UK; and by clinicians. Although neither description is anatomically 2 the mitralPapworth valve (MV)Hospital requires an understanding of the the terms aortic and mural leaflets are preferred.3 The mural (posDepartment ofImaging Cardiology, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK structure and are referred to as the anterior and posterior leaflets 1 normal anatomy and how this complex structure is altered by disease states. MV isafter composed structures Received 16 September 2010;The accepted revisionof16several September 2010 working in synchrony to open during diastole and close in systole effectively within the high-pressure systemic environment. Morphological changes of the valve can affect mechanical integrity resulting in abnormal leaflet closure and regurgitation of blood back into the left atrium causing loss of ventricular pressure and forward flow. Mitral regurgitation is increasingly prevalent. Despite the fall in rheumatic diease, it is the second most common valvular lesion seen in adults in Europe.1 Surgical repair should be performed whenever possible when the likelihood of successful repair is high. Since retaining the native valve has significant advantages, including the preservation of left ventricular function and longterm survival.2 In this review, the morphology of the normal and abnormal valve is reconsidered in relation to the key structures with a view to aiding the reader in understanding how this might relate to echocardiographic identification of abnormalties. terior) leaflet is narrow and extends two-thirds around the left atrioventricular junction within the inlet portion of the ventricle. In adults, the mural leaflet has indentations (sometimes called ‘clefts’) that generally form three scallops (segments) along the elongated free edge. These indentations do not usually extend all the way through the leaflet to the annulus; if this is seen, then this is usually associated with pathological valve regurgitation. Carpentier’s nomenclature4 describes the most lateral segment as P1, which lies adjacent to the anterolateral commisure, P2 is central and can significantly vary in size, and most medial is P3 segment, which lies adjacent to the posteromedial commissure (Figure 1). The semicircular aortic (anterior) leaflet of the MV is much broader than the mural leaflet, comprises one third of the annular circumference and has a clear and rough zone (Figure 2). The distinguishing feature of this leaflet is the fibrous continuity with the left and non-coronary cusps of the aortic valve and with the interleaflet triangle between the aortic cusps that abuts onto the membranous septum.5 The aortic leaflet is also divided arbitrarily into three regions labelled A1, A2 and A3 corresponding to the adjacent regions of the mural leaflet (Figure 1). From the attachment point of each leaflet at the annulus to the thfree edge, the leaflet is described as having basal, clear and rough Imaging the mitral valve requires an understanding of the normal anatomy and how this complex structure is altered by disease states. Mitra regurgitation is increasingly prevalent. Despite the fall in rheumatic diease, it is the second most common valvular lesion seen in adults i Europe. In this review, the morphology of the normal and abnormal valve is reconsidered in relation to the key structures, with a view to aiding the reader in understanding how this might relate to echocardiographic identification of abnormalties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Keywords Mitral regurgitation † Anatomy Normal mitral valve anatomy OBADIA Jean-‐FrançoisIntroduction Leaflets PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20 June 2015 structure and are referred to as the anterior and posterior leaflet Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » The American Journal of Cardiology (www.ajconline.org) Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for Assessment of Mitral Valve Functional Anatomy in Patients With Prolapse-Related Regurgitation History Giovanni La Canna, MDa,*, Iryna Arendar, MDa, Francesco Maisano, MDb, Fabrizio Monaco, MDa, Egidio Collu, MDa, Stefano Benussi, MDb, Michele De Bonis, MDb, Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1365–1374 , and Heart Ottavio Alfieri, MDb Echocardiography in Mitral Prolapse Alessandro Castiglioni, MDbValvular Disease/3D Transesophageal Ring The aim of the study was to evaluate the additional diagnostic value of real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) for surgically recognized mitral valve (MV) prolapse anatomy compared to 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE), 2D-transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE), and real-time 3D-transthoracic echocardiography (RT3D-TTE). We preoperatively analyzed 222 consecutive paA1,2,3 è for 25 prolapse-related % tients undergoing repair mitral regurgitation using RT3D-TEE, 2DTEE, RT3D-TTE, and 2D-TTE. Multiplanar reconstruction was added to volumerendered RT3D-TEE for quantitative prolapse recognition. The echocardiographic data were compared to the surgical findings. Per-patient analysis of RT3D-TEE identified prolapse in 204 patients more accurately (92%) than 2D-TEE (78%), RT3D-TTE (80%), and 2D-TTE (54%). Even among those 60 patients with complex prolapse (>1 segment localization or commissural lesions), RT3D-TEE correctly identified 58 (96.5%) compared to 42 (70%), 31 (52%), and 21 (35%) detected by 2D-TEE, RT3D-TTE, and 2D-TTE (p < 0.0001). Multiplanar reconstruction enabled RT3D-TEE 15 to differentiate dominant (>5-mm displacement) and secondary (2 to <5-mm displacement) prolapsed segments in % but with a low predictive agreement with surgically recognized dominant lesions (100%), value (34%) for secondary lesions. In addition, owing to the identification of clefts and subclefts (indentations of MV tissue that extended >50% or <50% of the total leaflet height, respectively), RT3D-TEE accurately characterized the MV anatomy, including that which deviated from the standard nomenclature. In conclusion, RT3D-TEE provided more accurate mapping of MV prolapse than 2D imaging and RT3D-TTE, adding quantitative recognition of dominant and secondary lesions and MV anatomy details. