* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Music Never Stops
Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup
Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup
Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup
Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup
Clinical trial wikipedia , lookup
Prescription drug prices in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup
Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
•BTK 2693.28 June 12, 2014 | Issue No. 781 Since Last Issue: •NBI 2,588.09 BTK: 3.5%; NBI: 2.9%; Model Portfolio: 4.5%; Trader’s Portfolio: 6.6% Three-week break ahead! Next issue out July 3rd, 2014 UPDATES: ALKS ANTH IMGN INCY ISIS NKTR NVAX PCYC This Issue: A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE Biotech Sector Analysis HCV Taketh And Giveth Back – Technical analysts say charts tell the story and ever since the IBB surpassed the 50-day moving average two weeks ago (for the first time since the March 21 GILD Solvadi letter on HCV drug pricing), the sector has continued a pre-Summer rally. MTSL is based on fundamental analysis. However, after a two-month consolidation period – momentum players appear to be back in the space for now. Moreover, fund managers may want to get ahead of a summer rally and make up for lost value after the February/March demolition of most stocks in time for the end of the second quarter. Expecting a post-ASCO selloff – but just the opposite occurred as investors began this June in a back-to-bios mode. ASCO was a Big Pharma and biotech conference after all – INCY and PCYC stars’ shined bright, while BMY’s immune-oncology disappointed. The sector’s leaders are leading once again – CELG’s Markman hearing was positive and the overhang removed, AMGN’s pipeline is emerging and BIIB gained timely Elocate approval. GILD, which rebounded earlier and more than most, took a hit on the surprising MRK purchase of IDIX (see below), but overall the sector seems to have regained some strength in a risk-back-on environment. after its failed attempt at AZN and now MRK appears to be following suit. Pharma knows quite well that their value drivers are being derived from innovative biotech discovery programs, while their core drugs lose patent protection. Hence, while biotech stocks were sold indiscriminately – it appears to have been a technical and not fundamental selloff. Biotech stocks remain in the golden age. Another example of positive clinical news, RCPT’s oral MS drug RPC1063 delivered impressive Phase II results that, if repeated in larger studies, could make it a drug of choice in the $20 billion MS drug market (on the other hand, OREX’s Contrave approval date was pushed back three months). Moreover, action has trickled down to the smaller and mid-cap names – driven by M&A, specific stock fundamentals, oversold conditions and short covering. First PFE proclaimed it was going shopping ©Piedmont Venture Group (2014). Address: P.O. Box 40460, Berkeley, CA 94706. Telephone: (510) 843-1857. Fax: (510) 843-0901. Website: http://www.bioinvest.com. Email: [email protected]. Published 24 times a year. Email subscription rates: 1 year - $399, 2 years - $678, 3 years - $898. You may cancel at any time for a prorated refund. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable but no representations or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness. In no way is any shall this newsletter be construed as an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. The publisher and its associates, directors or employees may have positions in, and may from time to time make purchases or sales of, securities mentioned herein. We cannot guarantee and you should not assume that future recommendations will equal the performance of past recommendations or be profitable. www.bioinvest.com | 1 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE MRK Acquires IDIX At An Enormous Premium In Big HCV Surprise – One of the emerging Big Pharma players once again revived the hepatitis C race. MRK’s purchase of IDIX for $3.6 billion or $24.50 per share – a 235% premium over IDIX closing price – is a sign that GILD may not have cornered the market and/or that the IDIX patent estate is a lot more valuable than investors gave CEO Ron Renaud credit for. Merck has stated they can cut the time to cure rate or cure different genotypes of HCV than Solvaldi. In addition, IP was probably key to the large premium as both Merck and IDIX were suing GILD before the acquisition and their combined IP could pose problems for GILD. Regardless, it is an excellent example of the value of small biotech companies that have disruptive/differentiated assets backed by solid patents (e.g., the NVAX RSV F Protein vaccine). Short sellers got taken out – 20 million shares of IDIX were short at the time of the announcement. Several other smaller M&A transactions have occurred of late, in addition to rampant rumors of an NPSP acquisition by Shire. ACHN’s Turn, Touché – On the heels of the MRK/IDIX deal, ACHN announced that the FDA