* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Full Report from Bond Talk
Yield spread premium wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
Peer-to-peer lending wikipedia , lookup
United States housing bubble wikipedia , lookup
Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup
Libor scandal wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
History of the Federal Reserve System wikipedia , lookup
Present value wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup
Continuous-repayment mortgage wikipedia , lookup
History of pawnbroking wikipedia , lookup
Adjustable-rate mortgage wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate swap wikipedia , lookup
Issue 13 Bond Talk Intellectual Mortgage Market News - June 2009 INTEREST RATES…WHERE TO FROM HERE…UP or DOWN? And… DOES IT REALLY MATTER!! Other articles in this newsletter reflect on the merits of the latest decision to leave rates unchanged, this article ponders on the importance of interest rates in relation to the Banks lending policies. Have we reached the end of the current cycle of rate reductions or are there more to come? General consensus is that there will, at best be another two 0.50% reductions by the end of 2009 meaning a prime rate of 10%. These may very well be the last cuts; the indications are that rates will start to climb slightly in the second half of 2010. But do interest rate reductions at this time really matter to the Estate Agent selling a property or to an Originator obtaining a home loan on that sale? The short answer is NO, except from making repayments more affordable; rate reductions make little difference as long as the Banks continue to apply their current tight lending policies. Whether the interest rate is 10% or 16% is irrelevant if the Banks are not prepared to advance home loans as in the past. In fact, be prepared for home loans being granted at an interest rate of prime plus. Cash deposits are here to stay, 100% bonds are a thing of the past, except for the so called affordable mass market and/or the supply of acceptable collateral security. Whilst Banks remain reluctant to extend credit, the property sector cannot recover from its current weak position. An oversupply of sellers and an under supply of qualified purchasers may continue well into 2010. An old saying goes that “the Bank gives an umbrella when the sun is shining and then takes it away when it starts to rain” is most certainly applicable today. We are currently caught in the middle of a downpour with not an umbrella to be found anywhere. Only an easing of Banks lending policies can lift the market to higher levels, not interest rates. Regards JOHN SMYTH Banks, analysts slam mboweni decision Cost of borrowing is still too high, though some say banks are to blame. Property experts assess decision to leave interest rates on hold. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) on Thursday announced that repo rate will remain unchanged at 7.5% while prime rate stays at 11%. “Reserve Bank Governor, Tito Mboweni warned consumers last month that he did not expect further significant rate cuts. Nevertheless, many were pinning their hopes on another chop. Only two of 26 economists polled by Reuters last week expected the no change decision, with 24 predicting a 50 basis point drop. The decision to not cut interest rates is disappointing and does not help an already heavily-indebted household sector still struggling with debt repayments, said Luthando Vutula, managing executive of Absa Home Loans. “A further cut in interest rates would have implied that mortgage repayments would have dropped by 26.3% since December last year when the mortgage rate was still 15.5%,” he said. The monthly repayment on a R500 000 mortgage loan over a 20year term would have dropped by another R169 if there was a 50 basis interest rate cut. This would have been implied a cumulative saving of R1 778 on a R500 000 mortgage loan since December last year. Vutula said that the economy is expected to remain under a lot of pressure until late this year which will continue to impact employment, household income and the property market. He urged consumers to keep expenses under control and look for properties that are affordable, taking account of their financial position. For property investors, this is bad news because the cost of borrowing is still high and banks are strict on lending in this current economy, said Jan van Staden, chief executive officer of Barnard Jacobs Mellet (BJM) Private Client Services. Speaking to Realestateweb.co.za following the MPC announcement, Van Staden said the cost of capital for buyers is still high. And, there is a lot of property supply in the market met with unbalanced demand levels and buyers battling to secure finance. On the other hand, he said, South African investors could consider listed property, which is still faring better compared to residential. The expectation was a 50 basis point cut in interest rates and this would have improved market sentiment and brought more buyers into the market. Kundayi Munzara, a research analyst at Investec Property, said the latest decision to keep the repo rate unchanged may have a slightly negative effect on property investors who had anticipated lower interest rates in their net cash flow projections for the remainder of the year. The higher-than-xpected interest rates may lead marginal tenants suffering operational strain to vacate occupied space. In the listed property space, explained Munzara, fundamentals continue to weaken as shown by slightly higher vacancies and bad debts. “For investors, we expect a real recovery in the property market once banks reduce funding requirements which have become more onerous over the last six months,” said Munzara. For residential property buyers and sellers, this is indeed depressing news. This, along with an increase in electricity costs announced earlier on Thursday, has made the situation worse for the residential market. Trevor Richter, CEO of Richter Properties, said 0,5% cut would have stimulated activity in the residential property market. But, others disagree and say another cut would not have been a boost to the real estate market. A 50 basis point was never going to stimulate further activity in the residential property market, because affordability is a major obstacle for buyers, said Kura Chihota, executive director of Leapfrog Properties. cut further as this would have further eased bond repayments. André Venter, spokesperson of United Association of South Africa (UASA - for trade unions), said home owners were pinning their hopes on a drop in interest rates for relief, many on the brink of losing their homes as it has become impossible to make monthly bond repayments. Would-be buyers will have to continue renting as banks are still not lending money. The decision by Nersa to grant Eskom a tariff hike of 31.3% will make it even difficult for home owners and many are likely to lose their homes, said Venter. The Reserve Bank has missed an opportunity to help stimulate the economy by leaving the repo rate unchanged, was his view. According to Brian Falconer, managing director of Colliers Residential, leaving the repo rate unchanged will mean no relief for the economy. Since December, the Reserve Bank has cut the repo rate by 450 basis points, from a high of 12% to its current level of 7,5%. The Reserve Bank has indicated that we are nearing or at the end of the 2009 rate-cutting cycle. Banks remain reluctant to extend credit, which is hampering the property sector, the petrol price is set to increase and this is all generally impacting negatively on the country’s economy, he added. article courtesy www.realestateweb.co.za However, it would have ensured activity remains in a holding pattern. In light of this, the rental market is expected to continue to grow strongly as it is more affordable to rent a R1m property than own it. Trade Unions have also expressed disappointment and concern saying that home owners would have benefited from another rate Eskom hike ‘unacceptable’ Johannesburg - Trade union Cosatu has said the 31.3% electricity tariff hike granted to power utility Eskom is “totally unacceptable” and unwarranted as it is almost four times the inflation rate. “Cosatu strongly condemns this hike; it is a face-saving measure by Nersa (the National Energy Regulator of SA) to show it is independent,” Cosatu spokesperson Patrick Craven told Fin24. com after the announcement on Thursday. “It’s going to affect the poor the most.” Craven said the union will use Nedlac structures to argue for a special tax “on the rich” to pay for Eskom’s infrastructure investment. “The tariff hike will have a negative impact on inflation and will no doubt make the recession worse, as small businesses cannot afford it,” said Craven. Brait economist Colin Garrow agreed that with the power price hike inflation is “not going to come down fast”. He said: “The electricity tariff hike goes straight to the inflation basket. Electricity is one of those administered prices that will weigh against the inflation outlook. “Beyond today [Thursday’s interest rate announcement], the appetite to cut interest rates will be weaker.” The rate hike will take away consumers’ buying power and delay a recovery in expenditure, said Monale Ratsoma, economist at Thebe Securities. “You are dealing with households that are already under pressure, and then you add another burden on already tight budgets. That is where the pain is.” Ratsoma said the hike will contribute to a delay in economic recovery as job losses are still expected to rise. Eskom had applied for 34% hike to fund a R385bn capital expenditure for electricity generation. article courtesy www.fin24.com