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1365–1374) Leaflets Chordae P2 patients è 8intercommissural 0 % to when . Prolapse localization. Per-patient prolapse localization in 222 according surgicalline. findings. Boxes number ofand monosegment along (A) Surgical viewindicate of MV dominant prolapse and flailor of middle Accurate localization of the valve lesion is crucial coaptation imaging (2D-TTE andshowing 2D-TEE) RT3D-TTE for MV scallop of posterior leafl Conclusion secondary prolapse of medial segments of both leaflets (*). (B1, B2, B3) Cross-section reference of cutting plane to guide prolapse measure sural lesions; solid lines, multisegment monoleaflet lesions; arrowed solid lines, bileaflet facing lesions; arrowed broken lines, nonfacing bileaflet planning the surgical repair strategy for prolapse-related functional anatomy assessment, using as a standard the coaptation; (C2) 7-mm displacement (arrow) of middle segment of posterior leaflet (dominant prolapse) with ruptured chordae tendinea 1–3 mitral regurgitation. The lesions. recent displacement availability of theofMitrasurgical findings in a group of patients with prolapse-related (arrow) medialcommissure; segment of posterior leaflet (secondary prolapse) without prolapse of medial dotted lines and asterisk, combined commissure and leaflet ALC # anterolateral PMC # posteromedial commissure; P1, P2, segment of anterior leaflet (ma Figure 1. RT3D-TEE. Cropped multiplanar images of 3D zoom data set of MV for quantitative evaluation of leaflet tip displacement above OBADIA Jean-‐François th Clip imposes a detailed of mitral undergoing valve repair. leftdepiction ventricular side). system further PMVR Summit –into Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20 June 2015mitral regurgitation Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » Figure 5. 3D-TEE and anatomic surgical picture showing 3 middle scallops of posterior leaflet (P2a, P2b, P2c) split by complete clefts (arrows). P1 ! lat scallop, P3 ! medial scallop. Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for Assessment of Mitral Valve Functional Anatomy in Patients e American Journal of Cardiology (www.ajconline.org) With Prolapse-Related Regurgitation History Giovanni La Canna, MDa,*, Iryna Arendar, MDa, Francesco Maisano, MDb, Fabrizio Monaco, MDa, Figure 5. 3D-TEE and anatomic surgical picture showing 3 middle scallops of posteriora leaflet (P2a, P2b, P2c) split by complete clefts (arrows). P1 ! lateral 1372 De Bonis, MDb, Egidio Collu, MD , Stefano Benussi, MDb, Michele scallop,Figure P3 !5.medial 3D-TEEscallop. and anatomic surgical picture showing 3 middle scallops of posterior leaflet (P2a, P2b, P2c) split by complete clefts (arrows). P1 ! lateral Ring scallop, P3 ! medial scallop. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1365–1374 Alessandro Castiglioni, MDb, and Ottavio Alfieri, MDb The American Journal of Cardiology (www.a The aim of the study was to evaluate the additional diagnostic value of real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) for surgically recognized mitral valve (MV) prolapse anatomy compared to 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE), 2D-transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE), and real-time 3D-transthoracic echocardiography (RT3D-TTE). We preoperatively analyzed 222 consecutive patients undergoing repair for prolapse-related mitral regurgitation using RT3D-TEE, 2DTEE, RT3D-TTE, and 2D-TTE. Multiplanar reconstruction was added to volumeLeaflets rendered RT3D-TEE for quantitative prolapse recognition. The echocardiographic data were compared to the surgical findings. Per-patient analysis of RT3D-TEE identified prolapse in 204 patients more accurately (92%) than 2D-TEE (78%), RT3D-TTE (80%), and 2D-TTE (54%). Even among those 60 patients with complex prolapse (>1 segment wing 3 middle scallops of posterior leaflet (P2a, P2b, P2c) split by complete clefts (arrows). P1 ! lateral 1372 The American Journal58 of Cardiology localization or commissural lesions), RT3D-TEE correctly identified (96.5%) (www.ajconline.org) compared to 42 (70%), 31 (52%), and 21 (35%) detected by 2D-TEE, RT3D-TTE, and 2D-TTE (p < 0.0001). Multiplanar reconstruction enabled RT3D-TEE differentiate dominant Figure 5. to 3D-TEE and anatomic surgical picture showing 3 middle scallops of posterior leaflet ( Figuredisplacement) 6. 3D-TEE. (A,C)and Imaging compared(2to to surgical findings (B,D) 2 patients with different anatomyinof middle scallop (P2) of posterior leaflet. scallop,inP3 ! medial scallop. (>5-mm secondary <5-mm displacement) prolapsed segments Monolobe P2 clearly separated by 2 clefts (arrows) fromlesions lateral (P1) and medial scallops posterior leaflet, mirrored by surgical view (B). (C) Bil agreement with surgically recognized dominant (100%), but(P3) with a lowof predictive Chordae with 2 for subunits M1 and M2 owing toInincomplete indentation (pseudocleft, broken arrow)ofconfirmed by surgical anatomy (D). valueP2(34%) secondary lesions. addition, owing to the identification clefts and subclefts (indentations of MV tissue that extended >50% or <50% of the total leaflet height, respectively), RT3D-TEE accurately characterized the MV anatomy, including that whichvalue deviated from the standard nomenclature. In conclusion, providedbalance more of functional MV anatomy, targ to discriminate dominant from secondary lesions. RT3D-TEE comprehensive accurate mapping of MV prolapse 2D imaging and RT3D-TTE, quantitative Using these diagnostic criteria,than our large study population, ingadding the mitral regurgitation mechanism and the related s recognition of dominant and secondary lesions and MV © 2011 22 Elsevier characterized by a relevant percentage of patients withanatomy com- details. gical strategy. These findings could be of paramount r Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1365–1374) plex MV disease, found that RT3D-TEE was both more evance owing to the less-than-optimal results of surgi accurate and more reproducible than 2D imaging for the repair, especially in those patients with multisite prolap 23–26 assessment of MV lesions. According to the per-patient in 2D-TEE) the currentand era.RT3D-TTE Accurate localization of the valve lesion is crucial when imaging (2D-TTE and for MV Conclusion analysis, RT3D-TEE provided incremental diagnostic Carpentier’s nomenclature describes planning the surgical repair strategy for prolapse-related functional anatomy assessment, using as a standard the 2 clefts in the p 1–3 mitral regurgitation. The recent availability of the Mitrasurgical findings in posterior a group of patients with value, (B,D) especially for the of complex multisegterior leaflet. leaflets; wasprolapse-related seen by Quill et al27 to be true on Figure 6. 