had removed the clinical hold on sovaprevir, its novel NS3/4A protease inhibitor, allowing the company to conduct trials in patients with HCV. Simultaneously, the company initiated dosing in patients with ACH3422, a uridine-analog nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, in patients with genotype 1. Proof-ofconcept results from this trial are due during the fall of 2014. With the three key targets of HCV drugs now in trials – a nucleotide, an NS5A and a protease inhibitor – takeover speculation rapidly took over ACHN shares. Like IDIX, ACHN shares were pretty much ignored once GILD’s Solvaldi emerged as the leader. Things have certainly been interesting this year in the multi-billion dollar HCV market – which is likely to have multiple drugs and multiple players over the next several years. After ASCO, A Number of June Scientific & Regulatory Meetings – This week, MTSL Recommendation NKTR/AZN’s naloxegol received a positive panel vote from an FDA Advisory committee, against CV studies for OIC drugs-paving the way for movantik and likely leading to approval by the September PDUFA data. Upcoming scientific meetings are taking place following ASCO, keeping many biotech stocks in the spotlight as summer approaches. They include the following therapeutic classes – arthritis – EULAR (Paris, 6/11-14, Eular), hematology/oncology – EHA (Milan, 6/12-15, Ehaweb event), diabetes – ADA (San Francisco, 6/13-17, Diabetescongress), and psychopharmacology – ASCP (Hollywood, FL, 6/1619, ASCP meetings). MTSL names involved include ALKS, ANTH, BMRN, CELG, INCY, IMGN, ISIS and PCYC. TEVA Buys Labrys for Migraine Treatment – Teva jumped into the M&A fray with its recent purchase of Labrys Biologics. The company paid $200 million in cash up-front for the privately held drug developer with an additional $625 million in potential milestone payments. The move has the potential to expand Teva’s lineup of migraine treatments as Labrys has a drug candidate, LBR-101, for the prevention of chronic migraines in midstage clinical testing. While not a huge deal, it does illustrate that large pharma companies continue to partner or buy the pipeline assets they need to assure future growth. France Gets Smart on GILD’s Solvaldi – France’s health technology assessment agency, Commission de la Transparence, has issued a positive recommendation for Gilead’s Sovaldi. The Committee voted unanimously for Sovaldi to be assigned SMR rating of “Important” and ASMR rating of “II”; both ratings together should put GILD into an excellent negotiating position and provide the necessary leverage required to secure premium pricing in France. As a reminder, historically an ASMR’s rating of “II” is assigned only to agents > www.bioinvest.com | 2 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE considered to have made an “important” improvement to the standard-of-care and such agents have been able to command strong pricing power (e.g., Soliris). The bottom line in our view, is this positive recommendation from the French indicates that Sovaldi will receive less push back in Europe then it has in the U.S., albeit, at a lower price. ASCO 2014 – Immune Oncology Rises to the Top – As many expected, immune oncology (I-O) was all the rage at the recently concluded American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting. While it is widely acknowledged that before ASCO, Bristol was the leader in the space followed by Merck, and Roche. At the conference, however, AstraZeneca showcased its I-O pipeline as the competitive landscape changes rapidly while the exciting sector evolves. BMS’s lead drug exhibited further toxicity in both NSCLC and renal trials, with some very real adverse events in lung cancer. Yervoy has been the primary culprit, however, BMS also reported some notable adverse events with its PD-1 blocker, nivolumab. Just before ASCO on May 6, MRK was granted priority review for its top drug PD-1 prospect, MK-3475, with an FDA approval deadline of October 28. It is expected to get the first mover position in a new wave of immune-oncology therapies that is expected to be a game changer in the oncology market. The initial indication is melanoma. Despite its speed bumps, BMS is still a leader but it is becoming clear that they may not have the best-inclass I-O drug candidates, leaving them vulnerable to the next wave of competitive I-O compounds. The emergence of AZN’s strong I-O pipeline is, in our view, the primary driver for the recent Pfizer bid. Pfizer has little presence in the I-O sector and AZN’s emerging pipeline would have transformed Pfizer into an I-O player overnight. Immune Oncology Market Poised for Significant Growth – The I-O sector is primed to become a super blockbuster market. Most current Wall Street estimates for the I-O treatment space (~$10-15 billion) are only based on few cancer types (melanoma, NSCLC, and renal) and that is changing. The signal at ASCO is that I-O will impact the vast majority, if not virtually all cancer types in some shape or form with all the new tools