3D-TEE. (A,C) Imaging compared to surgical findings in 2 patients withassessment different anatomy of middle scallop (P2) of (A) this Figure 5. 3D-TEE and anatomic surgical picture showing 3 middle scallops of posterior leaflet (P2a, P2b, P2c) split by complete clefts (arrows). P1 ! th Clip system imposes aand detailed depiction of mitral regurgitation undergoing valve repair. ment disease involving or compared in(B). 66% ofpBilobe the examined Although the standard cle P2 (A,C) clearlyImaging separated by 2 clefts lateral (P1) medial (P3) scallops of posterior leaflet, mirrored (C)leaflet. OBADIA ean-‐François further from findings PMVR SMV ummit scallop, Barcelona -‐different 1one 9-‐20 anatomy both June leaflets 2015 by surgical to (P2) Download this resenta0on on hearts. « chircardio-‐lyon.org » Figure Monolobe 6. J3D-TEE. compared to(arrows) surgical (B,D) in 2– patients with of mitral middle scallop ofview posterior (A) P3 ! medial scallop. [16]. There are diff summarized by Mu fied them on the b nous cords referred free edge of mitral can be identified fo the posterior leaflet lops) are called cle free edge are called Figure 2 (A) The aortic leaflet of the mitral valve is in fibrous continuity withcoapting the leafletssurfaces of the aortm the leaflet. The undersurface of the rough zone in this mitral leaflet has many cordal attachments. T on the anterior (B) leafl basal zone (bracket) which inserts into the annulus at the left atrioventricular junction (arrow). these arise from th be the strongest. Fin i5 tricular wall and are the so-called basal sidered to represen ered as belonging ventricular aspects The papillary m Fig. 5. The rough zone (RZ) is the border area where tendinous cords attach. The larger sate for the geom remaining portion of the leaflet is called smooth zone (SZ). [15]. On the contrary the posterior leaflet is the key structure in the closure of the valve. Its structure is similar to a skirt with pleats. When the posterior annulus contracts, first the scallops coapt together, then the leaflet, moving towards the anterior one, coordinates the History Ring Anatomy of the MV Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Secondary Chordae Primary Chordae Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Secondary Chordae è Basal Chordae Primary Chordae è Marginal Chordae Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History of the body of the leaflets [6 – 8]. All There chordae were nowere differences inthe mitral left orifice atri diam tion. Data were compared using a t test for paired between measurements with a Hegar dilator or mea observations, the level of significance set at p " 0.05 identified by with their insertion into the anterior leaflet (A1 through the ing the mitral perimeter in the open heart. for statistical comparison within a species. Interspecies and A2) and posterior mitral leaflet (P1, PM1, PM2, and diameters we The basal chordae were easily identified by their comparisons of basal chorda number were done using angular-shaped insertion into the ventricular aspe P2). The two constant and thick anterior (AS) and The postewas then sec the leaflets. total number of basal chordae 18.81and ! 3.54 AS2 in the human, 4.21 in the rior (PS) strut chordae were identified as AS1 for 24.6 !sinus ofporcine, Va 19.4 ! 2.98 in the ovine valves. A statistically signifi the anterior and PS1 and PS2 for the posterior. The other ventricular difference was found between the number of basalfr c Ring Fig 4. Left atrial view of the mitral valve. The continuous line represents basal chorda insertions into leaflets. Large stars represent the insertion of the anterior strut chordae. Smaller stars represent the insertion of the posterior strut chordae. Dots correspond to insertions of basal chordae. (AS1 and AS2 # anterior strut chordae; AB1 and AB2 # lateral anterior basal chordae; PS1 and PS2 # posterior strut chordae; PMB1 and PMB2 # lateral posterior basal chordae.) Leaflets dae in the human and porcine valves but not in human and ovine valves (ANOVA, Bonferroni corre significance level, p # 0.0167). The leaflet insertion of the basal chordae intoF undersurface of the anterior leaflet was at the junctio a the smooth and rough zones (Fig 2). The anterior le smooth zone height varied considerably between bi vidual valves: mean 10.78 ! 3.20 mm in porcine (ranA to 15.88 mm); 6.46 ! 1.66 mm in ovine (range, 5 to mm), and 10.22 mm ! 1.71 in humans (range, 6.77 tob1 mm). The leaflet insertion of the basal chordae into t posterior leaflet and commissural areas was always c d to the annulus in all three species (Fig 3). In fact, ex for the anterior leaflet, all basal chordae were inse t around the annulus (Fig 4). The AS and PS chordae were easily identified s in three species as the most medial basal chordae and c Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » length and length)/end-diastolic length-enà-systolic Wc computeddPidt valucs.1z preisedaspe;centageof ba.seline ed l0 ôf the l.fr ventricular pressure and used its marimum ancl 312.1 vdae't timc accordminimumvaluesas end-diastolicand end-systolic , toOK; ing to the ref'erencetechnique.l: cold' Threeeoicardialelectrodesfbr ECG recordingwere positionecl.Thisc ooeratiotts lasted -20 minutes in Langendorll l, the: mocle, a 10-J shockto obtain defibrillation. a phasercquiring Subvalvular Apparatus J aMitral nd' followeclby an equilibration period until a stable. regular ' ;. The -20 minutes in rvorking Different Functions of Primary and Secondary rhythm Chordae then another rvasobtainecl, ne 20 All of the modebeforethe variousrecordingsrvere initiated. 3125 Apparatus Mitral JeanF. Obadia.MD. PhD; CendrineCasali,MSc: Circula\on 1997;96:3121-‐312 et al MD: Obadia Jean F. Chassignolle. MarcSubvalvular Janier.MD parâmeters (left atrial prcssure,left ventricularpressure.antl in the B Ilackground Thc aint ol this stucly was to compare the A (Control)' in group Groups significantly lower than in the control Results (P:,006). In Hemodynamic lunction of the primarvchordac . This attachcdto the free eclgewith C, sectioning the of secondarv chordae (Secondary left a competent C and mit Sectioned), (Primary Chordae that of the seconclarychorclae attached to the t,entricular valve rvith good coaptation ) of :the?anterior G . n , * i l î l Chordae B (N î - i - Ctosether . o r r nSectioned) iand ( i r o r r p C ( N = ? ) of . ion surfaceol the anteriormitral leaflct. rior leaflets shown by video monitoring. However. aortiè Methodsand Results An isolated.; working pig heart model waslower than in the controlgroup (P:.007). an<Iultr 'fhree GrouP C Group B A Group (P=.009). was used. groups of 7lrebs' heiirts werc colrpared: Group A crometryevidencedimpairedfunction I History Ring Leaflets rhp rectlY ) The 'geia' lv:rs the control groLrpwith intact leaflcts.In group B, thc primarvchordaeof the antcrior leaflelwere sectionedand the secondaruchordae werc left intact before assemblvof the working heart model. In group Cl,the secondarychordac were sectionedand the primarychordaeleft intact.In groupIl, atrial and ventricularprcssurecl'iclenceddramaticrnitral regurgitation. Vidco monitoringshowerlsignificirntprolapseof the free edgc of the anterior lcaflet. Acute mitral regurgitationaccounted lbr the decreasein aortic flow rate to 30 ml/min. b Ya ' differ' red ttt here are sevcralarguments in thelin favor of preservin-u, insofâras possible,the internal structureof the left ventricleduring mitral1' valvesurgery.L-3 Such thout argumentsfavor mitral repair rather than replacement ârdial]: whcneverpossible.a In prosthetic valvereplacèment,the Conclusions This study suggeststhat the primary 3 0 : 4and 5 1100+135 m i the n o w ,m Uof A o r t i cf lchordae ondary mitral subvalvular appararus SF,prinrrn chordaeof the ànteriorle dillerentfunctions.1'he Sonomicrometry, 3*6 appeared 21 3 to be more involved in+mitral valve2 compe % whereasthe secondarychordae appearedto be more int ventricular LeTt in left ventricular gcometry and function. (Cl 86+8/16+3 101/13 pressure,mm Hg 1997;96:3121-3128.) Keyatrial llords r mitral valve r ventricles . Left 60a8/16*3 25x3/15*2 contraction pressure,mm Hg 8 5 0 - 10 4 17*3 J 90+8/14*3 30+6/17*3 aremeanlSD' Values fraction. shortening SFindicates ventilation, 8 L: tidal volume, 450 mL; 50% oxygen). sternotomy was then performed, and the heart was ha by the usual method, after aortic clamping and infusion of for 10 mincontinuously recorded werc ultrasonomicrometry) mL of crvstalloid solution (St Thomas No. 2) into the for PC. Aortic and coronaryflow software Lab-Vierv with utesf'he root. excised hearts were placed into cardioplegicfluid in the 4'C. groups Three directly of 7 hearts u'ere lormed measurccl postcrior leaflet is now generailyprcservedby the maby aortic randomiand pulmonary lines wcrc rates (Fig 2). jority of surgeons,..{' 10 minutes Afïer the recordthose and there is increasingemphasison during three occasions on In group A (n:7), the control group, the left atrium the importanceof preservingthe antericlrnitral valve in transmitterwas insertedthrougha left atrial vicleo ing phase, 'fhe opened. but theamitral leafletsrvereleft intact. The hearts severaltechniques.T.s dual role of left vcntricular i of the left ventricle in the20apcx located a bursa presened in cold cardioplegic bu"ria ancl iluid toattime minutes. competenceand functionof the mitral valveis therefore In group B (n:7), and ventricularsurfaces after the left ofatrium thc atrial was opened, display Direct succession. acknowledged,though globally, on the basis of arguprimary chordac of the anterior leal]et (chordae attached vicieorecording' with ments regardinglcfi ventricularfunction and postoperr,vasthus possible valve mitralrvere the edge) of free the sectioned ar-rdthe secondary ative course after valve replacement.') the aortic root' modiby-Ihis Conclusion attached wereside) the (chordae Because attached to hearts the vcntricular left intact. This researchaimed to investigateantl cleterminethe and l0fications could to l-5 minutes. The hcarts were geometn thcn presen'ed in be suspected, ventricular of the bubble pig heartenabling model"-1 workingmechanisms thcrndicates mitral valve ,:t, to play i ' r r r d i o p l r ' gfi ler r i dt o t i r n e2 { tn r i n u r c son Fro1. lsolatedanatomic . normal the to mimic pad a wet restedthis presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » pump;-‐ 4' hearts the dual P, roller comparc CML; the clifferent functioni oxygenator this 3, role and to Cobe PMVR Summit – Barcelona 1of 9-‐20th June 015 C werc also after Download group In 2 (n:7), .:lOBADIA Jean-‐François 2, postcfrarge; the left atrium was opened, , Chordae trunl, in the: l. tb€.: ithout l'n z. Experimentaldesign in group A (control),grouP B (Primary chordaesectioned),and group C (secondarychordae sectioned). minimum valuesas end-diastolic ing to the ref'erence n5 ing technique.l: , toOK ; totechnique.l: ref'erence the m the 10 ; 8 0 ' ml/min ôver ôver cold ml/min posiing technique.l: were to ref'erence the recording fbr ECG posiwere Threeeoicardial electrodes Three cold' eoicardialelectrodesfbr ECG recording ml 8 6 0 ra Heart mode. posiworking were recording mode fbr ECG working -20 Three electrodes eoicardial Langendorll in -20 minutes tionecl. lasted Langendorll in Thisc minutes ooeratiotts tionecl. lasted Thisc ooeratiotts wo 312.1 -20 minutes 40 Langendorll in these 10 minutes l, the: tionecl. lasted over Thisc ooeratiotts these 10 over defibrillation. obtain to shock defibrillation. mocle, 10-J obtain a to shock a phasercquiring mocle, 10-J a phase rcquiring a the: l, ovth defibrillation. to obtain shock mocle, 10-J auntil J a n dby ' anfollowecl rcquiring a phase in thoseparam regular in stable. difference regular a until stable. difference followecl period a period equilibration equilibration by an Jand' ' difv a stable. regular until followeclby period in equilibration ;. The -20ananother -20 in rvorking rvorking minutes of the rate)heart minutes rhythm rat another heart rhythm ' rvas thenobtainecl, and then and rvasobtainecl, The ;. -20 1, 1997 November in rvorking Vol 96, No 9 then Circulation 3126 rhythm an 20 rvas obtainecl, nebefore of the grouPs. of the All minutes Allanother rvere initiated. rvere initiated. mode mode recordings recordings various the various the Time (sec)three grouPs three 20before ne of the rvere initiated. modebefore recordings various the thr antl - L AAll antlpressure. pressure. parâmeters left - Sventricular ono ---.. LVP left ventricular (left prcssure, (leftparâmeters atrial atrial prcssure, P A -ThJresults S oobtained no . . . . . L V P pressure. ThJresults antl parâmeters ventricular left (left prcssure, B Mitral atrial Subvalvular Apparatus in the 160 T in the in lthe Table, given given in the 6and 160 . ThisDifferent Functions1 4 0 giv of Primary and SecondaryChordae . This (irorrp (N = ?) with iecorcled Lab-View with 1,1 . o (r N r n: ? ) G . n ,of * .i l î l î - i - C . o r rGn. n , * i l î l î - i - CB i B( i(rNo:r r p? )C ( Ni = ? )( N : ? ) C140 iecorcled ion = ( i r o r r p ( N ? ) iec C '120 G . n , * B ilîlî-i-C.orrn i 12 .; ionof . gr three F the in groups three t 2 the t20 lrebs' JeanF. Obadia.MD. PhD; Circula\on 1 997;96:3121-‐312 .; CendrineCasali,MSc: Jean F. Chassignolle.MD: Marc Janier.MD th lrebs' = 1oo a pr ventricular sh cold' 6 l, the: Jand' ;. The' ne 20 History in the . This ionof . .; lrebs' Ring : 4 J J J {^ q 5 r o i ventricularpressures ve viâe anci tion, significantly lower than in the controlgroup (P:,006). In monitor viâeo U ; ' anci tion, ; 8 0 tio C, sectioningof the secondarvchordae left a competent mit edg free the valve tosetherrvith good coaptationof the anterior a the and free edge of 6 ! the P 6 0 9 th rior leaflets shown by video monitoring. However. aortiè a ' 40 band Y Results An isolated a Acur mictdle). Methods pig heart model waslower than in the controlgroup (P:.007). mitral 4 ' 40an<Iultr b Ya ' Acute mictdle). 