emerging. A great example is the bladder cancer data reported by Roche which showed a 50% response rate (including one complete response) in PD-L1+ patients with RG7446 in pre-treated metastatic bladder cancer; a setting which typically has very limited treatment options. Adding combination treatments to both radiation and chemo is another example of why the IO market opportunity is poised to grow significantly larger over the next few years. Big Pharma Dominates I-O By Combining Biotech Assets – While Big Pharma dominates the I-O treatment landscape, most of the assets and the technological know-how came from the biotech industry which pioneered the development of monoclonal antibodies. BMS acquired much of its IO technology from the Medarex acquisition, Roche came into I-O through its Genentech investment, and AZN’s I-O platform is riddled with MedImmune technology. We believe that INCY and FPRX are the two MTSL Recommendations that will have the biggest impact in the I-O treatment landscape. INCY through their unique and proprietary oral IDO-1 drug candidate and FPRX through their second generation antibody discovery platform that has already been validated by a major BMS collaboration. What is Immune Oncology? Immune oncology (IO) is the newest and most exciting sector for new cancer drug development. Cancers grow and spread because tumor cells have developed ways to evade elimination by the immune system. For example, cancer cells make proteins which apply the “brakes” to immune cells and prevent the immune cells from killing the tumor cells. One of the most exciting recent discoveries in cancer therapy has > www.bioinvest.com | 3 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE been the identification of ways to release these “brakes” and allow the immune cells to once again kill the tumor cells. This new approach has the potential of not only reducing tumor growth like traditional therapies, but potentially eliminating the cancer entirely in some patients. The approval of BMY’s Yervoy (ipilimumab which targets CTLA-4) to treat melanoma was a major breakthrough for cancer immune therapy – the drug had failed in multiple direct solid tumor trials before BMY harnessed its potential and garnered approval. Recently ipilimumab showed that some melanoma patients had lived as along as 10 years while on therapy. The PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint pathway has recently emerged as the hottest target (and most competitive) for cancer immunotherapy in biotech with a slew of drug candidates in development (PD stands for “programmed cell death”). While the Immune-Oncology Drugs in Development aforementioned pathways have been grabbing all the headlines, IDO inhibitors are the next hot target in line behind the PD-1s. In our view, INCY’s INCB024360, an orally available small molecule that inhibits IDO (the others are injectable monoclonal antibodies), is rapidly emerging as the next major compound in I-O. In addition to being oral, ‘360 also may be a best in class drug which would make it a key part of combination therapy. Combo therapy is particularly important in I-O as this class of drugs appears to work better in combination and many experts expect three or more drugs could be used at once. This will also make safety very important for this class of drugs, because unknown and unpredictable toxicities can be a major problem when combining drugs. The NIH’s Dr. Louis Staudt referenced this exact point at the recent AACR meeting in April. There is much going on, but there is also much to learn. www.bioinvest.com | 4 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE AZN Unveils Broad I-O Portfolio at ASCO – AstraZeneca was one of the true surprises at ASCO as they have been busy building an I-O pipeline. The company will augment their current pipeline of drug candidates – CTLA4, PD1, PD-L1, with >9 new I-O molecules that will enter the clinic within next twelve months. ■ 1x new NME to take the T-cell breaks off ■ OX40 + 2xNMEs to put T-cell gas on ■ 1x NME in Tumor microenvironment ■ 4+x NMEs in Antigen presentation Combination of tremelimumab (CTLA4) + PDL1 – The first dose ranging data was presented at AZN’s analyst meeting (this was too early to be shown in the full ASCO meeting and will be updated at ESMO). Low toxicity burden means dose ranging is already much higher than BMS’ ipi+nivo combo and dose escalation continues. The ability to use a higher dose should bode well for ‘treme’s combo efficacy potential. Better safety also bodes well for ‘treme in combo studies as toxicity will be a limiting factor for many drugs when used in 2’s or 3’s, which is the expectation with most I-O treatments. MEDI4736 (PDL-1) - AZN will start an adjuvant lung study in 2015 with its PDL-1 under the theory that using I-O drugs earlier in the disease when the immune system is more intact will have a better affect. AZN made a specific point at their analyst meeting that bears watching going forward. They believe that PD-1 and PDL-1 may not be as interchangeable as