'fhree b Yworking m was used. groups of 7 heiirts werc colrpared: Group A crometryevidencedimpairedfunction (P=.009). differ' a in decrease lv:rs the control groLrpwith intact leaflcts.In group B, thc differ' llolv Conclusions This study suggeststhat the primary aortic in differ' decrease and de primarvchordae were sectionedand the ondary chordae of the mitral subvalvular appararus red tttof the antcrior leaflel with 1100ml/ ttt red secondaruchordae werc left red intactttt before assemblvof the dillerentfunctions.1'heprinrrn chordaeof the ànterior with wi le 1100ml/min in th Leaflets thel inVolmodel. working heart In group Cl,the secondarychordac were appeared to be more involved in mitral valve compe ultraso ever, thel Circulation 1, 1997 No 9 November thel 96, (sec) in3126 Time in left intact.In groupIl, atrial sectionedand the primarychordae ultrasonomicrom whereasthe secondarychordae appearedto be more ever, ev int Time (sec) 1' cl'iclenced thoutprcssure and ventricular dramatic rnitral regurgitamai was in left ventricular gcometry 1' (Cl 1' tion and function. thout -LAP thout S o n o . . . . . L V P by - S o n osignificirnt - - - . . L V P showerl tion. Vidco monitoring was tio prolapse B of the free 1997;96:3121-3128.) - Ltion AP -Sono . . . - - L Vmaintained ârdial]: A P lcaflet. Acute by the ârdial]: mitral regurgitationacducecl ârdial]:1 6 0 edgc of the anterior Key llords r mitral valve r ventricles . l6 60 , du counted lbr duceclby the mitral reg the decrease in aortic flow rate to 301 ml/min. trunl 160 contraction trunl, of trunl, 1 4 0 sectioning 1,1 140 B se in the: A (control), of the z. sectioning 140grouP design in group grouP l'n the:Experimental grouP B seco (control), in group A z. in B com Experimental design (control), in the:'120 group A remained z. in Experimental design l'n (Primary here are sevcralargumentsin 1favor of preservin-u, ventilation, L: tidal volume, 2 chordae l'n l. tb€.: oxygen). C (secondary t 2 450 mL; 50% and8 group t20 sectioned), re a competent, (Primary 120C (secondary remainedchordae tb€.:chordae group (Primary andand insofârchordae as possible, l. the internal sternotomy was then performed, chordae sectioned), (secondary chordae structure of the post group C and l. tb€.: sectioned). anci sectioned), a the heart was ha rior = 1 o o ithout r oclamping i left ventricleduring mitral valvesurgery.L-3 E sectioned). by the usual method, after aortic l o o Such Chordae E and 1,0r rio too infusion sectioned). riorof anciposteriorleafl ithout mL of crvstalloid solution (St Thomas No. 2) into the argumentsfavor mitral repair ithout rather than replacement rectlY rectlY ) The Ilackground 8 0 Thc aint ol this stucly was to ;compare the ) attachcd lunction of the primarvchordac The to the free eclgewith 8 6 0 that of 'geia' the seconclarychorclae attached to the t,entricular 'geia' surfaceol the anteriormitral leaflct. rectlY ) The 'geia' E loo 6 : 4 1 ) {^ ; 8 0 q 5 U ; ' into root. f'he excisedhearts were placed whcneverpossible.a U'U 5' ; 8 0 In prostheticvalvereplacèment, fluid : 8cardioplegic 0 the æ 4'C. Three groups of 7 hearts u'ere lormed by randomi postcrior leaflet is now generailyprcserved by the ma6 : 6 ! 0'6 i p 6 0 (Fig 2). P 6 0 jority of surgeons,..{' and there is increasingemphasis 9 on In group A (n:7), the control group, the left atrium 4 the importanceof preservingthe antericlr nitral 4valve in 4 0 0,4 40The hearts 'fhe opened.but the mitral leafletsrvereleft intact. severaltechniques.T.s dual role of left vcntricular presened in cold cardioplegic iluid to time 20 minutes. competenceand functionof the mitral valveis therefore nt 20 In group B (n:7), after the left atrium was opened, acknowledged,though globally, on the basis of arguprimary chordac of the anterior leal]et (chordae attached 0,0 0 ments regardinglcfi ventricularfunction and postoperthe free edge) rvere sectioned ar-rdthe secondary 0 1-Ihis 2 3 4 5 6 1 ative courseafter valve replacement.') Time (sec) (chordae attachedto the vcntricular side) left intact. Time (sec) This researchaimed to investigateantl cleterminethe Time (Sec.) l0 to l-5 minutes. The hcarts were thcn presen'edin anatomic -LAP enabling - S o n o thc mitral valve to play . . . . . L V P mechanisms i ' r r r.d. .i o- p- l r ' gfi ler r i-dSt o c s .3. Tracings parameters. -LAP o nt oi r n e2 { tn r i n u rFro Noteexistenc of hemodynamic clifferent functioni this dual role and to comparc PMVR the Summit – Barcelona -‐ 1of 9-‐20th June 015L V PC (n:7), after Download this presenta0on group In 2 the left atrium was opened,on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » I 8 6 0 40 Conclusion B OBADIA Jean-‐François History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ant. Leaf. / Double Part è Double Func/on Ring Leaflets Secondary Chordae Primary Chordae LV FuncGon ConGnence Load Bearing Basal Chordae + Basal Leaflet Aligning Chordae Marginal Chordae + Marginal Leaflet Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets were mounteded and onto the four individual chordae, left atriumdrainage in the placed viaas the right atrium to accomplish compared to the human mitral valve, and has from the atrium and vena cava inferior. After aortic also been found to bechorda the most suitable animal model shown in Figure 2. The to be examined was acoustic contact. crossclamping, the heart was stopped by administra(11). In postulating that secondary chordae are the tion of cold crystalline cardioplegic solution (St. principal force mediators in the valvular-ventricular subsequently interaction, severed between the fixing points to solutionwhere Thomas' Hospital, number 1)ainlong-axis the aortic the aim of the present in-vivo study was to tension in the secondary primary mitral tricle was obtaine ensure that allcompare chordal force wasandtransmitted through chordae tendineae. the c-ring. The c-ring was made of brass, 6 mm in cineloop images Differentialand Tension Secondary and Primary diameter 0.8between mm thick. A miniature strain gauge plane were down Mitral Chordae in an Acute In-Vivo Porcine Madel Inc., Raleigh, (EA-06-031DE-350; Measurement Group, Mads Lomholt, Sten Lyager Nielsen, 50fen Berndt Hansen, Niels Trolle Andersen, J. Michael NC, USA) was mounted on bath the outer ""and inner Study protocol Hasenkam Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and Institute of Experimental Clinical Research, Skejby Sygehus, JHeart Valve Dis Measurements ring surfaces in 2a002;11:337-‐345 Wheatstone half-bridge. Journal of and HDenmark eart coupled Valve Disease University Hospital, Aarhus, Aarhus The May2002 ters were perfor A strain indicator (2021; Measurement Group, Inc.) T Basal = 3 x T Marginal Figure 2: Right: Miniaturestances: chordal force transducers, A tendineae tension was recorded online in the openBackground and aim of the study:Figure Chordae1:tendineae Schematic and photographie representation of the which are mounted on the surgically exposed chordae 3.0 may be instrumental for valvular-ventricular interacchest condition with spontaneous circulation in l. Baseline condit mitral valve. The left ventricle has been opened and the tendineae. Units shown are cm. Left: Miniature force CTT, LVP and ECG trac lng three different hemodynamic conditions: baseline tion, i.e. the reciprocal exchange of force between the • leaflet has been detached from the annulus. Primary transducers implanted on the chordae. One transducer is left ventricular myocardium and the mitral apparawith no intervention; partial aortic occlusion; and • intervention. chordae insert in the leading edge, and secondary chordae implanted on a secondary chorda (foreground), and one on ! 2.0 tus. Chordae tendineae are divided into primary during dobutamine infusion. the leaflet belly. a primary chorda (background). 100.0 1.0edge chordae and secondary belly chordae, intoResults: leading Systolic tension in secondary chordae under 1:: 2. Partial aortic o and differences in thickness and distribution may baseline conditions was significantly higher than in u • 1.0 primary chordae (0.7 N versus 0.2 N, respectively). reflect different fonctions of the two types. Primary 0.8may be fondamental for leading edge conchordae No significant impact on this distribution80.0 by changtricular pressure ( trol and for correct leaflet coaptation, while seconding the hemodynamic condition could be identified. on ary chordae Conclusion: Chordal tension is distributed towards 3. During 0.8 may act as the main mediators of 60.0 - LVP PS PS dobuta AS AP the secondary chordae, with a tension more than valvular-ventricular interaction. was postulated three-fold that in the primary counterpart. The magthat tension in secondary chordae of the anterior ECXl arterial pressure o nitude of chordal tension seems to be determined 40.0 l leaflet is greater than in the primary chordae. The !: 0.4 & AP primarily by ventricular pressure. This finding supstudy aim was to investigate the distribution of !. - PP The aorta was p B ports the hypothesis that secondary chordae are more chordae tendineae tension in the porcine mitral li in0.2vivo. 20.0 important mediators of the valvular-ventricular valve - 3.0 PS interaction than are primary chordae. Methods: During extracorporeal bypass, miniature pr • tricular-aortic • chordal force transducers were implanted on four AS • 0.0 0.0 The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2002;11:337-345 chordae in 23 Danish Landrace pigs. Chordae • rate was infusion z 2.0 ....i time (dP /dt) . moted a reduced late mortality (8). This beneficial 6 1.0 Since the first successful implantation of a mitral Vol. 11. No. 3 • It Chordae • effect has been assigned to preservation of the sovalve prosthesis during the early 1960s (1), replacecalled valvular-ventricular interaction (9). This interment of this valve has gained worldwide acceptance. a complex 0.00 0.25 the 0.50enhanced 0.75 use1.00 1.25 action 1.50 is1.75 2.00mechanism 2.25 which 2.50 serves a dual During the past decade, of valve 0.0 PP fonction: (i) It enables a long-axis contraction of the AP PS repair at the expense of replacement has been encourAS Timo [si left ventricular myocardium by approximating the aged by numerous experimental demonstrations that Conclusion apex of the heart to the annular plane; and (ii) it assists the mitral subvalvular apparatus, that is, the chordae valve closure, prevents prolapse, and may also facilitendineae and papillary muscles, is of paramount mitral valve opening. importance (2- – Btate th June 2015 OBADIA Jean-‐François for left ventricular pump performance PMVR Summit arcelona -‐ 19-‐20 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » Data analysis All signals were c &I ;/(%-. 1/(/"#)< 9#&*:3 J7/#(&. !&++/-/3 H&#/(0 1&I3 =*((/K 1@LM NOP3 2G !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $%&'# ()$*+)( ,%%-+.' *&$+.' /01$2%.+( */3/,%-0/.456 -)4#7 9%: 4#$%&'# 4#/ 0)4&$/ #/)$4 #)3/ *+$/(4+%. (#).'/7 ).* 00/4$+/7 :#%7/ 4%-%,%'2 ).* 8&.(4+%.), 7+'.+;().(/ $/0)+. )4+3/,2 &./<-,%$/*! =/$/ :/ 7#%:6 &7+.' 0)'./4+( $/7%.).(/ %(+42 0)--+.'>?@6 4#/ )7200/4$+( $/*+$/(4+%. %8 74$/)0+.' $%&&%'( &) *+&,'% History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ing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| V OL 4 04 | 1 3 A PRIL 2 000 9#&*: &6 ;/:"#07/.0 &6 !&7:*0%.".$ @ ;/:"#07/.0 &6 !"#$%&0<&#")%) =*#-/#>3 4 $/(%+, ):)2 8$%0 /D/(4/* 1,%%* +7 +. ) *+$/(4+%. 4#)4 (). E 1&>"+ ?#&7:0&. @&(:%0"+ (%0/ &6 57:/#%"+ !&++/-/ &6 =)%/.)/3 ,/$%)%./ ".$ #).(/ $)4#/$ 4#). +.#+1+4 3/.4$+(&,%C)4$+), (%&-,+.' ! F#+$), A/)<.&+&->3 =>$./> =0#//03 B&.$&. =CD EF83 2G 00/4$2 0+'#4 #/,4% 0+.+0+G/ ? H+&I ;/(%-. 1/(/"#)< 9#&*:3*+77+-)4+3/ J7/#(&. !&++/-/3 +.4/$)(4+%. H&#/(0 1&I3 Leaflets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hordae E69M 74M98K654ME4C ;I :B54C9K E4 ME89:6E;4 54M 5KH<<968E9K ;I 4#/ :#%,/! A. 4#/ 1)7+7 %8 0)--/* 9%: ;/,*7 ).* *$):+.'7 4#)4 2 6B8;7CB B9586 :5JE6E9KF ;8 ;I 6B9E8 G;6946E5A KEC4EQ:54:9 E4 +,,&74$)4/ 7-)4+), $/,)4+%.7 1/4://. 9%: -)4#76 :/ -$%-%7/ 4#)4 6E;4 6; I74:6E;43 (9869L8569K KB;2 :9GB5A;P:57M5A 54M#/)$4 M;8K;P )7200/4$+/7 ).