is currently being assumed, and may actually have different effects on different cancers. This also explains why they have both PD’s currently in development. MTSL Recommendations INCY & FPRX Have I-O Potential – I-O is clearly of high interest to investors and the standing room only crowd that eagerly greeted the presenter for INCY’s INCB24360 (IDO) poster is further illustration. In fact, the presenter was barely able to put it up for display due to crowding in the presentation area. For immunotherapy-naïve patients in the 25mg BID (n=8) and 50mg BID (n=4) cohorts, the objective response rate was 42% and the disease control rate was an impressive 75%. In immunotherapy-experienced patients (n=5) there were two patients with stable disease. Data from a 300mg subgroup had some intriguing follow-up data despite being stopped due to toxicity. Although all patients in the 300 mg twicedaily cohort were discontinued before responses could be fully evaluated, six of the seven patients were alive after one year, including three who have not received subsequent checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. In our view, this shows that the ‘360 may have a sustained treatment effect even after therapy has stopped. We remain impressed with the data for ‘360, albeit, from a small data sample. For those who doubt IDO after the ASCO abstracts were made available, major votes of validation have occurred this year as INCY has already formed three IDO combination joint ventures with the leaders – MRK, BMY and AZN. An IDO1 competitor, NewLink Genetics (NLNK) has its own compound in the clinic. Based on the data to date and stage of development, in our view, INCY is still the unquestioned leader in the IDO1 inhibitor space. We anticipate multiple clinical updates over the next 12-24 months as the ‘360 combination studies mature. The fact that INCY has established three clinical research agreements to study ‘360 in combination with three of the four big players in I-O is further testament to the program’s strength. The collaborations are with anti-PD-1, MK-3475 (MRK), anti-PD-L1, MEDI 4736 (AZN), and with anti-PD-1, nivolumab (BMS). Given the prevalence of antibodies within the I-O drug development space, in our view, FPRX is extremely well positioned to be a > www.bioinvest.com | 5 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE major player in the future development of the sector. New targets for cancer immunotherapy are needed to address those patients that do respond to or cannot tolerate agents currently in development. FPRX and their cutting edge second-generation antibody technology puts them in the proverbial “catbird seat” when it comes to identifying new targets and antibody drugs in this exciting and growing space. Investment Conclusion – INCY, FPRX Well Positioned To Participate In The Next Blockbuster Oncology Market – As the I-O space evolves, MRK is currently in the lead, but by no means is it a zero sum game. BMS’ early lead appears less secure, with full data now being pushed to 2015. While being first to market is usually best, fast follow uppers can surprise as they use the information garnered by the leader to their advantage. This can be particularly important in clinical development and specific patient selection. AZN’s ‘treme is a very good example of a competitive late-comer as it is a second generation Yervoy and appears to have much less toxicity. The better toxicity profile should allow for increased dose vis-à-vis Yervoy leading to better efficacy. Additionally the better toxicity profile would make it a better combo drug than Yervoy as toxicity is paramount when combining multiple cancer drugs. While biomarkers are early in development for the IO space, they could be important. For example, BMS’ biomarker may not be as accurate as MRK’s or ROG’s, which could lead to some confusion with their data. unique skill set allows it to both identify new targets and make the antibodies that address the new targets. The excellent BMS deal for preclinical I-O drug candidates is a major validation of FPRX’ unique antibody discovery/development platform. CLINICAL TRIALS WATCH – Relevant New Studies or Changes Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for our MTSL Portfolio and/or Related Companies since last Issue: ALKS – A Study of ALKS 5461 for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) - the FORWARD4 Study BMY – A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial With Nivolumab (BMS-936558) for Subjects With Histologically Confirmed Stage III (Unresectable) or Stage IV Melanoma Progressing Post Prior Treatment Containing an Anti-CTLA4 Monoclonal Antibody (CheckMate 172) CELG/PCYC – Lenalidomide, Ibrutinib, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma CELG - Continuous Lenalidomide Therapy Versus Observation Following Induction Without Lenalidomide, Pomalidomide or Thalidomide in Myeloma In our view, INCY and FPRX are both well positioned to create value for their shareholders in the I-O sector. INCB24360 is a unique and