* (&$3)4&$/7 %8 4#/ ,%%-/* #)3/ -%4/.4+), 685A 5KH<<968E9K ;I L;MH 2E6B 89KG9:6 B)44/$.7 6; 2BE:B A56985A 9&+*+( ).*GA54 *2.)0+( )*3).4)'/7! %8 )4$+), ;,,+.' 7//0 4% -.F-+ 1/ )7200/4$+( +. ) 0)../$ 4#)4 ),,%:7 4#/ 0%0/.4&0 %8 <<968E9K ;I 6B9 B9586 54M ;6B98 E469845A ;8C54K ;::78 3 +.9%:+.' 74$/)07 4% 1/ $/*+$/(4/* 4%:)$*7 )4$+%C3/.4$+(&,)$ ME5: A;;GE4C E4J;AJ9K 6B9 J94685A MEKGA5:9<946 ;I 5 J9468E:7A58 3),3/76 ).* 4#/ (#).'/ +. *+$/(4+%. )4 3/.4$+(&,)$ ,/3/, +7 7&(# 6EJ9 6; 54 568E5A SA;;GT 5 J94685AAH A;:569MF :9GB5AE:5AAH 4#)4E4$/(%+, ):)2 8$%0 /D/(4/* 1,%%* +7 +. ME89:69M ) *+$/(4+%. 4#)4 (). 2 G56B3Conclusion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ean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 8)(4%$7 0+'#4 (%01+./ 4% ),,%: ) $/(+-$%()4+.'6 7,+.'C,+I/6 J0%$C ingue deux zones d’obstruction dans la CMH (Figure 16-3) : struction médioventriculaire liée à l’hypertrophie pariéaffrontement des piliers hypertrophiés ou à l’existence s anormaux. Cette obstruction médioventriculaire peut e VG en deux cavités avec exclusion de la pointe (aspect History et n c- pathie hypertrophique obstructive. L’hypotrophie av de courbure septale dévie le flux de vidange ventriculaire va entraîner la valve mitrale dans la voie d’éjection. Le ph Venturi attire encore la valve mitrale antérieure vers la (SAM). La perte de contact entre les feuillets antérieur et p responsable de l’IM. ASPECTS CLINIQUES MR in HCM: mulGple mechanism Ring eà csa té n l, Leaflets de cfs ade a b de Chordae cie it Figure 16-1 Représentation schématique du mécanisme de l’ins- 1) Pulling Mechanism è Venturi effect ): éce ut suffisance mitrale (IM) fonctionnelle au cours de la cardiomyopathie hypertrophique obstructive. L’hypotrophie avec inversion de courbure septale dévie le flux de 2) vidange ventriculaire gauche qui è Direct flow Pushing Mechanism la valve mitrale dans la voie d’éjection. Le phénomène de Venturi attire encore la valve mitrale antérieure vers la paroi septale La perte entre antérieur et postérieur OBADIA (SAM). Jean-‐François de contact les Pfeuillets MVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th Jest une 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » Conclusion va entraîner History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History 111 pa\ents : 61 % EVEREST exclusion criteria Table1 1 month è 34% grade 3 and 4 726 Mitral valve anatomy prior to MitraClip implantation and at follow-up. Ring Leaflets Chordae MR grade ≥ 3, (%) MR etiology, (%) Functional Degenerative Mixed Jet origin A2–P2, (%) Jet direction, (%) Central Posterolateral Anterior Anterolateral Coaptation length, (mm) Coaptation depth, (mm) Flail gap, (mm) Flail width, (mm) Length PMVL, (mm) Length AMVL, (mm) Annulus diameter 0° Annulus diameter 120° MVA<4cm2, coapta\on length < 2 mm, Letters to the Editor Coapta\on depth > 11 mm, flail gap > 10 mm and flail width ≥ 15mm. All patients baseline MR grade ≤2 at follow-up MR grade ≥3 at follow-up n = 79 n = 47 n = 24 100 100 100 ns 53 38 9 70 62 30 8 74 42 50 8 71 ns ns ns ns 63 19 10 8 3 8 5 13 14 25 35 34 72 17 4 6 3 7 5 13 14 24 35 33 42 25 25 8 3 10 6 15 15 27 35 33 0.02 ns 0.02 ns ns 0.01 ns ns ns 0.049 ns ns ±1 ±3 ±3 ±4 ±4 ±5 ±5 ±6 ±1 ±3 ±2 ±2 ±4 ±5 ±5 ±6 p-Value ±1 ±2 ±4 ±2 ±4 ±6 ±4 ±4 Values are in % or in mean ± SD. p-Value is between MR grade ≤ 2 and ≥3 at follow-up. ns: not significant; PMVL: posterior mitral valve leaflet; AMVL: anterior mitral valve leaflet. [4] Surder D, Pedrazzini G, Gaemperli O, et al. Predictors for efficacy of percutaneous Mitral valve anatomy predicts outcome of M itraClip implanta0on mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system: the results of the MitraSwiss registry. Heart12013;99(14):1034–40. Kirsten Boerlage-‐van Dijk, Int for J oa f Cardiol 2014 74 (3) 724-‐6 [1] Mauri L, Garg P, Massaro JM, et al. The EVEREST II Trial: design and rationale [5] Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral randomized study of the evalve mitraclip system compared with mitral valve Amsterdam regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2011;364(15):1395–406. surgery for mitral regurgitation. Am Heart J 2010;160(1):23–9. References Conclusion [6] Altiok E, Becker M, Hamada S, et al. Real-time 3D TEE allows optimized guidance of [2] Franzen O, Baldus S, Rudolph V, et al. Acute outcomes of MitraClip therapy for mitral percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging regurgitation in high-surgical-risk patients: emphasis on adverse valve morphology OBADIA Jean-‐François dysfunction. PMVR Summit Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 2010;3(11):1196–8. Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » and severe left ventricular Eur Heart J – 2010;31(11):1373–81. coapta\on length < 2 mm, flail gap > 10 mm flail width ≥ 15mm. History Ring Leaflets Measurement of the flail gap where flail gap is largest Measurement of the flail width where flail width is largest in a transgastric short axis view (0°). Chordae Measurements of coapta\on length in a 4 chamber view in 0°, Coapta\on length is measured in the view where coapta\on length is shortest Mitral valve anatomy predicts outcome of MitraClip implanta0on Kirsten Boerlage-‐van Dijk, Int J of Cardiol 2014 174 (3) 724-‐6 Amsterdam Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » History Ring Leaflets Measurements of anterior and posterior leaflets at maximum length in 120° Cut offè less than 28 mm Measurements of coapta\on depth in a 4 chamber view in 0° where the coapta\on depth is greatest. Cut off è less than 10 mm Chordae Mitral valve anatomy predicts outcome of MitraClip implanta0on Kirsten Boerlage-‐van Dijk, Int J of Cardiol 2014 174 (3) 724-‐6 Amsterdam Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20th June 2015 Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org » Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1250 –5 244 History M. Di Mauro et al. / International Journal of Cardiology 163 (2013) 242–248 The aortic leaflet is a compact, semicircular structure, without any indentation. It is positioned antero-superiorly in the left ventricle. When viewed from the ventricular aspect, the defining feature of the aortic leaflet, and the reason for this name, is seen to be its fibrous continuity with the left and non-coronary leaflets of the aortic valve. Indeed, unlike the tricuspid valve which is separated by muscle from its counterpart, the pulmonary valve, the mitral valve is immediately adjacent to the aortic valve. The insertion of the aortic leaflet, guards about 35 to 40% of the annular circumference and it is fibrous with some scarce muscular intrusions. The two leaflets of the mitral valve, although very different in shape, they share an almost equal area. It is made largely by a smooth zone, which is devoid by tendinous chords. The layered attachments of the tendinous chords represent the so called rough zone (Fig. 5) [11]. The rough zone is present in both leaflets and is broadest in the lowest portion of each leaflet, but tapers toward the periphery of the closure line, the commissures. It includes the coaptation zone, where the leaflets meet with the posterior leaflet, 4–6 mm deep into the ventricle. The mural leaflet, normally called posterior, has more variability than the anterior leaflet. It is narrow and extends two-thirds around the left atrioventricular junction within the inlet portion of the ventricle. Made mainly by three scallops, there is still debate if it represents a single unit or a whole of independent leaflets. The three scallops are named, from the anterolateral to the posterolateral commissures, respectively P1, P2 and P3 (Fig. 6). The facing corresponding portions of the anterior leaflet, for practical reasons, are called A1, A2 and A3, even if in the anterior leaflet no scallop can be identified [13]. Recent anatomical studies, however, showed that the usual pattern “anterior leaflet = no cleft; posterior leaflet = two clefts” is not the commonest one [12]. A deviant cleft in the anterior leaflet is present in 26.3% of the cases, whereas in the posterior leaflet 2 clefts are present only in 38.9% of the cases, no cleft at all in 2.8%, 1 cleft in 33.3%, 3 clefts in 13.9% or 4 clefts in 11.1%. In 36.9% of the cases 1 deviant cleft was present in mid A2, mid P2 or in both. The mitral valvar leaflets close along a solitary zone of apposition; the extremities of this zone do not reach the annulus. The portions beyond the end of the zone of apposition are called commissures; they are commonly known as antero-lateral and postero-medial commissures, based on a description of isolated organ in its own. The antero-lateral commissure position is superior, posterior, lateral, while the postero-medial is inferior, anterior, septal, if considering heart in the body [12,14]. The aortic leaflet is a monolithic structure, which participates passively in the mechanism of closure of the valve. In fact its insertion includes all the fibrous tissue of the mitral annulus, which then does not participate to the change of the mitral area during the cardiac cycle [15]. On the contrary the posterior leaflet is the key structure in the closure of the valve. Its structure is th similar to a skirt with pleats. CONCLUSION Leaflets Chordae Conclusion OBADIA Jean-‐François Fig 1. Terminology superimposed on an atrial view of the mitral valve. (T1 ! left trigone; T2 ! right trigone; C1 ! anterolateral commissure; C2 ! posteromedial commissure; A1 and A2 ! anterior leaflet; P1 and P2 ! posterior leaflet lateral scallops; PM1 and PM2 ! anterolateral and posteromedial segments of the posterior leaflet mid-scallop; M1 ! anterolateral papillary muscle; M2 ! posteromedial papillary muscle.) The Ring is not a ring Aor\c and Mural leaflet Marginal and Basal Chords More Complex than Aor\c è TMVR is not TAVI Ring MITRAL VA PMVR Summit – Barcelona -‐ 19-‐20 June 2015 anterior mitral leaflet and chordae supported by the anterior papillary muscle (called “M1”) were identified as A1, the commissure as C1, and the anterolateral scallop of the posterior leaflet as P1. The other half of the anterior leaflet, commissure, and posteromedial scallop supported by the posterior papillary muscle (called “M2”) were identified as A2, C2, and P2. Because it is supported by chordae from both papillary muscles (M1 and M2), the posterior middle scallop (PM), was divided into PM1 and PM2. The two trigones were identified as T1 for the left and T2 for the right. Similar with previously published classifications, the mitral chordae were divided into marginal (first order) when inserted into the leaflet’s free edge and basal (second order) when inserted into the ventricular aspect of the body of the leaflets [6 – 8]. All chordae were identified by their insertion into the anterior leaflet (A1 and A2) and posterior mitral leaflet (P1, PM1, PM2, and P2). The two constant and thick anterior (AS) and posterior (PS) strut chordae were identified as AS1 and AS2 for the anterior and PS1 and PS2 for the posterior. The other Fig 3. A ventricular view of the poster posterior strut chordae. (PS1 ! posteri anterolateral papillary muscle; PS2 ! from posteromedial papillary muscle.) basal chordae located lateral termed AB1 and AB2 for the PMB2 for the middle scallop of and Fig 3). For the purpose marginal) basal chordae were d other type of chordae arising labeled “mixed” when the cho marginal branches. Measurements Before examination of each hea nary artery were resected 1 cm sure, and each heart was weigh of mitral regurgitation, each val the left atrium while saline through the aorta. The aortic a diameters were measured with was then sectioned vertically th sinus of Valsalva, interventric ventricular free wall to allow a Fig 2. A diagram and ph aspect of the anterior mi basal chordae. (Tl ! left AB1 ! anterolateral bas basal chorda; AMC ! ao terolateral strut chorda; A Fig. 6. (A) The mural leaflets is made mainly by three scallops, named, from the anteda; M1 ! anterolateral p rolateral to posteromedial P1, P2 and P3. (B) The three posterior scallops, the anterolatteromedial papillary mus eral (ALc) and posteromedial (PMc) commissures. smooth zone.) valve closure process. This mechanism determines the complete closure (coaptation) and correct apposition (symmetrical overlap) of both leaflets that are essential in preventing regurgitation. 1.3. The subvalvular apparatus Since Leonardo da Vinci (1513), researchers have understood that the competence of the valve cannot be afforded by leaflets without the support of subvalvular apparatus. In the normal valve, groups of cords sprout from both papillary muscles, forking, and support the leading edges of both leaflets. The tendinous cords of the mitral valve are attached to two groups of papillary muscles or directly to the posterior muscular wall for the tensor apparatus of the valve [16]. There are different classifications of mitral tendinous cords as summarized by Muresian [1]. In 1970, Lam and coworkers [17] classi- Download this presenta0on on « chircardio-‐lyon.org »