potentially very active and safe drug candidate. The fact that the compound is already being developed with three of the biggest players in I-O (where are you Roche?) is a testament to both its uniqueness and potential. FPRX may have one of the most comprehensive tool kits to broadly address the I-O space. The company’s www.bioinvest.com | 6 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE Company Updates CELG - Safety and Efficacy Study of Abraxane in Combination With Carboplatin to Treat Advanced NSCL Cancer in the Elderly (ABOUND 70+) CELG - Efficacy and Toxicity Study of Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients Who Have Relapsed After Exposure to Lenalidomide and Bortezomib City of Hope Medical Center - Genetically Modified T-cell Immunotherapy in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia INFI - A Phase 1b/2 Study of IPI-145 in Combination With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab (iFCR) in Previously Untreated, Younger Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia INCY - Trial of Ruxolitinib and Erlotinib in Patients With EGFR -mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma With Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib INCY –INCB047986 in Rheumatoid Arthritis ISIS - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of ISIS -APO(a)Rx in Patients With High Lipoprotein(a) PCYC/PFE – Ibrutinib and Palbociclib Isethionate in Treating Patients With Previously Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma University of Pennsylvania CART - meso in Mesothelin Expressing Cancers ALKS, ANTH, IMGN, INCY, ISIS, NKTR, NVAX, PCYC ALKS – Initiates Two Registration Trials for ALKS 5461; Phase III AL Data Presentation At ASCP Meeting – This week, ALKS initiated two registration studies – FORWARD-3 and FORWARD-4 for ALKS 5461, a once-daily, oral investigational medicine with a novel mechanism of action for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). These studies will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ALKS 5461 in patients suffering from MDD who have had an inadequate response to commonly prescribed drugs, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). ‘5461 is a key driver of long-term ALKS growth, as a wholly owned, proprietary compound in yet another blockbuster anti-psychotic drug market. One of the biggest meetings of the year for ALKS, data from the positive Phase III study of aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) in patients with schizophrenia will be presented for the first time. The data was chosen as a best poster, which will appear in the online 2014 ASCP Poster Session: Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 12:00 – 2:00 p.m. ET Poster 75: Safety and Efficacy of Aripiprazole Lauroxil: Results From a Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Subjects With Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia. Alkermes will also present data related to the company’s state-of-the-art clinical trial methodologies in schizophrenia as well as data pertaining to the company’s development of ALKS 3831, a new investigational medication designed to address important unmet medical needs of patients with schizophrenia: > www.bioinvest.com | 7 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE Tuesday, June 17, 2014, 3:30 – 4:30 p.m. ET The oral presentation, “Analysis and Missing Data Handling in Psychiatry Trials With Inevitable, High, Differential and Informative Discontinuations,” will be presented during a symposium entitled, “Statistical Methods, Personality Disorders, Substance Abuse, and Comorbidity Presentations.” Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 12:00 – 2:00 p.m. ET Poster 73: Prevalence, Healthcare Utilization and Cost of Patients Dual Diagnosed With Schizophrenia and an Alcohol Use Disorder. Depression - Data relating to ALKS 5461, the company’s development candidate for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), will be presented. This presentation has also been nominated as a best poster, and will appear in the online 2014 ASCP Poster Session. Tuesday, June 17, 2014, 11:15 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. ET Poster 44: ALKS 5461, a Novel Opioid Modulator as Adjunctive Treatment for Depression Alkermes will also present data related to the company’s state-of-the-art clinical trial methodologies in depression. Key presentations include: Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 12:00 – 2:00 p.m. ET Poster 26: Feasibility, Integrity and Efficiency of the Sequential Parallel Comparison Clinical Trial Design. Poster 27: Blinded Dual Ratings Confirm Primary Site-Based Ratings in an MDD Trial. The transformation of ALKS is well underway. ALKS is a BUY under 55 with a TARGET PRICE of 75. ANTH – Interim SLE Look Due; Company Preparing MM Trial – In an update call with senior management, ANTH is expected to have a busy H2:14 with blisibimod (b-mod). Over the next month or so, the company is expected to take an interim look at the CHABLIS1 trial (CHABLIS1 Trial) in patients with lupus (SLE). The clinical/surrogate endpoint is a trend in the level of proteinuria and, while it will not be confirmatory of the final results, it is an important catalyst and will give ANTH and investors the first look at b-mod’s post-PEARL clinical trials. The interim look may or may not influence a potential partner decision to form a collaboration – but the company is hopeful one may finally be struck by the end of the year regardless. Such a partner will help fund and coordinate the second SLE trial, which is ready to go and is expected to begin by H2:14. In addition, a look at first IgA nephropathy trial is due by end of Q3/early Q4. There is a lot of sound science behind BAFF inhibitors including b-mod and we are cautiously optimistic of the outcome. ANTH is, by far, the cheapest stock in our portfolio after multiple clinical failures. Hence, investor expectation is minimal at best although there’s always high risk when unblinding studies. B-mod’s mechanism of action has also been identified as a potential treatment for multiple myeloma – and there is a chance that a collaboration for combination MM therapy may also be signed by the end of the year. The company ended Q1:14 with $23 million in cash, enough for the end of the year; hence, some form of capital raise is needed (e.g., partnership, capital markets) after hopefully good news. ANTH is a BUY under 6 with a TARGET PRICE of 20. INCY - A Slew of Positive Data at ASCO – INCY had a very productive ASCO as they presented positive data for ‘360 in combo with Yervoy (discussed above), and positive data for Jakafi in both PV and pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint for the PV trial was a spleen reduction of 35%+ and hematocrit control at week 32. While only 21% of Jakafi-treated patients met the primary endpoint (vs. 1% in control), 77% met at least one of the primary endpoints. Also important was symptomatic control with 64% of patients reported a www.bioinvest.com | 8 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE greater than 50% improvement in symptoms such as itching, muscle ache, and night sweats. We expect INCY to file an NDA with the FDA for PV approval shortly. The RECAP data in pancreatic data and the biomarker, C-reactive protein (CRP), were finally revealed at ASCO. The data was strong and showed that in the predefined subgroup of patients (n=60) with median CRP at study entry (13 mg/L), the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.26-0.85; P value =0.01. This is very strong data from such a small sample size and adds to our confidence that Jakafi will be effective in treating solid tumors. In totality, INCY had an excellent ASCO with positive data for both ‘360 and Jakafi in multiple cancer types. INCY is a BUY under 68 with a TARGET PRICE of 85. ISIS – AZN Initiates ISIS-AR Trials; ADA Data This Weekend – ISIS and partner AstraZeneca have started a Phase I trial of ISIS-AR in patients with cancer. ISIS-AR is an antisense drug designed to treat patients with prostate cancer by inhibiting the production of the androgen receptor (AR). AstraZeneca is planning to develop ISIS-AR broadly to treat patients under a variety of settings during the course of prostate cancer treatment, including both as a single agent and in combination therapy. The drug candidate may also work in other advanced solid tumors, such as breast, bladder and ovarian cancers, where the androgen receptor pathway is potentially a contributing factor. ISIS-AR is the second drug candidate (ISIS-STAT3 is in Phase I/II) with AZ to enter clinical development that incorporates generation 2.5 chemistry to increase the potency of antisense drugs. ISIS continues to deliver positive news flow from the 32 different drugs in development. Next up is Phase II “late breaker” data for ISIS-GCGR which will be presented at ADA starting this weekend. ISIS is a BUY under 55 with a TARGET PRICE of 70. MDCO – Oritavancin Phase III Data Published in the NEJM – The publication in the New England Journal of Medicine of results from the SOLO I Phase III clinical trial of oritavancin, MDCO’s novel antibiotic for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI), reported that a single 1200mg intravenous dose of ORBACTIV (the oritavancin proposed brand name) was non-inferior to twice-daily intravenous dosing of vancomycin given for 7 to 10 days in patients with ABSSSI caused or suspected to be caused by Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The PDUFA date is August 6th. In our view, approval is highly likely and Orbactiv’s single dose administration will allow it to take share in the fastgrowing, gram-positive infections market. On May 23rd, the FDA approved Durata's Dalvance, another new entrant into the market. Pricing will be key, although the Dalvance regimen involves two infusions (vs. one for oritavancin). Oritavancin is a key component to the MDCO transformation that includes a major focus on hospital-based infections. MDCO is a BUY under 40 with a TARGET PRICE of 60. NKTR – Panel Votes Against CV Studies For OIC Drugs Paving The Way For Movantik Approval – The FDA Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee (AADPAC) voted against requiring cardiovascular outcomes trials for the peripherally-acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) class of drugs. In our view, this was the best possible result for MOVANTIK – NKTR/AZN’s naloxegol oxalate – awaiting FDA approval for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) for patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The Committee suggested continued post-approval data collection for cardiovascular safety, which partner AstraZeneca presented a comprehensive plan at the panel. The PDUFA date for MOVANTIK is September 16, 2014, and after today’s meeting we are highly confident that the drug will be approved on time. www.bioinvest.com | 9 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE On June 4, the New England Journal of Medicine published data online from two pivotal Phase III studies of MOVANTIK – KODIAC-4 and KODIAC-5. Both studies met their primary endpoint, showing an improvement in treatment effect versus placebo. Results from these studies show that more OIC noncancer pain patients treated with MOVANTIK at a 25 mg dose had a consistent response of increased spontaneous bowel movements through 12 weeks of treatment compared to placebo. The approval of MOVANTIK (naloxegol) will be the first regulatory validation of the company’s pegylation platform and an oral version to boot. It will also trigger meaningful milestone payments from AZN. In our view, the approval will favorably impact the remainder of NKTR’s pipeline, lowering the discount rate and raising the net present value (NPV) of the multiple programs under development. NKTR is a BUY under 13 with TARGET PRICE of 20. Follow-On Offering Creates Buying Opportunity; Proceeds Will Accelerate “Respiratory Vaccine” Timeline – Last week, NVAX announced a $100 million secondary offering of common stock. The underwriters are JPMorgan and Citibank, two global investment banks that currently do not cover the stock from a research standpoint. After speaking with management, the use of proceeds is to fund a standalone elderly trial that will accelerate the path to approval for the disruptive/novel combination flu/RSV vaccine. On May 12th, the company announced longer-term follow up data from last year’s elderly RSV study that provided vaccination protection over 4-6 months (RSVStudy). As a result, the company now has a potential “seasonal” vaccine strategy for the elderly. Prior to this, there was no standalone elderly path to approval. The new path provides the earliest license/commercialization potential for the “respiratory vaccine” – the combination of the flu/RSV program into a single vaccine that, in our view, will be highly differentiated and lead the company into the combined >$5 billion market for flu and RSV vaccines. As a reminder, the NVAX F Protein RSV vaccine just completed its fourth clinical trial since last year, and the company is about to meet with the FDA to begin the first RSV trial in pregnant women. With the biotech sector beginning to rebound from the sharp pullback, NVAX included, a dilutive offering seemed a bit surprising – as the company has ~$130 million in cash and government funding (and no debt). However, in light of the new data from May 12th – there is a strong likelihood of accelerated development of the crown jewels. The company will, after the deal, be able to fund all major markets – maternal immunization, pediatrics and now the elderly. In addition, incorporating major distribution, market making and investment research from two of the larger, well-respected investment banks, in our view, will also add to long-term appeal of the stock. With the shares down based upon the financing, we believe an attractive opportunity exists to initiate or add to positions in NVAX. There is mounting evidence of the “respiratory vaccine” as a major biotech commercial success, driven by sound science, a growing clinical database and a focused management team. NVAX is a BUY under 6 with a TARGET PRICE of 13. PCYC – Imbruvica Shines at ASCO; sNDA Accepted For Priority Review - Updates at EHA – A day doesn’t go by without PCYC or Imbruvicarelated news and the totality of the data continues to be highly encouraging. At ASCO, partner JNJ and PCYC drug sponsored several symposia on CLL and the Phase III RESONATE data was presented and simultaneously published in the NEJM with major fanfare. The common term used among researchers at the conference and analysts afterwards is “SOC” – meaning Imbruvica is on its way to becoming the new “standard of care” for the treatment of CLL – the www.bioinvest.com | 10 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE most common form of B-cell blood cancer. In our view. ASCO data – including the duration of response (DOR) results now exceeding an astonishing 3 years – further solidifies the drug in hem-oncs eyes. As Dr. Susan O’Brien from MD Anderson put it – “Imbruvica is the easiest drug I’ve even prescribed.” Prescription data recently spiked and that was before the conference. The post-ASCO pop is likely over the next few weeks, too. In addition, the FDA just accepted the company’s sNDA application for a full CLL/SLL label, giving it a Priority Review and setting a PDUFA date for October 7. The train doesn’t stop there – the EHA – Jannsen’s home oncology base – is set for this weekend. And while some believe ABT-199 still has the chance to de-throne Imbruvica someday – most ASCO watchers note that its TLS profile has hardly been fixed and that its use in the community will be very difficult – especially compared with Imbruvica. When the autoimmune compound – one with even greater commercial opportunity and financial leverage to the company – starts poking its head out later this year, investors will begin to appreciate the next leg up in the PCYC value proposition. PCYC is a BUY under 160 with TARGET PRICE of 200. www.bioinvest.com | 11 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE “The Back Page” Price (52-week) # of Mkt. Value Symbol Company Orig.Rec. Lo Hi Current Target Shrs. (m) ($mil.) Recommendation ALKS Alkermes 10.13 26.47 54.25 46.65 75 140.3 6,176.0 BUY under $55 ANTH Anthera 3.04 2.54 4.88 3.28 20 19.3 57.9 BUY under $6 BMRN BioMarin 12.68 53.53 84.25 61.78 60 140.8 8,087.6 BUY under $45 CELG Celgene 49.93 110.53 174.66 160.22 145 408.8 60,849.9 BUY under $125 CNDO Coronado 6.63 1.25 10.20 1.73 N/A 35.2 61.2 HOLD FPRX Five Prime 16.29 8.02 23.33 13.90 32 21.40 275.8 BUY under $22 IMGN ImmunoGen 4.86 10.69 20.25 13.20 20 86.1 983.3 BUY under $12 INCY Incyte 5.88 18.23 70.86 53.20 85 170.6 8,692.1 BUY under $68 ISIS Isis 7.63 20.52 62.66 32.24 70 115.1 2,938.5 BUY under $55 MDCO Medicines Co. 31.98 23.53 41.28 28.04 60 61.8 1,619.8 BUY under $42 NKTR Nektar 4.66 8.87 15.34 12.54 20 116.9 1,289.4 BUY under $13 NVAX Novavax 2.44 1.87 6.95 4.55 13 208.5 871.5 BUY under $6 OGXI OncoGenex 36.82 3.31 14.25 3.55 N/A 15.4 58.8 HOLD PCRX Pacira 15.78 26.72 86.73 82.00 75 33.7 2,534.6 BUY under $55 PCYC Pharmacyclics 17.00 77.80 154.89 94.84 200 74.8 7,480.0 BUY under $160 SGMO Sangamo 4.77 6.86 24.69 16.01 30 60.4 796.1 BUY under $20 The Trader’s Portfolio The Model Portfolio Company Shares Owned Total Cost Today’s Value LONG positions Today’s Value LONG positions 27,189 93,300 Anthera 1,625 39,057 5,330 Coronado 3,700 24,776 6,401 Five Prime 2,900 40,420 40,310 Incyte 3,139 51,176 166,995 Isis 3,300 53,501 106,392 Medicines Co. 1,250 40,375 35,050 16,824 Nektar 6,000 36,411 75,240 81,510 Novavax 35,965 128,288 Anthera 2,875 68,731 9,430 Coronado 6,000 40,178 10,380 Five Prime 3,700 60,876 51,430 ImmunoGen 2,000 9,938 26,400 Incyte 3,662 42,500 194,818 Isis 4,750 58,333 153,140 600 19,380 6,500 63,277 Novavax Total Cost 2,000 2,750 Nektar Shares Owned Alkermes Alkermes Medicines Co. Company 25,000 58,025 113,750 OncoGenex 2,000 62,495 7,100 Pacira 1,000 15,938 82,000 30,000 67,670 136,500 OncoGenex 3,000 63,892 10,650 Pacira 1,500 23,907 123,000 Pharmacyclics 1,000 42,804 94,840 Pharmacyclics 1,450 52,892 137,518 Sangamo 5,000 23,250 80,050 Sangamo 5,000 23,250 80,050 29-May-14 Equities Cash Portfolio Value $1,159,938 $61 $1,159,999 Position Total Margin Portfolio Value $906,758 -$291,125 $615,633 www.bioinvest.com | 12 Medical Technology Stock Letter | A BRIEF IMMUNE-ONCOLOGY UPDATE Benchmarks NASDAQ S&P500 Model Trader’s Last 2 weeks 1.2% 0.5% 4.5% 6.6% 2014 year-to-date 2.9% 4.4% -2.4% -2.2% Calendar year 2013 38.3% 29.6% 103.4% 214.7% Calendar year 2012 13.4% 15.9% 25.7% 68.7% Calendar year 2011 -1.8% 0.0% -3.2% -16.0% Calendar year 2010 16.9% 12.8% 19.6% 4.3% Model Portfolio Contact Info The Model Portfolio is designed to reflect specific recommendations. We began the Model Portfolio on 12/23/83 with $100,000. On 4/13/84, we became fully invested. All profits are reinvested. Stocks recommended since then may be equally attractive, but may not be in the Model Portfolio. Transactions and positions are valued at closing prices. No dividends are created, and a 1% commission is charged. We don’t use margin. Interest income is credited only on large cash balances. Medical Technology Stock Letter John McCamant, Editor Jay Silverman, Editor Jim McCamant, Editor at Large Mahalet Solomon, Associate Joan Wallner, Associate Trader’s Portfolio The Trader’s Portfolio joined the Model Portfolio on 1/6/05 with $500,000 and is designed to take advantage of short-term opportunities throughout the biotech sector. Te Trader’s Portfolio will hold both long and short positions in stocks, trade in options, and use margin. These strategies increase risk. Although there is no limit on the time any purchase can be held, the time frame for most investments will be weeks to months. P.O. Box 40460 Berkeley, CA 94704 www.bioinvest.com Tel.510.843.1857 [email protected] New Money Buys (when under our limit) 1st Tier: ALKS, INCY, ISIS, PCYC 2nd Tier: IMGN, MDCO, NKTR, NVAX, PCRX, SGMO rd 3 Tier: ANTH, FPRX www.bioinvest.com | 13